Naft Genesis.doc

7/28/2019 Naft Genesis.doc

1/8

GENESIS i podrijetlo nafte i ugljena -

PregledFebruary 4, 2010 Veljaa 4, 2010tags:APOLOGETICS ,Bible Study ,Christianity , coal, Dr. tags:Apologetika , Biblija studija ,kranstvo, ugljen, dr.Gary S. Day , Genesis , global warming ,oilGary S. Dan , Genesis ,globalno zatopljenje ,naftneby christianconscience po christianconscienceBy Dr. Gary S. DayDr. Gary S. Dan

https://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0406/5ac76dbc16693/5ac76dbdf416c.jpg

https://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0406/5ac76dbc16693/5ac76dbdf416c.jpgTrevor Major is theauthor of this small booklet, copyrighted and published in 1990 and 1996 by Apologetics Press.When Major wrote this the US's energy consumption was heavily dependent upon petroleum,natural gas and coal. So he investigates the origins of these earth products, because of the dangerof the supply being exhausted by over grazing, as it were. The economic reason for the highinterest in the origins of these substances is the race for profits by the companies who spendbillions in research and recovery of the product. Trevor Major je autor ove male knjiice,zatiene autorskim pravima i objavljeni u 1990 i 1996 od strane Apologetika Press. Kada Majornapisao ovaj US potronja energije bila je jako ovisna o nafte, prirodnog plina i ugljena. Tako jeon istrauje porijeklo te zemlje proizvoda, zbog opasnosti opskrbe se iscrpljena preko ispae, kaoto su bili. gospodarskog razloga za visoke kamate na podrijetlo tih tvari je utrka za profit tvrtke

koji troe milijarde na istraivanju i oporavku proizvoda ....There is a problem with origins though, for the Biblical account of Creation and the Flood is atodds with geologist's model of the formation of oil and coal. The geologists assume that theseearth products took millions of years to form, from decayed organic life. The Bible would havethe world to be very young, in the thousands of years, rather than in the millions of years.Arguments run in different directions in accounting for the age and deposits of these products,but Major posits that, any large-scale geological effects, such as deposits of coal and oil, wouldhave to be explained by the Flood, and thinks that the deposits can be better explained by theFlood, rather than the standard geological model. Postoji problem s porijeklo ipak, za biblijskiopis stvaranja, a poplava je u raskoraku s geolog model formiranja nafte i ugljena. Geolozipretpostavljaju da su ti zemlja proizvodi su milijunima godina da se formira, od zaputeni

