61
간이식 면면 연세대학교 의과대학 세브란스병원 이식외과

간이식 면면면 면면 면면 · 2019. 4. 18. · O’Leary JG, Gebel HM, Ruiz R, et al. Class II alloantibody and mortality in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Am J

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 간이식 면 면 면 면 면 면 면

    주 동 진 연세대학교 의과대학 세브란스병원 이식외과

  • 1. Introduction

    2. Donor Specific Antibody in LT

    3. ABO incompatible LT

    Today….

  • Immune Tolerance

    Remove or neutralize circulating anti-donor antibody

  • Graft liver endothelium, hepatocytes

    T-cell

    Recruitment of other immune cells Ab production Cell killing

  • What is DSA?

  • HLA Class I molecules 1) HLA-A,B,C gene products 2) All nucleated cell 3) CD8(+) T-cell - cytotoxic function - cellular immunity

    HLA Class II molecules 1) HLA-D/DR gene products 2) B-cell, Activated T-cell, APC (macrophage, mococyte, Dendritic cell) 3) CD4(+) T-cell - helper/inducer function

  • Donor Specific Antibody (DSA)

    Preformed antibody against donor HLA (Sensitization)

    Pregnancy Transfusion

    Previous transplantation

    de novo DSA after liver transplantation (HLA mismatch)

  • How can we detect DSA?

  • (complement-dependent cytotoxicity) Donor

    lymphocyte Recipient

    serum Viable cells (negative)

    complement

    complement

    Cell lysis (positive)

    CDC Crossmatch

    +

  • Controversial Issues

    No difference!!

  • Controversial Issues

    Independent Risk factor in Small size graft

  • Effects of DSA on graft outcomes

  • O’Leary JG, et al. Liver Transplantation 2013; 19(9): 973-980

    DSA Persistency after Liver Transplantation

  • Rejection related with DSA (Class II)

    O’Leary JG, et al. Liver Transplantation 2013; 19(9): 973-980

  • Patient Survival according to DSA

    O’Leary JG, et al. Liver Transplantation 2013; 19(9): 973-980

  • O’Leary JG, Gebel HM, Ruiz R, et al. Class II alloantibody and mortality in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2013;13(4):954-60

    In Simultaneous Liver-Kidney transplantation, Class II DSA increase Liver rejection and Kidney AMR.

  • Biliary stricture related with DSA

    Speranta Iacob, et al. Liver Int 2012; 32(8):1253-1261

  • Miyagawa-Hayashino A, et al. Liver Transpl 2012; 18:1333–1342.

    DSA associated with idiopathic fibrosis

    79 Pediatric LT 5-yr protocol Bx DSA (+) or (-)

  • Acute/Chronic rejection Biliary stricture Graft fibrosis

    Poor Graft Survival

  • Old New

    Preformed De Novo

  • Patient Survival according to de novo DSA

    H. Kaneku, et al. De Novo Donor-specific HLA antibodies decrease patient and graft survival in liver transplantation . Am J Transplant 2013;13(6):1541-1548

  • O’Leary JG, et al. Am J Transplant 2011;11:1868-1876

    Chronic rejection patients showed Higher MFI DSA Preformed

    de novo

    Class I

    Class II

  • H. Kaneku, et al. De Novo Donor-specific HLA antibodies decrease patient and graft survival in liver transplantation . Am J Transplant 2013;13(6):1541-1548

    De Novo DSA after Liver Transplantation

  • Preformed DSA (Retrospectively-designed)

  • Results (Graft survival rate)

    Post-transplant year

    P >0.05 DSA − (N=187) DSA + (N= 32)

    Song SH, Joo DJ, et al. Ann Surg Treat Res 2015;88(2):100-105

  • Results (Graft survival rate)

    Post-transplant year

    P=0.294 No or single DSA (N=205) Multi DSA (N=14)

    Song SH, Joo DJ, et al. Ann Surg Treat Res 2015;88(2):100-105

  • Graft survival rate according to %PRA B.

    C.

    A.

    PRA class I PRA class II

    Total (Sum of % PRA)

    Song SH, Joo DJ, et al. Ann Surg Treat Res 2015;88(2):100-105

    High PRA > 30% Poor graft survival

  • DSAs after Transplantation (Prospective design)

  • Graft outcomes during f/u

    Patients (n=40) Acute rejection 4 (10%) Chronic rejection 1 (2.5%) GVHD 1 (2.5%) Primary non function 1 (2.5%) Biliary complication Stricture Leakage

    9 (22.5%) 2 (5%)

    Mortality 2 (5%)

  • Graft outcomes according to DSA (+/-----)

    Pre-DSA – (36) Pre-DSA + (4) P-value

    Acute rejection 3(8.3%) 1(25%) 0.355

    Biliary Cx. 9(25%) 2(50%) 0.300

    AR + Biliary Cx. 12(33%) 3(75%) 0.139

    Post-DSA – (34) Post-DSA + (6) P-value

    Acute rejection 2(6%) 2(33%) 0.100

    Biliary Cx. 7(20%) 4(66%) 0.039

    AR + Biliary Cx. 9(38%) 6(83%) 0.001

    Preformed

    After LT

  • 0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    PreTx POD7d POD14d POD21d POD3m POD6m

    MFI change of Class II DSA after LT

  • MFI Difference According to Rejection

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    PreTx 7 14 21 90 180

    No Acute rejection (N=4)

    Acute rejection (N=2)

    MFI

    Day

    6000

  • Conclusion

    Preformed DSAs no correlation with graft outcomes. de novo DSAs after transplantation associated with biliary complication. The higher MFI of DSA The more acute rejection.

  • How can we do?

  • MCS,median channel s hifts

  • Desensitization?

  • Induction?

    1270 LT patients 33 patients given induction therapy ATG or OKT3 + Daclizumab

    O’Leary JG, et al. Liver Transplantation 2013 (e-Pub ahead)

    Induction >> No DSA

  • Bortezomib?

    Velcade® 26S proteasome inhibitor Plasma cell depletion Indication: Multiple myeloma

  • Steroid resistance Abnormal C4d deposition Plasma cell infiltration Elevated DSA titers

  • ABO incompatible Liver Transplantation

  • Liver may be less susceptible than other organs to an antibody reaction.

    1974, Starzl TE et al, Transplant Proc 1984, Iwatsuki S et al, Transplant Poc 1990, Gugenheim J et al, Lancet

  • Hepatic necrosis Intrahepatic biliary complication

  • N=3

    N=10/13, 1yr

    Hemagglutin levels < 1:16

  • Desensitization!

  • Pre-transplant Desensitization

    Plasmapheresis / Exchange transfusion Splenectomy Rituximab PV infusion HA infusion

    Both or Select one

    Both or Select one

  • Preformed circulating Ab

    Plasma exchange

    Newly matured B-cell

    Rituximab (anti-CD20)

  • Thank you for donating your attention!

  • Role of mTORi in Liver Transplantation

  • Milan criteria can be “ carefully extended” with SRL.

  • 2491:12167

  • High dose Tacrolimus (>10ng/mL) increased Risk of HCC recurrence!

  • Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Slide Number 37Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Slide Number 40Slide Number 41Slide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44ABO incompatible �Liver TransplantationSlide Number 46Slide Number 47Slide Number 48Slide Number 49Slide Number 50Slide Number 51Slide Number 52Slide Number 53Role of mTORi �in Liver TransplantationSlide Number 55Slide Number 56Slide Number 57Slide Number 58Slide Number 59Slide Number 60Slide Number 61