18
Health Services Advisory Committee Meeting March 13, 2013

Health Services Advisory Committee Meeting March 13, 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Health Services Advisory Committee Meeting

March 13, 2013

AgendaTopic Who What/How Time

Get some lunch! All Individual decision making 10 minutes12:00-12:10

Approval of Meeting Notes CatherineWilliams

Inform 5 minutes12:10-12:15

Announcements All Inform 15 minutes12:15-12:20

Policy and Procedure Review 8.4/8.4P SusanQuinn

InformClarify

10 minutes12:20 – 12:30

Fiscal Update 12-13 status13-14 Budget Development

Susan Quinn

InformClarify

15 minutes12:30 – 12:45

PRPP item: Environmental Scan SusanQuinnAll

PresentAnalyze/Discuss

15 minutes12:45- 1:00

PRPP item: Sustainability, Facilities, Technology

Cheryl HigginsSusan QuinnAll

PresentAnalyze/Discuss

15 minutes1:15-1:30

PRPP item: Personnel SusanQuinnAll

PresentAnalyze/Discuss

5 minutes1:30-1:45

Department Presentation: Health Promotion – PEERS Coalition- SMHP Grant

Additional ideas/collaborations

Becky Fein

All

Present

Analyze/Discuss

20 minutes1:30 – 1:5010 minutes1:50-2:00

Environmental Scan #1:The Student Experience

Student Focus Group Findings

Environmental Scan #2: The Community

Sonoma County’s Health Action Report

Environmental Scan #3: Impact of the Affordable Care Act

Community-Based Healthcare Providers

Student accepting responsibility

for meeting healthcare needs

Insurance coverage options

Student Health Services(Clinical SPS HP)

Successful, Healthy

STUDENTinsuredwith a

medical home

SRJC Student Support Services

Students will maintain and improve their health….

Potential Changes in the Demand & Delivery of SHS with the Affordable Care Act

Brings Students into SHS Moves Students out of SHSKnowledge Gap: Students may not know where to go in the community for a healthcare service they need.

Convenience: Students continue to have issues with transportation, time constraints, planning ahead.

Confidentiality: SHS Reproductive Health Clinics continues to be a gateway to contraception for very young students concerned about confidentiality, SHS is “off the grid” to insurance companies.

Fiscal: High copays for visits to their provider, trying to keep costs

Access: Community clinic (MC), doctor’s office, and/or Kaiser? appointments may require a wait time that our students aren’t satisfied with (past, present, future)

Health Insurance: • Access: Greater and faster access to referral

networks/specialty care• Fiscal: no copays for appointments, devices or

prescriptions related to reproductive health, access to expensive prescriptions (anti-depressants for example), major medical coverage, more.

• Mental health services parity with medical services, possibly greater access to mental health treatment in the community.

Medical Home in the Community: Wrap around services with access 52 weeks/yr., evenings and weekend coverage, and continuity of care.

2011 2012

SPS visits upRepro – net evenNP visits downMD visits downAthletics downDisproportionate to enrollment decreases

All Referrals from SHS:2000-2012

Health Insurance coverage increasing in young adults

Consumer Reports June 2012Ratings of health insurance policies

Estimating Insurance Costs in California

PRPP items• Sustainability

– Current practices– New ideas

• Facilities– Pending needs-Petaluma, Race, Plover

• Technology– Computer replacements (minimum 6 per year)– Software – implement EMR for SPS– Software – shift to web-hosted server/database– Integrate new technology, YouTube channel, PEERS

Coalition webpage, FaceBook, etc with District support

PRPP item

• Personnel– Re-engineering update – MH Programs

• Professional Experts• STNC Interns

– Staffing requests • Replacement College Nurse Practitioner –Reduce FTE?• Student Employees• STNC – backfill NPs• Social Worker/Referral Case Manager• Other?

SRJC’s SMHP Grant – PEERS Coalition

Becky Fein, MPH

http://srjcpeers.wordpress.com/ https://www.facebook.com/srjcpeers

© 2010 Kognito Interactive. All Rights Reserved.

Kognito Online Trainings

Suicide and SRJC Students

Statistically speaking, it is highly likely that faculty and staff will interact with a student who is at-risk for psychological distress.

Suicide is the 2nd leading cause of death for college students

Almost 80% of today’s students that commit suicide aren’t seen by a mental health counselor

1.1% [ SRJC 3% ] say they actually attempted suicide in the past 12 months

Almost 7% [SRJC: 9%] seriously considered suicide in the past 12 months

This means that 2,520 SRJC students have seriously considered suicide in the past year

© 2012 Kognito Interactive. All Rights Reserved.

http://vimeo.com/35019671At-Risk for Faculty and Staff

At-Risk for Student Leaders

Creating a Supportive Campus for Student Veterans

Kognito – short demos

Staff & Faculty:DCC/IM MeetingFlex CreditStaff development webpageCIRT webpageSHS webpage

Student training:PEERS Coalition = Student Interns and participantsSHS webpage Bear FactsSH 101

Veterans on CampusFlex CreditStaff development webpage

Kognito Training Dissemination PlanKognito – SRJC dissemination plan

At-Risk for Faculty & Staff: http://kognitocampus.com/faculty/cccEnrollment key: ccc8752

Flex Credit 1.0 Hour available

At-Risk for Student Leaders:http://kognitocampus.com/student/cccEnrollment key: ccc6445

Veterans on Campus:http://kognitocampus.com/vet/cccEnrollment key: ccc4554

Kognito – Access Codes