13
03 - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR LRO Mission Overview

LRO SRR

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LRO SRR. LRO Mission Overview. 2008 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) First Step in the Robotic Lunar Exploration Program. LRO Objectives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

03 - 1NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

LRO SRR

LRO Mission Overview

03 - 2NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

2008 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)First Step in the Robotic Lunar Exploration

Program

Robotic Lunar Exploration ProgramRobotic Lunar Exploration Program

LRO Objectives

• Characterization of the lunar radiation environment, biological impacts, and potential mitigation. Key aspects of this objective include determining the global radiation environment, investigating the capabilities of potential shielding materials, and validating deep space radiation prototype hardware and software.

• Develop a high resolution global, three dimensional geodetic grid of the Moon and provide the topography necessary for selecting future landing sites.

• Assess in detail the resources and environments of the Moon’s polar regions.

• High spatial resolution assessment of the Moon’s surface addressing elemental composition, mineralogy, and Regolith characteristics

03 - 3NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

Develop an understanding of the Moon in support of human exploration (hazards, topography, navigation, environs)

Understand the current state and evolution of the volatiles (ice) and other resources in context

Biological adaptation to lunar environment (radiation, gravitation, dust...)

GEOLOGYGEOLOGY

EnvironsEnvirons

Prepare for Human Exploration

Prepare for Human Exploration

When • Where • Form • Amount

Topography & Environments

Polar Regions

Human adaptation

ICE

(R

esou

rces

)

LRO Mission OverviewScience and Exploration Objectives

03 - 4NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

LRO Project Start-UP

Instrument Selection

Project Funded

InstrumentK.O. Mtg.

1/05 2/05 3/05 4/05 5/05 7/056/05 8/05 9/05

InstrumentAccommodation

Rvw.

InstrumentA/B Contract

AwardsMission SRR

Requirements Definition & Preliminary Design

Level 1Requirements

Baselined

03 - 5NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

• Launch on a Delta II rocket into a direct insertion trajectory to the moon.

• On-board propulsion system used to capture at the moon, insert into and maintain 50 km altitude circular polar reconnaissance orbit.

• 1 year mission• Orbiter is a 3-axis stabilized,

nadir pointed spacecraft designed to operate continuously during the primary mission.

LRO Mission OverviewFlight Plan – Direct using 3-Stage ELV

Solar Rotating Coordinates

Earth

Moon at encounter

Cis-lunar transfer5.1978 day transferLaunch C3 –2.07 km2/s2

1-dayLunar Orbit

Sun direction

Nominal Cis-lunar Trajectory

Cis-Lunar Transfer

12-hour orbit

6-hour orbit

100 and 50kmmission orbits

Insertion and CircularizationImpulsive Vs (m/s)

1 – 344.242 – 113.063 – 383.914 – 11.455 – 12.18

03 - 6NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

LRO Mission OverviewOrbiter

Preliminary LRO Characteristics

Mass 1480 kg

Power ( bus orbit ave.) 823 W

Measurement Data Volume

575 Gb/day

LRO Instruments

• Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) Measurement Investigation – LOLA will determine the global topography of the lunar surface at high resolution, measure landing site slopes and search for polar ices in shadowed regions.

• Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) – LROC will acquire targeted images of the lunar surface capable of resolving small-scale features that could be landing site hazards, as well as wide-angle images at multiple wavelengths of the lunar poles to document changing illumination conditions and potential resources.

• Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) – LEND will map the flux of neutrons from the lunar surface to search for evidence of water ice and provide measurements of the space radiation environment which can be useful for future human exploration.

• Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment – Diviner will map the temperature of the entire lunar surface at 300 meter horizontal scales to identify cold-traps and potential ice deposits.

• Lyman-Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP) – LAMP will observe the entire lunar surface in the far ultraviolet. LAMP will search for surface ices and frosts in the polar regions and provide images of permanently shadowed regions illuminated only by starlight.

• Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) – CRaTER will investigate the effect of galactic cosmic rays on tissue-equivalent plastics as a constraint on models of biological response to background space radiation.

SOLAR ARRAY

PROPULSION MODULE

AVIONICS MODULE

INSTRUMENT MODULE

Mini-RF

LOLA

LAMP

LROC

CRaTER

SOLAR ARRAY

HGA

PROPULSION MODULE

AVIONICS MODULE

INSTRUMENT MODULE

Diviner

LEND

LAMP

03 - 7NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

LRO Mission Phases Overview

No Phase Sub-Phases Description

1Pre-Launch/ Launch

Readiness

Space Segment Readiness Ground Segment Readiness

Includes instrument I&T, spacecraft/orbiter I&T, space/ground segment testing as well as operations preparation and ground readiness testing leading up to launch.

