Upload
reynold-bryant
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Future Beam Test Plansof the GLD Calorimeter
Aug-6 2007 学術創成会議Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu)
for the GLD calorimeter group
We are planning to have two beam tests :1. at KEK new beamline at Nov 20072. at Fermilab in 2008 summer
3 Types of Modules
① WLSF readout
13 layers ② Direct readout
13 layers
③ WLSF readoutby extrusion technique
13 layers
Beam F R
② ① ③ ①① ②
13 + 13 layers
Beam position (mm)Sig
nal (
AD
C c
ount
s)
Fiber readout Direct readout Extruded scint.
Response uniformity of 3 differenttypes of scintillators
MPPCBeam
Layer #
Strip #
Response for MIP(DESY beam test data)
Fiberreadout extruded
Main objectives of the KEK beam test
• Check performance of various scintillator strips using the high energy beam
– Evaluate light yield, response uniformity, variation– Compare characteristics of 3~4 different scintillators– Need to establish extruded scintillator strips for next
ECAL prototype beam test in 2008 at FNAL
Fuji new test beam line(http://fujibeam.kek.jp)
ExperimentalStage (7 x 4 m)
• Electron beam line• p = 0.5 – 3.4 GeV/c, p/p = 0.4 %• Rate ~ 200 Hz @ 3 GeV• Spot size = +- 1cm• Currently magnet setup is ongoing• Start comissioning on Sep• Available periods:
• Nov-Dec 2007• Feb-Mar 2008
KEK Beam Test Plan (tentative)
• MIP scan of the scintillator strips• MPPC signal are read by CAMAC ADC• Tracking with Sci-Fi tracker (position resolution ~ 1mm)• 2-3 people from KNU (Korea), 2-3 from Japan• Very tentative schedule :
– ~ 3 days for setup (need 1-2 days access to beamline)– ~ 3 days for beam run (including 1 day commissioning)– ~ 1 day for withdrawal
Stripscintillators
Beam
Sci-Fi trackers
Trigger counters
2008 summer : The FNAL beam test
• Establish the Scintillator-strip ECAL– Evaluate all the necessary performances using various beams (,K,e,….) with wider energy range– Make the SCECAL ready for the engineering design
• Combined test with the Analog HCAL• Test 0 -> 2 reconstruction• Measure hadron shower to test simulation model
– Compare the result with various models– Precise hadron simulation will help study of PFA
The 2nd SCECAL module
MPPC R/O
• (At least) 4 times larger than the DESY BT module.
(Still need simulation study to determine the module size, depth, strip size)
• Fully adopt extruded scintillators• Expect several thousand channel
s
Beam test related Jobs for mid-term• Collect information about FNAL beam test facility (always)
– Kawagoe, Takeshita, Uozumi• Beam test simulation based on Mokka or simple G4 framework (fall~winter)
– Simulate SCECAL performance, 0 reconstruction test– Takeshita (for old G4 framework to check position dependence of light yield)– Nishiyama, Ueyama with support of other people
• Establish extruded scintillator (within this year)– KNU guys + Nishiyama for measurement in Japan
• Perform a beam test in November at KEK– Manpower from Kobe, Shinshu, Tsukuba, KNU (need to discuss at next Japan-Korea meeting)– Check Sci-Fi detector, if necessary repair or remake (Takasaki etc.)
• R&D of MPPC readout cable (~fall, Uozumi, Nishiyama)• Mechanical design and test of the entire module construction (Uozumi, Nishiyama)• Establish gain and temperature monitoring system (this year, Kobe)
– Test LED light distribution system with acryl bar and fibres (Ikeda)– Mechanical assembly of the system (Kobe, Shinshu)– Learn CANbus operation (Kaneko , Ikeda)
• MPPC mass measurement (system construction in this year)– Tokyo? Need discussion
• MPPC R&D (always)– Tsukuba, Tokyo, Shinshu
• Feedbacks from the DESY beam test analysis (Satoru, Daniel)