29
DOLLAR GENERAL COMPANY REPORT Prepared for: Business 202I Cluster Faculty Submitted by: Team 3 Michelle Belna Trudi Fisher Kevin Maxwell Tommy Pauley Lori Titkemeier

Dollar Case project

  • Upload
    elif01

  • View
    463

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dollar Case project

DOLLAR GENERAL COMPANY REPORT

Prepared for:Business 202I Cluster Faculty

Submitted by:Team 3

Michelle BelnaTrudi Fisher

Kevin MaxwellTommy PauleyLori Titkemeier

April 14, 2004

Page 2: Dollar Case project

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................3

INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................5

ANALYZING THE INDUSTRY......................................................................................5

COMPETITORS.................................................................................................................5CUSTOMERS....................................................................................................................5MERCHANDISE................................................................................................................6LOCATION.......................................................................................................................6

UNDERSTANDING DOLLAR GENERAL’S BUSINESS STRATEGY....................6

STORE GROWTH.............................................................................................................6PRODUCT EXPANSION.....................................................................................................7TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS...............................................................................7

EXPLORING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE............................................................7

LOW-COST STRUCTURE.................................................................................................8SUSTAINABILITY..............................................................................................................8

COMPARING SMALL AND LARGE FIRMS..............................................................9

ADVANTAGES OF THE SMALL FIRM..............................................................................9DISADVANTAGES OF THE SMALL FIRM.........................................................................9

LOOKING TO THE FUTURE......................................................................................10

REPOSITIONING.............................................................................................................10INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION.......................................................................................10CUSTOMER SERVICE.....................................................................................................1050TH ANNIVERSARY.......................................................................................................11

CONCLUSION................................................................................................................11

WORKS CITED..............................................................................................................14

Appendices Table of Contents

APPENDIX A – PORTER’S FIVE FORCES………………………...………………..IAPPENDIX B – PORTER’S GENERIC STRATEGIES….………………………….VAPPENDIX C – STAKEHOLDER’S ANALYSIS…………………………….……VIIAPPENDIX D – INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS…………………………………….XAPPENDIX E – SWOT ANALYSIS…………………………………………………XIIAPPENDIX F – MIS…………………………………………………………………..XVAPPENDIX G – PRODUCT COMPARISON CHART…………………………...XIXAPPENDIX H – INDUSTRY ANALYSIS CHART……………………………….XXIAPPENDIX I – MISSION STATEMENTS………………………………………XXIVAPPENDIX J – STORE LOCATION MAPS…………………………………….XXVIAPPENDIX K – 2004 VALUE LINE REPORT………………………………….XXIXAPPENDIX L – BUSINESS LAW CONSIDERATIONS……………………….XXXI

Dollar General 2

Page 3: Dollar Case project

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to determine whether Dollar General (DG) has the right strategy to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage within its industry. Also, the report will discuss how small firms, such as DG, are able to compete with larger firms, such as Wal-Mart. In this report, recommendations are also given to guide DG in obtaining a sustainable competitive advantage in the discount retail industry.

Analyzing the Industry

The first step to understanding a company is to examine its industry. There are four main areas to consider when analyzing an industry. These include:

competitors customers merchandise location

The way that these four factors interrelate determine how well a business will do in the particular industry.

Understanding Dollar General’s Business Strategy

Every business needs a strategy to direct it towards achieving a competitive advantage within its industry. DG’s current business strategy is growth. Some growth initiatives include:

store growth product expansion technological advancements

Clearly, by continuing to focus on these growth initiatives, DG can continue to further increase its profits and success in the industry. DG’s growth strategy gives it a competitive advantage over its rivals, who are not expanding at the same rate.

Exploring Competitive Advantage

DG has a current competitive advantage within its industry. DG maintains this advantage through a unique cost-efficient approach. This low-cost structure is apparent through low inventories, low advertising costs, and location of stores in rural areas. Though profitable in the short-run, its current advantage is not sustainable. It is not sustainable due to:

rivals’ similar competitive strategies low barriers of entry into the market the absence of a differentiation strategy

Dollar General 3

Page 4: Dollar Case project

When examining competitive advantage, it is also important to consider the market and take into account the existing competition against larger firms.

