Upload
vokhue
View
259
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Alex Soriano
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
MSSA: oxacillin versus other beta-
lactam choices
B-lactam MIC50 (µg/mL)
Cloxacillin
Amoxi-clav
Cefazolin (1st)
Cefuroxime (2nd)
Ceftriaxone (3rd)
Cefepime (4th)
Ceftaroline* (5th)
Imipenem
Minimun inhibitory concentration (MIC) of different ß-
lactams against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.
EUCAST.org (access 20-2-2012)
MIC90 (µg/mL)
0.25
1
0.5
1
4
2
0.25
0.03
0.5
2
1
2
4
4
0.5
0.06
* Jones R, et al. JAC 2010; 65 (suppl 4): 17-31
2 g/4h
1-2 g/6-8h
1-2 g/8h
Carrizosa J, et al. Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcus
aureus Endocarditis: Comparison of Cephalothin, Cefazolin,
and Methicillin
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1978; 13: 74-7
Clinical experience with cefazolin in infectious
endocarditis and Staphylococcus aureus
bacteremia
Reference Nº pat.
AACh 1973; 4: 525
JAMA 1977; 237:569
CID 2003; 37: 1194
CID 2005; 41: 127
AACh 2009; 53: 3437
Total endocarditis
Total
Failure (%)
3
2
1
1
12
7
19
1
2
1
1
3
5 (71.4)
8 (41)
Lee S, et al. Is Cefazolin Inferior to Nafcillin for Treatment
of Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus Bacteremia?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 5122-6
N=138
Shuford JA, et al. Lack of association of S. aureus type A ß-
lactamase with cefazolin combined with antimicrobial spacer
placement prosthetic joint infection treatment failure.
Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 54: 189-192
Zeller V, et al. Continuous Cefazolin Infusion To Treat Bone
and Joint Infections: Clinical Efficacy, Feasibility, Safety, and
Serum and Bone Concentrations
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 883-7
Success rate:
82/88 (93%)
Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA)
PBP 1 2 3 4
Penicillin
peptidoglucan
Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA)
PBP 1 2 3 4
Penicillin
PBP 1 2 3 4
peptidoglucan
DN
A
ß-lactamase
PBP 1 2 3 4
peptidoglucan
DN
A
ß-lactamase
PBP 1 2 3 4
DN
A
ß-lactamase
3 4
DN
A
ß-lactamase
methicillin
cephalosp.
penicillin
ß-lactams stable to the hydrolisis
of ß-lactamase:
3 4
DN
A
ß-lactamase
•Bla type A
•Bla type B
•Bla type C
•Bla type D
OXA
-
-
-
-
CFZ
++
-
-
+
PEN
++++
++++
++++
++++
CLV
-
-
++
+
TZB
-
-
++
+
Nannini EC, et al. Inoculum Effect with Cefazolin among
Clinical Isolates of MSSA: Frequency and Possible Cause of
Cefazolin Treatment Failure
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 3437-41
Type of ß-lactamase
(n=98)
cefazolin
MIC (µg/mL)
std. inoculum
A Bla producers (n=25)
B Bla producers (n=15)
C Bla producers (n=45)
Bla-negative strains (n=13)
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.6
Std inoculum= 5x105 CFU/mL
S. aureus producing ß-lactamases
MIC
(µ
g/m
L)
104 105 106 107 108
CFU/mL
Nannini EC, et al. Inoculum Effect with Cefazolin among
Clinical Isolates of MSSA: Frequency and Possible Cause of
Cefazolin Treatment Failure
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 3437-41
Type of ß-lactamase
(n=98)
cefazolin
MIC (µg/mL)
std. inoculum
A Bla producers (n=25)
B Bla producers (n=15)
C Bla producers (n=45)
Bla-negative strains (n=13)
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.6
11.2
2.8
5.6
1
cefazolin
MIC (µg/mL)
high inoculum
Std inoculum= 5x105 CFU/mL
High inoculum= 5x107 CFU/mL
Nannini EC, et al. Inoculum Effect with Cefazolin among
Clinical Isolates of MSSA: Frequency and Possible Cause of
Cefazolin Treatment Failure
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 3437-41
Low inoculum= 5x104 CFU/mL
Std inoculum= 5x105 CFU/mL
Intermediate inoculum= 5x106 CFU/mL
High inoculum= 5x107 CFU/mL
MIC
(µ
g/m
L)
104 105 106 107 108
CFU/mL
S. aureus producing ß-lactamases
•Pneumonia
•Endocarditis
•Abscess (not
drained)
•FBI (not
removed)
Lee S, et al. Is Cefazolin Inferior to Nafcillin for Treatment
of Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus Bacteremia?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 5122-6
Cefazolin (n=49)
4 PN and 1 IE
Nafcillin (n=89)
11 PN and 12 IE
Zeller V, et al. Continuous Cefazolin Infusion To Treat Bone
and Joint Infections: Clinical Efficacy, Feasibility, Safety, and
Serum and Bone Concentrations
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 883-7
Success rate:
82/88 (93%)
Time (h)
Cef
azol
in o
ncen
trat
ion
0 24
Loading dose: 0.5-1 g
Maintaining dose: 60-80 mg/kg (2-6 g/24h)
Zeller V, et al. Continuous Cefazolin Infusion To Treat Bone
and Joint Infections: Clinical Efficacy, Feasibility, Safety, and
Serum and Bone Concentrations
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 883-7
• 94% underwent surgery
• 100% a second atb (rifampin,
gentamycin)
1.- Oxa-cloxacillin
2.- Cefazolin if HI-
MIC is low
MSSA: oxacillin versus other beta-lactam choices
• Infectious
endocarditis
• Pneumonia
•Big abscess not
drained
• Foreign-body
infections, when
the implant is not
removed
Guy E. Thwaites and Vanya Gant. Are bloodstream leukocytes
Trojan Horses for the metastasis of Staphylococcus aureus?
Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9: 215-22
• Intracellular concentration
• SCV phenotype
diffusion
biofilms
Holmes NE, et al. Antibiotic Choice May Not Explain Poorer
Outcomes in Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
and High Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations.
J Infect Dis 2011; 204: 340-7
• Infectious
endocarditis
• Pneumonia
•Big abscess not
drained
• Foreign-body
infections, when
the implant is not
removed
1.- Oxa-cloxacillin
2.- Cefazolin if HI-
MIC is low
MSSA: oxacillin versus other beta-lactam choices
2nd ATB
• AG
• Rif
• FQ
• Fos
• Dap
• Lin
+
Severity
Vanco MIC
Biofilm
Source
Kumar A, et al. Early combination antibiotic therapy yields
improved survival compared with monotherapy in septic shock: A propensity-matched analysis.
Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1773-85
ß-lactam +
macrolide
Kumar A, et al. Early combination antibiotic therapy yields
improved survival compared with monotherapy in septic shock: A propensity-matched analysis.
Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1773-85
Kumar A, et al. Early combination antibiotic therapy yields
improved survival compared with monotherapy in septic shock: A propensity-matched analysis.
Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1773-85
Monotherapy Combination
Nº deaths/total
HR (95%CI) P