27

Click here to load reader

Gliclazide

  • Upload
    gs

  • View
    239

  • Download
    6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Gliclazide

Drug Evaluation

Drugs 27: 301 -327 (1984)0012-6667/84/0400-0301/$13.50/0© ADiS Press LimitedAll rights reserved.

GliclazideA Preliminary Review of its Pharmacodynamic Properties andTherapeutic Efficacy in Diabetes Mellitus

B. Holmes, R.C. Heel, R.N. Brogden, T.M. Speight andG.s. AveryADIS Drug Information Services, Auckland

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: A.L. Bloom, Department of Haernatol­ogy, Uni versity Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales; R.B. Jones, Andover, England; K.Kobayashi, Department of Clinical Pathology and Clinical Laboratory, Hyogo College ofMedicine, Nish inomiya, Japan; F.X. Lesbre, Lyon , France; A. Marble, Joslin DiabetesCenter, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ; R.C. Paton, Department of Medicine, Un iversityof Leeds , Leeds , England; L./. Rose, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hah­nemann University, Ph iladelphia, USA; C.Th. Smit Sibinga, Red Cross Blood BankGroningen-Drenthe, Groningen , The Netherlands; D.F. Vloli, Institute of Clinical Med­icine, University of Rome, Rome, Ital y; I .R.B. Williams, Liste r Hospital , Ste verage, Eng­land.

Contents

Summa ry 302I . Pharmacodynamic Studies 303

1.1 Hypoglycaemic Activity 3041.2 Effect on Plasma Cholesterol , Triglycerides and Fatty Acids 3051.3 Effects on the Blood 307

1.3.1 Effect on Platelet Adhesiveness 3071.3.2 Effect on Platelet Aggregation 3081.3.3 Effect on Platelet Metabol ism 3081.3.4 Effect on Platelet Coagulant Factors 3091.3.5 Effect on Fibrinolytic Activity 3101.3.6 Effect on Prostaglandin 12 Formation 310

1.4 Mechanism of Action 3102. Toxicology 3 11

2.1 Acute Toxicity Studies 3112.2 Chron ic Toxicity Studies 3112.3 Effects on Reproduction 311

3. Pharmacok inetic Studies 3123.1 Absorption 3123.2 Distribut ion 3123.3- Eliminat ion 313

3.3.1 Metabol ism 3133.3.2 Excretion 3143.3.3 Half-Life 314

Page 2: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review 302

Summary

3.4 Plasma Concentration and Clinical Effects 3144. Therapeutic Trials 315

4.1 Open Studies 3154.2 Controlled Trials 315

4.2.1 Gliclazide Compared with Tolbutamide 3154.2.2 Glidazide Compared with Glibendamide 3164.2.3 Glidazide Compared with Chlorpropam ide 3164.2.4 Glidazide Compared with Various Other Oral Hypoglycaemic Agents 316

4.3 Studies in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy 3184.4 Studies in Patients with Diabetic Nephropath y 320

5. Side Effects 3215.1 Hypoglycaemia 3215.2 Weight Change 3215.3 Laboratory Test Abnormalities 321

6. Drug Interactions 3227. Dosage and Administrat ion 3228. Place of Glidazide in Therapy 323

Synopsis: Gliclazide' is a 'second generation ' oral hypoglycaemic agent. The particularinterest with this drug is that it has shown certain effects on the blood fo r which it is hopedthere may be some clinical benefit in diabetic angiopath ies. Both in animal and humanstudies it has demonstrated a reduction in platelet adhesiveness and aggregation, whilstpossible enhancement of platelet metabolism , reduction of coagulant factors. as well asincreased fibrinolytic activity, are still being investigated. Initial trials have suggested thatgliclazide therapy may reverse or at least slow down the progression of diabetic retino­pathy. However, a few additi onal well-designed long term controlled studies are neededto confirm these findings, and to clarify whether any beneficial effect on diabetic retinop­athy is unique to gliclaz ide or also occurs with other oral hvpoglycaemic drugs.

Both newly diagnosed maturity onset diabetics as well as those previously treated withsulphonylureas respond well to gliclazide therapy. In the small comparative studies whichhave been reported, gliclazide was of comparable efficacy to other oral hypoglycaemicagents.

Gliclazide has been well tolerated by most patients. the most frequently reported sideeffects being gastrointestinal in nature which occurred in less than 2% of patients.

Pharmacodynamic Studies: The abil ity of glic\azide to lower blood glucose concen­trati ons has been demonstrated in various animals, as well as in a small number ofhealth y subjects and in pat ients with maturity onset diabetes. On a weight basis , glic\azidewas man y times more potent than tolbutamide, the relative potency varying betweenspecies (e.g. potency rat io of about I : 8 in rabbits and I : 27 in rats). As with othersulphonylurea oral hypoglycaemic drugs , glic\azide was not act ive in panc reatectomisedanimals. suggesting it has a direct action on the pancreas (postulated to be mediated byincreased calcium uptake in pancreatic islet cells) to increase insulin secretion. Singledoses of glic\azide 80mg in diabetic patients have brought about significant decreases inboth fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, the effect being slightly less prolongedthan that of glibenc\amide 5mg which produces more abrupt changes in blood glucoseconcentrations, whilst tolbutamide 500mg produces a milder and relatively less prolongedeffect. Therapy with gliclazide has produced decreases in plasma cholesterol , tr iglycerideand fatt y acid levels, with at least I of the decreased levels reaching a statisticall y sig­nificant value at some stage during the administration of the drug. Gliclazide has dem­onst rated some effects on the blood in both animal and human studies which it is pos-

I ' Diarnicron' (Servicr): 'Glimicron' (Da i Nippon).

Page 3: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review 303

tulated may limit the progression of diabetic or other angiopathies. They include areduction of platelet adhesiveness and aggregation, whilst possible enhancement of plate­let metabolism and anticoagulant factors as well as increased fibrinolytic activity arebeing investigated.

Pharmacokinetics: Gliclazide has been consistently well absorbed after oral admin­istration in animals, but peak plasma concentrations (2.8 and 3.9 rng/L) after a dose of80mg, as well as time to reach peak concentrations (0.4 and 4.8 hours), have showngreater variability in studies in man . Its relatively low volume of distribution (15.9 to17.4L) suggesting only limited tissue distribution may in part be explained by its exten­sive binding to plasma album in (85 to 97%). In common with other sulphonylureas,gliclazide is apparently metabolised to either hydroxylated metabolites or N-oxygenatedcompounds and the corresponding alcohol and carboxylic acid. 60 to 70% of a dose iseliminated in the urine, with less than 20% of this as unchanged drug, while a further10 to 20% of a dose is eliminated in the faeces. In contrast, 90% of all drug-relatedmaterial in the plasma is unchanged gliclazide. The elimination half-life ofgliclazide mayvary between sexes, with values for males of around 8 hours and for females of II hours.

Therapeutic Trials: In open trials, 60 to 100% of maturity onset non-ketosis-pronediabetes mellitus patients achieved satisfactory control of their blood glucose levels ongliclazide therapy . These patients included those who were newly diagnosed as well asthose previously treated with other sulphonylurea drugs. However, as would be expected ,gliclazide was not effective in insulin dependent diabetics, in whom substitution of in­sulin with gliclazide resulted in loss of blood glucose control while addition of gJiclazidetherapy conferred no additional benefit compared with insulin alone . Combined therapyinvolving gliclazide and a biguanide was sometimes effective in patients resistant to asulphonylurea alone. In mostly small comparative studies, gJiclazide was generally com­parable to other oral hypoglycaemic drugs in terms of overall quality of control of bloodglucose levels. In patients with diabetic retinopathy, gliclazide therapy for periods up toseveral years resulted in a significantly lower rate of deterioration of disease comparedwith control groups treated with another hypoglycaemic agent, whilst overall stability inthe progress of the disease during gliclazide therapy was noted in shorter term openstudies. Gliclazide did not significantly alter renal funct ion in patients with diabeticnephropathy.

Side Effects: Gliclazide is well tolerated by most patients. The most frequently re­ported side effects have been gastrointestinal upset such as abdominal pain, nausea , vom­iting, dizziness, skin reactions and symptoms of hypoglycaemia , the latter in most casesresulting from overdosage or inadequate diet rather than an adverse effect of the drug.

Dosage and Administration: The recommended adult dose in maturity onset non­ketotic diabetes mellitus is from 80 to 240mg daily . Maximum doses of 320mg have beenadministered in an attempt to achieve control of blood sugar concentrations and shouldthis fail, addition of a biguanide may be successful in some cases, provided ketosis hasnot developed .

Gliclazide, like other sulphonylurea drugs, is indicated only where diet fails to controlhyperglycaemia and glycosuria. It has no place in the treatment of juvenile diabetes orwhere there is severe metabolic decompensation with acidosis .

1. Pharmacodynamic Studies

Gliclazide is a 'second generation' sulphonyl­urea oral hypoglycaemic agent. It belongs to the

same class ofhypoglycaemic agents as tolbutamideand glibenclamide (fig. I). Its hypoglycaemic activ­ity has been demonstrated in animals, healthy sub­jects and diabetic patients.

Page 4: Gliclazide

Glibenclamic1e

Gliclazidc: A Preliminary Review

CI

Q-CO-NH_CH,-H'cD-so, - NH-CO-NH-{H,OCH3

H3C-{)- S02 - NH - CO - NH - (CH2b - CH3

Tolbutamide

Fig. 1. Structural formulae of gliclazide. gfibenclamide and tolbutamide.

304

1.1 Hypoglycaemic Activity

Gliclazide proved to be about 7 to 10 times asactive as tolbutamide in decreasing blood glucosein rabbits (Duhault et aI., 1972; Maekawa et aI.,1978b; Schimizu et aI., 1976a) [25 mg/kg gliclazide= 200 rug/kg tolbutamide), whilst the potency ratioincreased in rats (3 mg/kg gliclazide == 80 mg/kgtolbutamide) to around 27 (Duhault et aI., 1972;Schimizu et aI., 1976). Gliclazide 10 and 25 mg/kg orally also reduced blood glucose concentrationsin guinea-pigs and dogs . Increasing the dosage ofgliclazide from 2.5 rug/kg to 25 mg/kg resulted inan increased duration of activity of up to 24 hours.Tolbutamide did not show a similar effect, the dur­ation of action remaining at around 10 to 12 hoursdespite increased dosage . Gliclazide showed no ac­tivity in pancreatectomised dogs and alloxan dia­betic rats (Duhault et aI., 1972). This would appearto indicate that, as with other drugs of this type,gliclazide has a direct action on the pancreas toincrease insulin secretion.

Gliclazide 200mg was found to lower blood glu­cose levels to a significantly greater extent than tol­butamide 2g at 2 and 3 hours after administrationto 12 healthy subjects (Duhault et aI., 1972).Administration of a single dose of gliclazide 80mgproduced a maximum reduction of 20% in bloodglucose levels after 2 hours, the levels returning tocontrol values 4 to 6 hours after administration of

the drug in 23 healthy subjects (see also section3.4) [Campbell et aI., 1980).

In patients with maturity onset diabetes melli­tus , single doses of gliclazide (dose range 40 to320mg) have been shown to decrease hyperglycae­mia in response to oral (Campbell et aI., 1980) andintravenous glucose (Stephan et aI., 1980), a stand­ard meal (Charbonnel, 1980; Lagrue and Riveline,1980; Lesbre, 1977; Shaw et aI., 1980; Violi et al.,1982), after food given at 4 and II hours after drugadministration (Campbell et aI., 1980) and duringan arginine tolerance test (Brogard et aI., 1982). In­vestigating the effects of single doses of various oralsulphonylureas in 32 diabetic patients, Strata et aI.(1980) found the action of gliclazide 80mg on fast­ing blood sugar to be slightly less prolonged thanthat of glibenclamide 5mg, which also produced amore abrupt response, whilst tolbutamide 500mgproduced a less pronounced and less prolonged ef­fect (fig. 2). Eight healthy subjects demonstrated asignificant decrease in blood glucose for 240 min­utes after gliclazide 40,80 or 120mg, compared witha control group, whilst the higher doses of 80 and120mg produced significant rises in plasma insulinlevels (Ohneda et aI., 1977).

Treatment with gliclazide 80 to 240mg daily forup to 7 months resulted in a significant rise in the' insulinogenic index' [the ratio of the area underthe plasma insulin curve (~U/ml' hour) to the areaunder the blood glucose curve (g/L> houri] in 18

Page 5: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review 305

Fig. 2. Fasting blood sugar levels in 32 diabetics after a single

dose of placebo (6-6). tolbutamide 500mg (0-0). gli­

benelamide 5mg (A-A) or gliclaz ide 60mg (e-e) [after

Strata et al., 1960).

Puglisi and Colli, 1980; Smit Sibinga and Wier­inga, 1980). Gliclazide demonstrated a protectiveeffect on x-ray induced experimental atheromato­sis in rabbits treated with 5, IO or 25 rug/kg,whereas glibenclamide 0.07 mg/kg had no effect(Smit Sibinga and Wieringa, 1980).