organski ivot. Biblija bi svijet biti vrlo mlad, u tisuama godina, a ne u milijunima godina.Argumenti tranje u razliitim smjerovima u raunovodstvu za dob i depozite tih proizvoda, alibojnik tvrdi da, "bilo velikih razmjera geoloki uinci, kao to su depoziti ugljena i nafte, bi seobjasniti potop "i misli da moe bolje depozita objasniti Potopa, a" od standardnih geolokimodel ".Although many would love to believe the Biblical Flood model for the creation of the deposits ofoil and coal, but to do so they also would have to believe in the supernatural causation that theBible portrays, because the Flood cannot be explained away by any natural process. The
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/apologetics/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhhhKYfM3-3TMfhIw0rC8VCWtCU0pQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/apologetics/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhhhKYfM3-3TMfhIw0rC8VCWtCU0pQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/bible-study/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhgVUBzAcGkxJoAGxKHdvFgojl5TBghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/bible-study/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhgVUBzAcGkxJoAGxKHdvFgojl5TBghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/christianity/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhil8c2hXctzCTKTeLW3ZH-P-3G8rwhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/christianity/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhil8c2hXctzCTKTeLW3ZH-P-3G8rwhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/coal/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiMpWKhx58gGc-OoYgSf6LDGzYlEAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/coal/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiMpWKhx58gGc-OoYgSf6LDGzYlEAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/apologetics/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhhhKYfM3-3TMfhIw0rC8VCWtCU0pQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/apologetics/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhhhKYfM3-3TMfhIw0rC8VCWtCU0pQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/bible-study/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhgVUBzAcGkxJoAGxKHdvFgojl5TBghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/christianity/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhil8c2hXctzCTKTeLW3ZH-P-3G8rwhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/christianity/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhil8c2hXctzCTKTeLW3ZH-P-3G8rwhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/coal/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiMpWKhx58gGc-OoYgSf6LDGzYlEAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/coal/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiMpWKhx58gGc-OoYgSf6LDGzYlEAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/genesis/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhh50ldzeHhefGjuACpLINia5ilIoAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/global-warming/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiZPRas3mFbGA9yeqEH2C-thE3wdghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/oil/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhheHLB3yYWuMlP4nDvFS2kp-b1N9ghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/oil/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhheHLB3yYWuMlP4nDvFS2kp-b1N9ghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/genesis/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhh50ldzeHhefGjuACpLINia5ilIoAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/global-warming/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiZPRas3mFbGA9yeqEH2C-thE3wdghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/oil/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhheHLB3yYWuMlP4nDvFS2kp-b1N9ghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/oil/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhheHLB3yYWuMlP4nDvFS2kp-b1N9ghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/oil-coal-copy.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/oil-coal-copy.jpghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/apologetics/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhhhKYfM3-3TMfhIw0rC8VCWtCU0pQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/bible-study/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhgVUBzAcGkxJoAGxKHdvFgojl5TBghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/christianity/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhil8c2hXctzCTKTeLW3ZH-P-3G8rwhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/coal/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiMpWKhx58gGc-OoYgSf6LDGzYlEAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/apologetics/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhhhKYfM3-3TMfhIw0rC8VCWtCU0pQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/bible-study/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhgVUBzAcGkxJoAGxKHdvFgojl5TBghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/christianity/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhil8c2hXctzCTKTeLW3ZH-P-3G8rwhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/coal/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiMpWKhx58gGc-OoYgSf6LDGzYlEAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/genesis/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhh50ldzeHhefGjuACpLINia5ilIoAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/global-warming/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiZPRas3mFbGA9yeqEH2C-thE3wdghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/oil/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhheHLB3yYWuMlP4nDvFS2kp-b1N9ghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/dr-gary-s-day/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhjOhmSl6PIVuUMRY3T2DHwJ3jFnuQhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/genesis/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhh50ldzeHhefGjuACpLINia5ilIoAhttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/global-warming/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhiZPRas3mFbGA9yeqEH2C-thE3wdghttp://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=hr&langpair=en%7Chr&u=http://en.wordpress.com/tag/oil/&rurl=translate.google.hr&usg=ALkJrhheHLB3yYWuMlP4nDvFS2kp-b1N9ghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/oil-coal-copy.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/oil-coal-copy.jpg


2/8

resistance goes even deeper though. For if the Flood model works better in the petroleum history,cannot it do so for other geological histories? And if that is so, it would verify the Flood story andthus the Divine origins of the Bible. But the geological naturalists find it difficult to accept thatGod is involved in our affairs. Iako bi mnogi vole vjerovati model biblijski potop za stvaranjedepozita nafte i ugljena, ali to uiniti tako da oni takoer e morati vjerovati u nadnaravno