Comparing Small and Large Firms

Small firms often find it difficult to compete with larger firms. Though there are some disadvantages DG will never be able to overcome due to its size, small firms have advantages over their larger counterparts.

In order for a small firm, such as DG, to compete with larger firms, there are many options available.

Looking to the Future

There are several ways that DG can improve profitability and success. Several of which include:

repositioning itself in the market expanding internationally enhancing customer service promoting its 50th Anniversary

By taking these recommendations into consideration, DG will be lead towards obtaining a sustainable competitive advantage.

Conclusion

DG’s overall business strategy is growth, but the company currently does not have a sustainable competitive advantage in the discount retail industry. In order for DG to obtain an advantage and compete with larger firms, it must continue to make technological advances, differentiate itself within the market, and consider the recommendations listed above.

Dollar General 4

Disadvantages low purchasing power smaller pool of resources

to allocate less extensive market

reach

Advantages convenience absence of long lines customer service

Page 5: Dollar Case project
Page 6: Dollar Case project
Page 7: Dollar Case project

Introduction

For almost 50 years, Dollar General (DG) has been a top competitor in the discount retail industry. The company has grown considerably since it was first established by J. L. Turner in 1955. This Fortune 500® company opened its first store in Springfield, Kentucky and is now headquartered in Goodlettsville, Tennessee.i

The purpose of this report is to determine whether DG has the right strategy to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage within its industry. Also, the report will discuss how small firms, such as DG, are able to compete with larger firms, such as Wal-Mart.

In order to achieve this goal, this report will take an in-depth look at DG’s overall business strategy in comparison with its leading competitors. The first step to understanding a company is to examine its industry.

Analyzing the Industry

To understand an industry, aspects such as who the competition is, who the target customers are, what products the industry provides, and where the industry is located must be considered.

Competitors

There are several different types of stores within the discount retail industry, and for comparison’s sake, the industry is further broken into many segments. DG is in the market segment known as the dollar store category. It currently leads this segment in market value, above competitors such as Family Dollar, Dollar Tree, and Fred’s.ii See Appendix H for specific competitor information and Appendix G for product price comparisons. As a result, competitors such as Wal-Mart are in the same industry but not the same peer group.iii Comparisons will be made throughout this report to Wal-Mart and other big firms because they tend draw some of the same customers.

Customers

Retail merchandise stores attract many different types of people. For example, Wal-Mart targets all income level households, whereas dollar stores such as DG serve “need-to” shoppers.iv More specifically, the target customers of DG are normally in towns with less than 20,000 people and have the following characteristicsv:

most customers are in the low-, middle-, and fixed-income brackets 81 percent of customers are female 44 percent of customers are over the age of 55vi 48 percent of its customers earn less than $30,000 a year 26 percent of customers have incomes lower than $20,000 most customers live within five miles of the store

Page 8: Dollar Case project

DG serves a narrow market range and offers low prices. The company can be classified as having a focused cost leadership strategy according to Porter’s Generic Strategies Model (see Appendix B).

Merchandise

Stores within the discount retail industry offer a wide variety of products at low prices. Discount stores offer brand names but place an emphasis on brands unique to their own stores for a lesser price. Trends toward perishable items are becoming more apparent in the market as well. This is demonstrated by the growth of “super-stores” in the industry.vii In a more broad sense concerning merchandise, Standard and Poor’s says, “Retailers – whether discounter or department store – that provide an attractive array of quality goods at reasonably low prices are likely to see the strongest sales and earnings improvements.”viii Finally, location is vital to the success of every business. Location

A business can only be successful if it is placed in a region where it is likely to strive. In the retail industry, stores are positioned accordingly. Larger firms, such as Wal-Mart, are present in all 50 states and have grown internationally as well.ix Smaller firms, such as Family Dollar and DG have not expanded into all 50 states, nor have they ventured into foreign markets. In fact, they are only present in 43x and 29 states respectively.xi Each store has found success in different economic regions as well. For instance, Target is considered an “upscale discounter.”xii Location, in combination with competitors, customers, and merchandise, all affect a company’s business strategy.

