Ir Lect Ib.2 Int Pol System 2013

7/27/2019 Ir Lect Ib.2 Int Pol System 2013

1/123

Unit IBInternationalPolitical

Systems


2/123

Multiple Worlds


3/123

Multiple Worlds To 1500: one world


4/123

Multiple Worlds To 1500: one world Same technology, economy,

society (Feudal/Agrarian)


5/123

Multiple Worlds 1500 onwards: division

(industrialization)


6/123


(industrialization)


7/123


(industrialization) Post WWII = Multiple Worlds


8/123

Cold War: 1946-1991

Cold War Model 1st World = West 2nd World = Communists 3rd World = Rest


9/123

Post-Cold War Model


10/123

Post-Cold War Model

1st World = Post-Industrial (MDC) US, Europe, Japan


11/123

Post-Cold War Model

3rd World = Pre-Industrial (LDC) Africa, Asia, Middle East


12/123

Post-Cold War Model

2nd World = industrializing (TDC/NIC) L. AM, East Asia


13/123

Post-Cold War Model

4th World = Poorest States (LLDC) Sub-Saharan Africa/South Asia


14/123

Post-Cold War Model

4th World = Poorest States (LLDC) Sub-Saharan Africa/South Asia


15/123


16/123


17/123


18/123


19/123


20/123


21/123

International Law


22/123

International Law

1. Modern Evolution:

Hugo Grotius (1583-1645)


23/123

International Law


International Law based on Natural Law



24/123

International Law


International Law based on Natural Law Just War Doctrine



25/123

Just War Doctrine


26/123

Just War DoctrineDe bellis justis


27/123

Just War DoctrineDe bellis justis


28/123

Just War DoctrineDe bellis justise bellis justis

St. Agustine (354-430)


29/123


St. Agustine (354-430)

"A just war is wont to

be described as one

that avenges wrongs


30/123


St. Agustine (354-430) St. ThomasAquinas(1225-1274)


be described as one

that avenges wrongs


31/123


St. Agustine (354-430) St. ThomasAquinas(1225-1274)


be described as one

that avenges wrongsA just cause is required,

namely that those who are

attacked, should be attacked

because they deserve it onaccount of some fault.


32/123


http://www.catholic.com/library/Just_War_Doctrine_1.asp

i


33/123

Just War Doctrine


1. Just Cause.De bellis justis

i


34/123

Just War Doctrine


De bellis justis1. Just Cause.2. Just Alternative.


35/123

J W D i


36/123

Just War Doctrine


4. Just Outcome.1. Just Cause.2. Just Alternative.

3. Just Victory.

J W D i


37/123


http://www.americancatholic.org/News/JustWar/Iraq/

J W D i


38/123

Just War Doctrine4. Just Outcome.

1. Just Cause.2. Just Alternative.

3. Just Victory.

J W D i


39/123



3. Just Victory.


40/123

J t W D t i


41/123



3. Just Victory.

J t W D t i


42/123



3. Just Victory.

J t W D t i


43/123



3. Just Victory.

J t W D t i


44/123


http://www.americancatholic.org/News/JustWar/Iraq/

I t ti l L


45/123

International Law


International Law based on Natural Law Just War Doctrine


I t ti l L


46/123

International Law


International Law based on Natural Law Just War Doctrine Rules of War


International La


47/123

International Law


International Law based on Natural Law Just War Doctrine Rules of War Limits on Sovereignty of States


International Law


48/123

2. Sources:

International Law

International Law


49/123

2. Sources: Treaties & Agreements

International Law

International Law


50/123

International Law


Pacta Sunt Servanda:

Sanctity of Treaties

International Law


51/123

International Law


Pacta Sunt Servanda:

Sanctity of Treaties

Unsigning Int. Criminal Court (ICC)

International Law


52/123

International Law

2. Sources: Treaties & Agreements Customs

International Law


53/123

International Law


Diplomatic Immunity:

Representatives of

Countries to be given

safe passage.

International Law


54/123

International Law



Representatives of


safe passage.

International Law


55/123

International Law



Representatives of


safe passage.Pope Gelasiusi I,5

th

Century AD

International Law


56/123

International Law



Representatives of


safe passage.Pope Gelasiusi I,5

th

Century AD

International Law


57/123

International Law



Representatives of


safe passage.

