Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
中央氣象局全球預報系統積雲參數法之改進與其對於DYNAMO實
驗期間MJO對流之模擬表現
林昌鴻1 楊明仁2 陳建河1
中央氣象局氣象資訊中心1 國立臺灣大學大氣科學系2
前言
• 本研究將MPAS模式中的new Tiedtke積雲參數化方案置入至CWB/GFS全球模式,並針對DYNAMO實驗期間的三個MJO事件(2011/10 – 2011/12)進行模擬測試。
• 討論項目:1) new Tiedtke積雲參數化方案內,調整上衝/下衝流逸入率、 積雲
調整時間尺度,對於MJO事件模擬結果的影響。2) MJO對流事件的水氣收支分析研究。
Numerical model• Model: CWB/GFS (T511L60)• Vertical Coord.: S-P hybrid 60 layer• Horizontal Coord.: reduced gaussian grid (~25km)• Model top: 0.1mb
• Cumulus scheme: NSAS, Tiedtke, new Tiedtke(MPAS)• Shallow convection: NCEP (2010)• Grid scale precipitation: Zhao and Carr (1997) • Boundary layer: Han and Pan (2011)• Radiation: RRTMG
• Initialized at 2011/10/01, 10/15, 11/01, 11/15, 12/01, 12/15 00Z, respectively• 15-day forecast for each initialization
Data sets Spatial resolution Temporal resolutionq, u, v, omega,
LH,OLR precipitation
NCEP/CFSR(Climate Forecast
System Reanalysis)
0.5° 0.5°(64 levels in the
vertical)6-hour
precipitation TRMM 3B42 0.25° 0.25° 3-hour
precipitation GPCP 1° 1° daily
• 2-year time period for 2011-2012
NCEP Reanalysis data:
time
precipitation anomaly (mm)
GPCP
new Tiedtke (MPAS)NCEP (reanalysis) Tiedtke (CWB)
time
OLR anomaly (W/m2)
NSAS (CWB)
Time-longitude sections (MJO-2 event, 2011/11/15~12/15, 10°S~10 °N average)
1. decrease the convective adjustment time scale, ∗
• modified adjustment time scale, ∗:
∗ 1
0.14 1.0 500 following Xu and Krueger (1991)
C : convectivecloudfraction: updraft mass flux for deep convection
2. decrease the updraft Entrainment rate, ∗
• modified entrainment rate, ∗:
∗ E
⁄ = 5
RH: relative humidity: saturation specific humidity: environment temperature at cloud base
reduced new Tiedtke (MPAS)NCEP
GPCP
precipitation anomaly (mm)
OLR anomaly (w/m2)
reduced E
Time-longitude sections (MJO-2 event, 2011/11/15~12/15, 10°S~10 °N average)
Modified new Tiedtke scheme (nTDK_d)
• Following the WRFv3.8.1 version, the downdraft entrainment rate is given by
• Downdraft entrainment is modified to decrease with increasing buoyancy.
2 10 · ·0.5
1
:downdraft mass fluxB: buoyancy
NCEP (reanalysis) Tiedtke (CWB) new Tiedtke (MPAS) new Tiedtke ( )
OLR anomaly (W/m2)
Time-longitude sections of OLR anomaly (MJO-2 event, 2011/11/15~12/15, 10°S~10 °N average)
Water budget analysis-- Following Adames and Wallace (2015; JAS)
• ·• After vertical averaging,
Apparent moisture sink
prime: 20-100-day time scale anomalyL:latent heat coefficient of evaporationP: precipitationE: evaporation
(Wm-2)
NCEP_CFSR
TDK
nTDK_d
Contoured: kgm-2
· · · · ·· ′
warm pool (60°E-180°E , 10°S-10°N ) composite
Color:
· ·
(mm)
Contoured: L · / ( )Vector: 500-1000-hPa-averaged wind
latit
ude
latit
ude
latit
ude
NCEP TDK nTDK_d
· · ·
·
Contoured: L · ( )Vector: 500-1000-hPa-averaged wind
latit
ude
latit
ude
latit
ude
NCEP TDK TDK_d
·
·
warm pool (60°E-180°E , 10°S-10°N ) composite
Color: q’
· ′
′
NCEP TDK nTDK_d
warm pool composites (10°S~10°N ) Contoured: / (g )
′
′
NCEP TDK nTDK_dwarm pool composites (10°S~10°N ) Contoured: / (g )
Diabatic heating is dominated by condensational heating in the Tropics and thus is an indicator of the precipitating cloud distribution. (Wang et. al. 2017)
NCEP TDK nTDK_d
q
/
結論 (I)
• 水氣收支分析:1. 使用TDK方案和nTDK_d方案模擬的MJO對流系統於印度洋生成後,
有對流發展過強並於強降水發生後迅速減弱的趨勢,使得MJO對流系統無法維持並橫越海洋性大陸至西太平洋地區。
2. 模擬的MJO對流系統其對流範圍過窄且上衝氣流過強,以及MJO對流系統較無組織性,對流現象呈現隨機生成的特徵。
• 非絕熱加熱垂直分布之分析:nTDK_d參數化方案對於MJO前緣(東側)有過多發展旺盛的淺積雲對流,造成前方水氣無法有效地透過東風平流傳輸至MJO對流中心,使得對流中心水氣較少,系統發展較弱。
THANK YOUfor your
ATTENTION!