Understanding Dollar General’s Business Strategy

Every business needs a strategy to direct it towards achieving a competitive advantage within its industry. The business strategy must always remain consistent with the company’s individual mission. In DG’s case, its mission of “Serving Others” must be kept in mind as it carries out its business strategy: growth.xiii DG continually focuses on growth initiatives such as store growth, product expansion, and technological advancements.

Store Growth

DG’s current business strategy is growth. In 2004, DG plans to open 675 new stores as well as new distribution center. Twenty additional Dollar General Markets (“super-centers”) will be opened in 2004 after the success of two pilot stores in 2003.xiv Although these super-centers are still being tested for profitability, results are promising thus far. Stores including coolers have average purchase amounts of $13.00 compared to the average of $8.50 in stores without coolers.xv (For further statistics and company information, see Appendix K.) However, relying solely on building new stores does not always contribute to company growth financially.

Page 9: Dollar Case project

Product Expansion

DG currently carries a variety of products, including; health and beauty aids, packaged food products, home cleaning supplies, housewares, stationery, seasonal goods, basic clothing, and domestics. These are grouped into four broad categories: highly consumable, hardware and seasonal, basic clothing, and home products. Of these divisions, the highest gross profit rate is in the hardware and seasonal category, and the lowest gross profit rate is found in the highly consumables area. These two categories had sales percentages of 16.8 percent and 61.2 percent respectively, based on 2003 figures.xvi

Though highly consumables proved to be the least profitable of all products, DG recognizes the consumer demand for one-stop-shopping. Therefore, in combination with opening the new super-centers, DG also plans to expand its merchandise mix to include products such as perishable and grocery items.xvii By placing more everyday groceries on their shelves, DG hopes to establish a strong base of regular customers who would otherwise meet their perishable item needs elsewhere. To achieve product expansion, DG must have an efficient supply chain.

Technological Advancements

DG depends on a number of IT systems that aid in efficient functioning of its business. Without the use of software vendors and technology, the company would be unable to operate effectively and operations of day-to-day business would suffer. xviii According to company CIO Bruce Ash, “DG sees technology as a key enabler of business strategy.” xix

DG continues to improve its IT division by investing over $150 million to improve systems throughout the company in the last 5 years.xx These investments allow for DG to better manage inventory and merchandise shrink. DG’s main objective is to get products on the shelves more quickly to meet customer needs. Because of DG’s continued investments to make its supply chain more efficient, it can continue to offer everyday low prices to customers.xxi To further see how technology fits into the DG’s business strategy, see Appendix F.

Clearly, by continuing to focus on these growth initiatives, DG can continue to further increase its profits and success in the industry. While expanding, DG must keep in mind that growth is often monitored by anti-trust laws (as is discussed in Appendix L). DG’s growth strategy gives it a competitive advantage over its rivals, who are not expanding at the same rate.

Exploring Competitive Advantage

DG has a current competitive advantage within its industry that is maintains through a unique cost-efficient approach. This low-cost structure is apparent through low inventories, low advertising costs, and location of stores in rural areas.xxii Though profitable in the short-run, DG’s current advantage is not sustainable.

Page 10: Dollar Case project

Low-Cost Structure

Several attributes are essential in allowing DG to outperform its competitors. The first of these components is DG’s ability to maintain low levels of inventory at the store. This allows DG to minimize storage costs and to better manage store inventory. Another way in which DG reduces expenses is by limiting advertising costs. According to Dale Limes, V.P. of Lee Wayne Corporation, the average company spends 3 percent of gross annual sales and advertising.xxiii In 2003, DG spent $5.4 million on advertising expenses which worked out to be less than 1 percent of gross sales. The last contributing factor in the low-cost structure is the location of DG stores in rural areas. By situating stores in rural areas, DG can take advantage of the lower lease rates and the lower costs of living in general.xxiv

Sustainability

There are several factors that prohibit DG from maintaining a sustainable competitive advantage within the industry. Some of these include: rivals’ similar competitive strategies, low barriers of entry into the market, and the absence of a differentiation strategy.