uzronosti da je Biblija prikazuje, jer je potop ne mogu objasniti daleko od bilo koje fizikeproces. otpor ide jo dublje ipak. Jer, ako je potop model radi bolje u naftnoj povijesti, ne moe touiniti za druge geoloke povijesti? A ako je tako, to bi provjeriti poplava priu i na taj nainBoansko porijeklo Biblije . No, geoloka prirodoslovci teko prihvatiti da Bog je ukljuen unae stvari.Although many in the past saw God generally acting in natural events, two hundred years ago aman named James Hutton believed that the geological features we see on Earth today must beaccounted for by the geological processes we see working today. From this thought came thenotion that the laws of nature are uniform, now called uniformitarianism as popularized byCharles Lyell; therefore the rocks and deposits took million of years to develop. Iako su mnogi uprolosti vidio Boga openito djeluje u prirodnim zbivanjima, dvjesto godina ovjek po imenuJames Hutton "Vjeruje se da geoloke znaajke vidimo na Zemlji danas moraju objasnitigeolokim procesima vidimo radi i danas." Od ove misli doao pojam da zakoni prirode sujedinstvene, sada se zove uniformitarianism to je popularizirao Charles Lyell, stoga stijena idepoziti uzeo milijuna godina da se razvije. This takes God out of the picture, and represents thegeologists who work under the assumptions of uniformitarianism. On the other hand, those whosubscribe to the Genesis account of the Flood story and its interpretive framework for geologystand in opposition, and the gulf is wide. The author attempts to narrow the gap between the twogeological views. To traje Bog iz slike, a predstavlja geolozi koji rade pod pretpostavkeuniformitarianism. S druge strane, oni koji su se pretplatili na Postanka raun od poplava prie iinterpretativnog okvira za geologiju stajati u opoziciji, a zaljev je irok. pokuava smanjiti jazizmeu dvaju geolokih pogleda.Coal FormationUgljen formacijaBelow is an image of the hypothetical evolution of peat moss in a Carboniferous swamp, turninginto coal. Step one: slow decomposition of plant life accumulates, forming peat and then a softbrown coal called lignite. Step two: fragile plant tissue is destroyed while woody material ispreserved, eventually forming a higher carbon content coal called bituminous coal with increasedtemperature and pressure. Step three: A thick layer of sediment reduces water content and gaseswhile increasing pressure, causing chemical and physical transformation of peat into a hard blackcoal called anthracite. Ispod je slika hipotetski evolucije tresetnica u karbon movari, pretvara uugljen Korak jedan:. Sporo razgradnja biljnog ivota akumulira, formiranje treset i onda soft mrkiugljen lignit zove Korak dva:. Krhak biljnog tkiva je unitena, dok drvenastog materijala jeouvan, s vremenom formiraju vei sadraj ugljika ugljena zove bitumenski ugljen s povienomtemperaturom i tlakom Korak tri:. debeli sloj taloga smanjuje sadraj vode i plinova, apoveanjem tlaka, to uzrokuje kemijske i fizikalne transformacije treseta u tvrdu crnu ugljenazove antracit.


3/8

https://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0406/5ac76dbc16693/5ac76dbecdc0d.jpghttps://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0406/5ac76dbc16693/5ac76dbecdc0d.jpgThere are several types or ranks of coal, as mentioned above, lignite, bituminous, and anthracitecoals; which rank they are depends more on the depth of where they are found, and thus are not agood indicator of their age. Postoji nekoliko tipova ili redovima ugljena, kao to je spomenutogore, lignit, bitumenski, antracit i ar, koji rank su vie ovisi o dubini, gdje se nalaze, i na tajnain nisu dobar pokazatelj njihove dobi.Five evidences that challenge the uniformitarian model of coal formation, yet provide evidencefor the Flood model are as follows: Pet dokazi koji dovode u pitanje uniformitarian modelformiranja ugljena, ali pruiti dokaz za potop modela su kako slijedi:1) There is no gradation from one coal rank to the other; 1) Ne postoji gradacija od jednogugljena in na druge;

