MacDougall_ Manchester 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/22/2019 MacDougall_ Manchester 2007

    1/3

    Presentation David MacDougall, Manchester July 2007

    All forms of representation are interpretative:

    Choices of: What to film

    Framing

    Movements

    Culture

    Cinematography

    These are all different modes of interpretation

    We can therefore make different separations of approaches:

    We can distinguish different modes of camera-use for different purposes.We draw upon them according to our :

    Responsive

    Interactive and

    Constructive modes.

    Responsive Mode

    The term observational, implies detachment, which is often not the case.

    Observational is personal, participatory responses to events.

    Responsive means that it is observing + must also respond + interprete.

    It may mean though: non intervention, non-interference.

    Interactive Mode

    Does involve intervention. Many events would not have occured without the

    filmmaking

    Here we have to explore issues of :

    Intersubjctivity

    The contact between filmmaker and subjects

    These issues are often discussed in discourses comparing direct cinema and cinema

    verite. Where the camera is regarded as a catalyst for events to happen.

    Constructive mode

    The constructive mode of interpretation reassembles observed events. Can be seen as

    a non-realist mode of filmmaking

    Formally abstract

    Filmic construction

    Sentences of observed elements

    Responsive mode:

    In the responsive mode we see

    an acceptance of the presence of the filmmakerparticipation in events

  • 8/22/2019 MacDougall_ Manchester 2007

    2/3

    the filmmaker iss open to what is happening and to relationships with eachother, and

    has the ability to follow the unexpected shifts in eventss.

    When one feels one is filming effectively, one needs to have a sense that one can

    anticipate events that will happen, being at the right time at the right place. It is

    intuitive. There is a emotional synchrony with what haappens, suddenly we feel a

    national flow, like playing a musical instrument.There is a degree of opportunism in that: ceassing the telling detail.

    Non interactiveness meanss non-assertiveness. Not disrupting events. The filmmaker

    is present but not determining the situation. Filmmaking is not the main event!

    The filmmaker has to be sensitive to significance of the eventss.

    Question in her mind what to film next. The filmmaker has a thematic matrix in her

    mind (themes that have become apparent in the research-period) This matrix is

    evolving and has to be modified constantly.

    We have to understand at some point how events link up with eachother, to know

    what we need to understand of a certain event. Each action implies a context, we need

    to reveal that signifying context in the film.

    There are also social dramas (Turner) and existing patterns we can follow.

    This type of filming needs relationships of trust, within which a natural interchange is

    possible. It creates a physical space that dictates a comfortable distance from the

    persons we film. Such distances are obstructed by a tripod.

    When filming children we should choose an eyelevel position.

    The camera has to become a non-theratening item.

    The camera can become a catalyst as well which makes it into an interactive mode.

    Rouch claimed that people are more hounest when challenged to speak in front of a

    camera. People feel a historical importance in that, it is imperative to be truthful.

    When speaking of introducing reflexivity in a film, the filmmakerss presence becomes

    obvious in the filmmateriaal, through his voice, through a voice over, etc

    Constructive mode

    Through this mode there is an intensification of the elements possible. An abstraction

    of elements the filmmaker wants to stress as a result of analysis. It is a non-realisst

    mode because the filmmaker applies distortion for a purpose. He can emphasize

    certain elements. This formal cinematographic aspects are emphasized.

    Dai Vaughan referred to this mode as: the aim of this mode is not to record something

    but to give an impression of it. It is a summarization of events, an essentialisation.

    Abstarction, re-digetion in a more abstarct mode. We think here more in ecxistential,

    intelectual terms, it makes us think again about kinds of knowledge that we can

    communicate through film.

  • 8/22/2019 MacDougall_ Manchester 2007

    3/3