However, results of similar studies in patientswith diabetes were less consistent. Thus, significant

non-ketotic diabetics . Low values of the insulino­genic index were seen in 6 secondary treatmentfailures during long term treatment, and surpris­inglyalso in some of the adequately controlled dia­betics. Two months of gliclazide therapy (160mgdaily) in 8 subjects produced a significant decreasein fasting blood glucose but no change in insulinconcentration (Marchand et aI., 1983). While theseresults could suggest that the antidiabetic action ofgliclazide may be related to an extrapancreatic ef­fect, since the insulotropic action is apparentlylacking in certain patients (Stephan et aI., 1980),this postulate is not supported by the findings inanimals described above. Any extrapancreatic ef­fect of gliclazide is thought not to involve the re­ceptors (De Meyts et aI., 1983; Dolais-Kitabgi etal., 1983; Marchand et al., 1983; Vigneri et aI., 1982)but may take place at the 'post-receptor' level (un­published data on file, Servier; Ward et aI., 1983).

1.2 Effect on Plasma Cholesterol ,Triglycerides and Fatty Acids

Studies in rats and rabbits have revealed thatgliclazide reduces plasma concentrations of chol­esterol, triglycerides and fatty acids (Marquie, 1977;

150

:g, 140OlE:- 1301OOl

~ 120'0

g 110:0

g' 100:;:;en~ 90

Base 2

Time (hours)

4 5 6 7 6

Table I. Effects of gliclazide on plasma cholesterol . triglycerides and fatty acid concentrations in patients with diabetes

Reference No. of Dosage Duration Results·

patients (mg/day) (months)cholesterol triglycerides fatty acids

Asmal et al. (1960) 11 220 (mean) 6 ++ ±

Berber and Tomkin (1962) 6 160 3 ± ±

King et al. (1977) 12 Not stated 3 + ±

Lagrue and Riveline (1980) 56 60-240 24.7 + +

Radic et al. (1980) 45 80-240 12 ++ + +

Sadayoshi et al. (1962) 41 20-240 12-60 ++

Stephan et al. (1960) 18 60-240 6-84 + +

Strata et al. (1980) 10 80 Not +5 160 stated +

Villiger (1962) 65 160 3 ++ ++

a ++ = significant decrease ; + = apparent decrease (not statistically significant); ± = no signif icant effect.

Page 6: Gliclazide

Gliclazidc: A Preliminary Review 306

8

7~oE.s

6 .9ecQlo

5 goo!en

4 ~s:o

"'Een

"'0::

----

84

....__-------L.... ................... ............. .......---- .......

o

...---11----....- -------

.... - - - -II Gliclazide (n = 13)

o 0 Chlorpropamide (n = 13)

1.58

"'Een

"'0:: 0.45 '-------.......-------'------"'-------...-4Time (months)

1.36~oE.s.Q 1.13

ecQlo5 0.90oQl:gQ;o>-0> 068'S

Fig. 3. Plasma cholesterol and triglyceride changes in 26 patients treated for a 3-month period with either gliclazide (mean dose 273

mg/day) or chlorpropamide (352 mg/day) [after Asmal et aI., 1980].

decreases in both plasma cholesterol (240 to 225mg/dl) and triglyceride (236 to 175 mgjdl) levelswere found in diabetics on gliclazide therapy byVilliger(1982), whilst studies by Radic et al. (1980),Fukui et al. (1982) and Asmal et al. (1980; table I)reported significant decreases in cholesterol levelsalone (2.59 to 2.3 g/dl and 5.2 to 4.33 mmol/L),

GlOlc'" 20s:0

~~ 10(/)

u·0

'" 0>..t:~ -10Q)

~

'" -20E(/)

'"0:: -30

Base 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 gTime (hours)

Fig. 4. Mean percentage changes in free fatty acids after pla­

cebo (t.-t.) , tolbutamide 500mg (0----0) and gliclaz ide 80

(0-0) and 160mg (.-11) [after Strata et aI., 1980] .

Two other studies reported no significant changein either cholesterol or triglyceride concentrations(Lagrue and Riveline, 1980; Stephan et aI., 1980)[table I]. Berber and Tomkin (1982) noted an in­crease in high density lipoprotein cholesterol inpatients receiving gliclazide 160mg daily, and tol­butamide 1.5g daily (increased from 1.24 to 1.72mmol/L and 1.42 to 1.68 mrnol/L, respectively) butonly the increase caused by gliclazide was statis­tically significant. However, total cholesterol andtriglyceride levels showed no significant alterationwith either drug. No consistent alterations oc­curred in plasma cholesterol or triglyceride levelsin a 3-month study of patients receiving eitherchlorpropamide 352 mg/day or gliclazide 273 mgjday (fig. 3; Asmal et aI., 1980). Similarly , neitherglipizide nor gliclazide significantly altered bloodlipids including cholesterol and triglycerides duringa 3-month treatment period (Strata et aI., 1980).Since only the mean values for the levels of chol­esterol and triglycerides are quoted in these studiesit is not possible to determine whether thosepatients with elevated pretreatment levels experi­enced a greater or lesser response to gliclazide thanthose without elevated pretreatment levels.

Page 7: Gliclazide

Gliclazidc: A Preliminary Review

King et al. (1977) investigated the effect of singledoses of placebo, tolbutamide 500mg, and glicla­zide 80 and 160mg, on levels of free fatty acids inpatients with diabetes (fig. 4). All drugs producedabout a 20 to 25% maximum decrease in free fattyacids, with the peak effect occurring 4 to 5 hoursafter administration.

1.3 Effects on the Blood

The relevance of platelet function, as measuredin the laboratory, to the clinical situation in dia­betes is not yet known (Butterfield, 1980). How­ever. it is known that both microangiopathy andatherosclerosis involve interaction of blood vessel,platelet and plasma factors which may be alteredin diabetes . Elevation of lipids and of coagulationfactors, particularly procoagulant factor VIII andfibrinogen, have been reported in patients withdiabetes, and may playa part in influencing blood

307

rheology. Platelets may influence the developmentof angiopathy by 2 distinct but interrelated prop­erties - adhesion and aggregation (Bloom, 1980).Aggregation and adhesion (in in vitro systems), andcertain of their mediating mechanisms, are re­ported as being increased in diabetes (Colwell etal., 1978). Agents which inhibit or reduce these re­actions or lower the concentrations of the relevantreactants may thus reasonably be postulated to limitthe progression of diabetic or other angiopathies.However, this expectation is subject to the con­straint that some of the platelet changes seen insuch patients may be secondary to the angiopathy(Mustard and Packham, 1977), with consequentincreased platelet turnover and the presence ofyoung reactive platelets .

1.3.1 Effect on Platelet AdhesivenessPlatelet adhesiveness has been shown to be in­

creased in diabetes when measured by a number

Table II. Effect of gliclazide on platelet adhesiveness in patients with diabetes

Reference No. of Dosage Duration Decrease in adhesiveness'patients (mg/day) (months)

Bobillo et at. (1975) 25 Not stated 3 ++ P < 0.001

Dettori (1980) 14 80-240 3 +6 ++ P < 0.02

12 ++ P < 0.001

Jones et al. (1980) 12 80 3 ++ P < 0.025

6 ++ P < 0.001

Nakayama et al. (1979) 30 20-240 22 Maintained at medium to low level

Paton et at, (1981) 11 Adjusted for control 10 ++ P < 0.05b

Radic et al. (1980) 50 80-240 12 ++ Not stated

Shaw et al. (1980) 9 80-320 1 +3 +

Thouverez (1972) 40 20 3 ++ P < 0.00140 ++ (all doses)

80 ++160 ++

Verry et al. (1974) 150 Not stated 3-24 +

Yamada et al. (1977) 9 Not stated 12-24 Maintained at normal to low level

a Retention index measured by method of Salzmann; ++ =significant decrease ; + =apparent decrease (not statistically significant).b Significant at 2 months only.

Page 8: Gliclazide

Gliclazidc: A Preliminary Review

of techniques, including the Salzman glass bead re­tention index method (Colwell et aI., 1978). Intra­venous and oral administration of gliclazide 10 to50 mg/kg in rabbits (Desnoyers et aI., 1972) and100 mg/kg orally in alloxan diabetic rabbits(Kuwashima et al. , 1979), as well as oral admin­istration of 5 to 25 rug/kg/day in dogs, resulted ina marked decrease in the retention index (Desnoy­ers et aI., 1972). Schimizu et al. (1976b) carried outa similar study in animals which confirmed thesefindings with gliclazide, but which also demon­strated that tolbutamide had no effect on plateletadhesiveness. As a result of these early studies, fur­ther investigations of the effects of gliclazide onplatelet adhesiveness in diabetic patients were car­ried out. As can be seen from table II, gliclazide20 to 320 mg/day administered for periods rangingfrom I month to 2 years has in most trials broughtabout a significant decrease in platelet adhesive­ness. However the design of these studies has notdistinguished between an effect due to improve­ment of hyperglycaemia and an effect of the drugper se. In the only comparative study of this type,gliclazide (80 to 240 rug/day) was similar to aspirin(I to 3 g/day) and dipyridamole (150 to 500 mg/day) in inhibiting the adhesiveness of human plate­lets (Deguchi et al., 1978).

1.3.2 Effect on Platelet AggregationIn diabetics there may be increased platelet ag­

gregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP),as indicated by both the primary aggregation re­sponse and the release reaction (Colwell et aI.,1978). Studies in rabbits have demonstrated sig­nificant inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation bygliclazide given as an infusion (3 or 10 rug/kg/minfor 4 to 8 min before administration of ADP), asa single oral dose (30 to 100 mg/kg) or as contin­uous therapy (20 rug/kg) for 7 days . Using the sameroutes of administration, tolbutamide (10 to 30 mg/kg/min, as an infusion; 50 to 150 mg/kg as a singledose; and 100 rug/kg as continuous oral therapy)had no effect on aggregation (Desnoyers and Saint­Dizier, 1980; Schimizu et aI., 1976b). Kuwashimaet al. (1979) reported a significant reduction inplatelet aggregation induced by collagen (2 Ilg/ml)

308

in alloxan diabetic rabbits given gliclazide 100 mg/kg orally for 4 weeks compared to a diabetic con­trol group. Similarly, Arfors and Tangen (1977) re­ported marked and highly significant inhibition ofADP-induced platelet aggregation of human plate­lets in vitro, using gliclazide concentrations of I and2 mg/rnl.

However, studies in diabetics have been lessconclusive (table III), and the variability of find­ings in such studies prevent meaningful conclu­sions. Only 3 trials have reported a significant de­crease in ADP-induced platelet aggregation forgliclazide at some stage in the trial (Chan et aI.,1982; Dettori, 1980; Violi et al., 1982), whilst othershave reported only a tendency toward inhibition(Kato et al. , 1976; Yamada et aI., 1977) or no effectat all. In a comparative study, both glibenclamide5 to 10mg and gliclazide 80 to 240mg resulted ina return to normal in the aggregation values pro­duced by ADP I umol/L, In this study, gliclazidehad no effect on aggregation induced by higherconcentrations (10 and 100 umol/L) of ADP, col­lagen or adrenaline, while glibenclamide signifi­cantly decreased the aggregation induced by col­lagen (750 Ilg/ml) and adrenaline (10 urnol/L) [Klaffet al., 1979]. In contrast, Chan et al. (1982) re­ported a significant decrease in ADP-inducedplatelet aggregation in patients receiving gliclazidebut not in those receiving glibenclamide.

1.3.3 Effect on Platelet MetabolismStudies on platelet metabolism have examined

the thromboxane metabolic pathway and levels of.B-thromboglobulin, which are believed to reflect thelevel of platelet activity (Tsuboi et aI., 1981; Violiet aI., 1982). Only one significant finding of a de­creased level of .B-thromboglobulin (33%) in dia­betic patients receiving gliclazide 80 to 160mg overa 30-day period has been reported (Violi et al .,1982). Tsuboi's investigation of the effect of glicla­zide on prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesisin guinea-pig platelets revealed an in vitro and exvivo inhibition of arachidonate release from plate­let phospholipids. Gliclazide has induced a de­crease in the heavy (large and very metabolicallyactive) populations of platelets C and D frequently

Page 9: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review 309

Table III. Effect of gliclazide (GI) and some other sulphonylureas on platelet aggregat ion in blood of diabetic patients

Reference No. of Dosage Duration Method of stimulating Inhibition of aggregation· ·b

patients (mg/day) (months) aggregationADP adrenaline collagen

Non-comperetiv« trials

Dettor i (1980) 14 80-240 3 ADP 1 " g/ml + + + +

6 Adrenaline 5 " g/ml + + ++12 ++ ++

Shaw et al. (1980) 4 80-320 ADP 1, 2.5, 5 "g/ml +

Verry et al. (1974) 150 Not stated 3-24 Collagen

Violi et al. (1982) 18 80-160 15 days ADP 1.2 "mol/L +30 days ++

Comparative stud ies

Chan et at, (1982) 35 GI20 ADP 1, 4 "mol/L GI + +

Gb15 Gb ±

King et al. (1977) 12 GI 3 ADP 10 "mol/L GI + +

Gp 3 Collagen 750 " g Gp + +

GI Gb

Klaff et al. (1979) 10 G180-240 ADP 1 " mol/L + +Gb 5-10 10 Ilmol/L ± ±

100 "mol/L ± ±

Collagen 750 Ilg/ml GI ± Gb ++

Adrenaline 1 "mol/L GI ± Gb ±

10 " mol/L ± ++

a Method of evaluation of inhibition of aggregation used in most studies was that of Born (1962).b + + = significant inhibition: + = apparent inhibition (not statist ically significant): ± = no effect.Abbreviations : Gb = glibenclamide: Gp = glipizide (doses not stated): ADP = adenosine diphosphate.

present in diabetic patients, together with an in­crease in light populations B and A (Desnoyers andSaint-Dizier, 1980; Vainer and Verry, 1974). In­terference with platelet synthetic activity whichmainta ins platelet glycogen storage has also beenclaimed (Desnoyers and Saint-Dizier, 1980; Vainerand Verry, 1974), but further studies are requiredto substantiate these initial observations.