2) The excessive amount of coal the extent of the deposits; 2) pretjeranu koliinu ugljena opsegudepozita;3) The types of plants and fossils associated with many coal deposits; 3) vrste biljaka i fosilapovezana s mnogim leita ugljena;4) Evidence suggests a speedy and recent development of coal in nature; and 4) Dokazi sugerirajubrzo i nedavni razvoj uglja u prirodi i5) The evidence of speedy and recent formation of coal in the laboratory. 5) dokaz o brzom inedavni nastanak ugljena u laboratoriju.The Van Krevelen diagram below shows the main groups of organic matter plotted as a ratio ofhydrogen-to-carbon verses oxygen-to-carbon. Lignin is the durable substance of woody plantswhich produce vitrinite, the main component in most coals. The increased levels of heat and

pressure change the properties of lignin, which in turn produces the different ranks of coalsshown. The increase of rank from lignite to anthracite represents a rise in carbon content relativeto hydrogen and oxygen. Dijagram ispod pokazuje Van Krevelen "glavne skupine organskihtvari ucrtava se kao omjer vodik-ugljik stihovi kisik-ugljik". Lignina je izdrljiv tvar oddrvenastih biljaka koje proizvode vitrinite, glavni sastojak u veini ugljevlje. Poviene razinetopline i tlaka promijeniti svojstva lignina, to zauzvrat proizvodi razliitih redova ugljevljeprikazane. porast ranga iz lignita u antracit "predstavlja porast u odnosu na sadraj ugljika vodikai kisika."
http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/coal-strata-1.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/coal-strata-1.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/coal-strata-1.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/coal-strata-1.jpg


4/8

http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpg

http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpg1) Gradation 1) gradacijeAlthough regional tectonic activity may invert the ranks of coal, no swamp can be found wherepeat is changing into coal. In the Waikato Valley of New Zealand, peat swamps lie over rockscontaining sub-bituminous coal seams, but there is no subtle gradation between the two. Thisreminds me of the multiple missing links problem in evolutionary theory. There just isn't anysupportive evidence. Iako su regionalne tektonske aktivnosti moe izokrenuti redovima ugljena,ne movara mogu nai gdje treset se mijenja u ugljen. "U dolini Waikato Novog Zelanda, tresetmovare lee preko stijene sadre pod-bitumenski ugljen avova, ali nema suptilne nijanseizmeu ta dva. "Ovo me podsjea vie" nedostaje veza "problem u teoriji evolucije. Postoji samonije bilo koji podravaju dokaza. Although there are some limited variations, Coal deposits

appear in geological strata already formed, and do not show evidence of the presumedevolutionary pathway leading from a peat swamp. Iako postoje neke ograniene varijacije ",leita ugljena pojavljuju u geolokim slojevima ve formirana, a ne pokazuju dokazepretpostavljene evolucijske put vodi iz treseta movare".2) Quantity 2) KoliinaThe problem of the quantity of coal deposits can be seen graphically: Problem koliine ugljamoe vidjeti grafiki:1 ft of coal = 12 ft of peat 1 ft ugljena = 12 m od treseta1 ft of peat = 10 ft of plant matter 1 ft treseta = 10 m od biljnih tvariSO SO1 ft of coal = 120 ft of plant matter 1 ft ugljena = 120 m od biljnih tvari

Some would permit 1 ft of coal = 5 ft of peat. Neki bi dopustio 1 ft ugljena = 5 m od treseta.Nevertheless, a 10 ft coal seam would require 500-1,200 ft of plant matter. A 200 ft coal seamwould requirewell you get the point. As WG Woolnough said, Again, nowhere in the world,at present, can accumulations of vegetable matter be found which are quantitativelycommensurate with any of the major coal deposits of past geological time, (Sedimentation inBarred Basins and Source Rock Oil,: Origin of Evaporites, Tulsa, 1971). On the other hand aworld wide flood would have ripped up large quantities of plant life and covered them with hugequantities of sediments which would provide the pressure needed. Ipak, 10 m av ugljen e
http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpghttp://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpg


