Delos Santos v. Mallare.pdf

  • Upload
    corky01

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/20/2019 Delos Santos v. Mallare.pdf

    1/2

    Delos Santos v. Mallare 

    G.R. No. L-3881 August 31, 1950

    Tuason, J.

    Facts: 

    Eduardo de los Santos, the petitioner, was

    appointed City Engineer of Baguio on July 16, 1946, by the

    President, appointment which was confirmed by the

    Commission on Appointments on August 6, and on the 23rd of

    that month, he qualified for and began to exercise the duties

    and functions of the position. On June 1, 1950, Gil R. Mallare

    was extended an ad interimappointment by the President to

    the same position, after which, on June 3, the Undersecretary

    of the Department of Public Works and Communications

    directed Santos to report to the Bureau of Public Works for

    another assignment. Santos refused to vacate the office, and

    when the City Mayor and the other officials named as Mallare's

    co-defendants ignored him and paid Mallare the salary

    corresponding to the position, he commenced these

    proceedings.

    Issue: 

    whether or not the removal of the petitioner from his

    present position for assignment to another position violates

    Section 4, Article XII of the 1935 Constitution which provides

    that "No officer or employee in the Civil Service shall be

    removed or suspended except for cause as provided by law."

    Held: 

    Yes. Section 1, Article XII of the Constitution

    ordains: "A Civil Service embracing all branches and

    subdivisions of the Government shall be provided by law.

     Appointments in the Civil Service, except as those which are

    policy-determining, primarily confidential or highly technical in

    nature, shall be made only according to merit and fitness, to

    be determined as far as practicable by competitiveexamination." Section 670 of the Revised Administrative Code

    provided that "Persons in the Philippine civil service pertain

    either to the classified service," and went on to say that "The

    classified service embraces all not expressly declared to be in

    the unclassified service." Then section 671 described persons

    in the unclassified service as "officers, other than the provincial

    treasurers and assistant directors of bureaus or offices,

    appointed by the President of the Philippines, with the consent

    of the Commission on Appointments of the National Assembly,

    and all other officers of the government whose appointments

    are by law vested in the President of the Philippines alone."

    Three specified classes of positions — policy-

    determining, primarily confidentialand highly technical —

    are excluded from the merit system and dismissal at pleasure

    of officers and employees appointed therein is allowed by the

    Constitution. None of these exceptions obtain in the present

    case.

    The office of city engineer is neither primarily

    confidential, policy-determining, nor highly technical. A

    confidential position denotes not only confidence in the

    aptitude of the appointee for the duties of the office but

    primarily close intimacy which insures freedom of intercourse

    without embarrassment or freedom from misgivings of

    betrayals of personal trust or confidential matters of state. Nor

    is the position of city engineer policy-determining. A city

    engineer does not formulate a method of action for the

    government or any of its subdivisions. His job is to execute

  • 8/20/2019 Delos Santos v. Mallare.pdf

    2/2

    policy, not to make it. With specific reference to the City

    Engineer of Baguio, his powers and duties are carefully laid

    down for him be section 2557 of the Revised Administrative

    Code and are essentially ministerial in character. Finally, the

    position of city engineer is technical but not highly so. A cityengineer is not required nor is he supposed to possess a

    technical skill or training in the supreme or superior degree,

    which is the sense in which "highly technical" is employed in

    the Constitution. There are hundreds of technical men in the

    classified civil service whose technical competence is not

    lower than that of a city engineer. As a matter of fact, the

    duties of a city engineer are eminently administrative in

    character and could very well be discharged by non-technical

    men possessing executive ability.