1.3.4 Effect on Platelet CoagulantFactorsStudies using blood samples from rabbits showed

that gliclazide 10 to 20 rug/kg intravenously couldproduce from 25 to 55% inhibition of the activa­tion of coagulant factor XI by collagen. Oral

admin istration of 10 to 20 mg/kg resulted in 30 to35%inhibition. Under the same experimental con­ditions, tolbutamide 125 and 250 mg/kg orally andglibenclamide 5 mg/kg orally had no inhibitory ac­tivity. Gliclazide 20 and 40 ~g/ml was associatedwith a significant decrease (63% and 50%, respec­tively) in the activation of 'contact product-form­ing activity' when incubated with human plateletsin the presence of adenosine diphosphate (Des­noyers and Saint-Dizier, 1980).

Animal studies showed decreased levels of fac­tor V and VIII as well as platelet factor 4 afteradministrat ion of gliclazide to rabbits (Hoshiyama1980). Gliclazide (0.1 to 1.0 mmol/L) markedly in­hibited the release of factor VIII from washed hu-

Page 10: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

man platelets (Kajikawa et aI., 1978). Similarly asignificant decrease in factor VIII coagulant activ­ity and factor VIII antigen was found in 10 diabeticpatients given 10 months' treatment with gliclazide(Paton et aI., 1981), though again some of theseeffects may have been due to an effect on bloodglucose levels. Antithrombin III activity remainednormal in 20 diabetics given gliclazide, but showeda significant decrease in 15 diabetics on gliben­clam ide (Chan et aI., 1982).

/.3.5 Effect on Fibrinolytic ActivityVascular plasminogen activator levels are

thought to be decreased in 20% of diabetics. Des­noyers and Saint-Dizier (1980) found that glicla­zide 10 mg/kg given orally to rats significantly in­creased plasminogen activator levels . In diabeticpatients, however, while 6 months' therapy withgliclazide resulted in a trend towards increased lev­els, these changes failed to reach statistical signifi­cance (Chan et aI., 1982). When other oral hypo­glycaemic agents were tested in the rat preparation,tolbutamide 250mg, chlorpropamide 100mg anddimethylbiguanide 500mg all produced apparentincreases in plasminogen activator levels , but againthese changes were not statistically significant(Desnoyers and Saint Dizier 1980). However, Chanet al. (1982) found that 6 months of glibenclamidetherapy in 15 diabetic patients significantly de­creased plasminogen activator levels .

Further animal studies (Arfors and Tangen,1977) reported a significant increase in primary andhaemostatic plug formation time after single dosesof gliclazide 100 rug/kg, as well as after continuousdosing of 25 mg/kg for 7 days in rabbits. Almer(1980) noted a return to normal in the vascularfibrinolytic activity in 6 diabetics over a 6-monthtreatment period with gliclazide, which was stillpresent at follow-up 4 years later (Almer et aI.,1983), whilst Paton et al. (1981) monitoring 10 dia­betics over a 6-month period found no significantalteration of euglobulinysis nor of any of the otherfactors used to assess fibrinolytic activity.

While such studies invite interesting specula­tion. findings have not been conclusive. Thus, theseobservations can only be considered a foundation

310

for further studies involving monitoring offibrinolytic activ ity during gliclazide therapy III

diabetics.

1.3.6 Effect on Prostaglandin 12 FormationAs prostaglandin 12 is a potent inhibitor of

platelet functions produced by vessel walls (Higgset aI., 1978; Moncada et aI., 1976), it has been pos­tulated that the restoration of reduced prostaglan­din 12 formation may prevent the tendency tothrombus formation and microangiopathy in dia­betic patients. Gliclazide (100 to 300 /lg/ml) en­hanced the spontaneous prostaglandin 12 forma­tion in the aorta of guinea-pigs and rats in vitro. Asimilar effect was observed with tolazamide andacetohexamide, but not with chlorpropamide, tol­butamide and glibenclamide. In vivo. oral admin­istration of gliclazide 100 to 300 mg/kg to strep­tozin-diabetic rats restored the reduced formationof prostaglandin 12 (Fujitani et aI., 1983).

1.4 Mechanism of Action

Like other hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas, gli­c1azide appears to act directly on the pancreas toincrease insulin secretion (see section 1.1). Thereis some evidence that changes in calcium transportmay be involved in this action. Thus gliclazide, likeother drugs in its class, has been shown to affectthe movement of calcium in isolated pancreaticislet cells. The stimulant action of gliclazide upon45Ca net uptake, and subsequent insulin release bythe endocrine pancreas, is inhibited by organic cal­cium antagonists, e.g. verapamil. Hypoglycaemicsulphonylureas and organic calcium antagonists alsoexert opposite effects upon A23187-ionophore me­diated calcium translocation in an artificial system.It is postulated that ionophores located in the {3­

cell plasma membrane represent the target for theprimary action of gliclazide upon calcium trans­port into islet cells (Malaisse et aI., 1980), and thatthe mechanism of action could be related to a fa­cilitated transport of cations across the cell plasmamembrane (Deleers et al. , 1983).

While there is some evidence suggesting that gli­clazide may also act at extrapancreatic sites (see

Page 11: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review 311

2.3 Effects on Reproduction

Fig. 5. Plasma concentration of gliclazide in a 'fast' and 'slow'absorber after administrat ion of 80mg on separate occas ions[after Campbell et al. 19801.

48322416

Time (hours)

8

5

4

3

E2Oi

.3cQ

~CQ)oc0o

48'" 8 16 24 32EVI

'"C. 3 'Slow'Q)

"0'N

'":§ 2a

Pregnant mice and rats given gliclazide at da ilydose levels up to 500 and 480 mg/kg orall y, re­spectively, showed no adverse effects on the courseor outcome of pregnancy. However , pregnant rab­bits given doses of 10 to 50 mg/kg orally showedevidence of maternal and embryo toxic ity but noteratogen icity. Fetal tissue drug concentrations inthe mouse were similar to those in the parentalbody mass. Distribution of gliclazide was similarin pregnant and non-pregnant mice. Postnatal de­velopment in rats and mice was unaffected byadministration of gliclazide to the dams through­out the entire gestation period. Gliclazide had noadverse effects on fertility, gestation or postnatal

Single-dose toxicity studies revealed a low orderof acute oral toxicity with few adverse effects ap­parent at dose levels up to 4 g/kg in mice, rats anddogs. Gliclazide at doses of 30 and 100 rug/kgintravenously caused a sustained hypertension anda slight increase in heart rate in cats, whilst urinaryvolume and electrolyte excretion (K+ and CI-) werereduced in rats treated with large doses of glicla­zide (1000 mg/kg orally) . The median lethal oraldose in guinea-pigs was 1599 to 2068 mg/kg . Sub­acute stud ies in dogs revealed a max imum toler­ated dose of 150 mg/kg orally and good toleranceto dose levels up to 100 mg/kg orall y for 3 weeks(unpublished data on file, Servier) .

2. Toxicology2.1 Acute Toxicity Studies

2.2 Chronic Toxicity Studies

section 1.1), further studies are needed to confirmthese prelim inary find ings.

Six months' administration of gliclazide 25, 100or 200 mg/kg orall y to rats revealed no significantchanges in haematological and biological para­meters, or in results of urinal ysis. No tissue changeswere observed. Female rats appeared more suscep­tible to toxicity and showed slight increases in liverenzymes together with slight decreases in eryth­rocyte counts, haematocrit values and haemoglob­ulin concentrations at dosages of 200 mg/kg andhigher. Doses up to 100 mg/kg orally for up to 2months failed to produce any signs of toxicity inguinea-pigs. Similarly, administration of gliclazideat dose levels up to 24 mg/kg orally for 12 monthsor up to 29 mg/kg for 6 months in dogs producedno evidence of toxicity. 12 months of repeated dosesof 20, 60 and 180 mg/kg orall y in the rhesus mon­key failed to reveal any significant toxic effect ofgliclazide on the clinical condition, bodyweight , andfood and fluid intake, or du ring detailed laboratoryinvestigations, ophthalmological examination andcomprehensive histopathological evaluations (un­published data on file, Servier ; Matsuoka et aI.,1980),

Page 12: Gliclazide

Gliclazidc: A Preliminary Review 312

mortality in the first generat ion of rats after dosesup to 200 mg/kg orally (unpublished data on file,Servier ). Similarly , in a published report evenhigher doses (up to 800 mg/kg/day) did not alterfertility of either male or female rats and rabbits,or produce fetal abnormalities, although inhibition

3.0

E0;

2.5..=,c0

~C 2.0Q)oc0o

1.5Ql"0'Nto~ 1.0e;,toEU>to 0.51l:

of weight gain was noted with higher doses (Ka­wanishi et al., 1981 ).

3. Pharmacokinetic Studies3.1 Absorption

Gliclazide has been well absorbed in animalstudies in several species, consistentl y reaching peakplasma levels within 2 to 3 hours (Campbell et aI.,1980; Miyazaki et al., 1983). In a stud y in healthyvolunteers, 7 subjects attained mean maximum gli­clazide plasma concentrations of 3.9 gil within 4hours of an 80mg dose, whilst 6 subjects attaineda lower peak concentration of 2.8 gil, which wasdelayed for up to a further 4 hours (Campbell etal., 1980) [fig. 5]. However, it is not clear whetherthis represents different rates of absorption , orwhether it is due to differences in the rates of me­tabolism of the drug. In another study in 6 healthysubjects, peak plasma concentrations occurredwithin 2 to 4 hours after administration of glicla­zide 40mg, although a secondary increase in plasmaconcentration occurred in I subject 10 hours afteradm inistration (Kobayashi et aI., 1981; fig. 6).Plasma concentration-time curves for a single doseof gliclazide were found to have a similar profilein healthy subjects and diabetic patients , bearingin mind the different doses adm inistered (fig. 6a).Oral administrat ion of gliclazide 80 rug/day for 7days resulted in a slightly longer time to maximumconcentration with the last dose administered, to­gether with an increased maximum plasma con­centration and area under the curve from 0 to 24hours (table IV; fig. 6b) [Kobayashi et aI., 1981].

Peak plasma levels were significantly lower andoccurred significantly later, with overall absorptionbeing decreased by 20% in a group of 5 elderly fe­males (mean age 77 years) compared with a groupof 5 younger females (mean age 26 years) [Foretteet al., 1982].

24

241234 6 10

1 2 4 6 8 12

Time after admin istration (hours)

3.5

8

7

6

5

4

3

21

E0;..=,c.Q'§CQlUCooQ)"0'Nto:§e;,toEU>to1l:

b

a

Fig. 6. (a) Plasma concentration-time curves for gliclazide in 6heal thy sub jects given a single 40mg dose (after Kobayashi et

al., 1981).

(b) Plasma concentration-time curves for 7 diabetic patients who

took a single dose of gliclazide 80mg (e-e). and for the last

dose in 4 patients who were administered gliclazide 80 mg/dayfor 7 days (0 - 0).

3.2 Distribut ion

The volume of distribution of gliclazide inhealthy and diabetic subjects was 15.9 to 17.4L(Kobayashi et al., 1981 ), or 20 to 40% of body-

Page 13: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review 313

Table IV. Some pharmacok inetic parameters for gliclazide after oral administration

Reference Number and type Duration Dose Cp malit Tmax AUCO_24 Vd tYa,1

of subject of study (I'g/ml) (h) (I'g/ml · h) (h)

Campbell et al. 7 healthy 1 dose 80mg 3.9 4(1980) ' 6 healthy 1 dose 80mg 2.8 4-8

4 healthy Not 3 mg/kg 36.3% of 10.4stated bodyweight

23 healthy 3 days 80mg 0.7-4.9144 diabetic 80mg 0.3-8.2

Kobayashi et al. 12 healthy 1 dose 40mg 2.8 2.8 37.2 17.4L 12.3(1981) 7 diabetic 7 days. 80mg 6.8 2.3 72 16L 12.6

4/7 diabetic 80mg 7.6 3.0 91.4 15.9L 12.3

Abbreviations: Cp max = maximum plasma concentration; Tmax = time to maximum plasma concentration; AUCO_24 = area underplasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours ; Vd = volume of distribution; tv." = elimination half-life .

weight (Campbel1 et al., 1980)[table IV], there beinglarge intersubject variations. The volume of dis­tribution was found to increase with age, values ofaround 24L being found in elderly patients (Foretteet aI., 1982). These relati vely low values suggestonly limited tissue distribution, which could in partbe explained by the extent of protein binding. In15 healthy volunteers, gliclazide, in common withother sulphonylureas, was extensively bound (85 to97%) to plasma protein, but again there was a con­siderable variability in the extent of binding be­tween individuals (Campbel1 et aI., 1980). Koba y­ashi et al. (1981) exam ined the distribution ofgliclazide-bound blood proteins in 2 healthy sub­jects, and reported that fractionated serum proteinsof macroglobul in (M), "Y-globulin (lgG), albuminand smal1 molecular substances contained glicla­zide at an average of 3.7,0.7,82.3 and 13.2%, re­spectively, during the 24 hours after administra­tion.

