Forclime Awp 2014 Eng Fnal

Forests and Climate Change (FORCLIME) ProgrammeTechnical Cooperation Module (TC Module)

ANNUAL WORK PLAN 2014

Annual Work Plan 2014

GIZ Forclime (TC Module) is a joint program between the Government of Germany and the Government of Indonesia in this regard the Ministry of Forestry in the field of Climate Change. This program has been started

1 Annual Work Plan 2014_FORCLIME Programme, TC-Module

in 2009 until 2020 and is divided into three phase where Phase 1 is from 2009-2012, Phase 2 from 2013-2016 and Phase 3 from 2017-2020. Phase 1 has been completed in 2012 and the results has been endorsed by the Project Steering Committee (PSC) Meeting which was held on April 26th 2013.

This year is the the second year of Phase 2 where the implementation plan set forth in Annual Work Plan 2014, which is part of the Strategic Plan for Phase 2. From that Strategic Plan, has been elaborated into Annual Work Plan 2013 which has been implemented, although it still cannot be implemented entirely. Besides continuing the Annual Work Plan 2013, also formulated additional new main output/milestone according to the dynamics in the field and the desires of Ministry of Forestry and the relevant Local Government. Therefore in this Annual Work Plan 2014 expected to be a reference both for the program and partners in carrying out the activities set out in this Annual Work Plan.

We do hope that this Annual Working Plan will be valuable for the relevant parties or institutions

Programme Director Head of Planning BureauGIZ FORCLIME (TC Module) Ministry of Forestry,

Rolf Krezdorn Ir. Helmi Basalamah, MM


Glossary

BAU Business as UsualBDKS Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kehutanan Samarinda

Regional Forestry Education and Training Center in SamarindaCBFM Community-Based Forest Management

Pengelolaan Hutan Berbasis Masyarakat (PHBM)CBT Competence Based Training

Training berbasis kompetensiDFMIS District Forest Management Information System

Sistem Informasi Manajemen Hutan tingkat KabupatenDSA District Strategic Area

Kawasan Strategis Kabupaten (KSK)FMU Forest Management Unit

Kelompok Pengelola Hutan (KPH)FPNC Forest Protection and Nature Conservation

Perlindungan Hutan dan Konservasi AlamFORCLIME Forest and Climate Change Programme

ICRAF The International Council for Research in Agroforestry

IUPHHK Izin Usaha Pengelolaan Hasil Hutan KayuLisence Timber Forest Products Management

MRV Measurement, Reporting and VerificationPengukuran, pelaporan dan verifikasi

NAMA Nationally Appropriate Mitigation ActionsAksi Mitigasi Nasional yang Tepat

NTFPs Non-Timber Forest ProductsHasil Hutan Bukan kayu (HHBK)


PPK-BLUD Pola Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum DaerahFinancial Management Scheme of Public Service Board

Pusdiklathut Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan KehutananCenter for Forestry Education and Training

Pusrenbang Pusat Perencanaan PengembanganCenter for Development Planning

Pusdalbangut Pusat Pengendalian Pembangunan Kehutanan Regional Wilayah IVCenter for Regional Forest Development in Region IV

RAD GRK Rencana Aksi Daerah penurunan emisi Gas Rumah KacaLocal Action Plan for Green House Gas Emissions Reduction

REDD Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest DegradationReduksi Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi Hutan

RPJM-K Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah KabupatenMedium term development planning on district level

RPTN TNDS Rencana Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Taman Nasional Danau SentarumNational Parks Management Plan Danau Sentarum National Park

SFM Sustainable Forest ManagementPengelolaan hutan Lestari (PHL)

SIS Safeguards Information SystemSistem Informasi Pengamanan

TNA Training Needs Assessment Penelaahan kebutuhan pelatihan

Strategic Area 1: National and sub-national policy FrameworkObjective Strategic Area 1

National and sub-national forest policies, regulations and guidelines are improved in line with a) national climate change mitigation targets b) forest governance principles and c) development targets.


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unit1.1 At least 4 lesson

learnt (REDD+, FMU, biodiversity conservation, SFM, community involvement, livelihoods improvement, etc.) from the districts are integrated into national and sub national policies, regulations and/or guidelines.

1.1.1. Step-by-step guide to establishing and operationalising an FMU.

1.1.1.1. Developing a step-by-step guidance on how to establish and operationalise an FMU based on experience by pilot FMU supported by FORCLIME.

Dit.WP3H, Dit.BRPUK

1.1.2. Practice-tested guideline on establishing BLUD financial management system for FMU

1.1.2.1. Finalising the draft of PPK-BLUD guidance based on FGD inputs from practitioners and directions of the Ministry of Home Affairs

1.1.2.2. Book printing and publishing1.1.2.3. Support and accompany the trial implementation of

PPK-BLUD guidance in selected FMU and evaluate the result.

Dit.WP3H, Dit.BRPUK

1.1.3. Concept for a manual on internal organisation and staffing of FMUs

1.1.3.1. Developing a manual / guidance concept on internal organization and staffing of FMU based on the pilot FMU supported by FORCLIME

WP3H, Pusrenbang SDMK

1.1.4. Guidance for FMU Group of Experts to develop training and education modules on FMU management

1.1.4.1. Develop guidance on how to develop modules on FMU management for training and education together with a group of academics (the guidance will be used by university-based advisers/experts in all regions)

Seknas KPH, WP3H

1.1.5. Draft for new/revised regulation on zoning in National Parks to better accommodate people’s needs

1.1.5.1. Documentation and evaluation the experiences and lessons learnt on zoning in national parks of areas which are utilized by the communities.

