74
1 IPE-K <Lecture Note 8> 2013.6.7 IPE-K: Two Koreas and Unification *Some parts of this note are borrowed from references for teaching purpose only. Semester: Spring 2013 Time: Friday 2:00~15:00 pm Class Room: No. 331 Professor: Yoo Soo Hong Office Hour: By appointment Mobile: 010-4001-8060 E-mail: [email protected] Home P.: //yoosoohong.weebly.com

IPE-K < Lecture Note 8> 2013.6.7

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

IPE-K < Lecture Note 8> 2013.6.7. IPE -K: Two Koreas and Unification *Some parts of this note are borrowed from references for teaching purpose only. Semester: Spring 2013 Time: Friday 2:00~15:00 pm Class Room: No. 331 Professor: Yoo Soo Hong - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

IPE-K <Lecture Note 8> 2013.6.7

IPE-K: Two Koreas and Unification*Some parts of this note are borrowed from references for

teaching purpose only.

Semester: Spring 2013 Time: Friday 2:00~15:00 pm Class Room: No. 331 Professor: Yoo Soo Hong Office Hour: By appointment Mobile: 010-4001-8060 E-mail: [email protected] Home P.: //yoosoohong.weebly.com

2

Geography

3

4

Two Koreas Today

• South Korea• GDP Per Capita $20,400 • Military Expenses $21.06 bil-

lion• Military as share of GDP 2.6% • Population 48,846,823• Infant mortality

6.16 deaths/1,000 live births

• North Korea• GDP Per Capita

$1,800 • Military Expenses $5.21 Billion• Military as share of GDP 31%• Population 23,113,019 • Infant Mortality

23.29 deaths/1,000 live births

Cold War History: Korea

• USA/USSR tensions emerge almost at once

• USA envisions capitalist democracy

• USSR envisions communist government

• 1945: Divided occupation by the 38th Prallel Line

5

6

Two Koreas

• Emerging Cold War conflict between USA and USSR

• Joint elections were impractical

• Two separate Korean Governments established

• 1948 “Elections” in both South (UN endorsed) and North Korea

Korean War

• January 12, 1950, United States Secretary of State, Dean Acheson referred at:

• US Press Club: About America's Pacific defense perimeter

• Implied that the U.S. might not fight over Korea

• This omission encouraged the North and the Soviets

7

8

Korean War

• War began June 25, 1950: North Korea Invades

• Incheon landing, September 15 - September 28, 1950

• Chinese entry, October, 1950

• January 4, 1951, Communist Chinese and North Korean forces recaptured Seoul.

• MacArthur was removed from command by President Truman on April 11, 1951.

• Stalemate, July, 1951

Korean Division

• Originally 38th parallel

• Post Korean War: Red line called the DMZ

9

10

Korean War Ends

• Cease Fire: July 27, 1953

• Neither Korea signed armistice

• State of war continues

• Both Koreas considered themeslves the only legitimate authority

• Both Koreas had aurhoritarian dictatorships at least through 1987

11

Post Korean War History

• South Korea: 40,000 US troops remain to guard South Korea– US supports pro American authoritarian regimes

• North Korea: Chinese troops leave– North argues that South Korea is an occupied country, not independent– North sees US troops as a threat

North Korea

• North Korea sees 40,000 US troops on its southern border as a major threat– Asserts South Korea is simply a colony of the US.– No need to work with SK, it is the US that matters.

• Develops Juche ideology of independence– Economic independence– Military independence– Focus on People’s needs– In reality, Juche is a failure both in independence and in

People’s needs.– It became an ideological back-up for the Kim’s family dictatorship.

12

North Korea

• Authoritarian

• Anti religious persecution

• Inefficient production, very little economic growth

• Becomes progressively less secure as South Korea outgrows the North

13

North Korea

• Cold War ended

• Communist Block Collapsed 1991

• North Korea could not play China and Russia against each other

• South Korean President Roh Tae Woo (1988-1993) launched “Norde Politic” drive and normalized relations with China and Russia, Isolating North Korea.