Benakis and Glasson (1980), using carbonyl 14C_gliclazide 15 rng/kg and whole body autoradio­graphy in the rat, showed a rapid and high degreeoflocalisation of radioacti vity in the liver and kid­neys. The drug and its metabolites were identifiedin 15 organs and tissues such as pancreas, adrenalglands, lung, intestine, muscle and skin tissue. Smal1quantities were found in the brain and eye. Similar

results were found by Miyazaki et al. (1983) afteradministrat ion of 3H-gliclazide 10 rug/kg to rats .

3.3 Eliminat ion

3.3.1 MetabolismExamination of radioactive metabolic products

of gliclazide in urine and plasma after administra­tion of label1ed drug has led to proposals for themajor metabol ic pathways in man. As with othersulphonylureas, gliclazide is oxidised to produceeither hydroxylated metabolites or N-oxygenatedcompounds, and the corresponding alcohol andcarboxylic acid. Gliclazide is extens ively metab­olised, less than 20% of the dose being excretedunchanged in the urine. However, in plasma, gli­clazide represents over 90% of all drug-related ma­terial, the most important metabolite (an N-oxy­genated derivative) being present only to the extentof I%. Th is metabol ite has not demonstrated anyhypoglycaemic action but claims have been madethat it possesses effects on platelet aggregation andmicrothrombi format ion. The othe r metabol itesseen in urine are only present in trace quantities(less than 20 ng/m l) in plasma. The extensive pro­tein binding of gliclazide and its lipid solubil ity,which would inhibit glomerular filtration as wellas enhancing reabsorption offiltered material from

Page 14: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review 314

the tubules, might help explain the extreme differ­ences between the amounts of gliclazide found inplasma and urine (Campbell et aI., 1980).

carbutamide, chlorpropamide and metahexamide(25 to 50 hours). Mean elimination half-life in­creases with age (20.5 hours) in the elderly subject(Forette et aI., 1982).

3.4 Plasma Concentration and Clinical Effects

t Meals

4 8 12 16 20 24

Time (hours)

0-----0----U p' ----------0 40mg

''0 ' 80mg

",. - - -I ' ~,

I"I ' -- 80mg

I ---I ---- 40mg

4 8 12 16 20 24Q)

en 1108::l 1000> 90~ '680~ c; 700:: .s 60

'-'----,r-'----r----'--,--,---,---r-

Fig.7. Relationship between the estimated curve for plasma gli­clazide concentrat ion and plasma glucose concentration in

healthy subjects (each plot represents the mean value aftersingle-dose oral administration for 3 volunteers) [after Sada­yoshi et aI., 1982).

c:o~ 4CQ)oc: 38OJ't:l'N 2'":§0>",_1EEen _"'0>0:: 3 0

A study in healthy volunteers fasted overnightbefore being given gliclazide 80mg demonstrated amaximum reduction in plasma glucose levels (20%)at 2 hours (Campbell et aI., 1980). Glucose con­centrations returned to control values 4 to 6 hoursafter administration, but ingestion of a meal at 4hours made analysis of the data more difficult. Nocorrelation between percentage drop in glucose andgliclazide plasma concentrations was shown to ex­ist over the whole 24-hour period , but if only theconcentrations from 0 to 4 hours were consideredthen the correlation was significant. There ap­peared to be a 'threshold' gliclazide concentrationof 0.25 gIL required for hypoglycaemic action . Sa-

3.3.2 ExcretionStudies with 14C-gliclazide in animals and man

have reported 60 to 70% of the dose to be excretedin the urine and 10 to 20% in the faeces (Campbellet aI., 1980; Miyazaki et aI., 1983). Elimination inhuman faeces was slower than with other species,activity still being present in the 96-hour collectionperiod (Campbell et aI., 1980). The extent of pro­tein binding in man would hinder the glomerularfiltration process, whilst gliclazide lipid solubilitywould enhance reabsorption from the tubules. Thesame value for plasma clearance (13.5 ml/min) wasfound in a group of elderly subjects (mean age 77years) as in a group of younger subjects (mean age26 years) [Forette et aI., 1982].

Rats given 14C-gliclazide 10 mg/kg intraven­ously demonstrated a maximum concentration inthe bile after 2 to 5 hours, and during the 8-hourmonitoring period 20% of the dose was circulatingin the bile (Benakis and Glasson , 1980). Similarly ,biliary excretion of radioactivity amounted to 40%of the dose of 3H-gliclazide 10 mg/kg given to rats(Miyazaki et aI., 1983). Since the radioactivity inhuman faeces after administration of labelled drugis not thought to be due to unchanged drug, it ispostulated that biliary excretion also takes place inman (Campbell et aI., 1980).

3.3.3 Half-LifePlasma concentrations of gliclazide in healthy

subjects and diabetic patients have been shown todecline exponentially as a single phase [Campbellet aI., 1980; Kobayashi et aI., 1981; Sadayoshi etal., 1982]. Campbell et al. (1980) reported consid­erable variation in the elimination half-lives (6.1to 14.3 hours), with healthy male subjects havinga significantly shorter mean half-life (8 hours) com­pared with females (11 hours). Gliclazide is there­fore eliminated in man at an intermediate ratecompared with other sulphonylureas, not as rap­idly as tolbutamide, glibenclamide or tolazamide(half-lives 4 to 9 hours) , but faster than occurs with

Page 15: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

dayoshi et al. (1982) reported a significant 'mirrorimage' relationship between glucose blood concen­trations and plasma concentrations of the drug in3 healthy volunteers (fig. 7). Similarly, in a pla­cebo-controlled study, diabetics given gliclazide 40to 240mg as a single dose and a glucose load of 50gat time-zero followed by a meal at 4 hours, dem­onstrated a maximum fall in glucose levels at 2hours, a positive correlation between gliclazideplasma and plasma glucose reduction during theperiod 0 to 4 hours, and a 'threshold' concentrationof glicJazide for hypoglycaemic activity . But in dia­betics this minimum effective concentration washigher (1.5 g/L), possibly reflecting the decreasedsensitivity of the pancreatic tl-cell to respond toglicJazide stimulation (Campbell et al., 1980).

4. Therapeutic Trials

As with other sulphonylureas, the frequency withwhich blood glucose concentrations are well con­trolled by glicJazide may be influenced by severalfactors; for example, the quality of response to pre­vious oral hypoglycaemicdrugs, the duration of thediabetes, and whether or not patients have beentreated previously. Many trials have documentedpatients' previous therapy and the duration of thediabetes, but few have related these factors to bloodglucosecontrol on gliclazide (Baba et al., 1983; Fu­kui et al., 1976; Plauchu and Pousset, 1972).

4.1 Open Studies

Many workers have recorded an overall signifi­cant decrease in blood sugar concentrations duringopen trials with glicJazide (Bodansky et al., 1982;Brogard et al., 1982; Gibson et al., 1982; Iunes etal., 1983; Lagrue and Riveline, 1980; Lesbre andCanicave, 1977; Medbak et al., 1980; Mukaino etal., 1977; Paton et al., 1980; Ponari et al., 1979;Rubinjoni et al., 1978; Sakamoto et al., 1976; Wai­ters and McCarthy, 1980). Others, on the basis ofvarying criteria, have evaluated gliclazide therapyas producing 'satisfactory' control of hyperglycae­mia in 60 to 100% of patients with maturity onsetdiabetes mellitus (Cabezas-Cerrato and Fernandez-

315

Cruz, 1975;Canivet, 1972; Fukui et al., 1976; Na­kayama et al., 1979; Oli, 1980; Sadayoshi et al.,1982; Strata et al., 1980; Villegas Cinco and Fer­nando, 1978) [table V]. The dosage of gliclazide insuch studies has ranged from 40 to 320mg daily,but 80 to 240mg has been sufficient in mostpatients. In addition to those studies tabulated,several others reported a decrease in glycosylatedhaemoglobin during treatment with gliclazide(Gibson et al., 1983;Guillausseau et al., 1983; Jad­zinski et al., 1983).

In a 6-month study (Charbonnel , 1980) involv­ing 156 patients who had not been previouslytreated with hypoglycaemic agents, both the meanfasting and postprandial blood sugar levels fell sig­nificantly 2.05 to 1.17 and 2,48 to 1.43 g/L, re­spectively). Patients previously treated with sul­phonylureas (114) and biguanides (29) alone alsoexperienced significant decreases in fasting andpostprandial blood sugar levels on gliclazide com­pared with previous therapy, but those previouslytaking a combination of sulphonylurea and big­uanide did not develop a significant improvementin blood sugar control during gliclazide therapy .Thus, in this as in other studies (Fukui et al., 1976;Plauchu and Pousset, 1972), the percentage de­creases in blood sugar levels were much greater inthe previously untreated patients (43%)when com­pared with those previously treated with suiphon­ylureas (9.6%), biguanides (18.4%) or combinationtherapy (3.6%). In a large multicentre study (Strataet aI., 1980) involving patients previously treatedwith oral hypoglycaemic agents and in a few caseswith insulin, together with previously untreatedpatients, gliclazide was able to establish control ofblood glucosebelow a level of J.3g/L (fasting bloodsugar) in 45 to 77% of diabetics.

4.2 Controlled Trials (Table VI)

4.2.1 Gliclazide Compared with TolbutamideA 3-month study was conducted by Berber and

Tomk in (1982) on 12 insulin-dependent diabetics ,6 of whom received glicJazide 160mg daily in ad­dition to their insulin therapy . Mean fasting bloodsugar levels in the glicJazide group increased slightly

Page 16: Gliclazide

Gliclazidc: A Preliminary Review

from 10 to 11 .2 mmol/L whilst in the insulin-onlygroup fasting blood sugar decreased from 12 to 7.1mmol/L, Clearly, gliclazide therapy had no bene­ficial effect in these insulin-dependent diabetics. Inthe same study, 6 maturity onset insulin-inde­pendent diabetics received gliclazide 160mg dailyand another 6 were given tolbutamide 1.5g dailyfor the duration of the trial. Mean fasting bloodsugar levels fell significantly (7.4 to 4.95 mmol/L)in the tolbutamide group, but the fall in the glicla­zide group did not reach statistical significance (7.6to 6.0 mmol/L) ,

4.2.2 G/ic/azide Compared with G/ibenc/amideSeveral studies involving comparisons of glicla­

zide therapy with that of glibenclamide found nosignificant difference in the quality of blood sugarcontrol produced by the 2 drugs (table VI). Onlyone study (Balabolkin et aI., 1983), reported a sig­nificantly greater decrease in blood glucose levelswith gliclazide compared with treatment with gli­benclamide after 2 months' therapy. Fagerberg andGamstedt (1980) found no differences in fastingblood glucose levels or 2-hour postprandial levelsafter I, 6 and 12 months of therapy. They con­cluded that their 16 maturity onset non-insulin-de­pendent diabetics previously controlled on gliben­clamide could be equally well controlled withglicazide in equipotent dosages. Klaff et al. (1979),studying 10 newly diagnosed maturity onset dia­betics, reported a significant lowering of postpran­dial blood glucose levels after both glibenclamide(12.2 to 9.3 mmol/L) and gliclazide (12.2 to 7.8mmol/L) were added to their diet, and the differ­ence between the groups was not significant. Thelarger double-blind multicentre trial by Baba et al.(1983) involving 277 patients also found no sig­nificant difference in control of fasting blood sugarlevels by both drugs. Gliclazide produced goodcontrol (fasting blood sugar l.l to 1.39 gIL) in 49%of patients whilst glibenclamide did the same in51%.

4.2.3 Glic/azide Compared withChlorpropamideIn 26.maturity onset diabetics, 3 months' therapy

316

with either gliclazide or chlorpropamide resulted insignificant decreases in mean fasting blood glucoselevels when compared with pretreatment levels.However, once again the difference in degree ofcontrol effected by the 2 drugs was not significant.The dosage of chlorpropamide (352 rug/day) wasgreater than that of gliclazide (273 mg/day) at allintervals during the study period. Considering thepercentage reduction of pre-therapy blood glucoselevels, I of the 13 patients on chlorpropamideachieved a greater than 50% reduction, with 3 inthe range 30 to 50%, while none of the 13 gliclazidepatients achieved greater than 50% reduction, Ishowed a response in the range 30 to 50%, and themajority (9 patients) fell in the 10 to 30% range(Asmal et aI., 1980) [fig. 8].

When substituted for acetohexamide or chlor­propamide in 17 patients , gliclazide in daily dosesranging from 160 to 240mg was shown to producea significantly better degree of diabetic control. 64%of patients achieved a superior degree (reductionin blood glucose exceeding 2.0 gIL) of control offasting blood glucose, with 79%also showing a su­perior reduction in postprandial blood glucose lev­els. The efficacy of gliclazide was maintained overthe 9-month study period (unpublished report onfile, Servier).

4.2.4 G/ic/azide Compared with Various OtherOral Hypoglycaemic AgentsGliclazide has been found to be both at least as

effective (Cabral et aI., 1982; Regnault, 1980) andmore effective (Kosaka et aI., 1983b) than otheroral hypoglycaemic agents in maintaining bloodsugar control. No significant difference in thechanges in fasting blood sugar was seen betweenthe patients receiving gliclazide (alone or in com­bination with a biguanide or insulin) and a 'controlgroup' (taking another sulphonylurea, alone or incombination with a biguanide or insulin alone) ina study of 140 maturity onset diabetics over an 18­month period (Regnault, 1980) [table VI]. Patientsreceiving gliclazide (80 rug/day) over a 2-year pe­riod had better control offasting blood sugar levelsthan a similar group of patients who received othersulphonylurea therapy over the same period. Con-

Page 17: Gliclazide

Tab

leV

.S

ome

open

stud

ies

ofgl

icla

zid

ein

patie

nts

with

mat

urity

onse

td

iabe

tes

me

llitu

so ;:S

'

Ref

eren

ceN

umbe

ran

dD

osag

eD

urat

ion

Res

pons

e(%

ofpa

tien

ts)

Crit

eria

for

resp

on

see;- N 0:

type

of(m

g/da

y)(m

onth

s)ex

celle

ntgo

odfa

ir(f

ast

ing

bloo

dsu

gar)

!1pa

tien

tsp

oo

r);

> "tl

Cab

ezas

-Cer

rato

and

803-

639

4015

Exc

elle

nt<

1.2

gIL

2F

erna

ndez

Cru

zG

ood

<1.

