Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Facts and Tasks
at Fukushima DaiichiAugust 2012
Skilled Veterans Corps for Fukushima
1 Building of Unit 4 at Fukushima Daiichi
Quote TEPCO
Facts at Fukushima Daiichi
UNIT 4
Quote TEPCO
Facts at Fukushima Daiichi
Building of Unit 3 at Fukushima Daiichi 2
UNIT 3
Quote TEPCO
Facts at Fukushima Daiichi
Temporary Seawall at Fukushima Daiichi
3
Facts at Fukushima Daiichi
Hoses for Contaminated Cooling Water
Quote TEPCO
4
Facts at Fukushima Daiichi
Route of Cooling Water Hoses and Leakages
Quote TEPCO
5
Fuel Debris
Quote TEPCO
Facts at Fukushima Daiichi
Present Status of Fuel Debris (Estimated)
6
Quote EPRI
Spent Fuel Removal
Spent Fuel Removal
Quote TEPCO
Tasks at Fukushima Daiichi
7
Steps for Fuel Debris Removal
Repair of PCV (lower) Fuel Debris Removal
９
Quote TEPCO
Tasks at Fukushima Daiichi
8
TMI-2 Cleanup Experience
１１
2019 20202021
Quote TEPCO
1984-1989
Fuel Removal
Quote EPRI
9Annual Doses at TMI-2 and TEPCO’s Estimation of Man Power Requirement
Appeal of SVCF
Statement
SVCF requests:
Skilled Veterans be allowed to work at Fukushima Daiichito reduce doses for
Younger Workers10
Appeal of SVCF
Progress 11
March 11, 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami
April 10, 2011 First Appeal was delivered
May 4, 2011 First negotiation with TEPCO
May 24, 2011 Meeting with Mr. Hosonoand TEPCO
July 12, 2011 SVCF Inspection Team toFukushima Daiichi
August 3, 2011 Proposal to Government and to TEPCO
Limited Responcibility by TEPCO for Dose Control
Barrier for Fukushima Daiichi
a c2nd Sub-
Contractors b d
TEPCOFukushima Daiichi
PrimeContractors
Workers
Dose Control forWorkers within
Fukushima Daiichi
e
ASub-
Contractors Dose Controlby Employer not to
Exceed LimitValue
B C D F
3rd Sub-Contractors
Dose Control by Each Worker
400 Contractors
Workers
Workers
Workers
Workers
E
12
Proposal For National Project
Necessity of National Project
1. Independent from TEPCO2. Employ worldwide expertise3. Integrated Project management4. International inspection team
13
FukushimaDaiichi
TEPCO
National Project
Even TEPCO is owned by the government it is still profit oriented private company, as the same case as GM
Proposal For National Project
Necessity of National Project
1.Project Team shall be independent from TEPCO
There are so many issues are not known at Fukushima Daiichi, that a profit oriented company never has capabilities to deal with such a project
Presently the project cannot be open and clear due to TEPCO’s own interest
14
Proposal For National Project
Concentrate Capabilities Worldwidely １８
2.The Project Team shall employ capabilities, knowledge, experiences from all over the world
Fukushima Daiichi is more complex than Chernobyl, and larger in size than TMI-2
The project cannot be handled only by Nuclear Specialists. It’s much complicated Engineering Project
The Project members shall be from TEPCO, Hitachi, Toshiba; and also experienced engineers from Chernobyl, TMI-2, as well as Bechtel, Fluor, TEC, JGC, Chiyoda and/or other companies
15
Proposal For National Project
Integration of Operation, Clean-up, and R&D
3.Integrated Project Management, including progress, quality, cost, and radiation exposure control shall be applied
Project shall be managed in integrated way and avoid multi-layered contract system
Workers shall be employed directly by the Project Team , unless specially required
Allocation of workers including SVCF’s members shall be optimized considering dose in relation to age, skill, work place, etc.
17
Proposal For National Project
Integrated Project Management 20
4.Inspection Team consisting of international members shall be formed
Independent Inspection Team shall be free to check safety, progress, etc. to minimize risk of accident and minimize the cost and time
17
Proposal For National Project
International Inspection Team
SVCF appeals you: to speak up and to ask your
Government to request Japan Government that:
18
1. Form a National Project Team for Containment and Cleanup of Fukushima Daiichi, which is independent from TEPCO
2. Utilize all of the assets in the world
3. Integrated Project Management shall be the key replacing traditional multi-layered sub-contract structure
4. International Inspection Team be established