1.1.5.2. Draft concept paper for a regulation on zoning in national parks.

PHKA, Dit KKBHL

1.1.6. Draft for new/revised regulation on collaborative management of Protected Areas.

1.1.6.1. Documentation and evaluation the experiences and lesson learnt on collaborative management of Protected Areas.

1.1.6.2. Draft concept paper for a regulation on collaborative management of Protected Areas.

PHKA, Dit KKBHL


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unit1.1.7. Concept for a Ministry of

Forestry incentive scheme for emission reduction by forestry concessionaires

1.1.7.1. FGD series on the issue of a Ministry of Forestry incentive scheme for emission reduction by forestry concessionaires

Dit. BUHA

1.1.8. Comprehensive forest carbon accounting concept on district level developed that defines REL/MRV and its links to national level and RAD/RAN GRK(Milestone 1.1.1)

1.1.7.2. Setting up a concept paper for district based forest carbon accounting under REDD+ and RAN/RAD-GRK

1.1.7.3. Comparison of basic elements (land classification, emission factors, etc.) for SRAP and RAD-GRK (e.g. consultancy)

1.1.7.4. Assess the compatibility of baselines for RAD-GRK and REDD+ (based on GIZ REDD+ & NAMA study)

1.1.7.5. FGD to identify institutional responsibilities for REDD+ and RAD-GRK and clarify roles between stakeholders

1.1.7.6. Action plan to support the inter linkage of carbon accounting on district, provincial and national level

1.1.7.7. Support the development of a forest carbon registry for climate change mitigation (RAN/RAD GRK REDD+, CDM, NAMAs, etc)

Pustanling, Pokja PI, Dit.DIPSDH, Puspijak

1.1.9. Draft bioenergy concept for forestry sector stakeholders

1.1.7.8. Preparation of bioenergy potential in forestry sector1.1.7.9. Support the national and subnational forest

stakeholders in developping roadmap of bioenergy

1.2. The national FMU Secretariat has achieved its objectives with regard to cross-echelon coordination

1.2.1. Draft Technical Guideline on FMU’s role and function (“pembinaan dan pemantauan”) in relation to licence holders

1.2.1.1. FGD on the relationship between FMU and license holders.

1.2.1.2. Develop a concept on the FMU’s role and function including instruments for “promotion and monitoring” in relation to license holders

Dit.BUHA, Seknas KPH, Dit.WP3H

1.2.2. Concept for technical guideline on FMU’s role in

1.2.2.1. FGD series on FMU’s role regarding facilitating community empowerment in forest management

Dit BPS, Seknas KPH


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unitand removal of regulatory barriers to FMU development and operation

facilitating community empowerment in forest Management

1.2.2.2. Evaluation and documentation the experiences of pilot FMU with facilitating community empowerment and participation in forest management

1.2.2.3. Developing FMU capacity on the community empowerment

1.2.3. Draft regulations which are aligned to the operationalisation of FMUs

1.2.3.1. Study on mainstreaming forest management by FMUs into forest management policies and regulations

1.2.3.2. Develop activities to follow up the recommendations of the study.

1.2.3.3. Inputs into draft regulation on utilisation of the non-licenced area and socialisation of the regulation

1.2.3.4. Facilitate periodic discussions on the sustainable forest management

1.2.3.5. Facilitate the drafting of the sustainable forest management regulation

Seknas KPH,UPT Kemenhut, Dishut, KPH

1.2.4. Increased integration of Ministry of Forestry programmes into the operationalisation of FMUs

1.2.4.1. Facilitate the process of integratiing Echelon 1 programmes and projects through operational activities and meetings of the National Secretariat.

1.2.4.2. Events / socializations related to FMU development and operationalization in national / regional level in order to integrate government programme

1.2.4.3. FGD on how to deal with conservation areas which are not part of an FMU yet

Seknas KPH

1.2.5. Criteria to assess FMU readiness towards operationalisation and assessment guide

1.2.5.1. Develop guidance to assess the progress of readiness towards operationalisation of FMU

1.2.5.2. Develop a concept for a mechanism and approach to support FMU in preparatory process

Seknas KPH, Pusdalbanghut


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unit(operationalising the “clinical service”)

1.2.6. Contributions to FMU guidelines and support to FMU Forest Management Plan approval processes

1.2.6.1. Inputs into legal drafting process1.2.6.2. Develop a guidance and support the implementation

of the process of approving the FMU management plan

1.2.6.3. Provide demand driven advisory on the FMU management plan development (based on specific local demand)

WP3H, Pusdalbanghut

1.2.7. University-based FMU expert pool developed and managed

1.2.7.1. Develop a concept for an expert pool in two tiers (core expert team and university-based advisers in each region), to support the process of operationalising FMU at the field level.