2

Launch & Lunar Transfer

Launch and Ascent Separation and De-spin Deployment and Sun Acq. Lunar Cruise Lunar Orbit Insertion

Includes all activities & operations from launch countdown sequence to Lunar Orbit Insertion (LOI). LOI includes all maneuvers necessary to obtain the temporary parking orbit for Orbiter activation and commissioning. During the cruise phase, initial spacecraft checkout will be performed to support activities for mid course correction (MCC) and LOI.

3

Orbiter Commissioning

Spacecraft Commissioning Integrated Instrument

Commissioning

Configure and checkout the spacecraft subsystems and ground systems prior to instrument turn-on. Instrument integrated activation will be developed to complete instruments turn-on and commissioning. Instrument commissioning includes any calibration activities needed in the temporary orbit.

4

Routine Operations

Measurements (Routine Ops) Station-keeping Momentum Management Instrument Calibrations Lunar Eclipse Yaw Maneuver Safe Mode

One year of nominal science collection in the 50 (+/- 20) km orbit.

5Extended Mission

Operations

After 1-year of science observations, orbiter will be boosted into a higher orbit to reduce maintenance requirements. Potential purpose for extended mission operationsmay be to perform relay comm. operations. Alternatively additional measurementoperations may be performed for a shorter period in a continued low orbit.

6End-of-Mission Disposal

Includes planning and execution of end-of-life operations. LRO will impact lunar surface.

03 - 8NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

LRO Mission Schedule

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

7/31/05

LRO Mission Schedule

Task

LRO Mission Milestones

Mission Feasibility Definition

Payload Proposal Development

Payload Preliminary Design

System Definition

S/C &GDS/OPS Preliminary Design

Payload Design (Final)

Spacecraft Design (Final)

GDS/OPS Definition/ Design

Payload Fab/Assy/Test(7 Instruments)

S/C Fab/Assy/Bus Test

GDS/OPS DevelopmentImplemention & Test

Integration and Test

Launch Site Operations

Mission Operations

AO Release

AO Sel. MRD

SRR

IPDR PDR

IBRConf. Review

ICDR CDR MOR

IPSR

PER

FOR/ORR

MRR

PSR

LRR

Launch

Instr. PDR's9/6-9/30

Network Acquisition

Payload complete (Final Delivery to I&T)(LAMP/LOLA/LROC/Diviner/CraTer/LEND/Mini-RF)

S/C complete (Final delivery to I&T)

GND Net Test Ready

Ship to KSC

Launch

(1M Float)

s/c bus

s/c subsys

GDS

s/c subsys

s/csubsys

Payload(1M Float)

(1M Float)

Ver. 0.9

(1M Float)

CY

Phase A/B Phase C/D Phase E

03 - 9NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

LRO SRR

LRO Science Overview

Dr. Gordon Chin

03 - 10NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

LRO Science Overview• LRO follows in the footsteps of the Lunar Orbiter missions

which proceeded Apollo.

• LRO will launch by 2008 to provide critically needed data to enable and to plan future Exploration objectives

• LRO provides major exploration and scientific benefits by 2009– Apollo provided first order information from a small

region of the Moon; much more of the Moon needs to be explored

– LRO objectives addresses future landing sites, polar resources, safety, and lunar science goals

– LRO address both science and exploration objectives

• LRO instrument suite complements international lunar missions– Six instruments competitively selected– Comparison to international missions demonstrate

LRO uniqueness and value

03 - 11NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

Competitively Selected LRO Instruments Provide Broad Benefits

1000’s of 50cm/pixel images (125km2), and entire Moon at 100m in UV, Visible

~50m scale polar topography at < 1m vertical, roughness

Hydrogen content in and neutron radiation maps

from upper 1m of Moon at 5km scales, Rad > 10 MeV

Maps of frosts in permanently shadowed

areas, etc.

