Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    1/19

    Accepted Manuscript

    I n f l u e n c e o f v i b r a t i o n o n t h e s o l i d i f i c a t i o n b e h a v i o u r a n d t e n s i l e p r o p e r t i e s o f

    a n A l - 1 8 w t % S i a l l o y

    G . C h i r i t a , , I . S t e f a n e s c u , D . S o a r e s , F . S . S i l v a

    P I I : S 0 2 6 1 - 3 0 6 9 ( 0 8 ) 0 0 3 8 4 - 1

    D O I : 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . m a t d e s . 2 0 0 8 . 0 7 . 0 4 5

    R e f e r e n c e : J M A D 2 0 6 1

    T o a p p e a r i n : M a t e r i a l s a n d D e s i g n

    R e c e i v e d D a t e : 2 2 M a y 2 0 0 8

    R e v i s e d D a t e : 1 8 J u l y 2 0 0 8

    A c c e p t e d D a t e : 2 2 J u l y 2 0 0 8

    P l e a s e c i t e t h i s a r t i c l e a s : C h i r i t a , , G . , S t e f a n e s c u , I . , S o a r e s , D . , S i l v a , F . S . , I n f l u e n c e o f v i b r a t i o n o n t h e

    s o l i d i f i c a t i o n b e h a v i o u r a n d t e n s i l e p r o p e r t i e s o f a n A l - 1 8 w t % S i a l l o y , M a t e r i a l s a n d D e s i g n ( 2 0 0 8 ) , d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 /

    j . m a t d e s . 2 0 0 8 . 0 7 . 0 4 5

    T h i s i s a P D F f i l e o f a n u n e d i t e d m a n u s c r i p t t h a t h a s b e e n a c c e p t e d f o r p u b l i c a t i o n . A s a s e r v i c e t o o u r c u s t o m e r s

    w e a r e p r o v i d i n g t h i s e a r l y v e r s i o n o f t h e m a n u s c r i p t . T h e m a n u s c r i p t w i l l u n d e r g o c o p y e d i t i n g , t y p e s e t t i n g , a n d

    r e v i e w o f t h e r e s u l t i n g p r o o f b e f o r e i t i s p u b l i s h e d i n i t s f i n a l f o r m . P l e a s e n o t e t h a t d u r i n g t h e p r o d u c t i o n p r o c e s s

    e r r o r s m a y b e d i s c o v e r e d w h i c h c o u l d a f f e c t t h e c o n t e n t , a n d a l l l e g a l d i s c l a i m e r s t h a t a p p l y t o t h e j o u r n a l p e r t a i n .

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.045http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.045http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.045
  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    2/19

    INFLUENCE OF VIBRATION ON THE SOLIDIFICATION BEHAVIOUR AND TENSILE

    PROPERTIES OF AN Al-18wt%Si ALLOY

    Chirita, G.1, Stefanescu, I

    2, Soares, D.

    1, Silva, F.S.

    1

    1 Mechanical Engineering Department; School of Engineering, Minho University, PORTUGAL2Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University Galati, ROMANIA

    ________________________________________________________________________________

    Abstract. This paper is concerned with the influence of vibration on mechanical properties ofcastings. The main vibration effects include: promotion of nucleation and thus reducing as-cast grain

    size; reduction of shrinkage porosities due to improved metal feeding; and production of a more

    homogenous metal structure. In the present study, mechanical mold vibration was applied to an AlSi hypereutectic alloy at fixed amplitude and different frequencies. Tensile tests were done on

    specimens obtained with the different vibrating frequency levels. Experimental results show thatmechanical properties were influenced by the level of applied frequency. The tensile strength was

    improved for low vibration frequencies but decreased for high frequencies, as compared with gravity

    castings without vibration. A microstructure analysis along with a solidification behavior study wasperformed in order to understand the mechanism responsible for the previous behavior. A heat-

    transfer mechanism, that is acceleration dependent, seems to be the responsible for the shift inmechanical properties response to the vibration effect.

    Keywords: vibration; acceleration; mechanisms.