Congress of Vienna, 1814

International Law


58/123

International Law



Representatives of


safe passage.The Vienna Convention onDiplomatic Relations, 1961

International Law


59/123

International Law

2. Sources: Treaties & Agreements Customs General Principles of Law


60/123

International Law


61/123

International Law

2. Sources: Treaties & Agreements Customs General Principles of Law (Precedent & Stare Decisis)

3 Post WWII


62/123

3. Post WWII

Post WWII: Rise of Supranational International Law

3 Post WWII


63/123

3. Post WWII


United Nations


64/123


65/123

Human Rights


66/123

International LawHuman Rights


67/123

Just War

International LawHuman Rights

3 Post WWII


68/123

3. Post WWII


United Nations Nuremberg

War Crimes Trials

3 Post WWII


69/123

3. Post WWII


United Nations Nuremberg

War Crimes Trials Crimes Against

Humanity

3 Post WWII


70/123

3. Post WWII

International Court of Justice (World Court)

3. Post WWII


71/123

3. Post WWII

International Court of Justice (World Court)

3. Post WWII


72/123

3. Post WWII

International Court of Justice International Criminal Court

3. Post WWII


73/123

3. Post WWII


3. Post WWII


74/123

3. Post WWII


3. Post WWII


75/123

3. Post WWII

International Regimes

3. Post WWII


76/123

3. Post WWII International Regimes: Rule-governed activity

3. Post WWII Rule-Governed Activity


77/123

3. ost WW

International Regimes-- Security Regimes: NATO



78/123


-- Security Regimes: NATO-- Economic Regimes: GATT



79/123


-- Security Regimes: NATO-- Economic Regimes: GATT/WTO



80/123


-- Security Regimes: NATO-- Economic Regimes: GATT/WTO-- Environmental Regimes: Kyoto Accords

International Systems


81/123




82/123

International Systems1. Uni-Polar: One dominant power



83/123


Hegemonic stability theory: role of anchor nation-state



84/123


Hegemonic stability theory: role of anchor nation-state

Immanuel Wallerstein:

Three Instances of

Hegemony in the History

of the Capitalist World

Economy.


85/123

17th Century: Dutch


86/123

18th & 19th Century: British


87/123


Pax Britannia


88/123


Pax Britannia


89/123

20 h & 21 (?) C US


90/123

20th & 21st(?) Century: US



91/123




92/123


Stable: Anchor state = Enforcer



93/123


Stable: Anchor state = Enforcer



94/123

International Systems2. Bi-Polar: Two dominant powers



95/123


Rome v. Carthage



96/123


Rome v. Carthage

Unstable under conditions of Parity & Rivalry



97/123


US v. Soviet Union



98/123


US v. Soviet Union

Stable under conditions of MAD



99/123

te at o a Syste s

2. Bi-Polar: Two dominant powers

US v. Soviet Union


Mutually Assured Destruction



100/123

y

2. Bi-Polar: Two dominant powers

US v. Soviet Union




101/123

y

3. Multi-Polar: Many Powers

WWI & WWII



102/123

y

3. Multi-Polar: Many Powers Unstable: Parity & Rivalries

WWI & WWII


103/123


104/123

The Clint Eastwood School of


105/123

The Clint Eastwood School of

Political Philosophy:

It all comes down

to this. You got to ask

yourself:

Do I feel lucky?

International Systems:Balance of Power


106/123

y f



107/123

The power of one ormore states relative to that of another stateor group of states.

y f



108/123

y f



109/123

Great Powers: Half

dozen or so most

powerful states

y f



110/123

Great Powers: Half

dozen or so most

powerful states



111/123

Great Powers: Half

dozen or so most

powerful states Middle Powers: Less

power & Influence



112/123

Great Powers: Half

dozen or so most

powerful states Middle Powers: Less

power & Influence



113/123

Super Powers: Two

most powerful states



114/123

Super Powers: Two

most powerful states Hyper Power: Only

Super power state

Balance of International Power: 1914-2013


115/123

1914 1918 1945 1991



116/123

1914 1918 1945 1991UKGERFR

RSUSOT



117/123

1914 1918 1945 1991UKGERFR

RSUSOT

GERFR

USUK

JESU



118/123

1914 1918 1945 1991UKGERFR

RSUSOT

GERFR

USUK

JESU

USSU

FRUK

GERJP



119/123

1914 1918 1945 1991UKGERFR

RSUSOT

GERFR

USUK

JESU

USSU

FRUK

GERJP

US

GERJP

FRUK

RF



120/123

2013?US

GERJP

FRUKRF

PRC


121/123



122/123

2013?US

GERJP

FRUKRF

PRC

2050?PRC

US

IND

JPEU

RF

BRZ



123/123

2013?US

GERJP

RF

PRC

2050?PRC

US

JPEU

IND

BRZ

Documents

Ir Lect Ib.2 Int Pol System 2013