lec6.ps

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 lec6.ps

    1/3

    Lecture VI 16

    Lecture VI: Tight-binding and the Mott transition

    According to band picture of non-interacting electrons, a 1/2-filled band of states is metal-lic. But strong Coulomb interaction of electrons can lead to a condensation or crystallisa-tion of the electron gas into a solid, magnetic, insulating phase Mott transition. Herewe employ the second quantisation to explore the basis of this phenomenon.

    Atomic Limit of crystalHow do atomic orbitals broaden into band states? Transparencies

    0

    1

    0

    1

    V(x)

    x

    Es=1

    s=0 0A

    E

    0B

    1A

    1B

    n1 a

    E a

    E

    k0

    a

    x

    n+1 ana

    Weak overlap of tightly bound states narrow band:Bloch states |ks, band index s, k [/a, /a]

    Bloch states can be used to define Wannier basiscf. discrete Fourier decomposition

    |ns 1N

    B.Z.k[/a,/a]

    eikna|ks, |ks 1N

    Nn=1

    eikna|ns, k = 2Na

    m

    n0

    (x)

    (n1)a

    x

    (n+1)ana

    In atomic limit, Wannier states |ns mirror atomic orbital |s on site n

    Lecture Notes October 2005

  • 7/28/2019 lec6.ps

    2/3

    Lecture VI 17

    Field operators associated with Wannier basis:

    cns

    |

    |ns = dxc(x)

    |

    |xns(x) x|ns

    cns

    dx ns(x)c(x)

    and using completeness (exercise)

    ns ns(x

    )ns(x) = (x x)

    c(x) =ns

    ns(x)cns, [cns, c

    ns ]+ = nnss

    i.e. operators cns/cns create/annihilate electrons at site n in band s with spin

    In atomic limit, bands are well-separated in energy. If electron densities are low,one may project onto lowest band s = 0

    Transforming to Wannier basis, interacting electron Hamiltonian takes form

    H =mn

    tmncmcn +

    mnrs

    Umnrscmc

    ncrcs

    where hopping matrix elements: tmn = m|H(0)|n = tnmand interaction parameters

    Umnrs =1

    2

    dx

    dxm(x)n(x

    )e2

    |x x|r(x)s(x)

    (For lowest band) representation is exact:but, in atomic limit, matrix elements decay exponentially with separation

    (i) Tight-binding approximation:

    tmn =

    m = nt mn neighbours0 otherwise

    , H(0) n

    cncn tn

    cn+1cn + h.c.

    In discrete Fourier basis: cn =1N

    B.Z.k[/a,/a]

    eiknack

    tNn

    cn+1cn + h.c.

    = t

    kk

    kk 1

    N

    n

    ei(kk)na eikackck + h.c. = 2t

    k

    cos(ka) ckck

    H(0) =

    k( 2t cos ka)ckck

    As expected, as k 0, spectrum becomes free electron-like:k 2t + t(ka)2 + (with m = 1/2a2t)

    Lecture Notes October 2005

  • 7/28/2019 lec6.ps

    3/3

    Lecture VI 18

    /a

    (k)

    /a k-

    B.Z.

    (ii) Interaction

    Focusing on lattice sites m = n:1. Direct terms Umnnm

    Vmn couple to density fluctuations: m=n Vmnnmnn

    potential for charge density wave instabilities

    2. Exchange coupling JFmn Umnmn (exercise see lecture handout)m=n,

    Umnmncmc

    ncmcn = 2

    m=n

    JFmn

    Sm Sn + 1

    4nmnn

    , Sm =

    1

    2cmcm

    i.e. weak ferromagnetic coupling (JF > 0) cf. Hunds rule in atoms

    spin alignment symmetric spin state and asymmetric spatial state lowers p.e.

    But, in atomic limit, both tmn and JFmn exponentially small in separation |m n|a

    On-site Coulomb or Hubbard interactionn

    Unnnncnc

    ncn cn = U

    n

    nnnn, U 2Unnnn

    Minimal model for strong interaction: Hubbard Hamiltonian

    H = tn

    (cn+1cn + h.c.) + Un

    nnnn

    ...could have been guessed on phenomenological grounds

    Transparencies on Mott-Insulators and the Magnetic State

    Lecture Notes October 2005