    ________________________________________________________________________________

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Due to many advantages such as good thermal conductivity, excellent castability, high strength-to-weight ratio, wear and corrosion resistance, pressure tightness and good weldability, aluminium-

    silicon alloys are considered one of the most commonly used foundry alloys. Controlling the

    microstructure that results from the casting process is considered one of the main challenges faced

    by todays foundry industry. Fine equiaxed microstructures generally exhibit favourable mechanicalproperties of strength and ductility with low susceptibility to microporosity and cracks.The use of mechanical, sonic or ultrasonic vibration may have the advantage of promoting grain

    refinement, increased density, degassing, low shrinkage porosities, and changes of the shape, size

    and distribution of the second phase [1-9].Regarding the vibration effect in microstructure it is documented [1] that applying mechanical

    vibration to a mould during solidification may have an effect on mechanical properties of the

    casting. The responsible is the microstructure where the lamellar spacing tends to reduce and silicon

    morphology becomes fibrous with the increasing of the vibration amplitude as compared to gravity

    casting. However, it is also reported that exceeding a critical value of vibration amplitude, thesilicon tends to coarsen [1]. Fragmented primary dendrites with thicker dendrite arm thickness and

    reduced solidification time were obtained on Al8% Si with rectilinear vibration by transforming

    rotary motion of a DC motor, 100 cycles/min ( 2 Hz). The same level of vibration was applied toAl12% Si and it was reported a reduction of the eutectic cell size from 5 to 1.6 mm and a tendency

    of coarsening of eutectic Si [2]. Significant reduction in gas content was obtained with lowfrequency melt agitation in Al20Si [3]. With an applied vibration at a constant frequency of 100

    Hz and different amplitudes from 18 to 199 m an increase between 19 and 68 %, in percentelongation was reported while ultimate stress had a slight change, about 3% [1]. The increase in

    elongation was correlated with the increase in the amount of eutectic volume fraction compared to

    the non-vibrated case [1]. In another study [9] the amount and size of pores were increased in LM25

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    3/19

    [AlSi 7,15%] and LM6 [AlSi 12,30%] alloys with increasing frequencies between 15 and 41.7 Hz

    and amplitudes between 0,125 and 0,5 mm.

    Thus, it is clear that vibration may promote changes in microstructure and consequently in

    mechanical properties, either increasing or decreasing it. However the mechanisms under which

    those changes occur are still unclear. This work proposes a mechanism that is able to explain thereason for the shift on metallurgical and mechanical properties with vibration acceleration.

    2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS AND MATERIALS

    Materials

    The material used for castings is a commercial AlSi18 alloy with the following chemical

    composition (wt%): 18Si22; Fe0,75; 1,5Cu3,0; Zn0,2; Mg0,1; Mn0,3; Ni0,5; Pb0,1;Sn0,05; Ti0,2.

    Methods

    The material was melt at 8000C and poured into a permanent mould which was preheated at 130

    0C. A high frequency induction furnace (Titancast 700 mP Vac, from Linn High Term, Germany),

    equipped with a vacuum chamber, was used for melting. A charge of approx. 240g of material wasused in each melting, always performed under vacuum. After melting in the induction furnace thematerial was poured into the mould which was attached on the system that provides the mechanical

    vibration due to the eccentric of the shafts (Fig.1). The vibration was linearly applied with 0,5 mm

    amplitude for all castings and different frequencies, namely 0 Hz, 8 Hz and 24 Hz.The obtained castings were heat treated with a temper during 8h at 200C.

    For the analysis of the solidification behavior two thermocouples type K were attached to the mouldin order to acquire the temperature during the pouring and solidification of the material. Two holes

    were done in the wall of the mould in which thermocouples were inserted at a distance of 2 mm

    from the inside wall surfaces. The positions of the inserting points of the thermocouples are shown

    in figures 2 and 3.

    Specimens for mechanical tests were cut from each casting in three slices (each slice indicates the

    position in the mould) in order to compare the properties of the aluminum alloy not only betweendifferent frequencies but also in different places of the ingot. (Fig.4).

    Tensile tests were done in a Dartec tensile testing machine at room temperature. After doing thetensile tests the specimens were cut close to the fracture area and polished. An optical measurement

    method was used to do the phase quantification and microstructure analysis. The microstructureexamination was made on the middle part of specimen slice 1 of each casting.

    3. RESULTS

    Rupture strength and rupture strain results are shown on Figs. 5 and 6 respectively. It is clear on Fig.5 that rupture strength increases in about 31% for the casting with 8Hz in any position, when

    compared to simple gravity castings, and that rupture strength decreases in about 13% for castingswith 24Hz of vibration, as compared to simple gravity castings, again in all three positions. It is alsoobserved that there is a tendency of properties to increase from position 3 to position 1 in the case of

    vibrated gravity with 8 Hz and 0 Hz but with no tendency on vibrated gravity with 24Hz.

