Upload
nitouch3564
View
51
Download
19
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
design goods and service
Citation preview
5 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
55 Design of Goods and Services
Design of Goods and Services
PowerPoint presentation to accompany PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e
PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
5 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Regal MarineRegal Marine
Global market
3-dimensional CAD system Reduced product development time
Reduced problems with tooling
Reduced problems in production
Assembly line production
JIT
5 - 3
Some Well Known Companies Having Some Well Known Companies Having Competitive Advantage Through Their Competitive Advantage Through Their
ProductsProducts
• Organizations provide goods and services for the society. Great products are key to the success. They provide competitive advantage.
Honda: engine technology
Microsoft: PC software
Intel: Microprocessors
Michelin: Tires
Dell Computer: Customized hardware and software and Dell does this very fast.
5 - 4
Some Well Known Companies Having Some Well Known Companies Having Competitive Advantage Through Their Competitive Advantage Through Their
ProductsProducts• Toyota’s competitive advantage is rapid response to
changing customer demand. Their shorter design time (less than 2 years which is below the industry standard) gives them a competitive advantage.
• Regal Marine: introduces six new boats a year.
• Hospitals specialize to gain competitive advantage ,
- maternity hospitals, (Çınarlı Maternity Hospital)
- children hospitals,
- EKOL (Throat, nose and ear hospital in Çiğli, İzmir)
5 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The objective of the product decision The objective of the product decision is to develop and implement a is to develop and implement a
product strategy that meets the product strategy that meets the demands of the marketplace with a demands of the marketplace with a
competitive advantagecompetitive advantage
Product DecisionProduct Decision
5 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Strategy OptionsProduct Strategy Options
Differentiation
Shouldice Hospital in Canada
specializing in hernia operation
Low cost
Taco Bell, Walmart
Rapid response
Toyota (product development under 2 years. Industry standard is over 2 years)
5 - 7
Product Life CyclesProduct Life Cycles May be any length from a few hoursMay be any length from a few hours
((a newspapera newspaper), ), months (months (cell cell phonesphones), years (), years (furnituresfurnitures), ), to to decadesdecades ( (Wolgswagen BeetleWolgswagen Beetle))
A product’s life is divided into four A product’s life is divided into four phases:1. Introduction, 2. Growth, 3. phases:1. Introduction, 2. Growth, 3. Maturity, 4. DeclineMaturity, 4. Decline
The following figure shows how The following figure shows how these four stages are linked to these four stages are linked to product sales, cash flow and cost.product sales, cash flow and cost.
5 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life CyclesProduct Life Cycles
Negative cash flow
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Sal
es,
cost
, an
d c
ash
flo
w Cost of development and production
Cash flow
Net revenue (profit)
Sales revenue
Loss
Figure 5.1
5 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life CycleProduct Life Cycle
Introductory PhaseIntroductory Phase
Fine tuning may warrant unusual expenses for
1. Research
2. Product development
3. Process modification and enhancement
4. Supplier development
5 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life CycleProduct Life Cycle
Growth PhaseGrowth Phase
Product design begins to stabilize
Effective forecasting of capacity becomes necessary
Adding or enhancing capacity may be necessary
5 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life CycleProduct Life Cycle
Maturity PhaseMaturity Phase
Competitors now established
High volume, innovative production may be needed
Improved cost control is required
5 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life CycleProduct Life Cycle
Decline PhaseDecline Phase
Unless product makes a special contribution to the organization, must plan to terminate offering
5 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product-by-Value AnalysisProduct-by-Value Analysis Lists products in descending order
(from largest to smallest) of their individual dollar contribution to the firm
Lists the total annual dollar contribution of the product
Helps management to evaluate alternative strategies so that limited existing resourses are to be invested in few critical and not in many trivial.
