36
Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE

CE 7640: Fall 2002

Page 2: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

What is Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis?

A method of calculating the cost of a system over its entire life span.

Page 3: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Objectives of LCC Analysis

Evaluate the economic effectiveness of different mutually exclusive investment alternatives over a certain period Identify the most cost-effective alternative

Page 4: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Analysis Period

A time frame that is sufficiently long to reflect differences in performance among different strategy alternatives.

Page 5: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of Analysis Period

It is necessary to select an analysis period over which the alternatives are compared.

Page 6: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Pavement Rehabilitation Project

Analysis period is considered starting at the end of the performance period of the original pavement.

Page 7: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Rehabilitation strategy analysis period beginning at the end of original pavement

performance period

Page 8: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Example 1Common Performance Period

All the investment alternatives have the same performance period.

Page 9: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Common Performance Period

Performance curves for rehabilitation alternatives expected to exhibit notably different performance over the common performance period.

Page 10: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of analysis period for alternatives with common performance period, but different performance

Page 11: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Options for Defining the Analysis Period

The least common multiple of the performance periods of all the alternatives The shortest of the performance periods among the alternatives The longest of the performance periods of the alternatives Some other time period

Page 12: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Comparisons of Various Options

For relatively longer performance periods, use of least common multiple of the performance periods can result in an extremely long and unrealistic analysis period. The use of shortest performance period may adversely affect those alternatives with better long-term performance and favor those with short performance periods. The longest performance periods is recommended as the analysis period.

Page 13: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Example 2Unequal Performance Periods

Alternatives having different performance periods, which are expected to be able to keep the pavement condition above the minimum acceptable level for different lengths of time.

Page 14: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Unequal Performance Periods

The analysis period is recommended to be no less than the performance period of the longest surviving alternative. Using a shorter analysis period (equal to the performance period of one of the shorter-lived alternatives) would not fully capture the anticipated differences in performance.

Page 15: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of analysis period for alternatives with unequal performance periods

Page 16: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Unequal Performance Periods

While using a longer analysis period, the follow-up rehabilitation treatments would have to be assigned to all three alternatives.

Page 17: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of analysis period to encompass follow-up rehabilitation for all alternatives

Page 18: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Comments

One or more of the alternatives may have a follow-up rehabilitation performance period which extends beyond the end of the analysis period. FHWA recommends an analysis period of at least 35 years for all projects (new construction as well as rehabilitation)

Page 19: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Bottom Line of Analysis Period

Analysis period should be selected sufficiently long to reflect significant differences in performance among the different strategy alternatives.

Page 20: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Discount Rate

Refers to the rate of change of true value of money over time, considering fluctuations in both investment interest rates and the rate of inflation. Discount rate is approximately equal to the interest rate minus the inflation rate.

Page 21: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of Interest Rate

Philosophy 1: A zero interest rate is appropriate when tax monies are used for financing.

Philosophy 2: The interest rate need only reflect the “societal rate of time preference”.

Page 22: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of Interest Rate

Philosophy 3: The appropriate interest rate is dictated by the opportunity cost of those investments forgone by private investors who pay taxes or purchase bonds.

Page 23: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of Interest Rate

Philosophy 4: The appropriate interest rate is dictated by the opportunity cost of those investments forgone by budget agencies due to budget constraints.

Page 24: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Selection of Interest Rate

Philosophy 5: The interest rate should match that paid by government for borrowed money.

The rate at which governments can borrow money is felt to be appropriate for evaluating highway improvement projects.

Page 25: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Typical Discount Rate

Discount rates used by State DOTs in life cycle cost analysis vary from 0 to 10 percent, with typical values between 3 and 5 percent, and overall average rate of 4 percent.

Page 26: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Monetary Agency Cost

Costs associated with the alternative that are incurred by the agency during the analysis period, which can be expressed in monetary terms.

Page 27: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Monetary Agency Cost

Includes the following: Initial rehabilitation design and construction costs Follow-up rehabilitation design and construction costs Annual maintenance costs Traffic control costs during construction Demolition and removal costs, or residual value of the pavement structure

Page 28: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

User Costs

Costs associated with the alternative that are incurred by the users of a roadway over the analysis period, which can be expressed in monetary terms.

Page 29: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Categories of User Costs

• Vehicle operating costs - fuel and oil, wear on tires and other parts,

registration, insurance, and others • Delay costs - due to reduced speed and/or use of alternate routes• Crash costs - damage to the user’s/other vehicles, public/private property, as well as injuries

Page 30: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Vehicle Operating Costs

In-service vehicle operating costs are a function of pavement serviceability level, which is often difficult to estimate. Tools are available to model these costs, such as World Bank’s Highway Design and Maintenance Standards Model (HDM-III), FHWA’s Highway Investment Analysis Package (HIAP-Revised), AASHTO Red Book, and others.

Page 31: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Delay Costs

Costs associated with the value of time. Vary by vehicle class, trip type and trip purpose. A function of demand for use of the roadway with respect to roadway capacity. Work zone user delay costs may be significantly different for different rehabilitation alternatives.

Page 32: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Crash Costs

In-service crash rates for different roadway functional classes and crash severities are well known. Work zone crash rates may differ significantly for different rehabilitation alternatives.

Page 33: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Other Monetary Costs

Those incurred by parties other than the agency or the users of the roadway. Owners of properties and businesses adjacent to or near the route under study. Municipalities whose sales tax receipts might be reduced during the period that the nearby businesses were adversely affected.

Page 34: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Salvage Value

The residual value that can be attributed to the alternative at the end of the analysis period. The value that the item would have in the market place. Must be defined the same way for all alternatives.

Page 35: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Compare Strategies

Present Worth Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost Future Worth Internal Rate of Return External Rate of Return Benefit/Cost Ratio Payback Period Capitalized Worth

Page 36: Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE CE 7640: Fall 2002

Sensitivity of Life Cycle Cost Analysisto Key Parameters

Factors that are more sensitive: The analysis period and performance period The predicted traffic over the design and analysis periods The initial investment The discount rate The timing of follow-up maintenance and rehabilitation activities The quantities associated with initial and follow-up maintenance and rehabilitation