5/8

zahtijevati 500-1,200 ft biljnih tvari. 200 ft kop e zahtijevati ... dobro ste dobili toku. Kao WGWoolnough rekao: "Opet, nigdje u svijetu, u sadanjosti, moe akumulacije biljnih tvari koje semogu nai kvantitativno razmjerni s bilo koje od glavnih uglja prolih geolokih vremena"(Sedimentacija u Prugaste koljke Izvor Rock Oil,:Podrijetlo Evaporiti, Tulsa, 1971). S drugestrane svjetski potop imati ripped up velike koliine biljnog svijeta te ih prekrivene ogromnim

koliinama sedimenata koji e osigurati potreban tlak.3) Composition 3) SastavThe problem here is that the uniformitarian view requires most coal to be formed from peatcollecting in a swamp, but most coal forming plants require dry land, not wet. Problem ovdje jeda uniformitarian pogled zahtijeva najvie ugljen da se formira od treseta prikupljanja u movari,ali veina ugljena formiranje biljke zahtijevaju kopno, a ne mokra.4) Rapid Formation in Nature 4) Rapid formacije u prirodiSeveral clues indicate that coal didn't take millions of years to form: Nekoliko naznake upuujuna to da ugljen nije uzeo milijune godina u obliku:1) Vertical tree trunks within coal deposits indicate quick burial; 1) Vertikalni debla unutarleita ugljena upuuju na brzi ukopa;2) Gentry's work (Radiohalos in Coalfield Wood, Science, 194, 315-318, 1976) on coalfieldwood from uranium-rich rocks containing radiohalos, some which are apparently too young tosupport the uniformitarianism position. 2) Gentry je rad ("Radiohalos u Coalfield Wood, nauke,194, 315-318, 1976) na coalfield drvo od urana bogatih stijena sadri radiohalos, neki koji suoito premladi za podrku uniformitarianism poziciju. Without going into detail in this review,Gentry, summarizes his findings this way, This is exactly what would be expected on the basisof a near simultaneous deposition of all the wood at the time of the flood (Creation's TinyMystery, 1986). Bez ulaenja u pojedinosti u ovom pregledu, Gentry, rezimira njegov nalaz naovaj nain: "To je upravo ono to bi se oekivalo na temelju blizini istovremenog taloenja svihdrva u vrijeme poplava" (Stvaranje's Tiny Mystery, 1986) .5) Rapid Formation in the Laboratory 5) Rapid formacije u LaboratorijuTests which comes close to simulating nature, conducted at various labs, including the ArgonneNational Laboratory, has shown that subjecting lignin to a heat of 150C in the presence of clayover a period ranging from two to eight months in the absence of oxygen, produces a chemicalcomposition resembling bituminous coals in eight months, and lignite in two months. The reasonclay is important is that it is often associated with coal seams, and lignin is the primarycomponent of coal. Also, a temperature of 150C corresponds to a depth of burial [12,008-20,506 ft] we might expect for bituminous coals. Testovi koji dolazi blizu simulira prirodu,provedena na razliitim laboratorijima, ukljuujui i Argonne National Laboratory, pokazala jeda podvrgavanju "lignina na toplinu od 150 C u prisutnosti gline tijekom perioda od dva doosam mjeseci u odsutnosti kisika, "proizvodi kemijski sastav nalik bitumenskih ugljevlje u osammjeseci, i lignit u dva mjeseca. razloga gline je vano je da je esto povezana s ugljena avova, ilignina je primarna komponenta ugljena. Takoer," temperatura 150 C odgovara dubine ukopa[12,008-20,506 m] moemo oekivati za bitumenske ugljevlje. "A Flood ModelModel poplavaIn 1979 Austin found that (for the reasons mentioned above) many coal deposits did not formfrom the gradual accumulation of peat in freshwater swamps, and suggests another model: araft of plant debris floating on top of a sea or lake could sink, be buried, and then be transformedinto coal. This might explain how marine fossils found their way into sediments in coal, andexplain the size and composition of coal deposits. Major, believes that this log raft model isconsistent with a catastrophic flood. The explosion of Mt St. Helens may support this finding,


