GANSER

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 GANSER

    1/4

    C A S E R E P O R T

    Ganser syndrome: a case report from Thailand

    Kanida Tassniyom1 MD, Suchat Paholpak1 MD, Sompon Tassniyom2 MD, Thawatchai Krisanaprakornkit1 MD &

    Peerada Unprai1 BSc

    1 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand2 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

    Keywords

    Ganser syndrome, case report, Thailand

    Correspondence

    Kanida Tassniyom MD, Department of

    Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen

    University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

    Email: [email protected]

    Received: 12 March 2009

    Accepted: 5 May 2009

    DOI:10.1111/j.1758-5872.2009.00007.x

    Abstract

    Ganser syndrome or syndrome of approximates is characterized by the

    patient giving incorrect answers to questions, despite showing an under-

    standing of the questions, clouding of consciousness, perceptual abnorm-

    alities and symptoms of somatic conversion. The syndrome has a sudden

    onset, resolves abruptly, and is followed by subsequent amnesia. It was first

    described by Sigbert Ganser in 1897. It was earlier described as a hysterical

    disorder, and debate about its classification continues today. Currently, it is

    categorized under the rubric of dissociative disorder. Overall, fewer than 50cases have been reported. The etiology of Ganser syndrome remains

    unknown. Some precipitating stressors have been reported and in other

    cases patients have had organic brain syndrome. Hospital admission has

    been recommended, but treatment with antipsychotic medication is not

    necessarily advised because the syndrome can resolve without treatment.

    The prognosis is uncertain. The present report is of a 40-year-old Thai male

    with symptoms of clouding of consciousness, approximate answers to

    simple questions, reported auditory hallucinations and somatic delusions.

    All symptoms resolved within 5 days and the patient had no recollection of

    the event. Ganser syndrome is still considered a rare psychiatric syndrome

    requiring further exploration.

    Introduction

    Ganser syndrome or syndrome of approximates is

    characterized by four main clinical features: approx-

    imate answers to simple questions, clouding of con-

    sciousness, perceptual abnormalities and symptoms of

    somatic conversion (Dwyer & Reid, 2004; Sadock &

    Sadock, 2007). The outstanding feature of Ganser

    syndrome is approximate answers, although incorrect,

    indicating that the question has been understood. For

    example if asked How much is two plus three? the

    patient may give an answer of Four or Six. Cloud-

    ing of consciousness can fluctuate during the course of

    the illness. Perceptual disturbances include auditory or

    visual hallucinations, which may be vivid, accompa-

    nied by abnormal behavior responding to the halluci-

    nations. Various somatic conversion symptoms can be

    found, including gait abnormalities, hemiplegia or

    hyperalgesia.

    Ganser syndrome was first described in 1897 by a

    neurologist Sigbert J.M. Ganser while working at a

    penal institution in Germany. He wrote Concerning

    an unusual hysterical confusional state describing the

    syndrome in three prisoners. In the 1960s, Ganser

    syndrome was described in English textbooks under

    the description Hysterical disorders, while American

    textbooks listed it under Rare, unclassified, collective

    and exotic psychotic syndromes (Whitlock, 1967).

    The syndrome has had many reclassifications, such as

    adjustment reaction, somatization disorder, factitious

    disorder, psychotic disorder, and malingering. Cur-

    rently in the International Statistical Classification of

    Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision

    (ICD-10), Ganser syndrome is categorized under dis-

    sociative disorder and in Diagnostic and Statistical

    Manual (DSM)-IV-TR under dissociative disorder not

    otherwise specified (NOS; Cocores et al., 1984; Brom-

    berg, 1986; Knobloch, 1986).

    Ganser syndrome is a rare disorder; overall fewer

    than 50 cases have been reported. The condition is

    poorly understood and has been neglected (Carney

    et al., 1987). Men with the syndrome outnumber

    30 Asia-Pacific Psychiatry 1 (2009) 3033 c 2009 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd

    Asia-Pacific Psychiatry ISSN 1758-5864

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 GANSER

    2/4

    women by approximately two to one. The male pre-

    ponderance may relate to the reported occurrence of

    the syndrome in military personnel and prisoners

    (Tsoi, 1973). The etiology of Ganser syndrome remains

    unknown. Some case reports describe precipitating

    stressors and others organic brain syndromes, head

    injuries, seizures or psychiatric illness.The differential diagnoses of this syndrome include

    other forms of dissociative disorders, malingering, or-

    ganic dementia, depressive disorder (pseudodemen-

    tia), epilepsy, catatonia, post concussional syndrome,

    compensation neurosis and schizophrenia.