Rivals’ Similar Competitive Strategies. Companies in DG’s peer group are closely aligning themselves with competitive strategies similar to those of DG. For example, in light of DG’s profitable success with low advertising expenses, Family Dollar has drastically reduced advertising expenses in the past seven years. Family Dollar went from 14 circulars in 1997 to just 1 in 2003.xxv

Low Barriers of Entry. Because of the nature of a dollar store, which has few costs, it is fairly easy to start a new store. According to Dan Margles of Allied Systems Industries (ASI):

Our DollarStores are a relatively low investment compared to owning most franchises … Our average customer this year is purchasing a complete turnkey store with high-end inventory and fixtures in the 3,000 to 4,000 square foot range for a total cost of only $149,000 to $199,000. As always, there are no franchise fees or ongoing royalties to pay… Many operators are looking to open a second store within 12 to 18 months. xxvi

According to Franchise Direct’s website, “Allied Systems Industries (ASI) is the nation's largest developer of independently-owned Dollar Stores.”xxvii

Other barriers to entry include patents, cost advantages, advertising and marketing, and research and development expenditures.xxviii There is a lack of these barriers in the dollar store segment of the discount retail industry, making the industry susceptible to new entrants. The threat of new entrants is part of Porter’s Five Forces Model. See Appendix A for more details about this model.

Page 11: Dollar Case project

Absence of a Differentiation Strategy. In order for a company to remain successful, it must establish a differentiation strategy or market identifier to separate itself from competitors. DG is not unique when compared to other dollar stores because all products offered at DG are readily available elsewhere at comparable prices. Furthermore, each company faces the challenge of creating its own niche, with which DG has not yet been successful.

Comparing Small and Large Firms

Along with struggling to find a niche within the market, DG also struggles to compete with larger firms. Though DG has some methods that appear to be advantageous to the company, there are some disadvantages it will never be able to overcome due to its size.

Advantages of the Small Firm

DG’s overall culture focuses on convenience. Its stores are located in smaller areas so customers don’t have to travel far to reach the store. DG stores are smaller in size, making it easier for customers to find what they are looking for instead of having to search for what they want.xxix There is also the benefit of not having to wait in long lines. They offer a variety of products at low prices so most of the shopping can be done in one simple stop.xxx In the 2004 10-k report, DG stated:

The Company believes that its target customers prefer the convenience of a small, neighborhood store.  As the discount store industry continues to move toward larger, “super-center” type stores, which are often built outside of towns, the Company believes that DG’s convenient discount store format will continue to attract customers and provide the Company with a competitive advantage.xxxi

In addition to the convenience factor, smaller firms generally have exceptional customer service to ensure the return of customers. Smaller firms have the opportunity to be more personable with their customers due to the nature of their shopping environment. However, through “secret shopper” observations, a team of researchers found DG to be lacking in this category. Wal-Mart, on the other hand, goes against the norm of large firms and provides superior service to customers. This creates a more personal shopping experience that is common to most small firms.

Disadvantages of the Small Firm

The main disadvantage of a small firm when competing with a larger firm is its lack of purchasing power. Firms such as DG are unable to drive down prices from suppliers as Wal-Mart does. In an NPR interview with Charles Fishman of Fast Company Magazine, he says:

The best news is Wal-Mart’s going to buy your product, and the worst news is Wal-Mart’s going to buy your product. Because you instantly need to supply

Page 12: Dollar Case project

enormous quantities … which often lead companies into a position where they can’t pay attention to their existing customers. And over time, Wal-Mart insists that the prices you charge it go down.xxxii

Along with purchasing power, larger firms have a bigger pool of resources to allocate in order to expand and invest more freely.xxxiii Larger firms, such as Wal-Mart, have also extensively penetrated the U.S. market, allowing customers to be loyal shoppers no matter where they are in the country.xxxiv See Appendix J for distribution of stores.