1.2.7.2. Capacity development for the advisory group1.2.7.3. Management of the expert pool.1.2.7.4. Capacity development of FMU managers who have

competence and capability as the trainer1.2.7.5. Regional FMU expert pool training workshops in 4

regions ( 1 - Medan/ Batam; 2 – Bali ; 3 - Balikpapan: 4 –Makassar ) based on the finalized guidance for FMU Group of Experts to develop training and education modules on FMU management ( related to main output : 1.1.4 )

(Milestone 1.2.1 – The development of the subnational university based FMU expert pool (Tier 2) supported)

Seknas KPH

1.2.8. Monitoring and inspectorate system for FMU

1.2.8.1. Concept paper and development of a data management system including a system to monitor, control and report on FMU operations.

1.2.8.2. Monitoring Information system development in FMU

Dit. BPRPUK, Dit. WP3H


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unitlevel

1.2.9. Strengthened commitment of forestry stakeholders (other ministries, local government, NGO, donors, private sector) to support FMU

1.2.9.1. Concept development for a funding mechanism for FMU development.

1.2.9.2. Donor Roundtable related to FMU National Secretariat and support for FMU from other sources.

1.2.9.3. Develop “activity packages” to solicit FMU support from other donors

1.2.9.4. Organize multi-stakeholder meetings, socialization, promotion to obtain support and commitment for FMU development and operationalisation

1.2.9.5. FGD to select 7 – 10 FMUs which are potentially to be operated.

1.2.9.6. Discussion of stakeholder who concern on the FMU development and operationalization with proposal of specific support (PPK-BLUD implementation, business development, etc.)

MilestoneFlagship FMUs in Indonesia for additional (donor) support identified.

Seknas KPHWP3H , Pusdalbanghut

1.3. The pilot districts harmonize climate change and biodiversity aspects with economic growth in their development planning

1.3.1. Local government guideline on main-streaming biodiversity, social and climate change considerations into the medium term district development plan (RPJM-K)

1.3.1.1. Multi-stakeholder consultations, preparation and development the internalization process of biodiversity issues, social aspects and climate change in the medium term development planning on disctrict level (RPJMK). (not fixed)

1.3.1.2. Green development strategy drafting in the context ofthe concept of conservation district based on the existing conservation district master plan 2005 (Kab. Malinau)

1.3.1.3. Develop a natural resource conservation strategy (Kab. Malinau)

Bappeda, BLHD, Balai TNKM, WWF


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unit1.3.1.4. Integrate ecosystem services into the district

development plan (Kab. Malinau)1.3.1.5. Conduct a study on comparising infrastructure

development and forest protection and conservation1.3.1.6. Conduct a conformity assessment of the SK

554/2013 with the spatial plan in Malinau town and surrounding areas.

1.3.2. Green Economy training based on the GIZ IES approach supported

1.3.2.1 Finalize bilingual leaflets for awareness raising on IES1.3.2.2 Conduct training on integrating environmental

services (biodiversity, climate change mitigation) into development planning

Bappeda, Dinas Kehutanan, BAPPENAS, Pustanling, Birocan

1.3.3. Climate and green finance options into the districts facilitated

1.3.3.1. Study the climate and green finance options at national level

1.3.3.2. Feasibility study on climate and green finance on selected district sites and potential funds.

1.3.3.3. Facilitation support on climate and green finance implementation

Pustanling , Pokja PI

1.3.4. Establishment of bioenergy concept for Forestry Sector

1.3.4.1. Collecting materials and information about bioenergy potential in forestry sector

1.3.4.2. Support the Roadmap development about bioenergy in national and regional level

Pokja PI, BiroCan, Bappenas, KPH

1.4. At least two elements of REDD+ architecture (e.g. MRV, safeguards,

1.4.1. Concept for the REDD+ Safeguards Information System at national level

1.4.1.1. Preparation and printing book “Prinsip, Kriteria dan indikator Sistem Informasi Safeguards REDD+ (SIS REDD+) di Indonesia” (English and Bahasa)

1.4.1.2. Contributions to the further development of the web – platform for SIS REDD+

Pustanling, PuspijakDishut


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unitbenefit sharing mechanisms) at national and sub-national level are improved in coordination with relevant institutions

1.4.1.3. FGD and meetings linked to operationalization of SIS REDD+ at national level

1.4.1.4. Support exchange of lessons learnt in SIS REDD+ development at the international level (including preparation of inputs for UNFCCC website).

(Milestone 1.4.7 - REDD+ in MoFor mainstreamed or consolidated)

1.4.2. Concept for the REDD+ Safeguards Information System at province level (East and West Kalimantan)

1.4.2.1. Development and trial of the concept of SIS REDD+ at the provincial level (Kaltim) in accordance with national level.

1.4.2.2. Organizing training on SIS REDD+ management at provincial level (Kaltim)

1.4.2.3. Evaluation of lessons learned from SIS REDD+ trial

(Milestone 1.4.7 - REDD+ in MoFor mainstreamed or consolidated)

Pustanling, Pokja REDD+ Kaltim/Kalbar

1.4.3. Draft decree on utilisation of ecosystem services in production forests.

1.4.3.1. FGD series and study synthesising inputs into academic document.

1.4.3.2. Developing a draft regulation on the business of environmental services utilization in production forest area.

1.4.3.3. Support the preparation of two SNI on PES for international dissemination

Dit.BRPUK

1.4.4. District/provincial strategies and action plans for forest-related emission reduction which consider differences and synergies between REDD+ and RAD-GRK (and contributions to national

1.4.4.1. Study on the approaches and relations between land based Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA) and REDD+

1.4.4.2. Multistakeholder consultations and development of Strategic Plan and Action Plan for emission reduction related to forestry taking into account the differences and synergies between REDD+ and RAD-

Bappeda Pokja PI , Pustanling, PuspijakPustanling, Dishut, BTNKM,DPMU


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unitlevel). GRK in provincial / district level.