6/8

for Many logs with an attached root system were found floating [in Spirit Lake, which also hada dense log matt over much of its surface], in an upright position, and an estimated 15,000 logswere partially buried in the lake sediments. So, it is possible for a catastrophic event to placeupright trees inside of coal seams. This scene also resembles certain coal beds in Eastern UnitedStates. Austin states, All that is needed is burial and slight heating to transform the Spirit Lake

peat into coal (Mt. St. Helens and Catastrophism,Proceedings of the First InternationalConference on Creationism, Aug 4-9, 1986). Modern analogy from Spirit Lake, Austin's lograft model and evidence from many existing coal deposits provide a way to explain the existenceof coal in terms of the Genesis Flood. Godine 1979 Austin utvrdio da (iz razloga gore navedenih)"mnogi uglja nije oblik od postupnog nakupljanja treseta u slatkovodne movare", te predlaedrugi model: "splav biljnih ostataka plutajui na vrhu more ili jezero mogao sudoper, bitipokopan, a onda se pretvara u ugljen. "Ovo bi moglo objasniti kako se morski fosili se mogupronai svoj put u naslagama ugljena, i" objasniti veliinu i sastav leita ugljena. "Major, vjerujeda je ovaj" dnevnik splav "model je u skladu s katastrofalnim poplavama. "Eksplozija Mt St.Helens moe podrati ovaj nalaz, za" Mnogi zapisnicima sa priloenom korijenski sustav jepronaena mrtva [u Duhu Lake, koja je takoer imala gustu prijavite mat tijekom veeg dijelanjegove povrine] u uspravnom poloaju, a procjenjuje se 15.000 trupci djelomino bilezakopane u jezerskim sedimentima. Dakle, mogue je za katastrofalan dogaaj na mjestouspravno drvee unutar ugljena avova. Ova scena takoer podsjea odreene ugljena leaja uistonoj Sjedinjene Amerike Drave. Austin drave "Sve to je potrebno je pogreb i laganozagrijavanje za pretvaranje jezera treset Duh u ugljen" (Mt. St. Helens i katastrofizam ", Zbornikradova Prve meunarodne konferencije o kreacionizma, 4-9 kolovoz, 1986). Moderni analognoDuha iz jezera, Austin je "dnevnik splav" model i dokaza iz mnogih postojeih leita ugljenapruaju nain da se objasni postojanje ugljena u smislu Postanka Potopa.Oil and Natural Gas OriginNafte i prirodnog plina podrijetluMost petroleum geologist vote that oil derives from living organisms, while others, includingastrophysicist Thomas Gold, believe that oil has a non-biological origin and is formed bymethane, but so far his research has been fruitless. The difficulty in ascertaining oil's origin is thevariation of its chemistry and the differing geological locations where it is found, but the onething it has in common is that it is always found in or near sedimentary rocks of marine origin(Brownlow, 1979). And as is similar to the formation of coal, dead plants and animals, heat andpressure and chemical reaction, plus thousands of feet of sediment are combined to make crudeoil. With more burial depth and heat, methane and light hydrocarbons were developed, which isknown as natural gas. Veina naftni geolog glasovati da nafta potjee iz ivih organizama, dok sudrugi, ukljuujui astrofiziar Thomas Gold, vjerujem da ulje ima ne-biolokog porijekla te jeformirana metan, ali do sada je njegovo istraivanje je besplodna. Potekoa u utvrivanju ulje'spodrijetla varijacija svojih kemije i razliite geoloke mjesta gdje je pronaen, ali jedna stvar jezajednika je da je "uvijek nalazio u blizini ili sedimentnim stijenama morskog podrijetla"(Brownlow, 1979). I kao to je slian formiranje ugljena, mrtve biljke i ivotinje, topline i tlaka ikemijske reakcije, plus tisue metara sedimenta se kombiniraju da bi sirova nafta. s vie ukopadubine i topline, metana i lagani ugljikovodici su razvijene, koji je poznat kao prirodni plin .Two more bits of information are needed to explain the huge oil fields. Both oil and gas mustmigrate out of the original source rock into a reservoir rock, which will hold the oil in its poresand crevices, much like the conditions of an aquifer. Then impervious rock or some other barrieris needed to stop oil from leaking to the surface and keep it under pressure. In theuniformitarian perspective, this takes millions of years to occur, in several steps. Dva vie bitovainformacija su potrebne objasniti ogroman naftnih polja. Oba nafte i plina "mora seliti iz