5 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product-by-Value AnalysisProduct-by-Value Analysis
Individual Contribution ($)
Total Annual Contribution ($)
Recliner $136 $51,000
Couch $102 $36,720
Arm Chair $87 $51,765
Foot Stool $12 $6,240
Sam’s Furniture Factory
5 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Importance of New ProductsImportance of New Products
Industry leader
Top third
Middle third
Bottom third
Figure 5.2a
Percentage of Sales from New Products50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Position of Firm in Its Industry
5 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Scope of product
development team
Product Development Product Development SystemSystem
Scope for design and engineering
teams
Evaluation
Introduction
Test Market
Functional Specifications
Design Review
Product Specifications
Customer Requirements
Ability
Ideas
Figure 5.3
5 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Quality Function Quality Function DeploymentDeployment
1.Identify what will satisfy the customer
2.Translate those customer desires into the TARGET DESIGN
5 - 18
House of QualityHouse of Quality
• A part of the QFD process that utilizes a planning matrix to relate customer “wants” to “how” the company is going to meet those “wants”.
5 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
House of Quality ExampleHouse of Quality Example
Your team has been charged with designing a new camera for Great Cameras, Inc.
The first action is to construct a House of Quality
5 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
House of Quality ExampleHouse of Quality Example
Customerimportance
rating(5 = highest)
Lightweight 3Easy to use 4Reliable 5Easy to hold steady 2Color correction 1
What the customer
wants
What the Customer
Wants
RelationshipMatrix
TechnicalAttributes and
Evaluation
How to SatisfyCustomer Wants
Interrelationships
An
alys
is o
fC
om
pet
ito
rs
5 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
House of Quality ExampleHouse of Quality ExampleWhat the Customer
Wants
RelationshipMatrix
TechnicalAttributes and
Evaluation
How to SatisfyCustomer Wants
Interrelationships
An
alys
is o
fC
om
pet
ito
rs
Lo
w e
lect
rici
ty r
equ
irem
ents
Alu
min
um
co
mp
on
ents
Au
to f
ocu
s
Au
to e
xpo
sure
Pai
nt
pal
let
Erg
on
om
ic d
esig
n
How to SatisfyCustomer Wants
5 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lightweight 3Easy to use 4Reliable 5Easy to hold steady 2Color corrections 1
House of Quality ExampleHouse of Quality ExampleWhat the Customer
Wants
RelationshipMatrix
TechnicalAttributes and
Evaluation
How to SatisfyCustomer Wants
Interrelationships
An
alys
is o
fC
om
pet
ito
rs
High relationship
Medium relationship
Low relationship
Relationship matrix
5 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
House of Quality SequenceHouse of Quality Sequence
Figure 5.4
Deploying resources through the organization in response to customer requirements
Pro
du
ctio
n
pro
cess
Quality plan
House 4
Sp
ecif
ic
com
po
nen
ts
Production process
House 3
Des
ign
ch
arac
teri
stic
s
Specific components
House 2
Cu
sto
mer
re
qu
irem
ents
Design characteristics
House 1
5 - 24
Four Approaches to Four Approaches to OrganizingOrganizing for Product for Product
DevelopmentDevelopment1) Historically – distinct departments
R&D Dept, Eng. Dept, Mnfg. Eng. Dept, Prod. Dept.Duties and responsibilities are well
defined (Advantage)
Difficult to foster forward thinking (Disadvantage)
5 - 25
Organizing for Product Organizing for Product DevelopmentDevelopment
2) A ChampionTo assign a product manager to
champion the product through the product development system and related organizations
5 - 26
Organizing for Product Organizing for Product DevelopmentDevelopment
3) Team approach (Concurrent Engineering)
Cross functional – representatives from all disciplines or functions
Product development teams, design for manufacturability teams, value engineering teams
Marketability, manufacturability, serviceability
4) Japanese “whole organization” approach
No organizational divisions
5 - 27
Design for Design for Manufacturability andManufacturability and
Value Engineering Value Engineering DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY AND VALUE
ENGINEERING activities
reduce complexity of products,
reduce cost,
improve functional aspects of product,
improve maintainability (serviceability) of the product.
In short, they yield value improvement by focusing on achieving the functional specifications necessary to meet the customer requirements in an optimal way.