• Isolated North Korea has difficulty feeding its population– Bad weather– Communist incentive structure– Poor distribution– No more cheap resources from China and Russia– 25-30% of GDP spent on military

14

Nuclear Crisis

– North Korea launched Nuclear program, 1990

– 1994: NK withdrew from membership with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

• Jimmy Carter visited Korea representing Clinton Administra-tion

– 1994 Agreed Framework negotiated• N. Korea gives up nuclear weapons for energy support• Korean Economic Development Organization (KEDO)

formed to help N. Korean energy development.

15

Nuclear Crisis

– 1994 Agreed Framework

• DPRK's nuclear power plants would be replaced with light water reactor (LWR) power plants by a target date of 2003.

• Oil for heating and electricity production would be provided while DPRK's reactors were shut down, until completion of the first LWR power unit.

• The two sides would move toward full normalization of polit-ical and economic relations.

• The U.S. would provide formal assurances to the DPRK, against the threat or use of nuclear weapons by the U.S.

• The DPRK would take steps to implement the Korean Peninsula Denuclearization Declaration.

16

South Korean Response

• President Kim Dae Jung (1998-2003) Initiated “Sunshine Policy”– Attempts for the first time to engage NK with positive incentives– Negotiates some trade and family exchanges

• President Roh Moo Hyun (2003-2008) Continued Sunshine policy

• President Myung Bak Lee– Disagrees with the “Sunshine” approach

17

Axis of Evil and Bush Doctrine

– At 2002 State of the Union, President Bush included North Ko-rea in “Axis of Evil” with Iraq and Iran

– Iraq Invasion

– President Bush declared the “Bush Doctrine” of preemptive war

– US invaded Iraq

North Korean Reaction

– 2003 Withdrew from Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty

– Declared NK a nuclear power

– Insists on addressing only US, not 6-party talks

18

– North Korea’s Nuclear threat was derived from North Korean perception of insecurity

– Korea’s division created that insecurity

– North Korea sees US as the core threat (40,000 US troops aimed at them)

– Bush Doctrine and US behavior since 2001 reinforces percep-tion of threat

– North Korean leadership is not crazy nor suicidal

– North Korea uses aggressive negotiating tactics to achieve its ends

– North Korea is unlikely to use nuclear weapons

– Panic or over-reaction to North Korean provocations are coun-terproductive

19

20

The Political Economy of North Korea

Major changes in North Korean political economy over last two decades

- Transformation is better understood as an unintended response to state failure in the wake of the famine than as a top-down reform.

- Policy has at times ratified these changes, most notably with reforms of 2002

- However, since 2005 “reform in reverse” has been going on

21

NK Economic Decline and Recovery

- Collapse: the great famine of the mid-1990s

- Recovery: unintended grass-roots marketization

- Since 2005, the return of slow growth (and food distress

22

Production

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

Metric tons (millions)

USDA

South Korean Ministry of Unification

Declining Food Production

23

Daily PDS rations

500

400

300

427

353

250

196

271

319300 300

200

100 100

25

225250 250

300296

208

200

293

395 400

550575

600 600 600

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nov.1995 -Oct.1996

Nov.1996 -Oct.1997

Nov.1997 -Oct.1998

Nov.1998 -Oct.1999

Nov.1999 -Oct.2000

Nov.2000 -Oct.2001

Nov.2001 -Oct.2002

Nov.2002 -Oct.2003

Nov.2003 -Oct.2004

Nov.2004 -Oct.2005

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Max Average Min Farmers

grams grams

Minimum human need (457g)

Declining Reliance on the PDS

PDS: public distribution system. When the PDS cannot provide enough food, there are few ways for vulnerable people to cope beyond the now very limited international assistance that is being provided.

24

Changing Pathways to Advancement

25

Origins of Shortage

On the back of increasing harvests, rising aid government seeks to re-assert control

Internally– Banning private trade in grain– Seizures in rural areas– Shut down relief agencies in the hinterland

Externally: 2006 missile and nuclear tests disrupt assistance from South

Bad weather: the floods of 2007

26

Evidence I: Quantities

North Korean Grain Balance

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

1995/96 1998/99 2001/02 2004/05 2007/08

metric tons '000s

Haggard-Noland-Weeks Estimate

UN System Estimate

North Korea Food Balances 1995/96-2007/08

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

1995/96 1999/00 2003/04 2007/08

metric tons '000s

Aid

Imports

Domestic production

Adjusted Total Demand

27

Evidence II: Prices

1. 10/01/2005: Ban on private trade in grain & revival of PDS 2. 07/14/2006- 07/15/2006: Flood 3. 10/09/2006: Nuclear Test & UN Sanctions 4. 08/15/2007- 08/31/2007: Flood 5. 12/01/2007: Introduction of Chinese Export controls, partial ban on trading activities 6. 04/01/2008: Tightened control on trading activities 7. 05/14/2008: Military stocks reportedly ordered released & US aid announcement on the 16 th. 8. 06/30/2008: Arrival of first aid shipment