7/8

originalnog izvora stijena u rezervoar stijena, koja e se odrati nafte u pore i pukotine", ba kao iuvjete vodonosnik. Tada neprohodan rock ili neke druge barijere je potrebno da se "zaustavi uljeod curenja na povrini i drati ga pod pritiskom." U uniformitarian perspektive, to trajemilijunima godina da se dogodi, u nekoliko koraka.There are some creation scientists, like Morton, who follow the inorganic origin of oil, but most

share the belief that oil was formed by the sudden and catastrophic Biblical Flood, that buried theplant and animal life. One piece of evidence that may support the Flood model is that both redblood cells and plant life alike contain chemicals (heme and chlorophyll respectively) that forminto porphyrin, a common ingredient of sedimentary rocks and crude oil. A catastrophicworldwide Flood would also cut off porphyrin from oxidizing agents, which destroy them.Postoje neke stvaranje znanstvenici, poput Morton, koji slijede anorganskog podrijetla ulja, aliveina dijele uvjerenje da je ulje je formiran naglog i katastrofalnog biblijska poplava, kojepokopan biljnog i ivotinjskog svijeta. Jedan komad dokaza da moe podravati poplava modelaje da obe crvenih krvnih stanica i biljnog ivota podjednako sadre kemikalije (hema i klorofilarespektivno) koje formiraju u porfirin ", zajedniki sastojak sedimentnih stijena i sirove nafte."katastrofalnih poplava u svijetu takoer e odsjeeni od porfirin oksidacijskim sredstvima, to ihje unititi. Experiments has shown that porphyrins can be produced from chlorophyll in a matterof hours, showing the longevity of time needed by the uniformitarian model to be unnecessary.Eksperimenti pokazuju da je "porfirina se moe proizvesti iz klorofila u nekoliko sati", pokazujedugovjenost vrijeme potrebno za uniformitarian model biti nepotrebna.4) Rapid Formation in Nature 4) Rapid formacije u prirodiIn 1989, Didyk and Simoneit wrote about the Guaymas Basin 6,500 foot trench in the Gulf ofCalifornia which is covered by a 1,500 foot-thick blanket of olive green ooze. The hotgeothermal waters that are percolating through the ooze, is producing oil and natural gas. And theoil is only 5,000 years old, according to radiocarbon dating. This finding cannot be ingested atface value, but it does put into deep relief the millions of years that are needed for theuniformitarian view. Other studies suggest that the Flood involves the rapid addition of new, hotocean crust, which could compel the change of organic material into hydrocarbons. Althoughsome would negate the findings because of some chemical differences of the crude oil in theGuaymas Basin from other crude oil finds, this may be explained from the fact that the oil in theBasin is developed from basically one source of plant life, plankton and algae, while crudeelsewhere is found to have multiples sources. Godine 1989, Didyk i Simoneit pisao o GuaymasBasin "6.500 noga rov u Gulf of California to je obuhvaeno 1.500 noga-debeli pokrivamaslinasto zelenu mulj." Vrue geotermalne vode koje se gube kroz mulj, je proizvodnju ulja iprirodnog plina. A ulje je samo 5.000 godina, prema datiranje radioaktivnim ugljikom. Ovajnalaz se ne moe gutati po nominalnoj vrijednosti, ali on ne stavi u duboki reljef milijuna godinakoje su potrebne za uniformitarian pogled. Druge studije sugeriraju da je "poplava ukljuuje brzododavanje novih, vrue oceana kora", to bi moglo natjerati na promjenu organskog materijala uugljikovodika. Iako neki bi ponitila nalaza zbog neke kemijske razlike sirove nafte u Guaymasbazenu s drugih sirove nafte nalazi , To se moe objasniti iz injenice da je ulje u bazenu uosnovi se razvija iz jednog izvora biljnog ivota, planktona i alge, a sirova drugdje se utvrdi da suviekratnici izvora.5) Rapid Formation in the Laboratory 5) Rapid formacije u LaboratorijuLaboratory oil making is done to investigate the origin of oil, and the feasibility of makingsynthetic oil. However laboratory and natural setting differences bring this method into question.But researchers Saxby and Riley (1984) put oil shale and brown coals into six stainless steelpressure cooker devices; and beginning at 100C raised the heat one degree per week over a 300


