58
LABOR MARKET DISCRIMINATION Labor Economics Series

LABOR MARKET DISCRIMINATION

  • Upload
    mahon

  • View
    26

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LABOR MARKET DISCRIMINATION. Labor Economics Series. Tokoh Pejuang Wanita Indonesia. Raden Adjeng Kartini 21 April 1879 – 17 September 1904. Pemikiran Raden Adjeng Kartini. Dunia wanita hanya sebatas tembok rumah. Tidak bebas mendapatkan akses pendidikan. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

LABOR MARKET DISCRIMINATION

Labor Economics Series

Page 2: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

2

Tokoh Pejuang Wanita Indonesia

Raden Adjeng Kartini21 April 1879 – 17 September 1904

Page 3: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

3

Pemikiran Raden Adjeng Kartini

• Dunia wanita hanya sebatas tembok rumah.

• Tidak bebas mendapatkan akses pendidikan.

• Dipingit dan dinikahkan dengan pria yang tidak dikenal.

Adanya keinginan untuk memperbaiki kondisi kaum wanita yang disebabkan kungkungan adat, antara lain :

Page 4: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

4

Fakta di Indonesia

Page 5: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

5

Penduduk yang Bekerja (2007)

0

10.000.000

20.000.000

30.000.000

Wan

itaP

ria

Wanita Pria

Page 6: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

6

Penduduk yang Bekerja (2007)

Jenis Pekerjaan Utama JENIS KELAMIN

Jumlah Pria Wanita

Tenaga Profesional 1.945.782 1.857.339 3.803.121

Kepemimpinan 310.089 57.295 367.384

Tata Usaha 2.608.947 1.383.556 3.992.503

TU Penjualan 8.590.673 8.046.116 16.636.789

TU Jasa 3.351.697 2.992.762 6.344.459

TU Pertanian 26.479.175 15.753.497 42.232.672

Produksi 18.446.465 5.325.368 23.771.833

Lainnya 418.454 15.926 434.380

Jumlah 62.151.282 35.431.859 97.583.141

Page 7: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

7

Rata-rata Upah (2006)

0

400.000

800.000

1.200.000

1.600.000

Wan

ita Pri

a

Wanita Pria

Page 8: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

8

Rata-rata Upah (2006)

SEKTOR LAPANGAN PEKERJAAN PRIA WANITA

1 Pertanian, Kehutanan, Perburuan, Perikanan

(Agriculture,Forestry,Hunting,Fishery) 438.149 234.586

2 Pertambangan, Penggalian (Mining and Quarrying) 1.541.24

1771.415

3 Industri Pengolahan (Manufacturing Industries) 826.257 583.768

4 Listrik, gas dan air (Electricity, Gaz and Water) 1.176.16

01.338.737

5 Bangunan (Construction) 734.070 1.073.573

6 Perdagangan Besar, Rumah Makan & Hotel (Wholesale

Trade,Restaurant & Hotel) 806.110 621.248

7 Angkutan, Pergudangan dan Komunikasi (Transportation,Storage &

Communication) 934.761 944.419

8 Keuangan, Asuransi,Jasa Perusahaan (Financing,Insurance,Business

Services) 1.422.25

21.461.926

9 Jasa Kemasyarakatan (Public Services) 1.126.55

9789.557

Rata-rata 827.101 612.131

Page 9: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

9

Penduduk yang Bekerja Berdasarkan Jam Kerja Tahun 2007

0

15.000.000

30.000.000

45.000.000

WanitaPria

Wanita 803.388 14.623.275 20.005.196

Pria 1.798.703 15.615.701 44.736.878

<1 jam 1-35 jam >35 jam

Page 10: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

10

Konsep Diskriminasi

Page 11: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

11

Konsep Diskriminasi

Differences in EARNINGS and EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES among equally skilled workers employed in the same job simply because of the worker’s race, gender, national origin, sexual orientation, or other seemingly irrelevant characteristics.

George Borjas :

Page 12: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

12

Konsep Diskriminasi

Discrimination means treating people differently and less favourably because of characteristics that are not related to their merit or the requirements of the job.

These include race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction and social origin.

Page 13: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

13

The Discrimination Coefficient

Page 14: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

14

The Discrimination Coefficient

The Economics of Discrimination (1957)

Lauched for the first time

by Gary S. Becker

Page 15: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

15

• Basic Concept : Taste Discrimination

• Assumption Two types of workers :

• White workers : wage wW

• Black workers : wage wB

The Discrimination Coefficient

Page 16: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

16

• If the employer is prejudiced againts black, employer gets disutility from hiring black workers.