1.4.4.3. Public consultation of REDD+ strategic action (Kab. Malinau)

1.4.4.4. Continue to support and collaborate with Pokja PI, Pustanling, Puspijak, etc from MoFor about REDD+ issues based on UNFCCC decision (COP19)

1.4.4.5. Support the implementation of REDD in-house training for staff BTNKM, Bappeda and DFS (Kab. Malinau - support DIPA-BTNKM)

1.4.4.6. FGD series and meetings indentifying activities in the forest and area sector for NAMAs and NDCs also forest and area sector position post 2020

(Milestone 1.4.7 - REDD+ in MoFor Mainstreamed or Consolidated)

1.4.5. District Forest Management Information System (DFMIS)

(see SA 2 about DFMIS) Dinas Kehutanan

1.4.6. Agreed district emission baseline

1.4.6.1. Multi-stakeholder consultation in order to harmonise perceptions and generate agreement on defining a forestry based emission baseline at the district level

Dinas , Bappeda

1.4.7. RAN/RAD – GRK and REDD+SRAP reconciled

1.4.7.1. Support the set up of a concept for harmonising RAN/RAD – GRK and REDD+SRAP for integration into RPJMD

1.4.7.2. Support the development of a technical guideline for national Grants on RAD GRK implementation for forest and peatland

1.4.7.3. Support the finalisation on an M&E guideline (PEP)

Pustanling, Pokja PI,DNPI Daerah Kaltim/KalbarDPMU


Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unitfor RAD GRK

1.4.7.4. Support the identification of potential projects/activities for RAD-GRK grants (e.g. FMUs, energy, fire management, etc.)

1.5. Strategic Plan of Ministry of Forestry / Renstra Kemenhut (2015-2019) is developed in line with national climate change mitigation targets, forest governance principles and development targets.

1.5.1. Contributions to drafting the Ministry of Forestry strategic plan 2015-2019

1.5.1.1. Support capacity improvement for the planning staff of all forestry agencies

1.5.1.2. Multistakeholder review of Renstra 2010-2014 and establishment of methods for monitoring and reporting of Renstra in the future.

1.5.1.3. Support the development of technical guidance for planning, monitoring and reporting of strategic plan

1.5.1.4. Collecting forestry stakeholders’ inputs and viewpoints in the process of developing Strategic Plan of Ministry of Forestry 2015-2019

1.5.1.5. Gender Mainstreaming in Renstra 2015-2019

Birocan

1.5.2. Climate change mitigation and forest governance principles are mainstreamed in the forestry sector planning at national and sub national level

1.5.2.1. Support the development RPJMN 2015-2019 for Forestry Sector

1.5.2.2. Facilitating activities in order to develop strategic plan in pilot districts and province to be in line with Strategic Plan of MoFor

1.5.2.3. Multistakeholder review of RPJMN 2010-2014

Birocan , Dit Perencanaan Kawasan Hutan


Strategic Area 2: FMU establishmentObjective Strategic Area 2

FMU Model is managed in accordance with the principles of sustainable forest management and national target on climate change mitigation in relation with green economy development.

Indicators Main Output Activities Collaborating Unit

2.1. Forest inventory system and data management were establishedfor SMF and determination of emission baseline that built on three FMU Model at the end of 2014.

2.1.1 Emissions baseline and monitoring concept for FMU are developed

2.1.1.1. Following up the determination of baseline in local level and FMU

2.1.1.2. Potentially support additional baseline calculation for Malinau

2.1.1.3. Set-up the FMU-based baseline Monitoring

Dit. IPSDH, POKJA PI

2.1.2. Data management system for FMU and forest resources Forest Service developed.

2.1.2.1. Data management development study finalization2.1.2.2. Develop and support the development of data

management strategies in three kabupaten/FMU and the province of East Kalimantan.

2.1.2.3. Support the development of DFMIS and the development of the necessary capacity.

Dit. IPSDH, KPH, Dinas Kehutanan

2.2. Three of FMU Model are managed by an agreed management plan, by considering

2.2.1. FMU Management Plan (10 years) was prepared and approved by the parties in the 3 districts.

2.2.1.1. Continuing support on finalization and improvement of FMU development planning

2.2.1.2. Support the FMU Annual Work PlanDinas Kehutanan, Pemkab,



customary use rights, the potential of Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM), facilitating and controlling concessions and biodiversity conservation target (the approved budget, supervisory visits).