    Hospital admission is often recommended. A brief

    hospital admission may clarify the diagnosis and fre-

    quently includes remission (Carney et al., 1987). In-

    itiation of antipsychotic medication is unclear. Ganser

    syndrome can resolve abruptly in the absence of

    specific treatment, with the patient having no memory

    of the episode. The prognosis of the syndrome is

    uncertain, although a review of published case studies

    suggests that some patients experience further epi-

    sodes (Dwyer & Reid, 2004).

    Because the syndrome is uncommon and often

    underdiagnosed, the present report from Thailand

    will add to the collection of previous published case

    reports.

    Case report

    A 40-year-old, single, Thai male, working as a govern-

    ment officer in the northeastern province of Thailandpresented to the internal medicine clinic at Srinagarind

    Hospital, Khon Kaen University with the chief com-

    plaint of diplopia and pain in both thighs lasting 7 days.

    The physician found that the patient had clouding of

    consciousness, strange responses and an unusual per-

    sonality. Work-up of the man as an inpatient revealed

    no organic causes. A psychiatric consultation was

    requested.

    Table 1 lists some of the questions that were asked

    during the psychiatric interview, together with the

    patients answers. The patient believed that black

    magic was placed on him, during which something

    was inserted into his thigh causing progressive pain.

    (In Thai folk culture some people still believe in black

    magic, sorcerers and ghosts that can place screws or

    buffalo skin into the body.) The patient heard voices

    which forced him to obey their commands. Sometimes

    he heard the voices of people talking. When in

    crowded places people would talk behind his back and

    try to humiliate him. He was mildly anxious and

    depressed. No specific stressor was found.

    The patients aunt confirmed that he had no

    previous psychiatric history. He had a motorcycle

    accident 15 years ago and craniotomy was performed

    to remove an intracranial blood clot. There were no

    neurological complications. He was also diagnosed

    with aplastic anemia in 2003, but the disease was now

    inactive. He had no history of seizure or substance

    abuse. One of his grandparents and two of his aunts

    had psychiatric disorders with unknown diagnosis.

    Physical examination revealed clouding of con-

    sciousness, but no other abnormalities. Neurological

    examination and laboratory investigations were nor-

    mal. Brain CT scan revealed an old cerebral infarction

    Table 1. Questions and answers from a psychiatric interview with a

    40-year-old male Thai patient with Ganser syndrome (correct answers

    are given in brackets)

    Question What is your name?

    Response The patient gives a name that is not his.

    Question What do you do for a living?

    Answer A government officer at the office of elementary

    education.(The patient is a government officer at a court

    administrative office.)

    Question What is todays date?

    Answer Today is Monday, 30 February 2007, in the summer,

    3 p.m.

    (It is actually Saturday, 30 June 2007, rainy season,

    4.30 p.m.)

    Question What is this place?

    Answer At the moment, Im on the plane, these are all

    airhostesses.

    Question How much is 111?

    Answer Three.

    Question How much is 212?

    Answer Five.Questi on Serial 7 (Patient is asked to subtract 7 from 100 and

    then 7 from the result four more times.)

    Answer 92, 84, 75, 67, 59.

    Question What is this?

    (A pen is shown to the patient.)

    Answer Penci l.

    Question What is this?

    (Eyeglasses are shown to the patient.)

    Answer Binocular on ears.

    Question Please use your left hand to touch your right ear.

    Response The patient lifts his right hand and touches his left ear.

    Question The patient is asked to let go of his ear.

    Response The patient does not do so.

    Question 3 stage command (Patient is asked to take a piece ofblank paper in their right hand, fold it in half, and put it

    on the floor.)

    Response The patient picks up the paper with his left hand and

    places it on the table.

    Question Please copy this figure.

    (The patient is shown intersecting pentagon.)

    Response The patient draws two overlapping circles.

    Asia-Pacific Psychiatry 1 (2009) 3033 c 2009 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 31

    K. Tassniyom et al. Ganser syndrome

  • 8/3/2019 GANSER

    3/4

    in the right occipital lobe and a skull defect at the

    temporoparietal region from the previous craniotomy.

    Five days after diagnosis, all of the symptoms

    subsided suddenly without psychotropic medication.

    The patient couldnt remember the odd answers he

    gave during the interview and could not recall the

    events of the past few days.

    Discussion and conclusion

    We present here a report of Ganser syndrome in a Thai

    male. The patient presented with all four classic symp-

    toms of the syndrome: approximate answers and ap-

    parent understanding of questions; sudden clouding of

    consciousness; occasional symptoms of auditory hallu-

    cination; and somatic symptoms with pain in both legs

    without any evident pathology. A history of intracra-

    nial hemorrhage in the right temporoparietal region,

    an underlying disease of aplastic anemia, and history

    of psychiatric disorder in family members were predis-

    posing factors. He had no history of substance misuse.