8/8

week period, analyzing the product at every fifty weeks (and thus every fifty degrees increase).What was found was that after 200 weeks (four years) the production of a substance'indistinguishable from a paraffinic crude oil,' while the brown coal produced 'wet natural gas'.Yet despite the limitations of this and other successful experiments, it is clear that oil can formwithin a relatively short period of time. The Flood model, though in early stages, shows much

hope in finding the solution of these earth products' origin. Laboratorij ulje to je uinjeno da seispita porijeklo nafte, i izvedivosti izrade sintetikih ulja. No laboratorij i prirodnom ambijenturazlike donijeti ovaj nain dovedena u pitanje. No, znanstvenici Saxby i Riley (1984) staviti ulje ismei ugljeni kriljaca u "est od nehrajueg elika lonac na pritisak ureaja; ", s poetkom u100 C podie toplinu jednog stupnja tjedno preko 300 tjedan razdoblje, analiziranje proizvodana svakih pedeset tjedna (i tako svakih pedeset stupnjeva poveanja) Ono to je pronaao je da jenakon 200 tjedna (. etiri godine) proizvodnja "tvari" ne razlikuje od parafinske sirove nafte ",dok je smeeg ugljena proizvedenog mokri prirodnog plina '." Meutim, unato ogranienjimaovog i drugih uspjenih eksperimenata ", jasno je da ulje moe obliku u roku od relativnokratkom vremenskom razdoblju. "poplava model, iako u ranim fazama, pokazuje mnogo nade upronalaenju rjeenja za ove zemlje proizvoda podrijetlom.Some scientists capitulate to naturalism and abandon a conservative of Scripture, while othersfail to consider the proper relationship of science and Divine Revelation by invoking thatgeological things look old because God made them that way. Though God created life in a maturestate Gen 1:12, 22, 28 and 'He could have' just created these earth products, this last assumptiondenies that coal and oil deposits offer remarkable evidence for His watery judgment of sinfulman (Genesis 6:5-7) as has been seen above. Neki znanstvenici kapitulirati u naturalizam inapustiti konzervativnu Pisma, dok drugi "ne uzeti u obzir pravilan odnos znanosti i boanskeObjave" pozivajui se da je geoloki stvari izgledaju stare, jer ih je Bog napravio na taj nain.Iako je Bog stvorio ivot u zrelim stanju generala 1:12, 22, 28 i 'On je mogao imati' upravostvorili ove zemlje proizvode, ovaj posljednji pretpostavke negira da je "ugljena i nafte nudeizvanredne dokaze za njegovu vodeni presuda od grenog ovjeka (Postanak 6:5-7)" kao to je sevidi gore.What had developed in the naturalist camp since the writing of this book is the theory that theearth itself naturally produces oil without the need for a biological base in its formation, thusthere is an endless supply. to je razvio u prirodoslovac logoru od pisanja ove knjige je teorija daje zemlja sama prirodno proizvodi ulje bez potrebe za bioloku bazu u njegovom formiranju, pase beskrajne ponude. This position too excludes God, and is the way for carnal man regardless ofthe evidence that if put before them (Romans 1). Ovaj poloaj takoer iskljuuje Boga, a je put zatjelesni ovjek bez obzira na dokaze da ako se stavi pred njima (Rimljanima 1).

Documents

Naft Genesis.doc