Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
I have no financial support from an industry source at the
current presentation.
대한혈액학회 Korean Society of Hematology
COI disclosureName of author : Yasuhiro Okamoto
Recent updates of prospective trials for ALL in Japan
Yasuhiro OkamotoJapan Children’s Cancer Group (JCCG)
ALL committee
Outline
4 Groups• Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study
Group study
~2003
JPLSG• B-12 study
2003~2014
JCCG• B-19 study
2014~
TCCSG
KYCCSG
JCCLSG
JACLS
Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia Study(1996)
Kyushu-Yamaguchi Children’s Cancer Study Group(1984)
Japanese Children’s Cancer and Leukemia Study Group(1980)
Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study Group (1969)
~2003: 4 Groups
Outline
4 Groups• Tokyo Children’s Cancer
Study Group study
~2003
JPLSG• B-12 study
2003~2014
JCCG• B-19 study
2014~
TCCSG L92-13 study• Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study Group• Designed to test the hypothesis;
- “Intensified consolidation might reduce leukemic cell burden sufficiently to allow shortening of maintenance therapy.”
• Conducted in 1992 - 1995• Newly diagnosed ALL (1-15y)• n = 347 (non T-ALL 308, T-ALL 39)
All treatment was discontinued at 1 year after Dx, and duration of maintenance therapy; 4-6 months
Toyoda Y et al. J Clin Oncol 2000
Outcome of L92-13 study
EFS OS
• EFS 59.5%@5.5y (median f/u: 4 years)(6yEFS: 68.7% in L89-12 study)
• Conclusion: maintenance for 6m was not adequate.Toyoda Y et al. J Clin Oncol 2000
• To confirm long-term outcome of ALL with short maintenance therapy.
- true cure or late relapse?
• 347 pts enrolled in L92-13- a median follow-up period of surviving pts;
17.1y(0.25-21.8y)
An extended follow-up study; L92-13E
Kato M et al. Leukemia 2017
Which patients require standard maintenance?
Boys require standard maintenance.
Immunophenotype and early response could not predict those who require standard maintenance.
Kato M et al. Leukemia 2017
DFS by sentinel genomic alterations
Kato M et al. Leukemia 2017
Outline
4 Groups• Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study
Group study
~2003
JPLSG• B-12 study
2003~2014
JCCG• B-19 study
2014~
Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/lymphoma Study Group in 2003
TCCSG
KYCCSG
JCCLSG
JACLS
Keizo Horibe M.D.
T-ALL T11 (n= 290)
BCP-ALL B12 (n= 1577)
Infant MLL03 (n=63) MLL10 (n= 94)
Ph+ Ph04 (n=44) Ph13 (n=44)
03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Development of protocols for Acute Leukemia in JPLSG
RT-11 RT11 (n=4)
IntReALLSR 14 (n= 60)
Relapsed R08 (n= 163) R14 (n=24 )
AML AML05 (n=484 ) AML12 (n=255 )
18
JPLSG StudiesJPLSG trials Enrollment period Completion Date # of enrollments # of centers Publication
MLL03 2004-2009 2012/1/31 63 128 Leukemia. 2015;29:290-6
B-NHL03 2004-2010 2012/10/31 346 141 Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1215-21
B-NHL03 G-CSF 2004-2010 2012/10/31 60 84 Leukemia and Lymphoma, 2015;23:1-8
ALB-NHL03 2004-2010 2013/10/31 154 140 Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:451-7
Ph+ ALL04 2004-2008 2012/5/31 44 118 Cancer Med. 2015;4:682-9
AML-P05 2006-2011 2014/3/31 46 125 Br J Haematol. 2016 Mar 31
HLH-2004 2006-2011 2014/11/30 90 109 Int J Hematol 2019
AML-05 2006-2010 2012/4/30 484 137 Int J Hematol. 2013;98:578-88Leukemia. 2013;27:2413-6 etc.
