10

小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 2: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 3: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 4: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 5: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 6: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 7: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 8: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 9: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal
Page 10: 小山工業高等専門学校 · stands for Gilmer. It is expected that the ideal theory of G-semigroups is more simpler than that of commutative rings. But the multiplicative ideal