Looking to the Future

DG has many opportunities for advancement within the discount retail industry. Though it does not have a sustainable competitive advantage, there are several ways it will be able to keep ahead of the competition in years to come. Some of these include repositioning itself in the market, expanding internationally, enhancing customer service, and promoting its 50th Anniversary.

Repositioning

DG’s current marketing strategy involves the sale of an existing product in an existing market, also known as market penetration. The company is focusing on growing within the U.S. market in order to increase sales. In the future, the best marketing strategy to implement is market development. This includes offering an existing product in a new market. International growth will benefit DG in the long run and help them compete with larger firms.

International Expansion

Dollar General should focus on an international market that is similar to the one in the United States. One option for international expansion is to open stores in Canada. Statistics show that discount stores are on the rise in Canada, and Canadians are becoming more price-aware in their shopping. Wal-Marts in Canada have experienced a 22 percent increase in customers in the past eight years, and 82 percent of Canadians say that they have shopped at a dollar store in the past year.xxxv This data proves that there is an interest for discount retail, and DG has a great opportunity to benefit from this interest if it takes the initiative to expand internationally. For more international opportunities, see Appendix D.

Customer Service

Customer service should be an important part of a store’s culture. DG would be wise to follow the lead of Wal-Mart by pursuing a more customer-centered atmosphere. For example, Wal-Mart has a “Ten Foot Rule.” Sam Walton, founder of Wal-Mart stores, said, “… I want you to promise that whenever you come within 10 feet of a customer, you will look him in the eye, greet him and ask him if you can help him.”xxxvi DG is currently attempting to improve customer satisfaction through manager training that is

Page 13: Dollar Case project

designed to place more emphasis on customer service.xxxvii A firm’s mission statement often focuses on customer service. Please see Appendix I for a list of company mission statements.

50th Anniversary

The year 2005 marks the 50th Anniversary for DG, and this milestone event will be a perfect marketing opportunity for DG to separate itself from its competitors. DG should spend a substantial amount of time and effort planning and advertising its 50th Anniversary. DG must make customers aware of the fact that it is a company that has practiced good business ethics while surviving in the industry for 50 years.

Since DG has been in the industry for 50 years, it has created a good relationship with its suppliers. Despite low purchasing power, DG can use the 50th Anniversary as leverage to get suppliers to put it on an equal playing field with Wal-Mart for one year. If DG can stress the importance of their 50th Anniversary, it is possible that suppliers might lower their prices for DG for a limited time to match the prices that they offer larger accounts.xxxviii There is a point in time when suppliers may deem it acceptable to treat their “B” accounts (DG) like their “A” accounts (Wal-Mart).

Although DG has had success without much promotional advertising, it can also use its 50th Anniversary as an opportunity to engage in co-op advertising. Co-op advertising is when a wholesaler and a retailer establish a partnership to advertise a particular product. For example, if DG placed a 50th Anniversary ad in local newspapers that contained a picture of a Proctor & Gamble product, P&G would contribute money to DG to cover the advertising costs. In some cases, the wholesaler will pay for the majority, if not the entirety, of an ad that promotes its product. Co-op advertising is a win-win situation for both the wholesaler and the retailer as both parties receive recognition in the process.

DG would be foolish if it did not capitalize on marketing its 50th Anniversary. This 50th Anniversary event would be a good opportunity to attract new customers as well. Customers will want to associate themselves with a company that has 50 years of history and is still going strong. Although the anniversary event would only affect short-term profits, it would help DG establish a niche of long-time customer commitment that would direct them towards obtaining a sustainable competitive advantage.

