Meralco v Laguna- Lazatin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 Meralco v Laguna- Lazatin

    1/2

    Meralco v Laguna TOPIC: Grant of power to the local governmentunits to create its own sources of revenue

    DOCTRIN: !n"er the Constitution# localgovernment units are "irectl$ grante" general an"%roa" ta& powers to safeguar" their via%ilit$ an"self'su(cienc$) Nevertheless# the fun"amental law"i" not inten" the "elegation to %e a%solute an"uncon"itional) The legislature must still see to itthat the ta&pa$er will not %e over'%ur"ene" orsa""le" with multiple an" unreasona%leimpositions# that each local government unit willhave its fair share of availa%le resources# that the

    resources of the national government will not %eun"ul$ "istur%e"# an" that local ta&ation will %efair# uniform# an" *ust)

    +,CT-:

    • MR,LCO was grante" franchise for thesuppl$ of electric light# heat an" power %$certain municipalities of the Province of Laguna)

    • R, ./01 2LGC3 was enacte"# en*oining local

    government units to create their ownsources of revenue an" to lev$ ta&es# feesan" charges# su%*ect to the limitationse&presse" therein# consistent with the %asicpolic$ of local autonom$)

    • Pursuant to the provisions of the Co"e#respon"ent province enacte" LagunaProvincial Or"inance provi"ing for franchise

    ta& at a rate of 415 of /5 of the grossannual receipts)

    • Provincial Treasurer# then sent a "eman"

    letter to MR,LCO for the correspon"ing ta&

    pa$ment)• Petitioner MR,LCO pai" the ta which then

    amounte" to P/6#471#078)97# un"er protest), formal claim for refun" was thereaftersent %$ MR,LCO to the Provincial Treasurerof Laguna claiming that the franchise ta& itha" pai" an" continue" to pa$ to theNational Government pursuant to P)D) 44/alrea"$ inclu"e" the franchise ta& impose"%$ the Provincial Ta& Or"inance)

    • MR,LCO conten"e" that the imposition of a franchise ta& un"er -ection 7)16 of Laguna Provincial Or"inance No) 1/'67#insofar as it concerne" MR,LCO#contravene" the provisions of -ection / of P)D) 44/ which provi"es that the franchiseta& pa$a%le %$ all grantees of franchises togenerate# "istri%ute an" sell electric currentfor light# heat an" power shall %e in lieu of all ta&es an" assessment of whatever nature

    impose" %$ an$ national or local authorit$on earnings# receipts# income# an" privilegeof generation# "istri%ution# an" sale of electric current)

    • Claim for refun" was "enie" on the %asis of 

    the newer law# R, ./01) RTC a(rme")

    I--!:

  • 8/17/2019 Meralco v Laguna- Lazatin

    2/2

    • hether or not the power to ta& wasproperl$ e&ercise"

    R!LING:

    •  ;es) Laguna properl$ e&ercise" its power tota& pursuant to local autonom$)

    • !n"er the regime of the /6