15
Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF) LNF-LNGS-Padova

Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF). LNF-LNGS-Padova. Experimental setup ( @ Lab6 of LNGS ). Scintillator trigger Trigger area = (210*28) cm² Trigger rate = 15 Hz/m² RPC area = (2.9*1.1) m² (full size) RPC 1,2,3,4 with xy readout by 3 cm pitch strips - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso

A. Paoloni (LNF)

LNF-LNGS-Padova

Page 2: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Experimental setup( @ Lab6 of LNGS )

• Scintillator trigger

• Trigger area = (210*28) cm²

• Trigger rate = 15 Hz/m²

• RPC area = (2.9*1.1) m² (full size)

• RPC 1,2,3,4 with xy readout by 3 cm pitch strips

• RPC 2,4,5,6 (with grooves)

• RPC 1,3 (without grooves)

Page 3: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term operation test

• RPC 13 old chambers

• RPC 46 produced according to the final procedure (improved oil coating)

• Bakelite resistivity = 5÷10 * 10¹¹ *cm

• Counting rate at Gran Sasso lab surface ≈ 300 Hz/m²

• Counting rate at Gran Sasso hall ≈ 30 Hz/m²

• Ageing: 6 months surface test ≈ 10 years Opera (rate ratio=10, 6/12 months with beam on)

Page 4: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Operating voltage

• Typical operating conditions: Vapplied=7.4 ÷ 7.8 kV, Gas mixture Ar/TFE/i-But=48/48/4 (5 refills/day), T=20÷27 °C, P≈900 mbar

• Different T and P different chamber behaviour at fixed voltage (charge multiplication in gas depends on V/d, where d is the gas density)  

• In our analysis the voltage is rescaled to fixed T0=293 K and P0=1010 mbar according to :

V = Vapplied * (T/T0) * (P0/P)• Moreover, operating current and counting rates

increase with the temperature (change of bakelite resistivity)

Page 5: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (old chambers)

• RPC1 shows an increase of the current from day 110

• RPC2 showed an increase already from day 50, reversible by increasing the gas flow from 5 to 10 refills/day (days 105158)

• RPC3 with discharges in HV cabling: now we are not able to read currents, but the chamber is still on

• No loss of efficiency is observed ( ≥ 97% )

RPC 1

RPC 2

RPC 3

T0=1 May 2002

Gas flow

doubled

HV cabling

discharge

Gas failure

Page 6: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC1)

Rescaled

operation

voltage

Page 7: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC1)

•High currents and rates are correlated (noise)

Page 8: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC2)

Rescaled

operation

voltage

Page 9: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC2)

Page 10: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC3)

Rescaled

operation

voltage

Page 11: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC3)

Page 12: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (pre-production)

• Currents seem to be more stable

RPC 4

RPC 5

RPC 6

T0=1 August 2002

Gas failure

Page 13: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC4)

Rescaled

operation

voltage

Page 14: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Long term test results (RPC4)

Page 15: Long term test of RPCs at Gran Sasso A. Paoloni (LNF)

Conclusions and outlook

• RPCs after equivalent 10 years of Opera show good efficiency (though with an increase of current and noise)

• This increase can be cured by increasing the gas flow

• Final production procedures seems to improve RPC performances (low currents and noise)

• Ageing tests are still going on at Lab6 of LNGS