100

200

300

400

500

Pric

e In

dex

Oct

-14-

2004

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

FAO-Rice 50% Corn 50% NK-Rice 50% Corn 50%

North Korean Grain Prices

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6.7

.8C

orn

-Ric

e P

rice

Ra

tioO

ct-1

4-20

04

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Oct

-14-

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008(1

)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

North Korean Corn-Rice Price Ratio

28

Evidence III: Qualitative

29

Developments in the External Sector

North Korean Trade

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

19901992

19941996

19982000

20022004

20062008

Exports

Imports

2006-2008: indexed trade values based on 2005 trade figures.

30

China's Share of North Korea's Imports and Exports

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

% o

f To

tal

Share of Imports

Share of Exports

Share ofImports+Exports

China’s Growing Share

31

China-DPRK Trade

32

China exports of grains to North Korea, monthly 2004-09

0

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

70,000,000

80,000,000

90,000,000

100,000,000

Jan-

08

Apr

-08

Jul-0

8

Oct

-08

Jan-

09

Apr

-09

Jul-0

9

Oct

-09

Jan-

10

Apr

-10

Jul-1

0

Oct

-10

Jan-

11

Apr

-11

Jul-1

1

Oct

-11

Jan-

12

Apr

-12

Jul-1

2

Oct

-12

Jan-

13

Apr

-13

KG

Total

Soybeans

Rice

Corn

Wheat flour

China Food Exports to DPRK

33

North-South Trade

34

Forms of Engagement

35

The Kaesong Industrial Park

The model– An inducement in broader North-South relations– Engagement to socialize and transform

The outcome: leverage in reverse– North Korea not only holding hostage until release…– But holding entire Kaesong project hostage– Recent evidence of backing off by reducing land rent and wage de-

mands

Compromise– Resumed normal business

36

The New Geography of North Korean Trade

Beyond China, the growth of ties with Middle East (ongoing project)

With new incentives to proliferate– Nuclear cooperation with Syria and Iran– Missiles: even during moratorium on test, working with Iran – Small arms to Burma, perhaps even Hezbollah and Hamas

Other illicit activities

US concerns: not simply sanctions in context of 6PT, but defensive concerns and link to Middle East

37

Refugees’ Life Beyond North Korea

Preferences for permanent reset-tlement– US attracts younger, better

educated respondents– More might prefer China if

policies changed

Most want unification

38

South Korean Money

Coins- 10, 50, 100, 500 Korean Won.Notes- 1,000, 5,000, 10,000 Korean Won.

1 US Dollar = 1,043 South Korean Won

39

North Korean Currency

40http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=410158

41

Prospects of Reunification

42

43

North Korea

Communist system - The world most isolated regime & economic backwardness - Dictatorship and human rights issues - Nuclear development & ‘military-first policy’

“Juche” (Self Reliance) Ideology: - Symbolizes autonomy or identity in ideology, independence in politics,

self-sufficiency in economy and reliance on Korea’s own forces in na-tional defense.

Characteristics of North Korean system: - Acceptance of hereditary succession of power - Most militarized country among communist countries - Anti-American education

44

South Korea (ROK)

One of the most successful postwar economic development and democratization

- 12th largest economy (member of OECD)

- 12th largest trading country

- 11th in global competitiveness (WEF 2007)

- 1st in university enrollment

- 1st in broadband penetration (90% of households)

- Fully democratized political system

45

Current (MB) Korean Government

Five Goals by Sector

- A government serving the people

- A lively market economy

- Active welfare

- A country rich in talent

- A global Korea

“21st Century Strategic Alliance” KORUS FTA - “Denuclearization, Openness, 3000“ - Six-party talks (multilateral approach) >Inter-Korean Summits (bilateral approach)

