Upload
vandiep
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.siegalconsulting.com
Market Analysis for Life Science Start-ups Part One: What you need to Get Funding and Plan for the Future
Carolyn Siegal
Principal, Siegal Consulting
626-798-8700
www.siegalconsulting.com
If you are….. • Filing an SBIR or similar grant applications
• Raising external capital
• Building a business plan for internal purposes and decision making
2
MARKET ANALYSIS: A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF
PRODUCT, COMPETITION AND CUSTOMERS AND HOW
TO GET FROM ONE TO THE OTHER
www.siegalconsulting.com
Market Analysis Overview
3
Defining the target market
Market environment
Selecting your market segment
Industry trends
Distribution channels
Customer profile
Competitive activity
Pipeline activity
Opportunities and barriers to entry
Sales and marketing methods
Building a winning target product
profile
Product positioning
Features and benefits
Cost and reimbursement
Buying process
Map the future
Tool kit:
Situational market analysis (landscape)
Secondary market research
SWOT analysis
Buying process
Gap analysis
Tool kit:
Target Product Profile
Primary market research
Income forecast
Competitive Matrix
SWOT analysis
www.siegalconsulting.com
Market Research for SBIR Proposals
• What customer needs will be addressed with your product or service?
• Describe who your target customer is. Providing generally-known examples may be helpful.
• How does the target customer currently meet that need that you are addressing? Is there is a significant problem that is not yet being addressed?
• What is the business model you plan to adopt to generate revenue from your innovation?
• Is the target market domestic, international or both?
• What channels would you employ to reach the targeted customer?
• What is the current size of the broad market you plan to enter and the “niche” market opportunity you are addressing?
• What are the growth trends for the market and the key trends in the industry that you are planning to target?
• What are the barriers to enter this market?
4
Questions from the NSF Phase II Commercialization Plan
www.siegalconsulting.com
Defining Your Market Segment
5 Not too big…not too small, just right!
www.siegalconsulting.com
Finding the Right Level Right Level
• Market share is based on unmet needs, competitive attributes, displacement, buying patterns, customers • Ex. Neuromodulation for
Urinary Incontinence, 100 thousand patients per year, Product X can capture the 20% of the market that is dissatisfied with Product B
• Unit/demand driven • Ex. Relapsed, refractory multiple
myeloma, 20 thousand patients based on patients not responding to current 1st line standard of care
High Level
• Market $ # is not informative about competitive advantage
• Ex. Anti-cancer drug sales were $50 billion in 2009
• Ex. Clinical laboratory analysis for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) testing, $39 billion mark in 2008
6
www.siegalconsulting.com
Need vs. Nice to Have
• Need
• Information that will inform business decisions
• That shows your market knowledge, expertise
• That dovetails and adds to the knowledge of an expert
• “No data before it’s time”
• Model is more sophisticated than the product knowledge/stage
• Anticipate the pivot
• Most early stage companies change direction on the way to market
• Priority vs. budget
• If you don’t have money DIY!!!
7
www.siegalconsulting.com
DIY Market Research Resources
Secondary Data • Clinical literature
• Scientific literature
• Trade literature
• USPTO.gov
• SEC.gov
• http://report.nih.gov/
• clinicaltrials.gov
• Competitor websites
• Suppliers
• Medical Associations/Guidance documents
• Trade associations (BIO, AdvaMed, PMC)
• Patient advocacy groups (American Cancer Society)
• Government agencies (NIH, CDC, FDA, DARPA)
• Foundations (Gates, Michael J Fox)
• Public health (WHO, NICE)
• Wikipedia
Primary Data
• Customer and expert interviews
• LinkedIn groups
• Analyst reports
• Association lists and online survey resources
• Personal network
• Suppliers
• Conference competitive intelligence
8
www.siegalconsulting.com
DIY Starter Kit
• Target Product Profile
• Market segment landscape analysis
• SWOT
• Competitive matrix
• Buying process
9
Also a great foundation for business plan
www.siegalconsulting.com
Target Product Profile
10
Single Agent Therapy
(3rd
Line Relapse/refractory ALL, Mantle
Cell, Waldenström’s
macroglobulinemia,?)
Combination Therapy
(2nd Line in MDS, Mantle, CLL,
DLBCL, ?? )
Product Description/
Mechanism of Action
A tissue targeted cytotoxic prodrug that is
bioreduced to PRODUCT (reduced
PRODUCT), a highly potent DNA
topoisomerase II inhibitor.