    Regarding rupture strain results, Fig. 6 shows that rupture strain is much higher (95%) for thevibrated gravity process with 8Hz in any position then vibrated gravity with 8Hz and 0Hz. It is also

    clear a tendency of increasing properties from position 3 to position 1 in all the casting processes.

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    4/19

    Thus mechanical properties increase with vibration till a certain level frequency (acceleration) but

    decrease for higher levels of vibration frequencies.

    Figs 7 and 8 show the temperature readings during solidification for the three frequencies used. It is

    clear that the maximum temperatures reached in the mould, in both positions (down and front) are

    obtained on the vibration level of 8 Hz. For 0Hz and 24 Hz results are closer and different in thetwo different positions (down and front).

    On table 1 (also represented on fig. 7) are quantified both the solidification starting point and thesolidification intervals (difference between starting and ending solidification points) for the threevibration levels in position down (results were quantified in this position because the starting and

    ending solidification points are more clearly identified. It is shown on fig. 7 the starting and endsolidification points. The starting solidification point is the point when there is an increase in

    temperature resulting from latent heat of fusion of the first phase to solidify. The ending

    solidification point corresponds to the last inflection temperature point indicating the end of thelatent heat of fusion release of the eutectic constituent.

    It is observed that for 8Hz the solidification starts first and last less. 0Hz and 24 Hz have closer

    results for both the solidification starting point and interval.

    Table 1 Solidification characteristics for the three vibration frequencies:

    solidification starting time and solidification interval.Reading position: Down

    Solidification frequency (Hz) 0 8 24

    Starting Solidification Point (s) 9,6 5,0 8.5

    Solidification Interval (s) 9,5 9,3 10.5

    In Fig 9 is observed that, considering the 0 Hz frequencies as a comparison value, the amount ofeutectic increases for the 8Hz test in about 11% and decreases in about 8% for the 24 Hz test. This

    happens for the three tested positions. The volume fraction of-Al phase shows the opposite effect

    since the alloy has essentially these two phases (Fig. 9).The presence of isolated alpha phase in the microstructure can be attributed to a high undercooling

    level associated with the alloy and casting process characteristics [10].

    Fig 10 provides the silicon lamellae thickness. It is observed that the thinner values are observed for

    the 8Hz test and the thicker ones are for the 24Hz, in all three positions.

    Fig. 11 provides the microstructure pictures for the different vibration levels (0Hz, 8Hz and 24Hzfrequency). Basically, a thinner structure is found for 8Hz and courser structure for 24 Hz. It can

    also be observed that the morphology of eutectic silicon was modified from a dispersed coral likeform (0Hz) to a more finely and nested coral like form (8Hz) and to a coarse acicular plate-like form

    with less coral like eutectic form for 24Hz.

    4. DISCUSSION

    Mechanical results depend on metallurgical features which itself depend on solidification behavior.

    Starting from the obtained solidification curves it is clear that the 8Hz test is the one that starts andcompletely solidify first (and also has the smaller solidification interval)(table 1). Thus it is

    expected a thinner microstructure in these castings (Figs. 10 and 11), a higher amount of eutectic

    (fig. 10)[8] and, as a consequence, better mechanical properties (both rupture strength and rupturestrain)(Figs. 5 and 6). Regarding the comparison between 0Hz and 24 Hz, the results provide the

    same reasoning: 24 Hz is the one that takes longer to solidify (table 1); has the coarsestmicrostructure (Figs 10 and 11); has the lowest amount of eutectic (Fig. 10); and consequently has

    the poorer mechanical results, in particular tensile strength (figs 5 and 6). Thus, there is a perfect

    correlation between solidification behavior, microstructure, and mechanical properties.

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    5/19

    These results are basically in accordance with refs [1-2], and [8]. Furthermore it is also observed a

    peak shift in mechanical properties, after a certain frequency (acceleration), as reported in [1].

    The differences between position 1 and 3 are explained by the distance to the mould wall and

    consequent solidification behavior. The material in position 1 solidifies first and then has the

    thinner microstructure (Fig. 10), the higher amount of eutectic phase (Fig. 9), and consequently thebetter mechanical properties (Figs. 5 and 6), among all positions. Position 3 obviously has the lower

    properties.The main aspect is therefore to find an explanation that may provide a physical explanation for thephenomena of the mechanical properties shifting point with vibration level.

