lec4.ps

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 lec4.ps

    1/3

    Lecture IV 9

    Lecture IV: Second Quantisation

    We have seen how the elementary excitations of the quantum chain can be presented

    in terms of new elementary quasi-particles by the ladder operator formalism. Can this

    approach be generalised to accommodate other many-body systems? The answer is provided

    by the method of second quantisation an essential tool for the development of interacting

    many-body field theories. The first part of this section is devoted largely to formalism

    the second part to applications aimed at developing fluency.

    Reference: see Feynmans book on Statistical Mechanics

    Notations and Definitions

    Consider a single-particle Schrodinger equation:

    H| = |

    How can one construct a many-body wavefunction?Particle indistinguishability demands symmetrisation:

    n

    n

    0

    1

    1

    1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    2

    3

    1

    Fermions Bosons

    0

    e.g. two-particle wavefunction for fermions i.e. particle 1 in state 1, particle 2...

    F(x1, x2) 12

    (

    state 11 (

    particle 1

    x1 )2(x2) 2(x1)1(x2))

    In Dirac notation:

    |1, 2F 12

    (|1 |2 |2 |1)

    General normalised, symmetrised, N-particle wavefunctionof bosons ( = +1) or fermions ( = 1)

    |1, 2, . . . N 1

    N!

    =0n!

    P

    P|P1 |P2 . . . |PN

    n no. of particles in state (for fermions, Pauli exclusion: n = 0, 1, i.e. |1, 2, . . . N is a Slater determinant)

    Lecture Notes October 2005

  • 7/28/2019 lec4.ps

    2/3

    Lecture IV 10

    P: Summation over N! permutations of

    {1, . . . N

    }required by particle indistinguishability Parity P no. of transpositions of two elements which brings permutation

    (P1, P2, P N) back to ordered sequence (1, 2, N)Evidently, first quantised representation looks clumsy!

    motivates alternative representation...

    Second quantisation

    Define vacuum state: |, and set of field operators a and adjoints a no hats!

    a| = 0, 1=0

    n!

    Ni=1

    ai | = |1, 2, . . . N

    cf. bosonic ladder operators for phonons N.B. ambiguity of ordering?

    Field operators fulfil commutation relations for bosons (fermions)a, a

    = ,

    a, a

    =

    a, a

    = 0

    where [A, B] AB BA is the commutator (anti-commutator) Operator a creates particle in state , and a annihilates it Commutation relations imply Pauli exclusion for fermions: aa = 0 Any N-particle wavefunction can be generated by application of set of

    N operators to a unique vacuum state

    e.g. |1, 2 = a2a1|

    Symmetry of wavefunction under particle interchange maintained by

    commutation relations of field operators

    e.g. |1, 2 = a2

    a1| = a

    1a2|

    (So, providing one maintains a consistent ordering convention,the nature of that convention doesnt matter)

    Fock space: Defining FN to be linear span of all N-particle states |1, 2, NFock space F is defined as direct sum N=0FN

    General state | of the Fock space is linear combination of stateswith any number of particles Note that the vacuum state | (sometimes written as |0) is distinct from zero!

    Lecture Notes October 2005

  • 7/28/2019 lec4.ps

    3/3

    Lecture IV 11

    + a+a

    a

    0

    a

    ... F0

    a

    F1F2

    Change of basis:

    Using the resolution of identity 1 ||, we havea|

    | =

    a|| |

    i.e. a

    =

    |

    a, and a =

    |

    a

    E.g. Fourier representation: a ak, a a(x)

    a(x) =k

    eikx/

    L x|k ak, ak = 1

    L

    L0

    dx eikxa(x)

    Occupation number operator: n = aa measures no. of particles in state

    e.g. (bosons)

    aa(a)

    n| = a

    1 + aaaa

    (a

    )

    n1| = (a)n| + (a)2a(a)n1| = = n(a)n|Exercise: check for fermions

    Lecture Notes October 2005