AML-D05 2008-2010 2013/12/31 74 112 Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:248-54
ALL-R08 (I, II) 2009-2013 2016/10/31 163(I:82,II:81) 116 In preparation
AML-R11 2012-2013 2015/6/30 8 37 Submitted
TAM-10 2011-2014 2019/2/28 167 115 Submitted
CML-08 2009-2014 2019/9/30 79 119
MLL-10 2011-2015 2020/12/31 94 120
AML-D11 2012-2015 2018/2/28 82 110
STKI-14 2015-2016 2018/12/31 22 32
JPLSG Studies, continuedJPLSG trials Enrollment period Completion Date Target sample size # of enrollments # of centers
ALCL99 2002- - 400 163 117
LLB-NHL03 2004-2019 2022/10/31 48 37 140
JMML-11 2011-2017 2020/6/30 43 24 84
ALL-RT11 2011-2018 2019/11/30 6-18(P1), 22-25(P2) 4 21ALL-T11 2011-2017 2020/11/30 147 290 131
LCH-12 2012-2020 2023/5/31 130 183 131
ALL-B12 2012-2017 2022/11/30 1560 1577 148
ALL-Ph13 2013-2017 2021/9/30 44 29 105
AML-12 2014-2018 2023/2/28 50(P2),250(P3) 255 125
IntReALL SR 2010 2014-2018 2021/4/30 612 (Japan 60) 20 28
AML-P13 2014-2017 2020/11/30 30 19 89
ALB-R13 2015-2019 2021/2/28 24 4 42
ALB-NHL-14 2015-2019 2022/8/31 145 18 80
HL-14 2015-2020 2025/9/30 50 13 66
ALL-R14 2015-2017 2019/11/30 75 24 50
B-NHL-14 2016-2018 2023/9/30 46 6 60
JPLSG-CHM-14* 2010-2035 - - 8826 146
* Umbrella observational study. Other 16 studies are all interventional.
Outline
4 Groups• Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study
Group study
~2003
JPLSG• B-12 study
2003~2014
JCCG• B-19 study
2014~
JPLSG ALL B-12• Start from Nov 2012
- PI: Katsuyoshi Koh• B-cell precursor ALL in children (<19 years old)
- Excl. • Infant ALL• Mature B-ALL• T-ALL• Ph+-ALL
- Incl.• Down syndrome
• Target enrollment: 1,560 patients
Treatment schema ofJPLSG ALL B-12
Study question:
Can intensification with VCR/DEX pulse during maintenance improve outcome of SR patients?
(n = 800)
Treatment schema of SR
Treatment schema of IR
Study question:Can intensification with L-asp improve outcome of IR patients? (n = 490)
Treatment schema of HR
Study question:Which is better as consolidation for HR patients, Block-type or VCR intensifcation? (n = 270)
Patient accrualPa
tient
s per
mon
th
Patie
nts t
otal
400 patients/year>90% of ALL patients in Japan are enrolled
Closed enrollment in Nov 2017
Aim of ALL T-11
• T-ALL specific trial- Intensification by DEX and L-asp- Nelarabine for HR/VHR- Omit prophylactic CRT for all T-ALL
• CRT only for CNS-3- Indication of SCT is determined by PCR-MRD
• Includes 1-25 years of age- AYA-ALL:
• Collaboration with Japanese Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG)
Treatment schema ofJPLSG ALL T-11
Result of B12/T11
Not yet disclosed
Incidence of hematologic malignancy in Japan (2006-2010)
Horibe K et al. Int J Hematol 98:74-88, 2013
Outcome of hematologic malignancy in Japan (2006-2010)
Disease n 2y-OS 4y-OSLeukemia
ALL 2,464 94.2% 89.1%BCP-ALL 2,110 96.2% 91.8%T-ALL 269 81.3% 66.9%
AML 891 83.3% 76.3%MDS 296 92.8% 85.3%
LymphomaNHL 628 92.1% 83.1%HL 345 95.2% -
Horibe K et al. Int J Hematol 98:74-88, 2013
Updated Results 2006-2016
Horibe K, 60th JSPHO meeting, 2018
Years
Ove
rall
Surv
ival
Improved OS in recent years
3y OS Year 1 (2006-2011, n=3,042): 90.9%Year 2 (2012-2016, n=2,356): 93.3%
Horibe K, 60th JSPHO meeting, 2018
Years
Ove
rall
Surv
ival
Japan Children’s Cancer Group in 2014
Study Groups ofSolid Tumors
Outline
4 Groups• Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study
Group study
~2003
JPLSG• B-12 study
2003~2014
JCCG• B-19 study
2014~
