Upload
the-washington-post
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Hinckley hinckley.pdf
1/2
U.S. Department of Justice
Ronald C. Machen Jr.
United States Attorney for the
District of Columbia
Judiciary Center555 Fourth St. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEFriday, January 2, 2015
For Information Contact:
Public Affairs
(202) 252-6933
http://www.justice.gov/usao/dc/index.html
U.S. Attorneys Office Will Not Pursue ChargesAgainst John W. Hinckley, Jr. for Death of James Brady
Legal Barriers Cited in Decision
WASHINGTON The U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Columbia announcedtoday that it will not pursue criminal charges against John W. Hinckley, Jr., related to the death
last summer of former White House Press Secretary James Brady.
The decision was made following a review of applicable law, the history of the case, and
the circumstances of Mr. Bradys death, including recently finalized autopsy findings.
On March 30, 1981, President Ronald Reagan, his Press Secretary, Mr. Brady, Secret
Service Agent Timothy McCarthy, and Metropolitan Police Department Officer Thomas
Delahanty were shot during an assassination attempt in the driveway of the Washington Hilton
Hotel. All four victims immediately survived the shooting. Mr. Brady, however, was gravelywounded by a bullet to the brain, and remained incapacitated by that injury for the rest of his life.
Hinckley was apprehended on the scene. He later was charged with three federal and 10
District of Columbia offenses. In June 1982, following a trial in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia, a jury returned a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity on all charges.Hinckley, 59, has now been committed for over 32 years to St. Elizabeths Hospital.
Mr. Brady died on Aug. 4, 2014. He was 73. On Aug. 8, 2014, the Commonwealth ofVirginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner ruled that Mr. Bradys death was a homicide and
that it was caused by the 1981 gunshot wound. In the wake of that ruling, the U.S. Attorneys
Office initiated a review to determine whether to prosecute Hinckley for the homicide.
According to an autopsy report prepared by the chief medical examiners office, and
finalized on Dec. 4, 2014, the traumatic brain injury sustained by Mr. Brady created difficulty
8/10/2019 Hinckley hinckley.pdf
2/2
managing oral secretions and food and led to aspiration pneumonia and other chronic diseases.
At the time of his death, Mr. Brady was suffering from aspiration pneumonia. The chief medicalexaminer thus concluded that Mr. Bradys death was determined to be gunshot wound of head
and consequences thereof.
At his 1982 trial, the jury found Hinckley not guilty by reason of insanity of the twocharges, assault with intent to kill while armed and assault with a dangerous weapon, related to
the shooting of Mr. Brady. Because the jury conclusively made this finding, the government
would be precluded now from arguing that Hinckley was sane at the time he shot Mr. Brady.
Additionally, before 1987, the District of Columbia courts abided by the year and a day
rule, by which a homicide prosecution could only be brought if the victim died within a yearand day of the injury causing death. At the time that Hinckley made his assassination attempt, the
year-and-a-day rule was still in effect.
In summary, any further prosecution of Hinckley premised on his March 1981 shooting
of Mr. Brady would be precluded by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, which would prevent theU.S. Attorneys Office from arguing, or a court or jury from finding, that Hinckley was sane at
the time Mr. Brady was shot. Thus, Hinckley would be entitled to a directed verdict that he wasnot guilty of the murder of Mr. Brady by reason of insanity. Furthermore, a homicide
prosecution would be precluded by the common law "year-and-a-day rule," in effect at the time.
15-1
##