Conclusion

DG’s overall business strategy is growth, but the company currently does not have a sustainable competitive advantage in the discount retail industry. In order for DG to obtain an advantage and compete with larger firms, it must continue to make technological advances, differentiate itself within the market, and consider the recommendations listed above.

i Dollar General Company Information, “History,” <http://www.dollargeneral.com/

Page 14: Dollar Case project

aboutus/history.aspx> (7 April 2004).ii Standard & Poor's, “GICS Sub-Industry Peers General Merchandise Stores,” <http:// mi.compustat.com/cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=GVKEY&keyval=004016doc type=PG&docformat =html&gv=0&date= 20040409&ie=.html> (4 April 2004).iii Ibidiv Doris Hajewski, “Dollar Stores are Priceless,” JS Online, January 5, 2002, <http://www. jsonline.com /bym/ news/jan02/10347.asp> (5 April 2004).v Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k, January 30, 2004, <http://mi.compustat.com/ cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=ID&keyval=2834662&doctype=ED%3A10%2DK& doc format=txt&gv=0&date=20040316&action=STREAM&ie=.txt (5 April 2004). vi “Dollar General President Seeks to Improve Merchandise Flow,” The Wall Street Transcript, April 10, 2000, <http://www.twst.com/notes/articles/jat606.html> (7 April 2004). vii Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.viii Jason Asaeda, “Standard and Poor’s Industry Anaylsis: General Retail,” November 27, 2003, <http://mi.compustat.com/cgi-mi-oc/docserver.cgi?keytype=INDSUR&keyval= REG&doctype=IS&docformat=pdf&date=200311&ie=.pdf> (9 April 2004).ix Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Form 10-k, January 31, 2004, <http://mi.compustat.com/cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=ID&keyval=2891376&doctype=ED%3A10%2DK&docformat=txt&gv=0&date=20040409&action=STREAM&ie=.txt> (7 April 2004).x Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Form 10-k, August 30, 2003, <http://mi.compustat.com/ cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=ID&keyval=2614414&doctype=ED%3A10%2DK &doc format=txt&gv=0&date=20031126&action=STREAM&ie=.txt> (7 April 2004).xi Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xii Asaeda, Standard and Poor’s Industry Anaylsis.xiii Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xiv Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xv Jerome Kaplan, “Dollar General,” Value Line Report, (2004).xvi Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xvii Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xviii Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xix Retail Info Systems News, “A Category of Leadership,” <http://www.evant.net/news/ 7028-RIS-2.pdf> (31 March 2004).xx Ibidxxi Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xxii Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xxiii Personal Interview with Dale Limes, V.P. of Lee Wayne Corporation. (8 April 2004).xxiv Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xxv Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Form 10-k.xxvi Franchise Direct, “Dollar Stores - More Bang For Your Buck,” <http://www.franchise direct.com/news/dollarstores2.htm> (11 April 2004).xxvii Ibidxxviii “Barriers to Entry,” <http://www.faytechcc.edu/~burnsc/eco251/barriers.htm> (12 April 2004).

Page 15: Dollar Case project

xxix Paul Smith, “Anything For a Buck: Fauquier Shoppers Love the Wonderful, Wacky World of Dollar Stores,” <http://www.citizenet.com/news/articles/061203/ biz-tech1.shtml> (March 27, 2004). xxx Ibidxxxi Dollar General Corporation, Form 10-k.xxxii Charles Fishman, interview by Scott Simon, Weekend Edition Saturday, NPR, December 27, 2003.xxxiii “Barriers to Entry,” <http://www.tutor2u.net/economics/content/topics/monopoly/ barriers_to_entry.htm> (12 April 2004).xxxiv Store Wars, “Nationwide Distribution of Wal-Mart Stores,” <http://www.pbs.org/itvs/ storewars/us_stores.html> (12 April 2004).xxxv “Discount Retail on the Rise,” Millward Brown Goldfarb, <http://www.goldfarb consultants.com/CTZ/ctzsampleOct03.pdf> (7 April 2004).xxxvi Wal-Mart Company Information, “Ten Foot Rule,” The Wal-Mart Culture <http:// www.walmartstores.com> (10 April 2004).xxxvii Dollar General Corporation, Annual Filing, January 30, 2003, <http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=112150&p=irol-AnnualReports> (5 April 2004). xxxviii Personal Interview with Dale Limes.