• Disutility : employer will act as if costs for black worker wB (1 + d), where d is positive number and is called :

The Discrimination Coefficient

The Discrimination Coefficient

Page 17: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

17

• Suppose that wB = $10, and that d =0,5 ; the employer will then act as if hiring a black worker costs $ 15

• The greater the prejudiced, the greater is the disutility from hiring black workers, and the greater is the discrimination coefficient d.

The Discrimination Coefficient

Page 18: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

18

• If these black employers prefer to hire black workers, they will act as if hiring a black worker is cheaper than it actually is.

The Discrimination Coefficient

Nepotism Coefficient wB (1 – n )

Page 19: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

19

Labor Market Discrimination Analysis

FIRM

Non DiscriminatoryFirm

W = VMP

DiscriminatoryFirm

White Firmagaints Black

Black Firmagaints Black

DiscriminationCoefficientis very High

DiscriminationCoefficient

is relatively Low

Page 20: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

20

Employer Discrimination

Page 21: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

21

Skill and Labor Market Outcomes (2001)

WHITE BLACK HISPANIC

Male Female Male Female Male Female

Highschool Graduate or more (Percent)

84.3 85.2 78.5 78.9 56.1 57.9

Bachelor’s degree or more (Percent)

29.1 25.4 16.4 17.5 11.0 11.2

Labor Force Participation Rate (Percent)

79.9 59.9 72.1 65.2 83.8 59.3

Unemployment Rate (Percent)

4.7 3.6 8.0 7.0 5.2 6.6

Annual Earnings (in $1,000) 49.8 29.6 33.5 26.0 30.8 22.3

Annual Earnings(Full Time)

55.4 37.1 38.5 30.8 34.3 28.0

Page 22: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

22

Fact :

White Wage > Black Wage

Page 23: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

23

• Assumption : White Workers and Black Workers are

Perfect Subtitutes in Production.

• Firms’s output depends on the total number of workers hired, regardless of their race have the same Marginal Product of Labor ( MPE )

Employer Discrimination

Page 24: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

24

Employer Discrimination

Production function:

q = f ( EW + EB )

q firm’s output

EW number of white workers hired

EB number of black workers hired

Page 25: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

25

Employment in a non Discriminatory

Firm

Page 26: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

26

Employment in a non Discriminatory Firm

• Both groups of workers have the same Value of Marginal Product, a non discriminatory firms will hire whichever group is Cheaper

• Suppose that wW > wB , a firms that doesn’t discriminate will hire black workers up to the point where

wB = VMPE *BE

Page 27: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

27

The Employment Decision of a Firm

That Does Not Discriminate

Bw

Dollar

Employment*BE

Black workers wage is less than white

wage How many workerwill be hired..??

?VMPE

wB = VMPE

Page 28: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

28

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm

Page 29: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

29

• The employer act as if black wage is not wB , but instead equal to wB (1 + d). Where d is discrimination coefficient.

• The employer’s hiring decision based on a comparison wW and wB (1 + d)

– Hire only blacks if wB (1 + d) < wW

– Hire only white if wB (1 + d) > wW

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm

Page 30: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

30

• As long as black and white workers are perfect subtitutes, firms have a segregated workforce.

• Employer’s who have little prejudice and hence have small discrimination coefficient, will hire only BLACKS (called “Black Firm”).

• Employer’s who are very prejudice and have very large discrimination coefficient, will hire only WHITES (called “White Firm”).

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm

Page 31: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

31

• The white firm hires workers up to the point where : wW = VMPE

• Assumption : wW > WB

• The white firm is paying an excessively high price for its workers and hires relatively few workers ( )

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm

WHITE FIRM

*WE

Page 32: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

32

Ww

Dollar

Employment*WE

VMPE

The Employment Decision of a Prejudiced Firm

White Firm

Page 33: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

33

• Non discriminatory firms :

wB = VMPE

• If discrimination coefficient d0 :– Price of Black Labor wB ( 1 + d0 )

– Amount of Labor hired :

wB ( 1 + d0 ) = VMPE

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm

BLACK FIRM

*BE

Page 34: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

34

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm

BLACK FIRM

The number of black workers hired, therefore, is smaller for firms that have larger discrimination coefficient.

Page 35: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

35

The Employment Decision of a Prejudiced Firm

Bw

*BE

0BE

Dollar

Employment

VMPE

Black Firm

1BE

01 dwB

11 dwB

Discrimination Coefficient

Page 36: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

36

Discrimination and Profits

Page 37: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

37

Firms that discriminate lose on two counts :

• The prejudiced employer could have hired the same number of black worker at lower wage. Because black and white workers are perfect subtitutes.