2.2.2. Plan and implementation of community-based forest management in FMU is supported. (*)

Kapuas Hulu2.2.2.1. Support Dinas Kehutanan Kapuas hulu on CBFM

allocation map2.2.2.2. Participatory Mapping and inventory of Hutan

Desa in Nanga Lauk2.2.2.3. Support of Strengthening of Village Forest

organization in Kapuas Hulu2.2.2.4. Support the Development of local commodities

for community (Madu hutan) in Nanga Lauk (include Value chains analysis) and bussines plan development

2.2.2.5. Support Developing community training center for Honey bee with Disbunhut in Nanga Lauk

2.2.2.6. Technical assistance for local communities on legal drafting in Kapuas Hulu

2.2.2.7. Training for developing eaglewood in potential village with Disbunhut, and FC (Karangan Bunut)

2.2.2.8. Support the development of marketing of non timber forest product through gallery

FMU, Dinas Kehutanan, DAS/PS



development (with Disbunhut kapuas hulu) Gallery of NTFP in Kapuas Hulu

Berau2.2.2.9. Socialization of Hutan Desa Programme at

potential Village level2.2.2.10. Hutan Desa development and Field mapping in

Loggie Village2.2.2.11. Support the development of Management plan

in Hutan desa area2.2.2.12. Facilitate training for legal drafting in potential

village2.2.2.13. Support NTFP potential assessment2.2.2.14. Fasilitate CBFM Forum discussion in Beraul

Malinau2.2.2.15. Socialization of Hutan Desa/CBFM Programme at

DA location with Dinas Kehutanan, DPMU /FC malinau

2.2.2.16. Support on CBFM allocation map development in Malinau District FC/DPMU

2.2.2.17. Revision of Map of Protected Forest and Village administration map in Setulang Village coorporate with Tane’ Olen Institution, BPDAS and Dishut malinau

2.2.2.18. Participatory Mapping For identification village potential in Hutan desa collaborate with BPDAS Mahakam (Setulang)

2.2.2.19. Support setulang for Hutan Desa Management Plan collaborate with Dishut Malinau, BDK



Samarinda2.2.2.20. Development of NTFP product (Coconut oil,

Eaglewood, Honey bee) in setulang and some village surrounding setulang village

2.2.2.21. Training on organizational building for Village Government and Village Forest organization in Setulang

2.2.2.22. Support Finalized Legal drafting for Village Government and Village Forest organization in Setulang

2.2.2.23. Support for Ekowisata development,improving local guide skill in english (Setulang)

2.2.2.24. Support East Kalimantan and North Kalimantan Provinces in deeveloping Province regulation on CBFM

2.2.2.25. Socialization of Province Regulation on CBFM in east and North kalimantan (cooperation with Dinas and DKD kaltim

2.2.2.26. Develop training curriculum for Hutan Desa trainer

2.2.2.27. Review of CBFM hand book

2.2.3. FMU Annual plan in three FMUModel are developed (FMU Management Plan (10 years) and Annual Plan prepared and approved by the parties in the 3 districts.)

2.2.3.1. Further support for finalization of management Plan2.2.3.2. Support the development of annual plan for 3 KPHs

FMU, Seknas, Pusdal III, WP3H



2.2.4. Concept of FMU monitoring and development to the lisence holders is developed

2.2.4.1. Analysis on the mandate of FMU monitoring and development2.2.4.1.1. Assessment

2.2.4.2. Development of monitoring and training instrument. (link to IA1)2.2.4.2.1. Concept development2.2.4.2.2. Public Consultation2.2.4.2.3. Policy Development

KPH, WP3H

2.3. Organizational structure and human resource requirements are based on the approved management plan, business plan, etc

2.3.1. Academic document on FMU development and the organization of FMU at the district that require

2.3.1.1. FMU socialization to the wider and decision makers2.3.1.2.1. FMU socialization to desicion makers in

Malinau2.3.1.2.2.FMU socialization to the community and

concessioners in Kapuas Hulu and Berau

KPH, Dinas, WP3H

2.3.2. FMU Structure/Organization form

2.3.2.1. Support the organization structure development in Malinau

2.3.3. Management Instrument for FMU (Necessary tools/instruments to support KPH organization are developed)

2.3.3.1.Development of job descriptions, job specifications and others in Berau and Kapuas Hulu

2.3.3.2. Strandard Operating Procedure development in FMU Kapuas Hulu (specifically for activities already underway) and Berau Barat

2.3.3.3. Capacity building on FMU chieff and staff (need to be elaborated by the type of training and also with SA5)

2.3.3.4. Development of tools/instruments to support KPH

FMU, Seknas, ORTAL , Dinas Kehutanan, SEKNAS KPH



operations/management2.3.3.5. Setting and testing KPH Competency Standard using

SKKNI

2.3.4. Concept of mechanism / relationship system of FMU with other forestry agencies and forest users.

2.3.4.1. Establish good working relationship with organizations and related parties (including the existing TN in Kapuas Hulu)2.3.4.1.1. Analysis of relationship system /

procedure (business process)2.3.4.1.2. Public consultation/socialization2.3.4.1.3. Policy developmet2.3.4.1.4. Strengthening Monitoring and

Supervision function of FMU towards license holders

2.3.4.1.5. Coordination concept with the parties (including NGO,

KPH, Dinas, WP3H

2.4. At the end of 2016, all of three FMU Model published a business plan that was approved (in accordance with the principles of Green Economy) and has started its activities

2.4.1. Business plan which already integrate the principles of green economy (*) (Business plan which already integrate the principles of green economy (*), business partnership model and financial scheme developed.)

