Upload
tranthuan
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Data was collected from over 500 community colleges and four-‐year universities during June-‐August 2014.
Survey Respondent Demographics 4-‐year schools/traditional 67% 2-‐year schools/community 33%
Non-‐residential 36% Residential 64%
Public 70% Private 28%
Does your school have… BIT/TAT/SOC team 94% Counseling (mental health) 91%
Team Leadership
Dean of Students 44% Counseling 6% VPSA 24% Police/Safety 3% Student Conduct 9% Other/Misc 14%
2014 Survey Results
National Behavioral Intervention Team Association www.nabita.org
School Size (2012 in blue/2014 in red)
BIT/TAT/Student of Concern Team
Teams with websites 49% Number of meetings canceled each year 8% Teams with Logo for BIT 13% BIT vs. TAT focus for single team schools 89%/11% Teams that monitor faculty/staff behavior 42% Teams that also focus on faculty/staff 42% Teams that keep centralized records 85% Most schools have had a BIT for an average of 6 years ….case manager in student conduct 11%
Team Membership
Average Team Size: 8.6 members
Counseling 92% Police/Campus Safety 88% Dean of Students 75% Housing and Residential Life 59% Academic Affairs 53% Health Services 40% VP Student Affairs 40% Faculty 30% Human Resources 29% Student Activities 21% Case Manager 20% Legal Counsel 17% Admissions 8% Greek Life 4%
Van Brunt, B., Sokolow, B., Lewis, W., & Schuster, S. (2014). NaBITA Team Survey. www.nabita.org
Meeting Frequency (2012 in blue/2014 in red)
How long has your team been around? 1-‐2 years 18% 3-‐4 years 28% 5-‐10 years 44% 10+ years 10%
BIT websites contain:
Contact phone 58% Contact email 55% Mission statement 48% List of behaviors to report 52% Team membership list 47% Online report form 49% FAQ about team 21% Faculty classroom guide 14% Team polices 9% Risk Rubric 8%
How BITs Advertise
Train staff and faculty 80% Website 63% Orientation events 60% Handouts and flyers 38% School paper 9% We don’t advertise 9%
Measurement of Risk
Subjective method 50% Objective method 50%
Objective Methods:
NaBITA/CUBIT Tool 57% SIVRA-‐35 14% WAVR-‐21 4% Miscellaneous* 14% *Includes: MOSAIC, ATAP, Factor One, Deisinger’s Handbook, homegrown
Internal BIT Training
Webinars 63% Books and Journals 36% Other conferences 38% Tabletop exercises 36% No training yet 12% NaBITA conference 29% NCHERM consultants 20% Other consultants 13%
As part of the survey, some teams shared sample websites:
University of Oklahoma www.ou.edu/normanbit/ Morgan Community College www.morgancc.edu/about-‐mcc/bit/ Boise State University http://care.boisestate.edu Ozarks Technical College www.otc.edu/otccares/ Harper Community College http://harpercollege.edu/heat Northern Virginia Community www.nvcc.edu/NOVACares CSU San Bernardino www.csusb.edu/careteam/ Grand Rapids Community www.grcc.edu/behavioralinterventionteam U of Colorado Boulder www.colorado.edu/studentaffairs/students-‐concern
How does your team seek referrals?
Phone call 84% Online report 76%
Director of team 65% Anonymous report 45% Central office contact 34%
If your team keeps records, what method do you use? Caseload
Van Brunt, B., Sokolow, B., Lewis, W., & Schuster, S. (2014). NaBITA Team Survey. www.nabita.org