Page 16: Dollar Case project

Works Cited

AICPA. “Summary of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.” AICPA. <http://www.aicpa.org/info/ sarbanes_oxley_summary.htm>.

Asaeda, Jason. “Standard and Poor’s Industry Anaylsis: General Retail.” November 27, 2003. <http://mi.compustat.com/cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=INDSUR& keyval=REG&doctype=IS&docformat=pdf&date=200311&ie=.pdf>.

“Barriers to Entry.” <http://www.faytechcc.edu/~burnsc/eco251/barriers.htm>.

“Barriers to Entry.” <http://www.tutor2u.net/economics/content/topics/monopoly/ barriers_to_entry.htm>.

Catalyst Case Studies. “Dollar General.” <http://www.catalystwms.com/content/ Why_Catalyst/case_studies/dollar.asp>.

Clark Hill. “Summary of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.” Clark Hill, <http://www. clarkhill.com/law_media/Sarbanes-Oxley.pdf>.

CVS Corp. Information. “Community Involvement.” <http://www.cvs.com/corpInfo/ community/index.html>.

DataMonitor. “Dollar General Company Analysis.” <http://weblinks2.epnet.com/ authcitation.asp?tb=&_ua=adb+dmhco+op+scan+7654&_ug=dbs+buh+sid+1509D511%2D64EF%2D472D%2DB3E2%2D987AE140F869%40sessionmgr2+3EA3&_us=sm+ES+E6C7&_uso=db%5B0+%2Dbuh+hd+0+284B&tlog=1&tg=&an=520>.

“Discount Retail on the Rise.” Millward Brown Goldfarb. <http://www.goldfarb consultants.com/CTZ/ctzsampleOct03.pdf>.

Dollar General Company Information. “Benefits: Store Employees.” <http://www.dollar general.com/careers/benefits_store.aspx>.

Dollar General Company Information. “Community Investments.” <http://www.dollar general.com/community/communityinvestments.aspx>

Dollar General Company Information. “Dollar General Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,” <http://www.dollargeneral.com/investing/ cg_docs/charter_ethics.pdf>.

Dollar General Company Information. “General Information: Employees.” <http://www. dollargeneral.com/aboutus/generalinformation.aspx>.

Page 17: Dollar Case project

Dollar General Company Information. “History.” <http://www.dollargeneral.com/ aboutus/history.aspx>.

Dollar General Company Information. “Literacy Foundation.” <http://www.dollar general.com/community/dgliteracy.asp>.

Dollar General Company Information. “Management Biographies.” <http://www.dollar general. com/mediakit/companyinformation.aspx>.

Dollar General Company Information. “Mission and Values.” <http://www.dollargeneral. com/aboutus/missionandvalues.aspx>.

Dollar General Company Information. “Our Stores.” <http://www.dollargeneral.com/ ourstores/map.aspx>.

Dollar General Corporation. Annual Filing. January 30, 2003. <http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=112150&p=irol-AnnualReports>.

Dollar General Corporation. Form 10-k: January 30, 2004. <http://mi.compustat.com/ cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=ID&keyval=2834662&doctype=ED%3A10%2 DK&doc format=txt&gv=0&date=20040316&action=STREAM&ie=.txt>.

“Dollar General President Seeks to Improve Merchandise Flow.” The Wall Street Transcript. April 10, 2000. <http://www.twst.com/notes/articles/jat606.html>.

“Dollar General Raises Dividend.” <http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/stocks/troy wolverton/10148617.html>.

Dollar Tree, Inc. “Code of Ethics.” <http://www.dollartree.com/downloads/Ethics 2003.pdf>.

Family Dollar. “Our Mission.” <http://www.familydollar.com/mission.asp>.

Family Dollar Stores, Inc. Form 10-k: August 30, 2003. <http://mi.compustat.com/ cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=ID&keyval=2614414&doctype=ED%3A10%2DK &doc format=txt&gv=0&date=20031126&action=STREAM&ie=.txt>.