300m scale maps of Temperature, surface

ice, rocks

Tissue equivalent response to radiation

Measurement

Resource evaluation, impact flux and

crustal evolution

Safe landing sitesthrough hazard

identification; some resource identification

LROC

Geological evolution of the solar system by geodetic topography

Safe landing site selection, and

enhanced surface navigation (3D)

LOLA

Improved understanding of

volatiles in the solar system - source,

history, migration and depositionLocate potential water-

ice in lunar soil and enhanced crew safety

LEND

Locate potential water-ice (as frosts) on the

surface

LAMP

Determines conditionsfor systems operability and water-ice location

Diviner

Radiation conditions that influence life

beyond Earth

Safe, lighter weight space vehicles that

protect humans

CRaTER

ScienceBenefit

ExplorationBenefit

INSTRUMENT

1000’s of 50cm/pixel images (125km2), and entire Moon at 100m in UV, Visible

~50m scale polar topography at < 1m vertical, roughness

Hydrogen content in and neutron radiation maps

from upper 1m of Moon at 5km scales, Rad > 10 MeV

Maps of frosts in permanently shadowed

areas, etc.

300m scale maps of Temperature, surface

ice, rocks

Tissue equivalent response to radiation

Measurement

Resource evaluation, impact flux and

crustal evolution

Safe landing sitesthrough hazard

identification; some resource identification

LROC

Geological evolution of the solar system by geodetic topography

Safe landing site selection, and

enhanced surface navigation (3D)

LOLA

Improved understanding of

volatiles in the solar system - source,

history, migration and depositionLocate potential water-

ice in lunar soil and enhanced crew safety

LEND

Locate potential water-ice (as frosts) on the

surface

LAMP

Determines conditionsfor systems operability and water-ice location

Diviner

Radiation conditions that influence life

beyond Earth

Safe, lighter weight space vehicles that

protect humans

CRaTER

ScienceBenefit

ExplorationBenefit

INSTRUMENT

(BU+MIT)Cosmic Ray Telescopefor the Effects of Radiation

(UCLA)

(SWRI)Lyman-Alpha Mapping Project

(Russia)Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector

(GSFC)Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter

(NWU+MSSS)Lunar Recon Orbiter Camera

03 - 12NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

National Academy of Sciences NRC Decadal (2002) lists priorities for the MOON (all mission classes

thru 2013)

Sub-meter imaging of Apollo sites for flux validation and siting

Imaging and in situ

geochronology

Targeted Studies to

Calibrate Impact Flux

(chronology)

100m scale multispectral and 5km

scale H mapping

Orbital hyperspectral

mapping

Global Mineralogical

Mapping (crustal evolution)

Crustal structure to optimize siting and

landing safety

In situ landed stations with

seismometers

Geophysical Network

(interior evolution)

Neutron and IR spectroscopy in 3D

context + UV (frosts)

Spectroscopy and mapping

from orbit

Polar Volatile

Inventory

Sub-meter scale imaging with derived

local topography

Imaging, topography (at m

scales)

Local Geologic Studies

In 3D (geol. Evolution)

Global geodetic topography at ~100m

scales (< 1 m rms)

Altimetry from orbit (with

precision orbits)

Geodetic Topography

(crustal evolution)

LRO measurementsNRC approachNRC Priority Investigation

Sub-meter imaging of Apollo sites for flux validation and siting

Imaging and in situ

geochronology

Targeted Studies to

Calibrate Impact Flux

(chronology)

100m scale multispectral and 5km

scale H mapping

Orbital hyperspectral

mapping

Global Mineralogical

Mapping (crustal evolution)

Crustal structure to optimize siting and

landing safety

In situ landed stations with

seismometers

Geophysical Network

(interior evolution)

Neutron and IR spectroscopy in 3D

context + UV (frosts)

Spectroscopy and mapping

from orbit

Polar Volatile

Inventory

Sub-meter scale imaging with derived

local topography

Imaging, topography (at m

scales)

Local Geologic Studies

In 3D (geol. Evolution)

Global geodetic topography at ~100m

scales (< 1 m rms)

Altimetry from orbit (with

precision orbits)

Geodetic Topography

(crustal evolution)

LRO measurementsNRC approachNRC Priority Investigation

03 - 13NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

Comparison to International Systems Demonstrate Uniqueness and Value

Likely (contributed mineralogy mapping?)

Particles and Fields, etc.Particles and Fields, Farside gravity, elemental chemistry

Far UV imaging for frosts and lunar atmosphere (farside gravity from lidar)

OTHER

TBDLimitedPartially addressed, but frequency TBD?