5 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Issues for Product Issues for Product DevelopmentDevelopment
Robust design
Modular design
Computer-aided design (CAD)
Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)
Virtual reality technology
Value analysis
Environmentally friendly design
5 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Robust DesignRobust Design
Product is designed so that small variations in production or assembly do not adversely affect the product
Typically results in lower cost and higher quality
5 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Modular DesignModular Design
Products designed in easily segmented components
Adds flexibility to both production and marketing
Improved ability to satisfy customer requirements
5 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Using computers to design products and prepare engineering documentation
Shorter development cycles, improved accuracy, lower cost
Supports “mass customization”
3-D Object Modeling
Small prototype development
Computer Aided Design Computer Aided Design (CAD)(CAD)
5 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Computer-Aided Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM)Manufacturing (CAM)
Utilizing specialized computers and program to control manufacturing equipment
Often driven by the CAD system (CAD/CAM)
CNC MachinesCNC Machines
5 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1. Better Product quality
2. Shorter design time
3. Less Production cost
4. Database availability
Benefits of CAD/CAMBenefits of CAD/CAM
5 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Virtual Reality TechnologyVirtual Reality Technology
Computer technology used to develop an interactive, 3-D model of a product from the basic CAD data
Allows people to ‘see’ the finished design before a physical model is built
Very effective in large-scale designs such as plant layout
5 - 35
Value AnalysisValue Analysis versus Value versus Value EngineeringEngineering
While Value Engineering focuses on preproduction design improvement, Value Analysis takes place during the production process.
Value Analysis seeks improvements leading either to a better product or a product which can be produced more economically.
5 - 36
Ethics and Environmentally Ethics and Environmentally Friendly DesignsFriendly Designs
It is possible to enhance productivity, It is possible to enhance productivity, drive down costs, and preserve drive down costs, and preserve resourcesresources..
Effective at any stage of the product life cycleEffective at any stage of the product life cycle
DesignDesign
ProductionProduction
DestructionDestruction
5 - 37
Guidelines for Environmentally Guidelines for Environmentally Friendly DesignsFriendly Designs
1. Make products recyclable
2. Use recycled materials
3. Use less harmful ingredients(Using soy-based inks)
4. Use lighter componentsMercedes is using banana plant fiber for car exteriors
Biodegradable and lightweight
5. Use less energy
6. Use less material
5 - 38
OM Strategies need to be sensitive OM Strategies need to be sensitive to limited enviromental resourcesto limited enviromental resources
• Design: Nike’s new Air Jordan Shoes
- very little chemical-based glue
- recycled outsole
• Production: Ban Roll-On
- repackaging in smaller cartons
• Destruction: BMW
- recycles most of a car including plastic components
5 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Time-Based CompetitionTime-Based Competition
Product life cycles are becoming shorter and the rate of technological change is increasing
Developing new products faster can result in a competitive advantage
5 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Development Product Development StrategiesStrategies
By Purchasing a Firm (Microsoft acquired Hotmail for $500 million in 1997)
Through Joint Ventures (GM & Toyota, Fuji & Xerox) Both organizations learn
Risks are shared
Through Alliances (Sturbuck & Barnes and Noble) Cooperative agreements between
independent organizations, each remains independent, but uses complementing strengths
5 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Defining The ProductDefining The Product
Define the functions of product
Define design specifications to achieve these functions
Prepare an engineering drawing
List the components of a product, Bill of material (BOM)
Determine equipment, layout and human resources
5 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Engineering DrawingsEngineering Drawings
Figure 5.8
5 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Bills of MaterialBills of MaterialBOM for Panel Weldment
NUMBER DESCRIPTION QTY
A 60-71 PANEL WELDM’T 1
A 60-7 LOWER ROLLER ASSM. 1R 60-17 ROLLER 1R 60-428 PIN 1P 60-2 LOCKNUT 1
A 60-72 GUIDE ASSM. REAR 1R 60-57-1 SUPPORT ANGLE 1A 60-4 ROLLER ASSM. 102-50-1150 BOLT 1
A 60-73 GUIDE ASSM. FRONT 1A 60-74 SUPPORT WELDM’T 1R 60-99 WEAR PLATE 102-50-1150 BOLT 1 Figure 5.9 (a)
5 - 44
A A Product Structure DiagramProduct Structure Diagram Showing BOMShowing BOM
5 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Parts grouped into families with similar characteristics
Coding system describes processing and physical characteristics
