Upload
hogeschool-inholland
View
416
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
J Schneider - UVA
Citation preview
1
Study success among 2 nd Generation Turkish studentsResults from the TIES Survey
Jens SchneiderAISSR, UvA
Mix-In Conference on Diversity in Higher Education,Amsterdam, 22-23 March 2010
TIES
= “The Integration of the European Second Generation”= a quantitative survey on children of immigrants born in
destination countries of labour migration in the 1960/70s.= almost 10.000 respondents in 15 cities in 8 countries:
Sweden, Germany, The Netherlands, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Austria and Spain.
2
738259242-237Netherlands: Amsterdam
767253251-263Rotterdam
718266-200252Basel
9.8063.6421.5621.3273.275TOTAL
643202-235206Switzerland: Zürich
500250--250Sweden: Stockholm
500250250--Barcelona
500250250--Spain: Madrid
707253-204250Frankfurt
707250-202255Germany: Berlin
429177--252Strasbourg
422174--248France: Paris
973303312-358Antwerpen
778271257-250Belgium: Brussel
682234-242206Linz
755250-253252Austria: Wien
TotalComparison GroupMoroccan“Yugoslavian”TurkishINTERVIEWS per city and group
TIES 2007/2008
Survey Organisation
International Coordination:
General: Universiteit van Amsterdam Survey: Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), The Hague
National Partners:
Germany: Universität OsnabrückFrance: Institut National d’Etudes Démografique (INED), ParisAustria: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, WienSwitzerland: Université de NeuchâtelBelgium: Katolieke Universiteit LeuvenSweden: Stockholm UniversitetSpain: Universidad Pontificia Comillas de MadridThe Netherlands: see above.
3
Departure point
Much attention to problems of educational integration of immigrant children, BUT:
• the educational system and the integration context are often taken for granted;
• no distinction between immigrant children and “native-born”children of immigrants;
• only differences between groups are looked at, which overemphasizes “ethnic” differences.
→ Alternative: comparing the same groups in different contextsBUT: international comparison is very difficult (data collection methods, group definition criteria etc.).
→ Basic Idea of TIES:
A survey on the same groups in various European countries with the same questionnaire and definitional criteria.
• Target Group: native-born children of Turkish, Moroccan or former Yugoslavian immigrants in the age group 18 to 35 (= Second Generation)Definition of Second Generation in TIES: All persons born and resident in the respective survey country from either one or both parents being born in Turkey, Morocco or former Yugoslavia.
• Comparison Group: native-born children of native-born parents in the same age group and from the same neighbourhoods
4
Sampling in TIES
• Population registers as database in Austria, Belgium (Antwerp), Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland
• Additional onomastic analysis in Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Switzerland
• Phone directory screening + name recognition in France; Census street segment screening + name recognition in Brussels
• “Rare element”-sampling (e.g. difficult to find in Paris; approaching the “entire group” in Linz)
TIES Questionnaire
• Educational careers and attainments • Labour market careers• Discrimination• Identity formation• Social relations• Religion• Transnationalism• Partner choice and family relations
5
Education (42+ questions)
• Special focus on transitions and steps/choices taken in school trajectories:
Starting age of schooling
School choices and given adviceTransitions (to other schools, to higher levels, repetitions)
Highest level of schooling (incl. drop-out)
Highest obtained diploma (incl. branch of study)
• also: School context and climate in secondary education (e.g. relation to teachers and students, extra help, discrimination)
• also: Situation at home (siblings, homework guidance, role of parents, learning environment)
13,2%67,0%19,8%Switzerland
37,1%55,0%7,9%Sweden
25,6%42,3%32,1%Netherlands
3,0%62,3%34,7%Germany
39,6%44,6%15,8%France
24,8%50,2%24,0%Belgium
14,5%49,6%35,9%Austria
tertiary level (e.g. university)
maximum higher secondary
maximum lower secondary
Highest diploma
Turkish G2
6
42,8%Switzerland
22,7%Sweden
43,2%Netherlands
12,7%Germany
46,0%France
21,7%Belgium
19,7%Austria
Still in education
Turkish G2
Highest diploma + current level of education:Turkish G2 and Comparison Group
Tert.
Sec II.
Sec. I
Prim.
SwedenFranceGermanyNetherlands
Turk. CG. Turk. CG. Turk. CG. Turk. CG.
primary 6,0% 1,2% 3,0% 2,4% 10,0% 1,4% n.a. n.a.
special 1,5% 0,4% 0,8% 0,0% n.a. n.a n.a. n.a.
vocational 10,2% 5,0% 19,4% 6,6% n.a. n.a. n.a n.a
integr. 1,7% 0,4% 0,4% 0,2% 3,8% 0,6% 2,0% 0,8%
mixed 9,3% 3,2% 7,5% 4,8% n.a. n.a. n.a n.a
academic n.a. n.a n.a n.a. n.a n.a. n.a n.a
apprent. 11,8% 5,6% 48,5% 49,5% 22,4% 11,1% n.a. n.a.