4gI

L3'

(197

5)P

oor

<1.

5gI

L::s ., ..,

Fai

lure

>1

.5gI

L(6

%of

pts)

'< ~

Can

ivet

42(P

T)

80-3

201-

863

1720

Goo

d<

1.5

gIL

'"-<(1

972)

9(N

PT

)F

air

1.5-

2.0

gIL

iii'

l;:P

oor

>20

0mg

Fuk

uiet

at.

3240

-240

6-12

6816

16G

ood

<1.

4gI

L(1

976)

Fai

r1.

4-1

.7gI

LP

oor

>1.

7gI

L

Nak

ayam

aet

al.

3020

-240

12-3

063

20N

otst

ated

(197

9)

ali

(198

0)21

80-3

209

3833

9.5

Exc

elle

nt<

7.2

mm

ol/L

(RB

S)

Goo

d7

.2-8

.3m

mol

/LF

air

8.3

-10

mm

ol/L

Pla

uchu

and

Pou

sset

23(P

T)

160

Not

stat

ed47

2621

No

tst

ated

(197

2)9

(NP

T)

4444

Sad

ayos

hi

etal

.(1

982)

4120

-240

12-6

053

24N

otst

ated

Sha

wet

al.

(198

0)50

(NP

T)

80-3

202-

2246

1618

20E

xce

llen

t<

7.5

rnrn

olrt

,(P

PS

)G

ood

<8

.5m

mo

l/L

Fai

r<

10rn

mol

/t,P

oor

>10

rnm

oljt

,

Str

ata

etal

.(1

980)

d20

(PT

):22

(NP

T)

160-

240

1-6

4547

8E

xce

llen

t<

1.3

gIL

30(P

T):

1(N

PT

)80

-240

Not

stat

ed77

176

Goo

d1.

3-1.

7gI

L11

(PT

);21

(NP

T)

40-2

406-

1275

916

Poo

r>

1.7

gIL

37(P

T);

16(N

PT

)40

-240

32-4

453

425

14(P

T):

23(N

PT

)80

-240

1-38

6722

11

Vill

egas

-Cin

coan

d17

(PT

)80

-240

2-3

7426

Goo

d<

1.1

gIL

Fern

ando

(197

8)34

(NP

T)

Fai

r<

1.3

gIL

aM

ultic

entr

est

udy.

Res

ults

show

nar

efr

om

the

indi

vid

ual

cent

res

.A

bbre

viat

ions

:P

T=

prev

ious

lytr

ea

ted

;N

PT

=no

tpr

evio

usly

trea

ted

:R

BS

=ra

ndo

mbl

ood

suga

r;P

PS

=p

ost

pra

nd

ial

bloo

dsu

gar.

I:: .....

.

Page 18: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

trol in both these groups was not as good as thatproduced in the group treated by diet alone, butthe severity of diabetes in these patients would havebeen much less than in the dru g-treated groups(Kosaka et aI., 1983b).

4.3 Studies in Patients with DiabeticRetinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy has a variable natu ral his­tory. In order to study the evolution oflesions andthe effects of any therapeutic intervention, qua n­titative evaluatio n is important. There are a nu m­ber of methods available. Photographic grading willon ly indicate major changes, while point countingmethods are valid and repeatable but time con­suming. Fluorescein angiograms are most accuratein early and mild retinopathy, and vitreous fluo­rescence gives an accurate numerical value .

Treatment of diabetic retinopathy has consistedof correcting only I of the many factors involvedin its development - that of dist urbed glucose me­tabolism . Correction of haemobiological abnor-

14

12!:......-:~------

~ 10'0E.s

318

malities (such as increased blood viscosity, agglu­tination of the red cells or formation of plateletaggregates which constitute intracapillary micro­thrombi) has yet to be addressed .

Examinati on of serial photographs taken duringthe passage of fluorescein through the retina innormal or pancreatomised dogs revealed a protec­tive effect of gliclazide (10 rug/kg intravenously)against capillary obstruction induced by a constantadenine diphosphate infusion (Duhau lt et aI., 1980).This finding, together with its already demon­strated effects on platelets, has led to studies of gli­clazide in patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Several auth ors (Canivet, 1972; Fukui et aI.,1976; Plauchu and Pousset, 1972) reported no sig­nificant change in fundoscopic or other examina­tions of the eye during 'open' treat ment with gli­clazide, but the period of treatment (maximum of12 months) was too short to conclude that the drughad prevented the development or progression ofdiabetic retinopathy. A longer open stud y reportedstabilit y in the progress of the disease in 47 of the60 eyes examined, whilst II of the 13 with reti-

* p < 0.023

'""'-..(>-_----u *

c 8Q~C

400Q) 40 C>c0 .s0 300Q) Q)III III0 00 2 200 -c:::l en0> :::lt'Cl 100 0E'"t'Cl

0n: 0- 4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Time (weeks)

Fig. 8. Mean blood glucose concentrations during administration 01gliclazide (e and . ) or chlorpropamide (0 and 0 ) in 26 diabetics(alter Asmal et al.. 1979).

Page 19: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

Table VI. some controlled trials of gliclazide in patients with maturity onset diabetes

Reference Design Number of Drug and dosage" Duration Resultsb

patients (mg/day) (months) (quality of control offasting blood sugar)

Glic/azide compared with various other oral hypoglycaemic drugs

Cabral et al. (1982) non-blind G 19 40-160 37 Gliclazide group =

14 Control group 'control" group

Kosaka et al. db G 81 G 80 24 Diet ~G ~5

(1983a.b) 5116 578 diet Diet alone

Regnault (1980) db 140 Gliclazide group 18.5 Gliclazide group =

(G. G + B. G + I) 'control' group

'Control' group

(5.5+ B.I)

G/ic/azide compared with tolbutamide

Berber and Tomkin 6c G 160 + I 3 G < I(1982) 6c I

6 G 160 + diet6 T 1.5g + diet T >G

Glic/azide compared with glibenc lamideBaba et al. (1983) db Gb 131 Gb 2.5-10 6 Gb = G

multicentre G 146 G 40-160

Balabolkin et al. Gb 20 Not stated 6·8 weeks G > Gb

(1983) G 27

Fagerberg and co 16 Gb 2.5-15 6 up to 12 Gb = GGamstedt (1980) G 120·400

Klatt et at, (1979) co 10 Gb 5-10 4-6 weeks on Gb = Gd

G 80-240 each drug

Minami et al. (1981) Not stated G 12 G 40-120 36 Gb = G

Gb 13 Gb 2.5-7.5

Gliclazide compared with chlorpropamide

Asmal et al. (1980) 1 month washout 26 G 273 mean 3 G=Cthen ra C 352 mean

Unpublished report co 17 G 80·240 5-9 G >Con file. 5ervier 14 C 250 G >A

3 A 500

319

a Dosage was adjusted to obtain optimum contro l of blood sugar unless otherwise stated.

b > significantly better control of blood sugar; ~ better control of blood glucose; = equivalent control; < significantly poorer controlof blood sugar.

c Insulin-dependent diabetic patients.d Postprandial blood sugar.e Control group were taking other oral hypoglycaemic agents.

Abbreviations: db = double-blind; co = crossover; ra = random allocation; G = gliclazide; B = biguanide; I = insulin; 5 = sulphonylurea;P = placebo; T = tolbutamide; Gb = glibenclamide; C = chlorpropamide; A = acetohexamide.

Page 20: Gliclazide

Gli clazidc: A Preliminary Review 320

Fig. 9. Change in urinary protein excretion before and during

therapy with gliclazide 80mg daily in 10 diabetics with pre-ex­isting constant proteinuria over a 9-month treatment period. The

data points indicate means of all values before treatment andall values during treatment for each patient (after Jones et aI.,1980).

c:.Qa;13xQ)

c'iiioa.~

'"c§

3

2

Beforegliclazide

During

gliclazide

with the control group (19%), after 18 to 32 monthsof therapy. In another small controlled study, ret­inopathy improved or remained stable in 11/12patients receiving g1iclazide 80mg daily for a 3-yearperiod and in 9/13 patients receiving glibenclam­ide 5mg daily (Minami et aI., 1981).

Kosaka et al. (1983c,d), using 3 methods ofevaluation of diabetic retinopathy in a 2-yeardouble-blind trial, found that the results of eval­uation varied with the method employed, furtherillustrating the difficulties inherent in evaluatingthe effects of treatment on this condition. Thus,the rate of worsening of retinopathy was lower inthe gliclazide group (109 assessments) than in agroup receiving other sulphonylureas (177 assess­ments), or in a group treated with diet alone (120assessments) when estimated according to the se­verity of the disease, whereas no difference existedamong the groups when evaluation was by a pairedcomparison method. However , the rate of wors­ening of retinopathy as estimated by ranking ofphotofluorographic findings was higher in the gli­clazide group.

4.4 Studies in Patients with DiabeticNephropathy

nopathy present at entry into the trial did not ex­perience a deterioration of the disease over the 2.5­year monitoring period (Lesbre et aI., 1977). Sev­eral recent controlled studies, some against othersulphonylureas, using multiple methods of assess­ment (e.g. retinopathy and fluorescein angio­graphy) suggest a lesser progression of retinopathywith gliclazide in the short term (6 months) [Babaet aI., 1983; Chan et aI., 1982], and medium term(Cabral et aI., 1982; Charbonnel et aI., 1977; Ko­saka et al., 1983; Lesbre and Canicave, 1977; Min­ami et aI., 1981 ; Regnault et aI., 1980). Charbonnel(1977) reported a significantly lower rate of de­terioration in the gliclazide group (24%) comparedwith a control group receiving other hypoglycaem­ics (55%), as well as a significantly greater numberof gliclazide patients (43%) showing an impro ve­ment in the status of their retinopathy compared

Diabetic nephropathy is a serious disorder car­rying a high mortality. The earliest clinical indi­cation is interm ittent proteinuria, which later be­comes continuous and gradually increases inamount. Decline of renal function may not occurfor several years, but once it begins, end-stage renalfailure may occur rapidly. Gliclazide has not yetbeen studied widely in renal patients, initial studieshave been in patients with type I diabetes mellitus,but, since it is extensively metabolised and the me­tabolites have not shown any hypoglycaemic activ ­ity, it may be an appropriate choice if an oral hypo­glycaemic drug is to be used in diabetic patientswith proteinuria or other early indications of renaldysfunction.

Mean urinary prote in excretion in 12 diabeticswith pre-existing constant proteinuria was not sig­nificantly altered during 9 months of treatm ent withgliclazide 80mg daily (Jones et aI., 1980) [fig. 9].

Page 21: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

Similarly, in 15 patients with pre-existing mild pro­teinuria « 3g every 24 hours), who received gli­c1azide 80 to 240mg daily for 24 months, a sig­nificant reduction in proteinuria occurred (p <0.0I), whilst in those with higher levels of protein­uria no significant worsening was observed duringthe treatment period (Lagrue and Riveline , 1980).

5. Side Effects

At dosages used in the treatment of maturityonset diabetes mel1itus, gliclazide is well toleratedby the majority of patients. The most frequentlyreported side effects have been gastrointestinal up­set, such as abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting,dizziness, skin reactions , and symptoms of hypo­glycaemia which in most cases have been the resultof overdosage or inadequate diet rather than an ad­verse effect of the drug.

Of 727 patients included in studies of metabolicand haemodynamic effects (unpublished data onfile, Servier), adverse effects occurred in 7.6% ofpatients. Gastrointestinal disturbances accountedfor 1.7% of adverse effects and necessitated with­drawal in 5 cases, while skin reactions occurred in0.7% of patients and required withdrawal in 3 cases.

9

8

7

6

</l 5EQl 4iiia.'0 3;;;

2DE:JZ 1

+20 + 15 + 10 +5 0 -5 - 10 - 15 - 20

Fig. 10. Distribution of percentage change in weight after 1 year

of gliclazide therapy in 50 diabetics (0 = females; • = males)[after Radic et aI., 1980).

321

5.1 Hypoglycaemia

Symptoms of hypoglycaemia have been re­ported by several investigators (Charbonnel, 1980;Forette, 1977; Lagrue and Riveline, 1980; Masber­nard and Portal, 1972; Shaw et aI., 1980; Villegas­Cinco and Fernando , 1978; unpublished data onfile, Servier). Of the 727 patients included in stud­ies of metabolic and haemodynamic effects (un­published data on file, Servier), hypoglycaemia or'apparent hypoglycaemia' occurred in 5.2% (38) ofpatients, but in most cases was corrected by dosagereduction. Only 3 patients required termination ofthe drug due to hypoglycaemia.