Same
Primary Indication(s)
Phase Ib
Patients with advanced Lymphoid
neoplasms. POC in patient with Multiple
Myeloma. Phase 1b would be a short run in
trial starting on dose level below the phase
1 solid tumor study. Phase II program will
be broad based in areas other than MM if
Product is successful. These include, ALL,
Mantle Cell, Waldenström’s, AML, CLL,
DLBCL, Follicular. Most of these would
require a randomized phase 3 studies and
require at lease 600+ patients. ALL,
Mantle, Waldenström’s would require
single arm studies but these are small
prevalence diseases
Phase Ib
MTD, DLT, PK/PD, Safety in combination
with Doxorubicin, Rituximab (?),
Fludarabine (?), lenalidomide (?) in selected
population of Lymphoid neoplam
Dependent on indication selected from
phase 1 and/or Product development
Phase 2
As above in a randomized phase II
Target Patient
Population/
Patients with DLBCL, Follicular, Mantle,
Waldenström’s who have failed front-line
and at least one second-line multi-agent
regimen with alkylating agents and/or
Rituximab. Patients with ALL who have
failed at least 1 regimen who are not
candidates for BMT.
In combination with chemotherapy or
biologic who have failed frontline therapy
or after first relapse.
Route of Administration Oral Oral
Dosage and
Administration
Administered daily (or BID) for 5 days with
nine day rest in a 28 day cycle or daily for 5
days for 2 weeks with 12 days rest. Dose to
be determined from Phase 1 trial in
lymphoid and/or solid malignancy trials.
Administered daily (or BID) for 5 days with
nine day rest in a 28 day cycle or daily for 5
days for 2 weeks with 12 days rest. Dose to
be determined from Phase 1b combination
trial in lymphoid neoplasm trial.
Duration of Treatment Up to 6-12 months Up to 6-12 months
Success Criteria
(efficacy) for modeling
purposes only
Very successful
Observed response rate (ORR) of > 50%
with RD of > 12 months
This is dependent on the indication selected.
ORR of > 80% with a PFS of > 12 months
Successful ( for modeling
purposes only)
ORR of 40-50% with RD of 10-12 months ORR of 50-60% with a PFS of 10-12
months
Minimally Successful ( for
modeling purposes only)
ORR of 30% with RD of 7-10 months
ORR 0 – 10% efficacy is not supportive of
further development as a single agent.
ORR of 45% with PFS of > 10 months
ORR of 0 – 10% efficacy is not supportive
of further development in combination.
Expected Primary
Endpoint (for modeling
purposes only)
Phase I
Preliminary Bioavailability
Phase II
ORR and Duration of Response
(need both endpoints for 3rd line approval)
Phase I
Phase II
ORR and Duration of Response
(need both endpoints for 1st or 2
nd line
approval)
www.siegalconsulting.com
Market Segment - Landscape Analysis • Merges situational analysis and mapping/landscapes
• Key market attributes
• Epidemiology/demographics
• Market behaviors
• Trends
• Key competitive attributes
• Competitive matrix
• SWOT of your Target Product Profile
• Map products against market attributes
• Drivers and hurdles
• Validate assumptions from secondary and primary market research 11
www.siegalconsulting.com
Market Landscape Analysis Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
High Medium Low
Likely Impact on Standard of Care
Phase III
Phase II
Phase I
Sorafenib
Tipifarnib Lestaurtinib
Sunitinib
Tandutinib
Product
No combination data available for sunitinib, tipifarnib will not directly address flt3 mutant but overall benefit in
first line may impact treatment selection FLT3 selective
Other MTKI w/ flt3 Other targeting 10/11/2011 12
www.siegalconsulting.com
SWOT
• Strategic planning method
• Project/Product/Business Venture
• Factors that are helpful vs. harmful to achieving business objective
• Internal factors • Strengths
• Weaknesses
• External factors • Opportunities
• Threats
• A way to summarize hurdles and opportunities in one page • Do before market research to see what you are missing
• Do after market research to summarize what you learned 13
www.siegalconsulting.com
REMICADE – SWOT Analysis 1
4
Sources:1Drugs@FDA – REMICADE Label, 2Jeff Stoll “Is the anti-TNF Market Facing a Seismic Shift?, Scientia Advisors, May 12, 2011, 3Jeffrey G Stoll and Uma Yasothan,
Rheumatoid Arthritis Market – Nature Review – Drug Disc, Vol 8, Sep, 2008, 694, 4“Anti-TNF Treatments and IBD” University of Manitob, 5“Positioning of REMICADE relative to
SIMPONI in leading indication – RA”, PharmaShare, 6“Surveyed Gastroenterologists Indicate That Humira Has Advantages Over Remicade In Maintaining Clinical Remission Of
Crohn’s Disease, Decision Resources, Jan 26, 2009, 7Armuzzi, A. & Pugliese, D., “Adalimumab for ulcerative colitis — is the glass half empty or half full?, Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol.
Hepatol. 8, 249–251 (2011), ” New Therapies in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis”, 8Maya H Buch et al., “New Therapies in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Curr
Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23(3):245-251
• Largest number of approved indications, including a pediatric label in Crohn’s disease
• REMICADE was the only approved drug for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis for almost 9 years and has an archive of experience across indications.