2.4.1.1. Coordination with SA42.4.1.2. Development of business Plan2.4.1.3. Support Business development/ Productive forest

activity2.4.1.4. Support the Partnership model development for

FMU (eg. joint venture, CSR, PPP, PES, MoU, carbon investment, etc)

2.4.1.5. Support identification of potential financing mechanism for FMU

2.4.1.6. Identifying potential business partner

FMU, Dinas Kehutanan, Dinas Perdagangan, Kemenhut, BUK

2.4.2. BLUD concept for FMU 2.4.2.1. Assessing possibility of BLUD implementation in KPH, Dinas, WP3H



FMU2.4.2.2. Structural building in FMU with BLUD-based2.4.2.3. Support the implementation of BLUD

Milestone2.4.3. Field implementation of SFM

within the KPH supported2.4.3.1. Coordination with SA32.4.3.2. Support the Sustainable forest management

practice2.4.3.3. Environmental service2.4.3.4. Promotion of timber and non-timber2.4.3.5. Technical activity for emission reduction within the

KPH (RIL Carbon)2.4.3.6. Support the development of KPH Based mitigation

activities

FMU, Dinas Kehutanan, Dinas Perdagangan, Kemenhut

Strategic Area 3: Sustainable Forest Management (SFM)

Objective of Strategic Area 3

Private sector companies in KPH Models have been implemented Sustainable Forest Management.

Indicator Main Output Activites Relevant Agencies

3.1. Obtaining forest management certification (eg FSC / LEI) that shows

3.1.1. Current forest management analysis outcomes(gap analysis)

3.1.1.1 Analysis of current forest management compared with social parameters, ecology and economics of SFM certifications (FSC)

3.1.1.2 Signing the Cooperation agreement with the TBI to

BUK, Dishut, KPH


the implementation of SFM principles in operational management on the area of 150,000 ha at least on three private companies.

assist the certification processon three companies that have positive pre-assesment

3.1.2. Completion of work plan for certification

3.1.2.1 Selecting "certified trainer " to support the certification process up to 3 concessions

3.1.2.2 Developing action plan to improve forest management based on gap analisys.

3.1.2.3 Developing capacity building plan for the company that enter the certification process

3.1.2.4 Negotiating a cooperation agreement with APHI to distribute the concept of capacity building in improving forest management of member of APHI

3.1.2.5 Developing FMU guidelineson how to monitoring and controlling certifiedmanagement in FMU

BUK, Dishut, KPH

3.1.3. Concept ofinvolving the community into the forest concession activities

3.1.3.1 studying the socio-economical impact of people living near to the concessions that have been certified

3.1.3.2 studying socio-economical impact of people living near to the concessions that will be certified

3.1.3.3 Analysis on the possibility of how to involve the community in forest management activities and the benefit possibility from the certified concession

3.1.3.4 Supporting negotiation on the cooperation agreement between community and concessions.

DAS-PS, Dishut

Milestone

3.1.4. Results of analysis of current status of forest management (gap analysis) available

3.1.4.1. Social compliance study of FSC certified concessions3.1.4.2. Pre-assessment3.1.4.3. Assessment3.1.4.4. Signing cooperation agreement with HPH

BUK; Dishut; KPH;

SA 2


Milestone

3.1.5. Action plan developed toward certification and certification process supported.

3.1.5.1. Guidelines for Dishut/KPH how to evaluate and control management of HPH

3.1.5.2. Support certification process

BUK; Dishut; KPH;

SA 2

Milestone

3.1.6. Concept to integrate communities into activities of Forest Concessions

3.1.6.1. Analyse possibilities how to involve communities into Forest concession activities

DAS-PS, Dishut, BUK, Community

SA 2

SA 4

3.2. Measurability of sustainable forest management impacts on emissions reductions compared to BAU in two companies that have been certified.

3.2.1. Methodology to compare the BAU forest management and sustainable forest management is available

3.2.1.1 Developing a methodology to compare emissions betweenbusiness as usual (BAU) and SFM management (metodologi VCS metodologi?)

3.2.1.1.1 Determining parameters to compare emissions from BAU management and SFM

3.2.1.1.2 Measuring and comparing the emissions of forest management in a business as usual (BAU) and PHL 2013/14)

BUK, Dishut, KPH, FORDA

3.2.2. Emissions reductionoutcomes is available

3.2.2.1 Publishingon comparison outcomes between BAU emissions forest management and enhancement of Tropical Forest Management (2014/15)

BUK, FORDA

3.2.3. Concept of policy incentives for companies that have been

3.2.3.1 Drafting guidelines or framework to develop new incentives to the certified concession (2014/15)

BUK, Dishut


certified

Milestone

3.2.4. Methodology to compare BAU forest management and SFM available

3.2.4.1. Develop a methodology to compare emissions between BAU and SFM (VCS methodology?)

3.2.4.2. Parameters to measure BAU-SFM determined

BUK, Dishut, KPH, FORDA, Pustanling

DPMU

SA 1; SA 2

Milestone

3.2.4. Results of emission reduction through SFM available

3.2.2.1. Emission reduction calculations (VCS methodology?) applied to improved tropical FM

BUK; FORDA; Pustanling

DPMU

SA 1; SA 2

Milestone

3.2.5. Guideline and incentives mechanism for certified forest concession available based on the results of carbon emission reductions.

3.2.5.1. Use the results of comparison between BAU and SFM to draft guidelines or framework to develop new incentives mechanism for certified forest concession.