Part families can be produced in dedicated manufacturing cells
Group TechnologyGroup Technology
5 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Group Technology SchemeGroup Technology Scheme
Figure 5.10
(a) Ungrouped Parts(b) Grouped Cylindrical Parts (families of parts)
Grooved Slotted Threaded Drilled Machined
5 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1. Simplified production planning and control
2. Improved layout, routing, and machine loading
3. Reduced tooling setup time, work-in-process, and production time
Group Technology BenefitsGroup Technology Benefits
5 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Documents for ProductionDocuments for Production
Assembly drawing
Assembly chart
Route sheet
Work order
Engineering change notices (ECNs)
5 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Assembly DrawingAssembly Drawing
Shows exploded view of product
Details relative locations to show how to assemble the product
Figure 5.11 (a)
5 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Assembly ChartAssembly Chart1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
R 209 Angle
R 207 Angle
Bolts w/nuts (2)
R 209 Angle
R 207 Angle
Bolt w/nut
R 404 Roller
Lock washer
Part number tag
Box w/packing material
Bolts w/nuts (2)
SA1
SA2
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
Leftbracket
assembly
Rightbracket
assembly
Poka-yoke inspection
Figure 5.11 (b)
Identifies the point of production where components flow into subassemblies and ultimately into the final product
5 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Route SheetRoute Sheet
Lists the operations and times required to produce a component
Setup OperationProcess Machine Operations Time Time/Unit
1 Auto Insert 2 Insert Component 1.5 .4 Set 562 Manual Insert Component .5 2.3
Insert 1 Set 12C3 Wave Solder Solder all 1.5 4.1
components to board
4 Test 4 Circuit integrity .25 .5test 4GY
5 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Work OrderWork Order
Instructions to produce a given quantity of a particular item, usually to a schedule
Work Order
Item Quantity Start Date Due Date
Production DeliveryDept Location
157C 125 5/2/08 5/4/08
F32 Dept K11
5 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Service DesignService Design Service typically includes direct
interaction with the customer Increased opportunity for customization
Reduced productivity
Cost and quality are still determined at the design stage Delay customization
Modularization helps customization
Reduce customer interaction, often through automation
5 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Service DesignService Design
Figure 5.12
5 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Service DesignService Design
Figure 5.12
5 - 56© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Application of Decision Application of Decision Trees to Product DesignTrees to Product Design
Particularly useful when there are a series of decisions and outcomes which lead to other decisions and outcomes
5 - 57© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Application of Decision Application of Decision Trees to Product DesignTrees to Product Design
1. Include all possible alternatives and states of nature - including “doing nothing”
2. Enter payoffs at end of branch
3. Determine the expected value of each branch and “prune” the tree to find the alternative with the best expected value
ProceduresProcedures
5 - 58© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExampleDecision Tree Example (A semiconductor (A semiconductor manufacturer wants to produce a new manufacturer wants to produce a new
microprocessor)microprocessor)
Purchase CAD
Hire and train engineers
Do nothing
Figure 5.14
5 - 59© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExampleDecision Tree Example
Purchase CAD
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Hire and train engineers
Do nothing
Figure 5.14
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
- 500,000 CAD cost$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)- 500,000 CAD cost- $20,000 Net loss
EMV (purchase CAD system) = (.4)($1,000,000) + (.6)(- $20,000)
5 - 60© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExampleDecision Tree Example
Purchase CAD
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Hire and train engineers
Do nothing
Figure 5.14
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
- 500,000 CAD cost$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)- 500,000 CAD cost- $20,000 Net loss
EMV (purchase CAD system) = (.4)($1,000,000) + (.6)(- $20,000)
= $388,000
$388,000
5 - 61© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExampleDecision Tree Example
Purchase CAD$388,000
Hire and train engineers$365,000
Do nothing $0
$0 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 400,000 Mfg cost ($50 x 8,000)- 375,000 Hire and train cost
$25,000 Net
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,250,000 Mfg cost ($50 x 25,000)
- 375,000 Hire and train cost$875,000 Net
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
- 500,000 CAD cost$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)- 500,000 CAD cost- $20,000 Net loss
Figure 5.14