JCCG-B19:stratification
• Age and WBC count: NCI criteria• Biology
- Favorable: ETV6-RUNX1, high hyperdploid- Unfavorable: MLL-AF4, hypodiploid, E2A-HLF,
IKZF1 deletion• Treatment response
- Day 8 PSL response/Day 15 BM- Day 33 CR status- TP1(day33) and TP2(day78) PCR-MRD
JCCG ALL-B19 StudyRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mLR
IIA2 IIBIM2 III
IM RR
HR
IIA4 IIB
IR
B12IR+LIIA4 IIB
SR
B12SRIIA2 IIB
RRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mHR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1 BLINBLIN
HR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1BLINBLIN SCT
SCT group
Chemotherapy group
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
Induction: Dex (<10y), PRD(>10y)Randomize of HC for Dex
JCCG-B19: Study Questions
• Test the pediatric based treatment to adult• Treatment reduction for selected LR patients• Test the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab for HR
patients• Optimization of treatment duration
JCCG-B19: patient age• 1-65y: joint study with adult group JALSG
Hayakawa F, et al, Blood Cancer Journal 2015
JCCG-B19: Study Questions
• Test the pediatric based treatment to adult• Treatment reduction for selected LR patients• Test the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab for HR
patients• Optimization of treatment duration
JCCG ALL-B19 StudyRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mLR
IIA2 IIBIM2 III
IM RR
HR
IIA4 IIB
IR
B12IR+LIIA4 IIB
SR
B12SRIIA2 IIB
RRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mHR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1 BLINBLIN
HR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1BLINBLIN SCT
SCT group
Chemotherapy group
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
Induction: Dex (<10y), PRD(>10y)Randomize of HC for Dex
Reduction of therapeutic intensity for low risk
Inclusion criteria: B-ALL & NCI-SR, PGR, (day 15 M1/M2 + TP1 PCR MRD negative) &ETV6-RUNX1 or HHD & no CNS3 & no extramedullary disease
IIA2 IIB
IM2 III Imaintenance
R
B12 SR standard arm
IM R Imaintenance including VP pulse
JACLS SR-02
Day 15 TP1 TP2
Week 13 14 15
Day 1 8 15
6-MP
HD-MTX(3 g/m2) ◆ ◆
LVⅠⅠⅠ ⅠⅠⅠ
TIT ◎ ◎
Protocol Mweek(SR) 16 17 18 19
day 1 8 15 22
PSL
VCR ○ ○ ○
THP ▲ ▲
L-ASP ◇ ◇◇ ◇ ◇◇
TIT ◎
Re-inductionJACLS ALL-02 SR
Results of JACLS ALL-02 SR Reduced intensity regimen for LR-B-ALL in B19
Inclusion criteria: WBC<10K, age<10y, no CNS3day15 M1/M2, PGR
JCCG-B19: Study Questions
• Test the pediatric based treatment to adult• Treatment reduction for selected LR patients• Test the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab for HR
patients• Optimization of treatment duration
JCCG ALL-B19 StudyRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mLR
IIA2 IIBIM2 III
IM RR
HR
IIA4 IIB
IR
B12IR+LIIA4 IIB
SR
B12SRIIA2 IIB
RRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mHR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1 BLINBLIN
HR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1BLINBLIN SCT
SCT group
Chemotherapy group
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
Induction: Dex (<10y), PRD(>10y)Randomize of HC for Dex
Blinatumomab RCT in high risk arm
IA IB + LTP1 TP2
SCT-group
BLIN
Prot II-A,II-BHR3
HR2
HR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1
HR1
maintenanceBLIN
BLINBLIN HR3
HR2
HR1 SCT
Chemo-group
Immuno-monitoring of the patient lymphocytes will be performed prior to and during binatumomab.
