5/26/2018 MahmudShabestariWaAndishe-yeFalsafa-slidepdf.com http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mahmud-shabestari-wa-andishe-ye-falsafa 1/18 !" #$%&'() *+%',+-./01: 23%45 58 6%7,8%9: 1387 ;18 ' 1 < ; 254 - 237 < Human Sciences: No. 58‚ Summer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`T ,- 7-39BC' #=3F$ " 7-;1 a>0& 3! 2';*? #0*C b )=)=3&, ,38/! 7,35 cJ135 Z5)! " >= #=3$P3& 8N3dB$ J*`e ,- #=31;C " #./01 c#$%S . N39$ L5' ,- 2)=,34= c fg& ' -3h5' ,- ', #=';5' M,O! X,3C " ;C3T 7;B/FT ->*:$ i8T " 2-;S #&,;! )5)6 b5;I L5 #$ (3V= )?- L5' S j./01 )@*T", " #!3h5' )9= 3! ;`.B$ #53V$ J1;d$ " #=31;C 23k)5- P' 7-;1 a>0& ! 6>+ 3! " c#[';T' #&3@T J&' BT'- #*g$ l9= ;$' L5' ,- #53V$ j./01 _!39$ ,- J*`e m;I 3! " c7O$, (3!P " 7-39BC' #=3F$ 3! 2';*? . '")80S 2n 3? : j./01 c_9C c^%S cJ*`e cbVC c7O$, (3!P c(31;C c_9C c(3*5' #53V$ bW@$ c Shabestari and Philosophical Thought Mohammad Ilkhani Associate Professor, D epartment of Philosophy Facul ty of Letters and Hu man Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University Abstract The place of philo sophy i n Islami c civil isation, especiall y in Iran, and its relation to reli gious beliefs have been the focus of many researchers’ attenti on. Western historians of philosophy think that after the criti ques of Ghazali and w ith the death of Ibn Roshd, phil osophy disappeared from Islamic lands. The conti nuation of phil osophy in Iran up to the present day, how ever, show s that this idea is incorrect. In fact, Ghazali’s theological critiques made philosophers pay more attention to religious principles. Furthermore, by applying methodological criticism to philosophy, paying attention to ill umination and practical way w ith personal spiritual itinerary and religious principles, mystics helped greatly to form a new philosophical system in Iran in which theological, phil osophical and mystical princi ples found a new structure. This article studi es the role of Sheikh Mahm oud Shabastari, the great Iranian poet and mystic, played in developi ng this new w ay. We wi ll see that he pl ayed an i mportant role by applying a positive and methodological criticism to Peripatetic philosophy from the mystical p oint of view and ill uminative epistemology and also paid attention to the personal spiritual itinerary accompanied by religious principles and allegorical language, and presented wisdom in op position to Peripatetic phil osophy. Keywords: Faith, Reason, M ysticism, Allegorical Language, Love, Wisdom, Theology, Peripatetic Philosophy, Logic * ./0123%4(5& !"#$%&6% 70584* . 9!,#$%& 84: ./012 9& '$!0$%;<1=8>!,*&%?+@#$%&.
Mohammad Ilkhani Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy
Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti
University
Abstract The place of philosophy in Islamic civilisation,
especially in Iran, and its relation to religious beliefs have been
the focus of many researchers attention. Western historians of
philosophy think that after the critiques of Ghazali and with the
death of Ibn Roshd, philosophy disappeared from Islamic lands. The
continuation of philosophy in Iran up to the present day, however,
shows that this idea is incorrect. In fact, Ghazalis theological
critiques made philosophers pay more attention to religious
principles. Furthermore, by applying methodological criticism to
philosophy, paying attention to illumination and practical way with
personal spiritual itinerary and religious principles, mystics
helped greatly to form a new philosophical system in Iran in which
theological, philosophical and mystical principles found a new
structure. This article studies the role of Sheikh Mahmoud
Shabastari, the great Iranian poet and mystic, played in developing
this new way. We will see that he played an important role by
applying a positive and methodological criticism to Peripatetic
philosophy from the mystical point of view and illuminative
epistemology and also paid attention to the personal spiritual
itinerary accompanied by religious principles and allegorical
language, and presented wisdom in opposition to Peripatetic
philosophy. Keywords: Faith, Reason, Mysticism, Allegorical
Language, Love, Wisdom, Theology, Peripatetic