Fishman, Charles. Interview by Scott Simon. Weekend Edition Saturday, NPR. December 27, 2003.

Franchise Direct. “Dollar Stores - More Bang For Your Buck.” <http://www.franchise direct.com/news/dollarstores2.htm>.

Gartner Research. “How CIOs Should Prepare for Sarbanes-Oxley.” March 2004. <http://www2.cio.com/analyst/report2271.html>.

Gartner Research. “Hype Cycle for Supply Chain Management.” June 2003: 1-19.

Page 18: Dollar Case project

Hajewski, Doris. “Dollar Stores are Priceless.” JS Online. January 5, 2002. <http://www. jsonline.com /bym/news/jan02/10347.asp>.

Hymowitz K, 2003, “In The Lead: Toy Maker Survives By Moving An Icon From Ohio to China,” The Wall Street Journal, <http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=0&did=000 000426498591&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1081824975&clientId=3960> (12 April 2004).

Intermec. “Retailer Dollar General uses wireless...” <http://home.intermec.com/eprise/ main/Intermec/Content/About/getCaseStudy?section=about&ArticleID=149>.

InvestorWords.com. "Antitrust Laws." InvestorWords.com. <http://www.investorwords. com/233/antitrust_laws.html>.

IPNet Solutions. “Dollar General Saves Time and Money on Transportation Carrier Communication.” <http://www.ipnetsolutions.com/news/pressreleases/ 021202.php>.

Kaplan, Jerome. “Dollar General.” Value Line Report. (2004).

Kotelnikov, Vadim, Business e-Coach <http://www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/jv_main.html>.

“Managers Win Right to Join In Suit About Overtime.” The Wall Street Journal, January 14, 2004, pg. C.6.

Manugistics Press Releases. “Dollar General Driving Value…” <http://www. manugistics.com/news/detail.asp?id=478>.

Marshall L. Fisher. “What is the Right Supply Chain for your Product.” Harvard Business Review. March-April 1997: 105-116.

“Office of New York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer,” Anti-trust <http://www.oag.state.ny.us/ business/antitrust.html>.

Retail Info Systems News. “A Category of Leadership.” <http://www.evant.net/news/ 7028-RIS-2.pdf>.

Schermerhorn, John R. Jr. Core Concepts of Management. Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004, 94.

Smith, Paul. “Anything For a Buck: Fauquier Shoppers Love the Wonderful, Wacky World of Dollar Stores.” <http://www.citizenet.com/news/articles/061203/ biz-tech1.shtml>.

Page 19: Dollar Case project

Standard & Poor's. “GICS Sub-Industry Peers General Merchandise Stores.” <http:// mi.compustat.com/cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=GVKEY&keyval=004016 doctype=PG&docformat =html&gv=0&date= 20040409&ie=.html>.

Store Wars. “Nationwide Distribution of Wal-Mart Stores.” <http://www.pbs.org/itvs/ storewars/us_stores.html>.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "The Investor's Advocate: How the SEC Protects Investors and Maintains Market Integrity." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. <http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml>.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Important Information About EDGAR," U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. <http://www.sec.gov/edgar/ aboutedgar.htm>.

Wal-Mart Company Information. “3 Basic Beliefs.” The Wal-Mart Culture. <http://www. walmartstores.com>.

Wal-Mart Company Information. “Ten Foot Rule.” The Wal-Mart Culture. <http://www. walmartstores.com>.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Form 10-k: January 31, 2004. <http://mi.compustat.com/cgi-mi-doc/docserver.cgi?keytype=ID&keyval=2891376&doctype=ED%3A10%2DK&docformat=txt&gv=0&date=20040409&action=STREAM&ie=.txt> (7 April 2004).

Working Council for Chief Information Officers. “Impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Chief Information Officers.” March 2003.

Zuckerman G., and Stringer K. 2004. In Dollar General, Some Investors See a Hidden Bargain. The Wall Street Journal, February 27, 2004, pg. C.3.

Page 20: Dollar Case project