• Infusion once in 8 weeks limits office visits and improves patient convenience.
• As it is administered at a hospital/rheumatology clinic, patients usually do not have reimbursement concerns.
• Robust data supporting remission with full steroid withdrawal
at 1 year for CD; considered gold standard in IBD4
Opportunities
• Chimeric antibody vs. competitor mAbs that are
humanized • Black box warning of risk of infections especially
tuberculosis • Being an IV infusion drug, patients have to face
inconveniences of traveling to an infusion center. • Duration of infusion is long (2 hours) • Mostly reserved for second-line+ in rheumatoid arthritis,
psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis.
• REMICADE is the only IV anti-TNF and is thought to offer a
faster response than other anti-TNFs • Strong foothold in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis indications
with robust patient registry data creates an advantage over other anti-TNFs.
• Cannibalization with SIMPONI IV formulation (Phase
III)8
• Results from HUMIRA 52-week trial in UC induction &
maintenance are pending. If data is positive, HUMIRA
could take away share from REMICADE in UC.7
• Abatacept (ORENCIA) has shorter infusion time (30
min vs. 1 hour for REMICADE) and similar efficacy to
anti-TNFs. • Due to different MoA, ORENCIA and ACTEMRA are better
positioned to target anti-TNF refractory patients. • Novel oral drugs in pipeline (JAK, MAPK, SYK
inhibitors)
Strengths
Threats
Weakness
www.siegalconsulting.com
Competitive Matrix
10
/11
/20
11
Si
egal
Co
nsu
ltin
g -
Co
nfi
den
tial
15
Reaction
Yield Purity Capacity
Processing
Speed Scale-up
Additional
Requirements
Synthetron™ S3 98% Highest 1.5 Kg/hour Fastest Linear
No external cooling
required
Microreactor 90% Good 5 gram/hour Moderate Parallel
Requires cooling &
maintaining 0°C
Batch 76% Varies Multi-kg/hours Slow est Non-Linear
Cooling capabilities to -
40°C & below
Extrapolation of experimental results to commercial use characteristics
Chemical Synthesizer Competitor Comparison
www.siegalconsulting.com
Buying Process
16
Tailor to your product/your industry 6 stages • Problem recognition • Information search • Evaluation of alternatives • Purchase decision • Purchase • Post-purchase evaluation
Validate your assumptions with secondary and primary market research
www.siegalconsulting.com
ww
w.s
iega
lco
nsu
ltin
g.co
m
Treatment Process: RA RA Patients
Under Treatment
NSAID Non-MTX DMARD
MTX
MTX
2nd TNF Blocker Other Biologic
TNF Blocker
Non-MTX DMARD
+
1% adult pop, 2.1 million
75%, 1.6 million
75%, 1.2 million
15%, 250 K
30-40% of TNF blocker treated will progress, annual ~40K
+ MTX or
www.siegalconsulting.com
Consulting Projects Type Area
Target Product Profile, identification of commercial challenges Device to provide visual cues to visually impaired
Commercialization Plan, support in- license agreement POC rapid diagnostic test, Q Fever
KOL IDS’s to support in-licensing-in-licensing HDAC-inhibitor, oncology, PTCL, Lung cancer
Top-line competitive clinical assessment to support venture investment Malignant melanoma
Partnering support; non-confidential docs and exhibit prep Antibody library generation
Strategic advisor; SBIR companies Antibody discovery and development, Power wheel chair, Lyme disease field inoculation, microneedle transdermal path, Alzheimer therapeutic, cardiac monitoring device, OCT imaging, early detection for Parkinson's, mobile wireless ECG, Oncology research tool based on modified B-lactam
Pipeline; resource allocation/prioritization Rheumatoid arthritis
Out-licensing strategic partner assessment, identification Oncology
Pricing analysis and recommendations for Phase 2 product to support out-licensing
Oncology
Deal comp analysis and recommendations Cardiac output monitor
Partner identification for out-licensing Cystic fibrosis
Acquisition opportunity vetting Oncology, supportive care
Commercial Assessment and Sales Forecast Pre-clinical TNF Blocker
Analysis of industry standards for SG&A and Product Marketing to support US sales forecast
Japanese Pharma
Corporate summary for investor review Lab equipment/process for rapid chemical reaction processing
Commercialization plan for SBIR grant application Liposomal formulation , chemotherapy, breast cancer
18
10
/11
/20
11
Si
egal
Co
nsu
ltin
g -
Co
nfi
den
tial
www.siegalconsulting.com
Next Session
• Working group
• Hands-on web time/mentoring
• Pick a “Tool” to focus on.
19
www.siegalconsulting.com
20