post-sec. n.a. n.a. 5,9% 8,9% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
vocational 23,4% 13,4% 0,4% 1,4% 14,8% 10% n.a. n.a.
academic 1,0 6,2% 7,3% 7,2% 2,2% 3,1% 60,4% 35,6%
vocational 26,6% 32,1% 1,9% 5,0% 7,4% 7,7% n.a. n.a.
university 8,5% 39,6% 5,6% 14,1% 42,8% 66,1% 36,6% 63,6%
TIES diverse 2007/2008
7
Educational attainment Moroccan/Turk. G2
19,0%16,3%lower sec.
tertiary
apprenticeship
primary
tertiary
apprenticeship
lower sec.
primary
27,1%
9,6%
9,2%
32,0%
12,4%
16,6%
7,1%
Moroccan G2
30,0%
13,3%
22,8%
4,2%Amsterdam
Turkish G2
8,0%
Rotterdam 12,2%
27,4%
Still in education or highest diploma
253500500602505465458total N
8,1%0,7%12,6%13,8%18,2%9,2%5,7%No answer
15,5%9,6%6,2%6,8%1,6%10,1%15,9%Sec II + Tert.
28,6%40,9%35,0%40,7%19,6%47,1%50,2%Sec I
47,8%48,8%46,2%38,7%60,6%33,5%28,2%max. primary
SwedenFranceNLBelgium GermanyCH Austria
TIES diverse 2007/2008
Background Turkish parents: educational level of the fathers
8
Educational level Turkish G2: current level + highest diploma(parents of high educational background)
18,4
25,4
21,1
16,3
15,9
8,6
17,8
10,3
9,5
6,4
4,0
6,0
4,7
36,7
38,8
63,2
67,4
67,1
59,1
68,3
77,3
52,0
52,4
27,3
58,1
63,6
44,9
35,8
15,8
16,3
17,1
32,3
13,9
12,4
38,5
41,3
68,7
35,9
31,8
Amsterdam
Rotterdam
Berlin
Frankfurt
Vienna
Linz
Basel
Zürich
Stockholm
Strasbourg
Paris
Antwerp
Brussels
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
lower secondary or below Upper secondary and vocational orientatedPost Seocndary & Tertiary education
31,0
37,2
36,8
34,1
40,0
32,8
22,1
19,0
7,0
23,8
12,5
10,1
15,1
43,0
42,5
60,2
63,8
47,1
49,2
66,3
63,8
56,1
51,6
36,4
64,5
60,3
26,0
20,4
3,0
2,2
12,9
18,0
11,6
17,2
36,8
24,6
51,1
25,4
24,7
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Amsterdam
Rotterdam
Berlin
Frankfurt
Vienna
Linz
Basel
Zürich
Stockholm
Strasbourg
Paris
Antwerp
Brussels
lower secondary or below Upper secondary and vocational orientatedPost Seocndary & Tertiary education
Educational level Turkish G2: current level + highest diploma(parents of low educational background)
9
Influential Factors
e.g. Educational level of the parents; speaking about school at home; help with homework by parents or siblings; a quiet place to study; the number of books at home...
� only relevant, when school system fails to fulfill a “complete duty”(Germany: yes, Sweden: no); highest relevance in higher education
Permeability of the system in both directions; second or third chances,long routes for “late bloomers”
� Germany: no; Netherlands: yes
Better access conditions to the labour market through vocationaltraining in “full-term”-apprenticeships
� Germany and Switzerland: yes; Netherlands and France: no
10
Average starting age in education (incl. pre-school)
4.2Germany
3.1Sweden
3.0Belgium
5.2Austria
Turkish G2 Starting age in school
France 3.1
Netherlands 4.0
Switzerland 4.9
Selection age for secondary school
10/12Germany
15Sweden
14Belgium
10Austria
Turkish G2 Selection age
France 15
Netherlands 12
Switzerland 12
11
Number of years in school before tracking and % of those in pre-academic tracks
joint years in school % in pre-academic track
Sweden 11,9 56,2%
France 11,9 53,6%
Belgium 11,0 51,3%
Netherlands 8,0 25,6%
Germany 5,8/7,8 12,7%
Switzerland 7,1 8,2%
Austria 4,8 n.a.
Turkish G2
19,7%n.a.Austria
33,2%25,6%Netherlands
35,5%56,2%Sweden
24,2%51,3%Belgium
Pre-academic track Entering higher education
France 53,6% 52,0%
Germany 12,7% 7,5%
Switzerland 8,2% 13,8%
Turkish G2: Relation pre-academic track and actual access to higher education
12
% left without a diploma
Austria 5,6%
Belgium 22,8%
France 15,0%
Germany 10,5%
Netherlands 14,5%
Sweden (29,2%)
Switzerland 9,3%
Turkish G2: Drop-out in higher education
Second generation Success?
Success is relative: Do we compare with peers or with parents?
Institutional arrangements condition second generation success across Europe.
Educational success = question of integration or discrimination?
13
Thank you!Thank you!
www.TIESproject.euwww.TIESproject.eu