5.2 Weight Change

Most studies reported no significant overallchange in weight of patients whilst taking g1iclazide(Asmal et aI., 1980; Baba et aI., 1983; Bodansky etaI., 1982; King et aI., 1977; Lagrue and Riveline ,1980; Lesbre and Canicave, 1977; Stephan et aI.,1980). However, some authors (Almer et aI., 1983;Charbonnel , 1980; Donnet et aI., 1982; Forette ,1977; Oli, 1980) have reported a significant weightloss in obese patients after treatment with g1icla­zide for periods from 6 months to 4 years. Normalweight patients did not experience a significantchange in weight (Charbonnel , 1980), whilst thosebelow average were shown to gain weight after 10months of gliclazide therapy (Forette, 1977). Thedistribution of percentage change in weight after Iyear of gliclazide treatment in 50 diabetics is shownin figure 10.

5.3 Laboratory Test Abnormalities

Apart from I or 2 isolated cases of raised con­centrations of AST and/or ALT (Asmal et aI., 1980;Masbernard and Portal , 1972) no significant alter­ation of hepatic function has been reported. Bloodurea nitrogen levels have been reported to be bothincreased (Villegas-Cinco and Fernando, 1978) anddecreased (unpublished data on file, Servier). Sim­ilarly, both significant increases and significant de­creases in eosinophils have been documented as

Page 22: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

well as decreased red and white blood cell countsin different trials (Baba et al., 1983; unpublisheddata on file, Servier). However, the clinical im­portance of these changes is questionable as theyhave not yet been supported by other studies . It isbelieved that in some of the studies the haemato­logical values were distorted on entry into the trialby subjects with unusually high or low counts, sothe significant changes brought the values to withinthe normal range of these subjects. Gliclazide wasshown to have no effect on thyroid function in 15diabet ic patients given 160mg for 6 months (Tour­niaire and Orgiazzi, 1980).

6. Drug Interactions

Although drug interactions with gliclazide havenot been systematically studied, many drugs havebeen co-administered without the need to altertherapy (Campbell et al., 1980; Charbonnel, 1980).As gliclazide is highly protein bound and has arelatively small volume of distribution, drugs thatdisplace gliclazide from its binding sites on plasmaprotein may temporarily increase the concentra­tion of unbound drug and theoretically could causehypoglycaemia. Therapeutic concentrations of as­pirin, phenylbutazone, and sulphafurazole (sulfi­soxazole) displace gliclazide from human plasmaand increase the free drug concentration from 3%to 5-8%, but other highly bound drugs includingwarfarin, chlorthiazide, clofibrate and chlorpro­pamide do not significantly alter the extent ofbinding of gliclazide (Campbell et al., 1980).

Drugs which may inhibit the metabolism of gli­clazide in the liver could result inhypoglycaemicepisodes as has occurred with other sulphonylureasadministered with drugs such as chloramphenicol,dicoumarol ,sulphaphenazole, phenylbutazone, oxy­phenbutazone or clofibrate. As monoamine ox­idase inhibitors have been shown to stimulate in­sulin secretion in animals, hypoglycaemia could re­sult from their concomitant administration withgliclazide. Aspirin (200 rug/kg orally), phenelzine(15 mg/kg intramuscularly) and phenylbutazone(100 rng/kg orally) all prolonged the hypogly­caemic effect of gliclazide (25 rug/kg), but did not

322

significantly alter the magnitude of the responsewhen studied in rabbits for 24 hours (unpublisheddata on file, Servier). On the other hand , a druginteraction with imidazole type antifungal drugs(miconazole, econazole, clotrimazole and ketocon­azole) was reported with sulphonylureas and gli­clazide (Niemegeers et al., 1981; Loupi et al., 1982;Meurice et al., 1983). Intolerance to alcohol mayoccur in some sulphonylurea-treated patients. Thiseffect has been reported in 1 patient taking glicla­zide (Canivet, 1972).

{j-Adrenoceptor blocking drugs may mask thesigns of hypoglycaemia and possibly inhibit glu­coneogenesis and may be a problem particularly inpoorly controlled cases. Propranolol (1.0 rug/kg)promoted the recovery from the lowered blood glu­cose induced by gliclazide (1.0 mg/kg) in rabbits(Maekawa et al., 1978a).

Diminution of the hypoglycaemic action of thedrug may occur with the concomitant administra­tion of thiazide diuretics, corticosteroids and oes­trogens.

7. Dosage and Administration

Gliclazide, as with other sulphonylurea drugs,is indicated only in maturity onset stable diabetes,where dietary modifications fail to control hyper­glycaemia and glycosuria. Gliclazide is not effec­tive in insulin-dependent diabetics, and so is notindicated in juvenile diabetes mellitus.

The recommended dose in newly diagnosed dia­betics is to begin with 80mg daily with breakfast,and increase by 40 to 80mg as required in singleor divided dosage to a maximum of 240 rug/day.However, in therapeutic trials, therapy was oftenstarted at a lower level of 40mg daily, and in somecases a total daily dose of 320mg (as a single ortwice daily dose) was needed before patientsachieved satisfactory control (see section 3.1). Nosignificant differences in blood sugar levels, andquality of blood sugar balance, were seen in 21 dia­betics given gliclazide either once or twice a day(Schrub et al., 1972), suggesting that a convenientonce daily dose schedule may be appropriate in atleast some patients .

Page 23: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

Dose titration starting from 80 to l60mg daily,depending on the severity of the diabetes, is rec­ommended when substituting gliclazide for otheroral hypoglycaemic agents.

If adequate control of hyperglycaemia is notachieved with dietary measures and maximumdosage of gliclazide, the response has been im­proved in a number of patients by the concomitantadministration of a biguanide. The dosage of thebiguanide should be adjusted gradually until con­trol is achieved .

8. Place of Gliclazide in Therapy

In open trials, glicazide reduced blood sugarlevels to normal in newly diagnosed patients withmaturity onset diabetes failing to respond to diet­ary measures alone, and maintained or improvedcontrol in patients previously managed on othersulphonylureas or biguanides. Gliclazide has beengenerally well tolerated, the most frequently re­ported side effects being gastrointestinal in nature.Although there were differing reports, and reportedexperience in formal studies is limited, most ob­servers noted that gliclazide did not seem to giverise to an increase in weight, did not alter renalfunction when administered to a small number ofpatients with diabetic nephropathy and generallydid not change or in a few cases significantly de­creased plasma levels of cholesterol, triglyceridesor free fatty acids, thus seemingly avoiding whatcan sometimes be undes irable effects with otherhypoglycaemic agents.

Comparative trials, not surprisingly, suggest thatgliclazide likely controls blood glucose levels in ap­propriately selected patients as effectively as otheroral hypoglycaemic drugs. Thus, particular interestwith gliclazide is related primarily to its effects onthe blood. Some data from animal studies , andstudies in patients with diabetic retinopathy, sug­gest that the effects of this drug on platelet aggre­gation and haemostasis may possibly be beneficial,reversing or at least slowing progression of reti­nopathy . In the cases where other hypoglycaemicagents were also tested for these properties theywere generally found to be less active , or in some

323

cases inactive. Quite clearly, any oral hypogly­caemic drug which could be shown with certaintyto halt or reverse diabetic retinopathy would be amajor advance. However, further evidence is re­quired to confirm any clinical benefits of the ef­fects of gliclazide on the blood in the long term,and to show more clearly whether any such clinicalbenefits are unique to gliclazide or also occur withother oral hypoglycaemic drugs.

References

Almer. L.O.: The effects of glielazide on the fibrinolytic system;

in Keen et al. (Eds) G lielazide and the Treatment of Diabetes.

Internationa l Congress and Symposium Series No. 20. Pro­

ceedings of International Symposium. London. April 5-6. 1979.

pp. 201-205 (Academic Press and Royal Societ y of Med icine .

London 1980).

Almer . L.O.: Effect of chlorpropamide and glielazide on plas ­

minogen activator activity of vascular walls in patients with

maturity onset diabetes. Thrombosis Research (Submitted for

publication. Feb 1983).

Arfors . K.E. and Tangen. 0 .: Effects of Diamicron on blood plate­

let in rim and in vitro. Unpublished data on file. Servier la­boratories (1977).

Asrnal, A.C.: Leary. W.P.; Thandroyen, F.; Jailal , 1.: Pillay N. and

Bentley-Phillips. c.: An evaluation of the efficacy and safety

of glielazide compared to chlorpropamide: in Keen et al. (Eds)Gl ielazide and the Treatment of Diabetes. International Con­

gress and Symposium Series No. 20. Proceedings of Inter­

national Symposium. London. April 5-6. 1979. pp. 113-123

(Academic Press and Royal Society of Medicine. London1980).

Baba. S.: Nakagawa. S.: Takebe. K.: Goto, Y.; Maezawa, H. and

Tak eda . R.: Double-bl ind randomized control study with gli­

elazide. Clinical Evaluations II : 51-94 (1983) .

Balabolk in, M.I.: Levitska ya, L.I.: Morozova, T.P. : Nodosugova,

L.V. and Gavriluk. L.T.: Recent data on the metabolic action

of glielazide. Diabet ologia 25: 138 (1983) .

Benakis. A. and Glasson. B.: Metabolic study of I·C-Iabelled gli­

elazide in nor mal rats and in ra ts with streptozotocin-induced

diabete s: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gl ielazide and the Treatment

of Diabet es. International Congress and Symposium Series

No. 20. Proceedings of International Symposium. London.

April 5-6. 1979. pp. 57-69 (Academic Press and Royal Society

of Medicin e. London 1980).

Berber. MJ . and Tomkin. G .H.: The effect of glielazide in dia­betes: A comparison with tolbutamide. Irish Journal of Medi ­

cal Science 151: 46-49 (1982) .

Bloom . A.L.: Blood and vascular interactions and the ir possible

relevance to diabetic angiopath ies: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gl i­

clazide and the Treatment of Diabetes. International Con ­

gress and Symposium Series No. 20. Proceedings of Inter-

Page 24: Gliclazide

Gliclazidc: A Preliminary Review

nati on al Symposi um, London, April 5-6, 1979 , pp . 171-182

(Acade mic Press and Royal Soc iety of Med icine , London

1980).

Bobillo. E.R.: Castriello, J.M .A. and Romero. E.: Plat elet functi on

in d iabeti c patient s treated with g1iclazide. Orbe Med ico March:49-51 (1975) .

Bodan sky. H.J .: Medbak, S.: Cudwort h. A.G .: Rees, L.H . and DeSilva. R.S.: Long term improv ement in insulin response with

gliclazide treatment. Diabeteet Metabolisme 8: 319-322 (1982).

Born . G .V.R.: Aggregation of blood plat elets by adenosine d i­

phosphate and its reversal. Nature 194: 927 (1962) .

Brogard . J.M .: Pinget, M.: Leconte, A. and Dorner. M.: Effects of

a 3 month treatment with a hypoglycemic and sulfenamide

(gliclazid e) on insul in secretion in non-insulin dependent dia­

betics. Revue de Medecine Interne 3: 379-387 (1982).

Butterfi eld . J .: Introduction: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gliclazide and

the Tr eatment of Diabetes. International Congress and Sym­

posium Series No. 20. Proceedings of International Sympos­

ium. Lond on. April 5-6. 1979. pp . 1-3 (Academ ic Press and

Royal Society of Medic ine, London 1980) .

Cabezas-Cerrato, J . and Fernandez-Cruz. A.: Influence of glicla­

zidc on the grade of compensation of diabetes on the behav­

iour of the oral tolerance test to glucose (glucose and insulin )

in pat ient s with responsive pancreas and in secondary failure .

Med icina C1inica 64: 512-516 (1975 ).

Cabral. B.V.: Fernando. R.: lcasas-Cabral, E.: Villegas-Cinco and

Cinco , L.:G liclazide in the treatment of earl y d iabetic retinal

micro vascular changes: in Alberti et al. (Eds) 11th Congress

of the International Diabetes Federation Abstracts p. 7 (Ex­

cerpta Med ica. Am sterdam 1982).

Campbell. D.B.: Adriaenssens, P.: Hopkins. Y.W.: Gordon. B. and

Will iam s. J.R .B.: Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of glicla ­

zide: A review: in Keen et a l. (Eds) Gl iclaz ide and the Treat­

ment of Diabetes. International Congress and Symposium Se­

ries No . 20. Proceedings of International Symposium. London.

April 5-6, 1979. pp . 71-82 (Academic Press and Ro yal Society

of Medic ine. Lond on (980).

Canivc t, J .: Valeur therapeutique d'un nouvel antidiabetique oral

orig ina l a visee vasculaire: Le gliclazide (1702 SE). Semaine

dcs Hop itaux Therapeutique 48: 457-462 (1972) .

Chan. T .K.: Chan. V.: Teng. C.S. and Yeung, R.T .T.: Effects of

gliclazide and glibenclamide on platelet fun ction. fibrinolysis

and metabolic control in diabetic patients with retinopathy.

Scmaine des Hopitaux 58: 1197-1200 (1982 ).

Charbonnet. 8.: Un nou vel abord therapeutique de la maladie

d iabet iqu c. Bilan a long term. Volume T herapeutiq ue des En­

trct icns dc Bichat 187-192 (1977 ).

Char bo nnel. B.: Clinical and metab olic effects of the treatment

of d iabet ic patient s with gliclaz ide: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gl i­

clazidc and the T reatment of Diabetes. International Con­

gress and Sym posi um Ser ies No. 20. Proceedings of Int er­

nat ion al Symposi um . London . Apr il 5-6. 1979, pp. 123-129(Academ ic Press and Royal Socie ty of Medi cine , London

1980).

Colwell. J .A.: Halu shka. P.V.: Sarj i. K.E. and Sagel. J. : Platelet

324

functio n and d iabetes mell itus. Medi cal Clin ics of North

America 62: 753 (1978).