BUK; Dishut; FORDA; Puspijak, Pustanling

SA 1;


Strategic Area 4: Integration of conservation and development/Green Economy

Objective of Strategic Area 4

District agencies (government and non-government) identify and implement sustainable economic activities that contribute to the improvement of livelihoods, reduction of GHG emissions and biodiversity conservation.

Indicator Main Output Activities Relevant Agencies

4.1. Concept of green economy which is related to livelihood improvement, reduction of GHG emissions and Biodiversity conservation, is reflected in sectoral planning district, FMU and the National Park Planning by 12/2016.

4.1.1. Common understanding on the principles of green economy is built between relevant stakeholders

4.1.1.1. Finalization of concept of green economy4.1.1.2. Focus Group discussion4.1.1.3. Workshop about green economy4.1.1.4. Agreement on concept of green economy4.1.1.5. Supporting on documentation and communication

process

Bappeda, Dishut, Disbun, BLHD, KPH, Balai TN, Disbudpar, Asosiasi, FC

4.1.2. (Milestone) Green Economy mainstreaming in district development planning, including Integrated Ecosystem Services (IES) knowledge

4.1.2.1. ToT to integrate green economy principles in development planning (eg., IES& TEEB)

4.1.2.2. Training IES for relevant stakeholders4.1.2.3. Support Heart of Borneo (HoB) working groups in

advocating green economy principles to the member institutions.

4.1.2.4. Facilitate focus group discussion on green economy applications in land base sectors activites to Heart of Borneo (HoB) working group.

Pusdiklat, Bappenas, Bappeda, Dishut, Disbun, BLHD, KPH, Balai TN, GIZ-RED, Disbudpar, FC, HoB working groups.

SA 1, SA 2, SA 54.1.3. Determination of guideline

on the principles of green economy as planning guideline for District sectoral

4.1.3.1. Support BAPPEDA draft planning guidelines that integrate the principles of green economy

4.1.3.2. Supporting on guidelines draft discussion, revision and approval.

Bappeda, BLHD

SA 1, SA 5



agencies by BAPPEDA

4.1.4. (Milestone) Green Economy Concept and implementation strategy is identified with relevant stakeholder

4.1.4.1. Facilitate focus group discussion about green economy application in forestry sector within Ministry of Forestry on cosultants findings

4.1.4.2. Initiate and support Heart of Borneo (HoB) working group to lead green economy round table in the district

4.1.4.3. Networking with likeminded districts4.1.4.4. Support Heart of Borneo (HoB) working group in

advocating implemention of green economy for sectoral related activities.

Pustanling, Bappeda kabupaten, HoB working group, BLHD

National park aministration

DPMU, FMU

SA 14.2. District

governments adapt the local development strategy in accordance to land use principles of green economy by 2016

4.2.1. (Milestone) Plans and strategies for District Strategic Area (DSA) are developed together with relevant parties.

4.2.1.1. Support revision process of Management Plan of TNDS.

4.2.1.2. Facilitate finalization of DSA Ecotourism document draft and its public consultation.

4.2.1.3. Support Ecotourism Working Group in finalization of District Ecotourism Roadmap Development

Bappeda, Dinas Cipta Karya & TR, Dishut, Disbudpar, Balai TNDS

DPMU

SA 14.2.2. Carbon stock map for

selected strategic areas are available and promoted to district government.

4.2.2.1. Workshop on identification of strategic areas in the district.

4.2.2.2. Develop carbon stock map for the strategic areas.4.2.2.3. Facilitate roundtable discussion in the distirct about

carbon stock map of strategic areas and how it should be used.

Dishut, Bappeda, Dinas Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang, Pokja HoB, Dinas



4.2.2.4. Support the possible improvement of the resolution of the existing carbon stock map of DSA Agro-politan Kapuas Hulu and its socialization process

Perkebunan, Dinas Pertanian, Dinas Pertambangan.DPMUSA 1

4.2.3. (Milestone) The Economic value of forest ecosystems, particularly from NTFP is studied and the distribution of main NTFP is mapped

4.2.3.1. Study on economic values and mapping of selected NTFP

4.2.3.2. Public consultation of the study results

4.2.3.3. Training on FMU based NTFP value chains analysis and rapid market assessment

Bappeda, Dishut

National park authorities

DPMU

4.3. A district based M & E system on livelihood improvement, reduction of GHG emissions and biodiversity conservation ise formulated and implemented by 12/2016

4.3.1. (Milestone) Draft of a district based M&E system available

4.3.1.1. Develop a participatory and district base M&E system draft for FORCLIME Programme in terms of livelihood improvement, GHG reduction and biodiversity conservation.