B19 HR: PPR, M3@Day15 in IR, CNS-3, hypodiploid = or <44, MLL-AF4, E2A-HLF, IKZF1, TP2-MRD = or >10-e3
SCT indication: M2/M3@TP1, hypodiploid = or <43, MLL-AF4 and PPR, E2A-HLF, TP2-MRD = or >10-e3
R
JCCG-B19: Study Questions
• Test the pediatric based treatment to adult• Treatment reduction for selected LR patients• Test the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab for HR
patients• Optimization of treatment duration
JCCG ALL-B19 StudyRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mLR
IIA2 IIBIM2 III
IM RR
HR
IIA4 IIB
IR
B12IR+LIIA4 IIB
SR
B12SRIIA2 IIB
RRRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30mHR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1 BLINBLIN
HR3
HR2
HR1
HR3
HR2
HR1BLINBLIN SCT
SCT group
Chemotherapy group
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
RRCT-L
RRCT-S 18m
24m
24m
30m
Induction: Dex (<10y), PRD(>10y)Randomize of HC for Dex
Kato M et al. Leukemia 2017
B19: therapy duration RCT
RCT-L: Total therapy 24m vs. 30m- Eligible (estimated as 58% of cases)
• Boys (excluding ETV6-RUNX1/TCF3-PBX1)• Girls with HHD
- Superiority of long duration
RCT-S: Total therapy 24m vs. 18m- Eligible (estimated as 42% of cases)
• Girls (excluding HHD)• Boys with ETV6-RUNX1/TCF3-PBX1
- Non-inferiority of short duration
B19: therapy duration RCT
Upcoming Studies in Japan
• B19 for BCP-ALL will start late in 2019• MLL17 for infant ALL will start early in 2019• Ph18 for Ph+-ALL will start mid in 2019• T19 for T-ALL will start late in 2019
Summary
• JPLSG B12 study was closed.- First nation-wide study in children- 2000 patients- improved outcome
• JCCG B19 study will open soon.- Age up to 65- Reduce treatment for selected LR- Blinatumomab in first line treatment- Optimization of duration of maintenance therapy
Acknowledgements- TCCSG
• Atsushi Manabe• Akira Ohara• Masahiro Tsuchida
- JCCGALL committee
• Toshihiko Imamura• Yasuhiro Okamoto• Chihaya Imai• Atsushi Sato• Arata Watanabe• Soichi Suenobu• Hidemi Shimonodan• Hirotoshi Sakaguchi• Sae Ishimaru• Takeshi Inukai• Yuki Arakawa• Motohiro Kato
- JALSG・Fumihiko Hayakawa・Etsuko Yamazaki・ Hitoshi Kiyoi・ Yasushi Miyazaki
MRD based stratification
• In T11 study all patients were stratified by PCR-MRD because patient number was relatively small
• In B12 study PCR-MRD was used only to decide SCT indication in HR patients
• In mid 2018 PCR-MRD was approved by government and will be available for all ALL patients in December
MRD analysis in B12SR/IR 感度 定量域 TP1-MRD TP2-MRD
1.00E-01 0 0 0 01.00E-02 0 0 5 21.00E-03 0 19 20 75.00E-04 5 87 0 01.00E-04 115 232 6 91.00E-05 255 36 2 2
定量域未満陽性 - - 31 48陰性 - - 207 287
NA 0 1 0 0total 375 375 271 355
HR 感度 定量域 TP1-MRD TP2-MRD
1.00E-01 0 0 4 31.00E-02 0 0 11 71.00E-03 0 6 16 95.00E-04 1 31 0 01.00E-04 44 74 12 61.00E-05 81 15 2 0
定量域未満陽性 - - 20 25陰性 - - 35 71
NA 1 1 0 0total 127 127 100 121
positive: less than quantitative areapositive
positive: less than quantitative areapositive
T-ALL• 2006-2010 74.1%• 2006-2016 81.5%• → 2011-2016 = 163-74.1= 88.9%
BCP-ALL• 2006-2010 93.2%• 2006-2016 93.4%• → 2011-2016 = 186.8-93.2= 93.6%