Dcguchi, K.: Kusunose, K.: Kawai. S.: Beppu, H.: Kato, M.: Kon­

ishi . M.: Shima , H.: Umernoto, H.: Kuto, M.: Sawaki, A.:

Kato , F.: Ueno . H.: Ito. S.: Koba yash i. T .: Izuch i. Y. and

Yamada . S.: Estimat ion of platelet fun ct ion inhibiti ng drugs

on platel et adhesive ness. Blood and Vesse l 9: 479-485 ( 1978).

Dclecrs. M.: Ge lbeke . M. and Malaisse. W.J .: Transport o f Pr ·'·

by hypoglycaem ic sulfon ylu reas across lipo somal membranes.

Federation of European Biochem ical Societie s Letters 151: 269­

272 (1983).

De Meyts, P.: Grigorescu, F. and Lambert. 8.: The role of insulin

recept ors in the hypoglycemic effects of sulfonylureas: The

status of 1982: in Pfeiffer (Ed.) Rationale for Sulfonylurea

Therapy . Excerpia Medica (In press . (983).

Desn oyers. P. and Saint-Dizier . D.: Gliclazide: Haemobiological

properties. A syno psis with emphasis on inhibit ion of platelet

coagulant factor s: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gl iclazide and the

Treatment of Diabe tes. International Congress and Sympos­

ium Series No. 20. Proceed ings of International Symposium.

Lond on. April 5-6. 1979. pp. 19-27 (Academic Press and Royal

Societ y of Med icine. Lond on 1980).

Desnoyers . P.: Labaume, J.: Anstett, M.: Herrera, M.: Pesquet, J .

and Sebas tian . J .: Th e pharmacolog y of S1702. a new highly

effective oral antidiabe tic d rug with unusual propert ies. Part

III: Antistickiness act ivity, fibrinol yt ic properties and hae­

rnostatic param eters study . Arzneimittel-Forschung 22: 1691­1695 (1972).

Dcu ori, A.G .: Antiplatclet effects of long-term treatment of dia­

bet ic pat ients with glicazide: in Keen et a l. (Eds) Gl iclaz ide

and the Treatment of Diabetes. International Co ngress and

Symposium Series No. 20. Proceed ings of International Sym­

posium . London . April 5-6. 1979. pp. 189-193 (Academic Press

and Royal Society of Med icine. London 1980).

Dola is-Kitabgi . J.: Alengrin. F. and Freychet , P.: Sulphonylur eas

in vitro do not a lter insulin binding or insul in effect on am ino

acid tran sport in rat hepatocytes . Diabetologia 24: 441-444(1983) .

Donner, J.P.: Evalu ati on metabolique et ponderale de l'efficacite

a long tcrm e du Diamicron dans Ie diabete non insulino-de­

pendant . Vie Medi cale 10: 725-727 (1982) .

Duhault. J.: Boul anger . M. and Loncharnpt, M.: Gli clazide and

the micro vascular system : in Keen et al. (Eds) Glicl azide and

the Treatm ent of Diabetes. International Congress and Sym ­

posium Series No. 20. Proceedings of International Sym pos­

ium. Lond on . April 5-6. 1979. pp . 9- 19 (Academ ic Press and

Royal Society of Med icine. London (98 0).

Duhault. J.: Boulanger. M.: Tisserand. F. and Beregi, L.: Th e

phar macology of S 1702. a new highly effecti ve oral antidi­

abetic d rug with unusual properties. Part I. Pharmacological

and hypoglycaem ic act ivity, stud ies in d ifferent an imal spe­

cies. Arznei mittcl -Forschung 22: 1682- 1685 (1972) .

Fager berg. S.E. and Garnstcd t, A.: Paired observa tions betw een

d ifferent sulpho nylureas in ant id iabetic treatment: in Keen et

al. (Eds) Gli clazi de and the T reatment of Diabetes. Int ern a-

Page 25: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

tional Congress and Symposium Series No. 20. Proeeedings

of Internat ional Symposium. London . April 5-6. 1979. pp, 143­

151 (Academic Press a nd Royal Societ y of Medicine. London1980).

Forcu c, B.: G liclazide (Diamicton) in metabolic and vascular

treatment of diabetes melli tus . East African Medical Journal

54: 579-581 (1977).

Forcuc , B.: Rolland . A.: Hopk ins. Y.: Gordon. B. and Campbell.

B.: Gl iclazide pharmacokin etics in the elde rly: in Alberti et

al. (Eds) II th Congress of the International Diabetes Feder­

at ion Abstracts p. 9 (Excerpta Medica. Amst erdam 1982).

Fujitan i. 8.: Maeda. J.: Tsuboi. T.: Kadok awa , T. and Schimizu,

M.: Effect of gliclazide on prostaglandin ( ~ formation in nor­

mal and strcptozotocin-induced diabetic animals. Japanese

Journal of Pharmacology 33: 965-970 (1983).

Fukui. I.: Sahcki, S.: Kakumoto, E.: Nakayama. M.: Ozeki, T .:

Otsuka. A.: Yokoh , S.: Och iai, K. and Masak i. K.: Clinical

investigation of gliclazide on the treatment of diabetes mel­

litus - espec ially in relation to diabeti c retinopath y (Abstract

176). New Delhi International Diabetes Fede ration (1976).

Fukui. I.: Yokoh, S.: Masaki. K.: Nakayama. M.: Sahek i, S.: Ozek i,

T.: Otuka, A. and Matsu yam a, S.: Clinical investigation of

glielazide on the treatment of dia betes mellitu s - plasma con­

centra tion and long term treatment: in Alberti et al. (Eds)

11th Congress of the International Diabetes Federation Ab­

stracts p. 9 (Excerpta Med ica. Amsterdam 1982).

Gibson. F.S.: Benchi mol. 1.1.: Rias. T.D.P. and Cordeiro de No­ronha Pessoa, C H.: Gliclazid e in the treatment of non-insulin

dependant diabetics. Arquivos Brasileires de Medicina 55: 346­348 (1982).

Guillausseau. P.J.: Faraill . M.: G uillausscau, C : Legrand . A.: Pey­net. J .: Warner. A.: Rousselet, F. and Lubetzki , J .: L'h erno­

globine glycosylee: Ses variations it court et long term e aucours du traitement du diabete sucre Vie Medicine II : 479­

483 (1983).

Higgs. E.A.: Moncad a. S.: Vane. J .R.: Caen , J .P.: Michel. H. andToblcm . G.: Effect of prostacyclin (PGI ~) on platelet adhesion

10 rabb it as tcnal subendothelium. Prostaglandins 16: 17-22(1978).

Hoshiyarna. M.: Effect of gliclazid e on alloxan diabetic rabbits.

Journal of the Ja panese Diabeti c Society 23: 579-586 ( 1980).

luncs, M. and Franco . L.J.: Gliclazid e in diabet es mellitus. Ar­

quivos Brasile iros de Mcdic ina 57: 229-231 (1983).

Jadzin sky. M.N.: Bart ornco, A.: Markrnann , C: Burlando, G. and

Fox. D.: Gliclazida en cl trat ami ento de la diabetes insulino

indcpcnd icntre, Prensa Medica Argentina 70: 40-43 (1983) .

Jones. R.H.: Parson s. V. and Watkins. PJ.: The effect of glicla­

zidc on platelet adh esion and urinar y prote in excretion in d ia­

betic nephropathy: in Keen et al. (Eds) G liclazide and the

Treatment of Diabetes. International Congress and Symp os­ium Series No. 20. Proceed ings of Internat ional Symposium .

London . April 5-6. 1979. pp. 231-239 (Academic Press and

Royal Societ y of Med icine. London 1980).

Kaj ikawa. M.: Taket o. M.: Fujimura. K.: lhara. A.: Waka sa, N.

and Kuram oto . A.: Mob ilizat ion mechan ism of von Wille-

325

brand Factor (VIII VWF) from the platelets and its signifi­

cance in thrombosis. Blood and Vessel 9: 312-316 (1978) .

Kato . M.: lzuchi. Y.: Deguchi , K.: Okuda. H.: Shimomura, T.:Takeuchi . T.: Sawaki, A.: Ogura, K. and Yamada. S.: The

effect of gliclazide (SE1702) on human platelet function. Blood

and Vessel 7: 97-102 (1976).

Kawanishi, H.: Takesh ima , T.: Igarashi. N. and Tau ehi. K.: Re­

production studies of gliclazide a new sulfonylurea antidi­

abetic agent. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 9: 65­

85 (1981).

Klaff. L.J.: Vinik. A.I.: Jackson. W.P.U.: Malan . E.: Kernoff L.

and Jacobs. P.: Effects of the su lphon ylurea drugs gliclazide

and glibenclamide on blood glucose control and platelet func­

tion . South African Medical Journal 56: 247-250 (1979).

King. J.B.: Kalk. WJ. : Vinik, A.I.: Jack son . W.P.U .: Bracher. M.

and Jacob s. P.: An evaluation of the effects of some sul­phonylureas on platelet function. South African Medical

Jou rna l 51: 124-126 (1977).

Kobayashi. K.: Kimura. M.: Sakoguch i, T.: Kitani , Y.: Mitsu o,

H. and Matsuoka. A.: Influence of blood proteins on biomed­

ical anal ysis III. Pharmacokinetics and protein bind ing of gli­

c1azide . Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynarnics 4: 436-442 (1981) .

Kosaka, K.: Hirata. Y.: Akanuma, Y.: Miharu , T.: Kanazawa, Y.:

Takatcr i. E. et al.: Clinical comparative stud y on the thera­

peutic effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents in pati ents with

diabetic retinopathy. I. Animal method. Journal of Japanese

Diabeti c Societ y 26: 531-540 (1983a).

Kosaka. K.: Hirata. Y.: Akanurn a, Y.: Mihara. T .: Kanazawa, Y.:

Ta kato ri, E. ct al.: Comparative clinical stud y on the thera­

peut ic effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents in pat ients withdiabet ic ret inopath y. II. Pat ients and Results I (Degree of sat­

isfaction with treatment ofdiabetes mellitus and safety) . Jour­

nal of Japanese Diabeti c Societ y 26: 541-550 (1983b) .Kosaka. K.: Hirata. Y.: Akan uma, Y.: Miha ra. T .: Kan azawa , Y.:

Takatori, E. ct al.: Comparative c1inieal study on the thera­peut ic effects of oral hypoglycaem ic agent s in pat ient s with

diabetic ret inopathy. III. Result s 2 (FBG . platelet adhesion .

plasma lipids. bod yweight and drugs) . Journal of Japanese

Diabeti c Society 26: 551-559 (I 983c).

Kosaka , K.: Hirata. Y.: Akanurna, Y.: Miha ra. T.: Kanazawa, Y.:

Takator i, E. et al.: Comparative clini cal stud y on the thera­

peutic effects of oral hypoglycaem ic agents in patients with

diabe tic retinopathy. IV. Results 3 (Evalu ation of diabetic ret­

inopath y). Journal of Japanese Diabetic Society 26: 561-570(1983d ).

Kuwashim a, J.: Tsuboi , T.: Korniy a. M.: Fujitan i. 8. : Nakamura.

K.: Maeda. J .: Kaneko. H.: Yoshida. K. and Schimizu, M.:

Inhib itory effect of gliclazide on platelet adhesi veness and ag­

gregation in alloxan diabeti c rabb its. Yakugaku Zasshi 99: 59­64 (1979).

l.agruc. G. and Rivclinc, B.: Effects of long-te rm administrati on

of gliclazidc on proteinuria and renal funct ion in pat ients with

diabetic neph ropathy: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gli clazide a nd the

Treatm ent of Diabetes. International Congr ess and Sympos­

ium Series No. 20. Proceed ings of Internat iona l Symposium.

Page 26: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

Lond on. April 5-6. 1979. pp. 219-225 (Academ ic Press andRoyal Society of Medicine . London 1980).

Lcsbrc, F.X. and Canicave. J.e : Metabolic and ophthalmological

effects of gliclazide after 2'12 years adm inistration. GazetteMedicale de France 84: 51-54 (1977).

Lou pi. E.: Descotes. J.: Lery. N. and Evreu x. J.U.: Interactionsmedicamenteuses et miconazole. Therapie 37: 437-441 (1982).

Maekawa. H.: Sekiya, A.: Yamamoto. J.: Kato , Y.: Amano, R.

and Kubota. H.: Effects of jj-adrenergic blocking agent s and

hypoglycaemi c agent s on blood glucose in the rabbit. Phar­macom etrics 16: 981-986 (1978a).

Maekawa. H.: Yamamoto. J.: Kato , Y. and Sekiya, A.: Effects of

oral hypoglycemic agent s. gliclazide and tolbutamide on thecardiovascular system. Folia Pharma cologica Japonica 74: 549­558 (1978b).

Malaissc. W.1.: Courturier, E. and Valverde . I.: The insulino­

tropic action of gliclazide: Possible mode of action : in Keenet al. (Eds) Gliclazide and the Treatm ent of Diabete s. Inter­national Congress and Sympo sium Series No. 20. Proceed ings

of International Sympos ium. London. Apr il 5-6. 1979. pp. 37­

42 (Academic Press and Royal Society of Medicin e. London

1980).

Marchand . E.: Grigorescu, F.: Buysschaert , M.: DeMe yts. P.: Ke­

telslcgers. M.: Brems. H.: Nathan. Co and Lambert. A.E.: The

hypoglycaernic effect of a sulphonylurea (gliclazide) in mod ­

crate type II diabetes and glucose intolerance is not accom­panied by changes in insulin action and insulin binding to

erythrocytes. Molecular Physiology 4: 83-93 (1983) .