4.3.1.2. Workshop and consultancy for the draft M&E system.

4.3.1.3. Documentation of process

Bappeda, Dinas Kehutanan, BLHD, BPS

NGOs

FMU, DPMU

SA 1, SA 2, SA 3, Bioclime

4.4. Increased public and private investment into products and

4.4.1. (Milestone) Baseline study on investments into GE for 3 districts elaborated and reflected by district

4.4.1.1. Facilitate study and consultancy of green economy investment in Berau (the remaining district).

4.4.1.2. Focus group discussions4.4.1.3. Support establishment of District roadmap

District planning and sectorial agencies

DPMU



services of Green Economy as much as 10% by 2016 compared to baseline (which will be elaborated in 2013/2014)

authorities 4.4.1.4. Publication of final results4.4.2. (Milestone) PPP Agroforestry

with demonstration plots in FMU implemented

4.4.2.1. Coordination with developpp

4.4.2.2. Producer group training and exposure

4.4.2.3. Develop agroforestry demonstration plots in FMU

4.4.2.4. Coordination and Monitoring (stakeholder meetings: districts, farmers and companies)

4.4.2.5. Documentation of Lessons learned

Companies: Nestle, Bumi Tangerang,

District organizations (FMU, district forestry service, KADIN, producer organizations)

DPMU,

SA 24.4.3. (Milestone) Enhancement of

capacities of district stakeholder (producer groups, district agencies) to develop marketing strategies and investment planning based on GE concept

4.4.3.1. Enterpreneurship training (CEFE) on NTFP and other marketed FMU based local products (in coordination with GIZ RED)

4.4.3.2. Develop agroforestry demonstration plots for selected forestry and agriculture commodities.

4.4.3.3. Stakeholder dialogue4.4.3.4. Intersectorial working group4.4.3.5. Documentation of lessons learned

Bappeda, KADIN, Producer organizations, FMU, participants of value chain training,

Dinas Kehutanan, Disperindagkop, DPMU



GIZ-RED

SA 2; SA 5

Strategic Area 5: Human Capacity Building

Objectiveof Strategic Area 5

Forestry Education and Training institutions provide Education and Training which is applied and oriented to the need to support the achievement of forest sector strategic target in particular the development of FMU and climate change mitigation forestry sector.


5.1. Completion of development strategy of forestry Education and Training institutions (forestry faculty, Center for Forestry Education and Training (CFET), Regional Forestry Education and Training Center (RFETC), Forestry Vocational high School) to fulfill the

5.1.1. Policy and standarts on for HRD in forestry sector are developed

5.1.1.1. Supporting on survey of Human Resource Development (HRD) on FMU development in East KalimantanSupport regional workshop of HR mapping and planning in Forestry Sector

5.1.1.2. Support development RSKKNI related KPH (Perencanaan Hutan/Pengusahaan Hutan)

5.1.1.3. Support improvement of SKKNI SDM KPH for Forest Planning and Community empowerment

5.1.1.4. Study concerning personeel competence assessor in forestry sector

Pusat Rencana Pengembangan SDM-BP2SDM, WP3H, seknas KPH

5.1.2. Strategy to mainstream KPH and REDD into CFET and BDK are in place (milestone)

5.1.2.1. Support Training Workshop for mainstreaming KPH with CFET and BDK

CFET and BDK

5.1.3. Strategy to mainstream KPH 5.1.3.1. Support curriculum improvement for SMKK Sorestry



needs of the forestry sector strategic objectives particularly FMU development and climate change mitigation.

and REDD into Forestry Vocational High School (SMKK) are in place (milestone)

5.1.3.2. Support training for competence accessor in SMKK5.1.3.3. Support initial networking development for SMKK

(sister school)5.1.3.4. Support Training Workshop for mainstreaming KPH

with SMKK

Vocational High School, Pusdiklathut, Pusat Rencana Pengembangan SDM-BP2SDM,

5.2. Strengthened on the capacity of training institution management.

5.2.1. Assessment results regarding readiness to implement Competence Based Learning in CFET and 2 BDK are in place (milestone)

5.2.1.1. Assessment of CBL implemented in three BDK, CFET and SMKK

5.2.1.2. Fund raising training and network facilitation

Pusdiklathut, BDK Samarinda,

5.2.2. Capacity building for widyaiswara and SMKK teachers are implemented

5.2.2.1. Training e-learning for Widyaiswara5.2.2.2. Training entrepreneurship for Widyaiswara5.2.2.3. Training GIS for SMKK teachers5.2.2.4. thematic apprenticeship for widyaiswara and SMKK

teachers

Pusdiklathut, BDK, Forestry Vocational High School

5.3. Availability of Education and Training Center senior lecturer and 3 training modules that relevant withFMU management and climate change mitigation in forestry

5.3.1. Two new training modules for FMU based SKKNI are developed. (milestone)

5.3.1.1. Training need assessment, field visit5.3.1.2. Curriculum development5.3.1.3. Module development5.3.1.4. Support training implementation for certain topics

(Basarhut, FMU manager, Entrepreneurship)

Pusdiklathut, WP3H

5.3.2. One Training module related to FMU using E-learning application are developer (milestone)

5.3.2.1. Mini-workshop E-learning for KPH development5.3.2.2. Curriculum development5.3.2.3. Module development5.3.2.4. Implementation of training using E-learning

Pusdiklathut



sector. approach

5.4. Availability of RFECT Trainer in Samarinda and 2 packages of teaching materials that have integrated field experiences and practical examples to offercertified training in the field of FMU and climate change mitigation , forestry sector for FMUstaff and other targeted stakeholders (staff offices, communities, private sector).

5.4.1. Two new training modules (GPS mapping, GIS carbon accounting) are developed and tested. (milestone)

5.4.1.1. Fine-tune curriculums and get approval by CFET5.4.1.2. Develop modules based on curriculum approved by

CFET5.4.1.3. Trial training developed modules

BDK Samarinda


Documents

Forclime Awp 2014 Eng Fnal