• Discriminatory black firms are hiring too few workers ( or ) they are giving up profits in order to minimize contact with black workers.

Discrimination and Profits

0BE

1BE

Page 38: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

38

Dollar

DiscriminationCoefficient

BlackFirm

Profit and Discrimination Coefficient

max

w

dw0

White Firm

Max Profit

Page 39: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

39

The Most Profitable Firm 

Zero Discrimination

Discrimination and Profits

Page 40: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

40

Labor Marker Equilibrium

Page 41: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

41

• Firm dengan Discrimination Coefficient :– Rendah cenderung Black Firm– Tinggi cenderung White Firm

• Asumsi : Supply Black Worker Perfectly Inelastic sejumlah N Black person tidak terpengaruh tingkat upah.

Discrimination and Profits

Page 42: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

42

Labor Market Equilibrium

Black-WhiteWage Ratio

*)/( WB ww

Black Employment0

1

S

R

D

D’

)'/( WB ww

N

Page 43: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

43

Employee Discrimination

Page 44: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

44

• Diskriminasi dilakukan oleh “Fellow Worker”

• Misal : White worker yang bekerja pada Black Firm dengan upah wW akan merasa mendapat upah wW (1- d).

• Tidak berpengaruh terhadap “Profitability of Firms” karena white worker dan black worker adalah perfect subtitutes sehingga firm membayar jumlah upah yang sama.

Employee Discrimination

Page 45: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

45

Customer Discrimination

Page 46: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

46

• Dikemukakan oleh Harry J. Holzer dan Keith R. Ihlanfeldt (1998) research di Atlanta, Boston, Detroit dan Los Angeles.

• Keputusan membeli tidak ditentukan oleh Actual Price ( p ) tapi oleh The Utility-Adjusted Price p (1 + d).

• Employer dapat mengatur tenaga penjualan sesuai kondisi.

Customer Discrimination

Page 47: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

47

Customer Discrimination

TYPE FIRM> 50 %BLACK

CUSTOMER

> 75 %WHITE

CUSTOMERPERBEDAAN

Customer & worker bertemu 58,0 % 9,0 % 49,0 %

Customer & worker tidak bertemu 46,6 % 12,2 % 34,4 %

Perbedaan - - 14,6 %

Page 48: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

48

Customer Discrimination and NBA

Lawrence Kahn and Peter Sherer 1998) :

A study of attenance records indicates that replacing a black player with an

eqqually talented white player bring in about 9,000 additional fans per year.

At $50 a head (a very conservative estimate of ticket prices and concession revenues), the racial switch would increase annual team revenues by roughly $450,000

Page 49: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

49

Measuring Discrimination

Page 50: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

50

Measuring Discrimination

___

MW___

FW

_________

FM WWW

Diskriminasi : selisih average wage, yaitu :

Asumsi : Tenaga kerja terdiri dari• Male, dengan average wage

• Female, dengan average wage

Page 51: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

51

Measuring Discrimination

Pengembangan model :

Schooling mempengaruhi pendapatan

Earning Function :• Male :

• Female :

MMMM Sw

FFFF Sw

M menyatakan pendapatan pria meningkat bila mendapatkan tambahan 1 tahun pendidikan.

Page 52: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

52

Measuring Discrimination

Model Regresi :

FFFMMMFM ssWWW _________

Page 53: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

53

Measuring The Impact of Discrimination on the Wage

M

F

___

FW

Dollars

Schooling

Women’s Earning Function

___

MW

*Fw

__

Fs__

Ms

Men’s Earning Function

Women’s Schooling

Women’s Earning

Men’s Schooling

Men’s Earning

Measure Discrimination :*Fw

___

FWWoman’s Earning

Men’s Earning

Page 54: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

54

Trend in Female-Male Wage Ratio (USA 1930-1990)

0.541940 1950 1960 19701930 1980 1990

Year

0.57

0.60

0.63

0.66

0.69

0.72

Page 55: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

55

Global Gender Gap 2007

INDONESIA

Rank 2007 : 81Score 2007 : 0.6550 ( 1 = equality )

Rank 2006 : 68Score 2007 : 0.6541( 1 = equality )

Page 56: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

56

Global Gender Gap 2007

Page 57: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

57

Global Gender Gap 2007

INDONESIA

Page 58: LABOR MARKET  DISCRIMINATION

58

Terima kasih…