Marqui e. G.: Preventive effect of gliclazide on cholesterol-in­duced atherom atous lesions in the rabbit. Corntes Rendus 285:197-200 ( 1977).

Masbernard. A. and Portal. A.: Le vrai problem e du d iabete (Es­sai du gliclazide. molecule originale apropri etes rnetaboliquesct vasculaires), Therapeutique 48: 569-573 (1972).

Matsouka. N.: lida. M.: Yasuba , M.: Nishiwak i. T.: Maeda . K.:Ueda. N.: Ohni shi. K. and Tatsumi, H.: Acute. subacute andchronic toxicity stud ies on gliclazide. a new sulphonylurea

deri vative . Basic Pharmacology and Therapeutics 8: 41-69( 1980).

Medbak. S.: Rees. L.H. and Cudworth. A.G.: Plasma C-peptide

and insulin responses in maturity onset diabetics treated by

diet alone and in conjunction with gliclazide : in Keen et al.(Eds) Gl iclazide and the Treatment of Diabetes. International

Congress and Sympos ium Series No. 20. Proceed ings ofInter­nat ional Symposium . London . April 5-6. 1979. pp. 137-143(Academic Press and Royal Societ y of Medicine. Lond on1980).

Meur ice. J.e.: Lecomt e. P.: Renard. J.P. and Girard. J.1.: Inter­

action miconazole et sulfamides hypoglycem iants . PresseMcdicalc 12: 1670 (1983).

Minam i. N.: Matsuba, I.: Saito. S.: Tajim a. N.: Yamada. H.: Mo­

toyoshi, M. ct al.: The effect of long-term treatment with gli­

c1azide on diabeti c retinopath y. Ji keikai Medical Journal 28:

127-131 ( 1981).

Miyazaki. H.: Fujii . T.: Yoshida . K.: Arakawa. S.: Furukawa. H.:

326

Suzuki. H.: Kagemoto. A.: Hashimoto. M. and Tamaki. N.:Disposition and metaboli sm of [-'H) gliclazide in rats . Euro­

pean Journ al of Drug Metab olism and Pharmacokinetics 8:117-131 (1983).

Moncada. S.: Higgs. E.A. and Vane. J.R.: Hum an arterial andvenous tissues generate prostacyclin (prostaglandi n X) a po­

tent inhibitor of platelet aggregation. Lancet I: 18-20 (1976).

Mukauno. S.: Iwasaki. Y.: Saito. N.: Yasunaga. K. and Kanzaki .

M.: Clinical evaluatio n of glyclazide in treatm ent of diabetes

mellitus. Japanese Archives of Internal Medicine 24: 81-92( 1977).

Mustard . J.F. and Packham. M.A.: Platelets and diabetes melli­

tus. New England Journal of Medicine 297: 1345-1347 (1977).Neimegeers. C.J.E.: Levron. J.U.: Awouters, F. and Janssen. P.A.1.:

Inhibition and inducti on of microsomal enzymes in the rat.A comparative stud y offour antimycotics: Miconazole. econ­azoic. c1otrimazole and ketaconazole. Archives Internation­

ales de Pharma codynam ic et de Therapie 251: 26-38 (1981).Nakayama. M.: Fukui. I.: Kakum oto. E.: Masaki. K.: Sahek i. S.:

Ozeki. T.: Otsuka. A.: Yokoh, S.: Ochiai, K. and Matsu yama.

S.: Clinical investigatio ns on gliclazide in the trea tment of

diabetes mellitus . Journal of Japanese Diabet ic Societ y 22:977-988 ( 1979).

Ohned a. A.: Horigome. K.: Maruharna. Y.: ltabashi , H.: Ch iba,

M.: Kai. Y.: Abe. R. and Sakai. T. : Experimental stud ies onhypoglycaemic and insulin releasing act ivitie s of gliclazide .Journal of the Japan ese Diabeti c Society 20: 403-409 (1977).

Oli. J .M.: Treatment with gliclazide (Diamicron) in obese Niger­

ian diabeti cs. Curr, Therap. Res. 28: 992-996 (1980).

Paton. R.C.: KernotT. B.A.: Wales. J.K. and McNicol. G.P.: Ef­fects of diet and gliclazide on the haem ostat ic system of non­insulin-dependant diabetics. British Medical Journal 283: 10\8­102 \ (1981).

Plauchu. M. and Pousset. G.: Gliclazide nouvel an tidiabetiquedoue de propr ietes haemobiologiques et vasculaires. Lyon

Medical 228: 283-285 ( 1972).Ponari. 0 .: Civardi, E.: Megha, S.: Pin i. M.: Porti oli , D. and Det­

tori. A.G.: Ant iplatelet effects of long-term treatment with gli­c1azide in diabeti c pat ients. Thrombosis Research 16: 191-203

(1979).

Puglisi. L. and Colli. S.: Effect of gliclazide on experimental hy­

pcrtr iglyceridaem ia; in Keen et al. (Eds) Gliclazide and the

Treatm ent of Diabetes . Internat ional Congress and Sympos­

ium Series No. 20. Proceed ings of Intern ational Symposium.London. April 5-6. 1979. pp, 43-51 (Academic Press and Royal

Society of Medicine. Lond on 1980).

Radic. B.: Rubinjon i. Z.: Skrabalo. Z. and Maitre. D.: Effect onplatelet adhesiveness in diabetic s after long-term treatment

with gliclazide: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gliclazid e and the Treat­ment of Diabetes . Intern ational Congress and Symposium Se­ries No. 20. Proceedings of Intern ational Symposium. Lon­don. April 5-6. 1979. pp. 183-189 (Academ ic Press and Royal

Society of Medicine. London 1980).

Regnault . F.: Prognosis of non-proliferat ive diabetic retinopathy

du ring treatment with gliclazide: in Keen et al. (Eds] Gl icla-

Page 27: Gliclazide

Gliclazide: A Preliminary Review

zidc and the Treatm ent of Diabet es. International Congre ss

and Symposium Series No. 20. Proceedings of InternationalSympos ium. Lond on . April 5-6. 1979. pp. 249-259 (Academi c

Press and Royal Society of Medicine. London 1980).

Ruhinjon i. Z.: Turk. Z.: Cocc, V.: Mustovic, D.: Maitre. D. a nd

Skrabalo. Z.: Effect on platelet adhe siveness in d iabeti cs afterlong term treatm ent with a new oral hypoglycaemic agent .

gliclazidc, Curr, Med, Res. Opin . 5: 625-632 ( 1978).Sadayos hi. Y.: Fukui. I.: Kimio. 0 .: Tadahisa. 0.: Akio. 0 .:

Schinichi. M.: Susumu. S.: Masahik o. N.: Kiyotaka, M. and

Eiichi. K.: Study on the antidiabetic effect of gliclazide. Its

plasma concentration and effect of long term treatment. Jou r­

nal Kyoto Prcf University Med . 91: 895-9 14 (1982).

Sakamoto. N.: Houa, N.: Sato , Y.: Nagashima, M.: Kakura, H.:

Iguch i. A. and Ohara. S.: Clini cal experience with gliclazide.

Acta Thcrapcut ica 2: 329-337 (1976).

Schimizu. M.: Matsuno. Y.: Sohji . Y. and Ito . T. : Pharmaco­

logical studies on gliclaz idc (3) general pharmacological ef­fects. Pharmacometr ics 12: 303-317 (l976a).

Schimizu. M.: Tsuboi. J.: Fujit an i, 8.: Yosh ida. K. and Tamura.

Y.: Pharmacological studies on gliclazide (2). Effect of glicla­

zidc on plate let aggregation . adh esion and blood coagulation.

Pharmacom etrics 12(2): 295-302 (1976b).

Schrub, J .-n : Courtois. H. and Birembau. Y.: A stud y of the

mode of administratio n of a hypoglycaernic sulphon ylure a in

blood glucose regulation. A communication presented at the

French Society of Therapeutics and Pharmacodynamics.

Thcr apic 27: 983-987 ( 1972).

Shaw. K.M.: Wilkinson . L.: Goldstone. A.H .: Mcleod. A.: Har­

per. P.G.:G reenbaum. R.and Bloom .A-,: Experiencewith glicla­zide in newly diagnosed matu rity onset diabetes: in Keen etal. (Eds) Gliclazide and the Treatm ent of Diabetes. Interna ­tional Co ngress and Sym posium Series No. 20. Proceed ingsof Internat ional Symposium. Lond on . April 5-6. 1979. pp , 57­

69 (Acade mic Press and Royal Society of Med icine . Lond on

1980).

Smit Sibinga. C T h. and Wieringa. R.A.: The effect of gliclazide

on irradiation- induced experimental atheromatosis: in Keen

ct al. (Eds) Gliclazide and the T reatm ent of Diabetes. Inter­

nat ional Congress and Symposium Series No . 20. Proceedings

of International Symposium. London. Apr il 5-6. 1979. pp . 51­

57 (Academi c Press and Royal Society of Medicine. Lond on

1980).

Stepha n. F.: Reville. P.: De Laharpe. F. and Doerflinger. M.A.:

Action of gliclazide on the insul inogenic index during shor t­

and long-term treatment of diabetes mellitus : in Keen et al.

fEds) Gliclazide and the Treatment of Diabetes. International

Congress and Symposium Series No. 20. Proceed ings of Inter­

nat ional Symposium . London. April 5-6. 1979. pp. 91-98 (Ac­

ademic Press and Royal Societ y of Medicine. London 1980).

Strata. .A.: Magnan , G. and Pugnoli , C : Studie s on the clini calpharmacology and ther apeut ics of gliclazide: in Keen ct al.

(Eds ) Gliclazidc and the Treatment of Diabetes . International

Congress and Symposium Series No. 20. Proceedings of Inter­

nat ional Sym posi um. Lond on. April 5-6. 1979. pp. 103-113

327

(Academic Press and Royal Society of Medicine. London1980).

Thouvcrc z. J.P.: Platelet anti-adhesiveness of Diamicron in hu­

man clinical studies. Paper presented at the Mcgeve Sym­posium on Diabetol ogy ( 1972).

Tourni airc. J . and Orgiazzi, J .: Gliclazide and thy roid function .

an experimental and clinical study: in Keen et al. (Eds) Gli­

clazidc and the Treatm ent of Diabet es. Intern ational Con­

gress and Symposium Series No. 20. Proceedings of Inter­

national Symposium. London. April 5-6. 1979. pp, 151-157

(Academ ic Press and Royal Society of Medicine. London

1980).

Tsuboi, T.: Fujitani . B.: Maeda . J.: Yoshida. K. and Schimizu,

M.: Effect of gliclazide on prostaglandin and thromboxane

synthesis in guinea-pig platelets . Thrombosis Research 21: 103­109 (1981).

Vainer. H. and Verry. M.: Effects in vitro du gliclazide , nou vel

agent hypoglycemiant. sur les plaqueues humaines normales.

Th romb osis Research 4: 523-538 (1974).

Verry. M.: Dcchavanne, M.: Desno yers. P.: Stoltz. J.F. and Vai­

ner. H.: Effect of gliclazide on platelet beha viour. Nou velle

Prcssc Mcd icale 3: 2099 (1974).

Vigncri, P.: Pczzino, V.: Wong. K.Y. and Goldfine. I.D.: Com­

parison of the in vitro effect of biguanides and sulphonylureas

on insulin bind ing to its receptors in target cells. Journal of

Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 64: 95-100 (1982).

Villegas-Cinco, A. and Fernando. R.: A clinical trial of Diamicron

on the treatment of adult onset diabetes in Filipinos. Filipino

Fam ily Physician 16: 1-4 (1978).Villiger. U.: Clinical trial with a new oral antidiabetic gliclazide

in general practice . Schweiz. Rund . Med. PI'. 71: 699 (1982).

Violi. F.: DeMania. G.C : Alessandri, C : Perron e. A. and Vezza,E.: The effects of gliclazide on platelet funct ion in pat ientswith d iabetes mellitu s. Current Medical Research and Opi­

nion 8: 200-203 (1982).

Walters. J .M. and McCarth y. CF.: Efficacy of gliclazide as a

hypoglycacm ic agent in 12 patients with maturity onset d ia­

betes: An interim report : in Keen et al. (Eds) Gliclazide and

the T reatment of Diabet es. International Congress and Sym­

posium Series No. 20. Proceedings of International Sympos­

ium. Lond on . April 5-6. 1979. pp. 99-103 (Academic Press

and Royal Society of Medicine. London 1980).

Ward . G.: Harr ison. L.C : Proictt o, J .: Aitken . P. a nd Nankervis.

A.: Gliclazidc potentiates post receptor insulin action in vivo.2nd Internati onal Symposium on Insulin Receptors. Recept or

interaction and insulin action. Rome . September 1-3 (1983).

Yam ada. S.: Deguchi. K.: Kato, M.: Kato , H.: Shima. H.: Kuto ,

M.: Konishi . M.: Bcppu, H.: Kusunosc , K. and Shimo mura.

T.: Therapeutic effect of gliclazidc on diabetes mellitu s with

reference to platelet function . Japanese Arch ives of InternalMedicine 24: 179-190 (1977).

Auth ors' address: Barbara l lohnes. ADIS Drug Information Serv­

ices. P.O. Hox 34-030. Birkcnh cad, Auckland 10 (New Zealand).