17
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association 1 KIT, Karlsuhe; 2 CNRS / Meteo France; 3 LEGOS / OMP www.kit.edu Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign Vera Maurer 1 , Florent Beucher 2 , Jean-Philippe Lafore 2 , Francoise Guichard 2 , Jeremie Aublanc 3 , Remy Roca 3

Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a ...srnwp.met.hu/.../Offenbach_2013/srnwp13_cosmo_arome.pdfIntercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association

    1KIT, Karlsuhe; 2CNRS / Meteo France; 3LEGOS / OMP

    www.kit.edu

    Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaignVera Maurer1, Florent Beucher2, Jean-Philippe Lafore2, Francoise Guichard2, Jeremie Aublanc3, Remy Roca3

    VorführenderPräsentationsnotizen- hier bereits erklären, wieso Westafrika extrem hoher Anteil konvektiver Niederschläge, große Systeme

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)2

    General comparison of model components

    AROME COSMOparameterizations

    turbulence scheme

    prognostic TKE, comp. of exchange-coeff. (Cuxart et al., 2000)

    TKE-based level 2.5 turbulence closure after Mellor and Yamada (1982)

    shallow convection

    Eddy diffusion / Kain Fritsch (EDKF)

    shallow convection from Tiedtke mass-flux scheme

    radiation two-stream approximation (RRTM scheme from IFS)

    radiative transfer after Ritter and Geleyn (1992)

    microphysics mixed-phase bulk scheme cloud-ice bulk scheme including graupel

    soil model ISBA (3 layers) Terra-ML (8 layers)

    25.06.2013 Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)3

    General comparison of model components

    AROME COSMO

    numerics spectral limited-area model rotated geographical lat/lon grid

    semi-implicit, semi- Lagrangian timestep

    3rd order two time-level Runge- Kutta split-explicit scheme (Wicker and Skamarock, 2002)

    Arakawa A-gridterrain-following hybrid mass coordinates

    Arakawa C-gridterrain-following hybrid height- based coordinate

    model setup model version 4.18

    initial and bound- ary conditions

    Arpège analysis using AMSU-B microwave data

    ECMWF AMMA re-analysis (6- hourly resolution)

    nominal res. of 0.05° 0.025°

    25.06.2013 Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)4

    differences of total precipitable water

    25.06.2013

    Arpège – ECMWF reanalyes, 6-day mean

    time

    15°W 2°E 20°E

    AROME – COSMO simulation,average over 12-20°N

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)5

    anomaly of precipitable water with respect to 6-day period, averaged over 12-20°N

    25.06.2013

    23/07

    25/07

    27/07

    29/0715°W 2°E 20°E

    AROME COSMO

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)6

    precipitation 5-day mean

    25.06.2013

    average 8°W to 6°E

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    AROME COSMO

    TMPA V7

    IFS

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)7

    MCS tracking – definition of “blobs”

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)8

    MCS tracking 25/07 and 26/07

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

    MCS tracks derived from GSMAPprecipitation product

    tracks derived fromAROME hourly precip- itation data interpolatedto 0.1°

    tracks derived fromCOSMO hourly precip- itation data interpolatedto 0.1°

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)9

    MCS tracking - statistics

    25.06.2013

    initiation

    max. area of precipitation patterns

    first occur- rence of pre- cipitation

    lifetimemean total pre- cipitation of systems with same area

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)10

    MCS tracking – statistics (2)

    25.06.2013 Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)11

    boundary layer - vertical profiles at 12 UTC

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

    AROME COSMO radio soundings

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)12

    distribution of boundary-layer heights

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

    AROME COSMO

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)13

    comparison of boundary-layer characterisics

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)14

    surface layer – humidity and potential temperature

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)15

    Conclusions

    intercomparison of two simulations with similar setup but different initial and boundary conditionsdisplacement of convective activity towards the south by AROME and towards north by COSMOdaily cycle of convective systems for both simulations in accordance with precipitation productmaximum surface of systems underestimated, intensity overestimated wrt GsMAP (under investigation)overestimation of total precipitation sum by AROME and underestimation by COSMO general behavior of each model for convective situations ?

    different boundary layer states: COSMO warmer and moister than AROMEday-to-day variability larger in COSMO (more clouds, higher variations in turbulent fluxes)no clear explanation for differences in precipitation amounts

    Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)16 Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    25.06.2013

  • IMK-TRO, KIT (Karlsruhe)17

    zonal wind component at eastern boundary

    25.06.2013 Maurer et al.: Intercomparison of AROME and COSMO simulations for a period of the AMMA campaign

    Foliennummer 1General comparison of model componentsGeneral comparison of model componentsdifferences of total precipitable wateranomaly of precipitable water with respect to 6-day period, averaged over 12-20°Nprecipitation 5-day meanMCS tracking – definition of “blobs”MCS tracking 25/07 and 26/07MCS tracking - statisticsMCS tracking – statistics (2)boundary layer - vertical profiles at 12 UTCdistribution of boundary-layer heightscomparison of boundary-layer characterisicssurface layer – humidity and potential temperatureConclusionsFoliennummer 16zonal wind component at eastern boundary