46

47

Inter-Korea Agreements and Documents1953-Present

Total 92 agreements and documents:

- 1953: Armistice Agreement

- 1972: Inter-Korean Joint Communique

- 1991-1992 (11 on Inter-Korean Basic Agreement)

- 1994-1997 (9 on DPRK-US Agreed Framework-related)

- 2000-2004-2007 (69+1 since the Summit in 2000)

48

South Korea’s Policy Towards North Korea

From confrontation to reconciliation

Engagement policy of North Korea during the last decade

- Dialogue and cooperation

- Confidence building

- Peaceful coexistence

- Prosperity on the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia

Peaceful and gradual process of unification

Sunshine Policy - Not allow any armed provocation hampering peace on the peninsula

- Don’t absorb North Korea

- Push reconciliation and cooperation with North beginning with those areas which can be most easily agreed upon

49

Inter-Korean Relations

Humanitarian assistance - South Korea is the biggest donor county to the North

People’s exchanges - In 2005, 88,000 South Koreans visited the North (more than the total number of visitors during the previous five decades)

- 1.5m South Korean tourists to Mt. Geumgang since 1998

50

SK Government Aid to North Korea1995-2004

Year Aid Amount (USD) Note 1995 232,000,000 Rice (150,000 MT) direct1996 3,050,000 Grain, P milk via UN 1997 26,670,000 Grain, P milk via UN1998 11,000,000 Grain, flour via UN1999 28,250,000 Fertilizer - direct2000 78,630,000 Fertilizer – direct2001 70,450,000 Fertilizer, grain, underwear, medicine

– D 2002 83,750,000 Fertilizer, grain, med – Direct2003 87,020,000 Med, cash (Unicef), fertilizer, grain -D2004 740,000 Yongchon ER supplies, medicines,

etc.-D

51

SK NGO Aid to NK, 1995-2004

Year Aid amount Note9/95-5/97 4,960,000 Food, blanket-via IFRC6/97-7/97 8,500,000 Food, fertilizer-Korean RC8/97-10/97 8,900,000 Food, vitamins-KRC3/98 170,000 Fertilizer (800 mt)-KRC4/98-6/98 9,350,000 Food, potato,socks–KRC9/98-12/98 11,330,000 Corn, cows; NGO-food1999 18,630,000 Indep (10 NGOs)- diverse KRC (24 NGOs) -food,

clothing, med

2000 35,130,000 Independ (13 NGOs); KRC (16 NGOs)

2001 64,940,000 Indep (19 NGOs); KRC ($238,333) 2002 51,170,000 Indep (25 NGOs); KRC ($692,308)2003 70,610,000 Indep (29 NGOs); KRC ($583,333)2004 (Jan-Apr) 37,510,000 Indep (19 NGOs); KRC ($491,667)

52

Gaeseong, the city next to the DMZGaeseong, the city next to the DMZ

53

Inter-Korean Summit Meetings (2000, 2007)

Major results of the 2007 Summit: (Peace building) - Cooperation on denuclearization and establishment of a peace regime - Reduction of military tension and the holding of a defense ministers’ meeting - Holding Prime Minister’s meeting (Economic cooperation) - Creating a Special Peace and Cooperation Zone in the West Sea - Constructing ship-building complexes and repairing roads - Expanding Gaeseong Industrial Complex (Reconciliation) - Expanding the reunion of separated families - Promoting exchanges and cooperation in social and cultural areas

54

Long-term Goals

- To establish a permanent peace regime on the Korean Peninsula

- To develop a multilateral security forum in Northeast Asia

Progress (North Korea’s action to be taken by the end of 2007) - Disable key nuclear facilities - Provide a complete and correct declaration of all its nuclear programs (Other Six Party’s action) - Economic and energy assistance up to the equivalent of 1 million tons of

heavy fuel oil - Discuss normalization of US-North Korea relations, Japan-North Korea rela-

tions

Stalemate (2008- ) - MB government demands proper apology by the North for killing a civilian - Three-generation succession of the ‘Kingdom” - Military Confrontation between NK and SK in the recent period - Reconciliation?

Six Party talks

Unification Strategy

• Containment

• Engagement

• Absorption

- Waiting collapse

- Absolute superiority

• EPA only

55

56

Statistics on North Korea

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74