    No precipitating factor was identified; the patient did

    not describe stress or life struggles before the symp-

    toms appeared. His relatives said he that he was work-

    ing as usual until the symptoms occurred. All four

    symptoms persisted for only a short period of time. No

    organic cause was found to explain the symptoms, and

    without any psychotropic treatment the symptoms

    subsided dramatically in 1 week.

    Only a few cases of Ganser syndrome have been

    reported during the last decade. Understanding of thissyndrome is minimal and its classification is uncertain.

    The syndrome has been classified as malingering,

    factitious disorder, psychotic disorder or dissociative

    disorder (in two major diagnostic classifications) (Dab-

    holkar, 1987). No specific diagnosis criteria are given in

    either the DSM or ICD systems. The development of

    diagnostic criteria is missing because of the small

    number of Ganser syndrome cases. Clinicians are

    advised to use their clinical judgment after ruling out

    other psychiatric diagnoses. Therefore, it is difficult to

    diagnose this disorder with certainty. Furthermore, the

    lack of objective markers makes the diagnosis process

    difficult (Lee & Koenig, 2001).

    From the Ganser syndrome in the Lancet (2004)

    (Dwyer & Reid, 2004) suggested four clinical symptoms:

    approximate answers; clouding of consciousness;

    perceptual abnormalities; and somatic conversions. In

    the present case the patient fulfilled all of these

    criteria. Whitlock (1967) suggested that the diagnosis

    of Ganser syndrome should be restricted to the patient

    who develops clouding of consciousness with charac-

    teristic verbal responses to questions and abrupt termi-

    nation of the illness. Subsequent amnesia, and

    hallucination or conversion may be detected or not.

    In most cases, Ganser syndrome has been diagnosed by

    experts.

    In the present case, differential diagnosis was

    made to separate the syndrome from brief psychoticdisorder, delirium, mood disorder, substance-induced

    disorder, anxiety disorder, malingering and epilepsy.

    The syndrome in the present patient was differentiated

    from acute and transient psychotic disorder because

    the symptoms of auditory hallucination were present

    without delusions, and no disorganized speech or

    behaviour were seen. This patient was not delirious

    because most aspects of cognitions were normal, ex-

    cept clouding of consciousness. The patient had no

    abnormal sleep/wake pattern or abnormal behaviour,

    and did not report abnormal mood. Electroencephalo-

    gram showed no signs of epileptic discharge. The

    patient did not have impaired memory or other de-

    mentia symptoms. Psychological testing was per-

    formed and did not reveal any signs of faking. Blood

    tests and comprehensive workup did not identify an

    organic explanation or cause of the symptoms. No

    trace of substance use was found in the blood or urine

    of the patient.

    In Thailand, psychiatric diseases are still misunder-

    stood as being caused by black magic. People believe in

    supernatural powers and take patients, such as the

    man described herein, to monks or sorcerers for treat-

    ment. Extraordinary methods of removing the black

    magic may be performed.Recognition is important in this underdiagnosed

    and little known condition. Additional case series are

    required to monitor the development of psychopathol-

    ogy in this condition in response to changes in lifestyle

    and social environment in the 21st century.

    References

    Bromberg W. (1986) The neglect of Ganser syndrome. Am.

    J. Psychiatry, 143, 7.

    Carney M.W., Chary T.K., Robotis P., Shilds A. (1987)

    Ganser syndrome and its management. Br. J. Psychiatry,

    151, 697700.

    Cocores J.A., Santa W.G., Patel M.D. (1984) The Ganser

    syndrome: evidence suggestion its classification as a

    dissociative disorder. Int. J. Psychiatr. Med., 14,

    4756.

    Dabholkar P.D. (1987) Ganser syndrome: a case

    report and discussion. Br. J. Psychiatry, 151,

    256258.

    32 Asia-Pacific Psychiatry 1 (2009) 3033 c 2009 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd

    K. Tassniyom et al.Ganser syndrome

  • 8/3/2019 GANSER

    4/4

    Dwyer J., Reid S. (2004) Gansers syndrome. Lancet,

    364(9432), 471475.

    Knobloch F. (1986) Ganser syndrome and DSM-III. Am.

    J. Psychiatry, 143, 3.

    Lee H.B., Koenig T. (2001) A case of Ganser syndrome:

    organic or hysterical. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry, 23(4),

    230231.

    Sadock B.J., Sadock V.A., editor. (2007) Synopsis of

    Psychiatry, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,

    Philadelphia.

    Tsoi W.F. (1973) The Ganser syndrome in Singapore:

    a report on ten cases. Br. J. Psychiatry, 123, 567572.

    Whitlock F.A. (1967) The Ganser syndrome. Br. J.

    Psychiatry, 113(494), 1929.

    Asia-Pacific Psychiatry 1 (2009) 3033 c 2009 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 33

    K. Tassniyom et al. Ganser syndrome