High time-rate polar imaging (Imagers)

Polar illumination

Not addressed, but imaging (MS) will be included (10’s m/pixel)

Not addressed (best imaging is 10-100 m/pixel)

Not addressed: best imaging is ~10m/pixel stereo, MS imaging (10+ VISNIR bands)

Targeted, meter-scale feature detection, hazards (Imager, Lidar)

Sub-meter imaging for landing site assessment

TBD (contributed S-band SAR and Mineral mapping from US?)

Not addressedNot addressed in this mission (cf. GRS)

~25-400m scales in shadows (Imager, Lidar, NS, IR, UV)

Putative ice deposits at poles

TBDNot addressedNot addressedLandform scale at 3-5K (40-300K): ~300m scale

(IR mapper)

T mapping cold traps (polar)

Some potential, but depends on contributed sensors

Limited to 100’s of km scale (H) [does not meet LRO goals]

160km scale via GRS (does not meet LRO goals)

Landform scale at 100 ppm(~5 km scale at poles) (imaging NS)

H mapping to assess ice

Not addressedNot addressed1.6 km x, y at > 20 m vertical precision (RMS)

[not meet LRO goals]

10’s m x,y, with < 1m vertical precision, attn to poles (Lidar)

Geodetic topography (global)

Not addressedNot addressedNot addressedShielding expt’s with TEP (Rad Sensor)

Shielding materials

(test-beds)

Not addressedNot addressedNot addressedBiological responses to radiation (Rad Sensor)

Biological Adaptation

TBDLimited to some energy ranges

Highly limited overlap in some narrow energy ranges

Global assessment including neutrons, GCR (imaging NS, Rad Sensor)

Radiation Environment

Chandrayaan(ISRO 2007-2008 launch)

[100+ km orbit]

SMART-1 (ESA lunar 2005 orbiter)

[250km periapsis]

SELENE (JAXA orbiter ~ 2007)

[100km orbit, 1 yr]

2008 NASA LRO[50km orbit, 1 yr+]

Competed Payload

Reqt’s for LRO(from NASA ORDT, and ESMD RLEP Reqt’s 9/04; NRC Decadal, 2002)

Likely (contributed mineralogy mapping?)

Particles and Fields, etc.Particles and Fields, Farside gravity, elemental chemistry

Far UV imaging for frosts and lunar atmosphere (farside gravity from lidar)

OTHER

TBDLimitedPartially addressed, but frequency TBD?

High time-rate polar imaging (Imagers)

Polar illumination

Not addressed, but imaging (MS) will be included (10’s m/pixel)

Not addressed (best imaging is 10-100 m/pixel)

Not addressed: best imaging is ~10m/pixel stereo, MS imaging (10+ VISNIR bands)

Targeted, meter-scale feature detection, hazards (Imager, Lidar)

Sub-meter imaging for landing site assessment

TBD (contributed S-band SAR and Mineral mapping from US?)

Not addressedNot addressed in this mission (cf. GRS)

~25-400m scales in shadows (Imager, Lidar, NS, IR, UV)

Putative ice deposits at poles

TBDNot addressedNot addressedLandform scale at 3-5K (40-300K): ~300m scale

(IR mapper)

T mapping cold traps (polar)

Some potential, but depends on contributed sensors

Limited to 100’s of km scale (H) [does not meet LRO goals]

160km scale via GRS (does not meet LRO goals)

Landform scale at 100 ppm(~5 km scale at poles) (imaging NS)

H mapping to assess ice

Not addressedNot addressed1.6 km x, y at > 20 m vertical precision (RMS)

[not meet LRO goals]

10’s m x,y, with < 1m vertical precision, attn to poles (Lidar)

Geodetic topography (global)

Not addressedNot addressedNot addressedShielding expt’s with TEP (Rad Sensor)

Shielding materials

(test-beds)

Not addressedNot addressedNot addressedBiological responses to radiation (Rad Sensor)

Biological Adaptation

TBDLimited to some energy ranges

Highly limited overlap in some narrow energy ranges

Global assessment including neutrons, GCR (imaging NS, Rad Sensor)

Radiation Environment

Chandrayaan(ISRO 2007-2008 launch)

[100+ km orbit]

SMART-1 (ESA lunar 2005 orbiter)

[250km periapsis]

SELENE (JAXA orbiter ~ 2007)

[100km orbit, 1 yr]

2008 NASA LRO[50km orbit, 1 yr+]

Competed Payload

Reqt’s for LRO(from NASA ORDT, and ESMD RLEP Reqt’s 9/04; NRC Decadal, 2002)