    5. PROPOSED MECHANISM

    These results may be explained based on heat transfer mechanisms both in the liquid phase and inthe mould wall interface. The proposed mechanism is schematically provided in Fig. 12, and is the

    following:

    In the case of 0Hz casting, there is a normal contact between liquid metal and mould. The heattransfer is normal and the solidification rate has a certain value giving rise to a determinedmicrostructure;

    In the case of 8 Hz the vibration induces a higher heat transfer to the mould (higher cooling rate)due to the alternated movement of the liquid (see Figs. 7 and 8 with higher initial solidification

    temperatures in the mould). Furthermore this movement may also provide displacement of thegermen solidification sites providing a higher solidification rate. The contact between liquid

    metal and mould is about the same as for the 0Hz case. However as the heat convection in the

    liquid phase is improved by the vibration movements the liquid temperature near the interface is

    higher what explains the higher temperatures in the mould obtained in the cooling curves for

    these experiments (fig. 7 and 8). The lower cooling times (table 1) resulted from the faster liquidcooling rate and the improved nucleation characteristics by germen distribution in the liquid.

    The consequence is that the microstructure is thinner (see Figs. 10 and 11) and the amount of

    eutectic is higher (see Fig. 9). Consequently rupture strength and rupture strain increase (seeFigs. 5 and 6);

    In the case of 24 Hz the vibration should induce even a higher heat transfer inside the liquid tothe mould interface due to the quicker alternated movement of the liquid. However, the relative

    acceleration between liquid metal and mould seems to be high enough in order to create a lossof contact (low pressure zones in the interface liquid metal-mould)(in front position) and even

    eventually low pressure bubbles as those originated in cavitation. This situation occurs when the

    surface tension (liquid mould wall) is not low enough in order to keep the surface contactwhen high acceleration rates (frequency*amplitude) exist. A loss of contact means to switch the

    heat transfer mode from totally conductive to a conductive + convective transfer in the interface.Because the convective heat transfer is much lower than the conductive heat transfer the heat

    transfer and consequent solidification rate substantially decreases (see mainly Fig. 8 with lowerinitial solidification temperature in the mould). The consequence is a courser microstructure (seeFigs. 10 and 11) and a lower eutectic content (see Fig. 9). Mechanical properties should then

    decrease (this is particularly evident for rupture strength)(Fig. 5 and 6).Although with the same consequence, in the down position a different mechanism may occur.

    There is a loss of contact due to the tangential movement of the liquid (in front position there is

    a normal contact see figs. 1 and 3 with vibration direction and temperature readings/walls

    positions and detail on Fig. 12). This loss of contact is due to the liquid movement and

    roughness effect (see detail on Fig. 12).

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    6/19

    This means that vibration can be beneficial as well as detrimental depending on the acceleration

    level between liquid metal and microstructure and surface tension of the liquid metal and mouldmaterial. This may be the reason why some papers attribute to vibration beneficial effects and others

    detrimental effects on properties.

    5. CONCLUSIONS

    Solidification behavior as obtained by solidification curves, microstructure analysis and mechanical

    results seem to point out that:

    Vibration affects the solidification rates and its characteristics; Vibration has an influence on mechanical properties; Its influence seem to be due to heat transfer related aspects; Vibration increases heat transfer in the liquid; Vibration may substantially reduce heat transfer in the interface metal-wall due to the loss of

    contact under mainly two hypothetic mechanisms: high surface tension and wall roughness

    effect.

    6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The research presented here was carried out in Materials Testing Laboratory of the Mechanical

    Engineering Department of University of Minho, and was supported by Fundao para a Cincia e

    Tecnologia (Portugal)through the PhD grantwith the reference SFRH / BD / 19618 / 2004.

    7. REFERENCES

    [1] Abu-Dheir Numan, Marwan Khraisheh, Kozo Saito, Alan Male, Silicon morphology

    modification in the eutectic Al-Si alloy using mechanical mold vibration, Materials Science andEngineering A393 pp. 109-117, (2004).[2] T.P. Fisher, Effects of vibrational energy on the solidification of aluminium alloys, Br.

    Foundryman 66 (3), 7183, (1973).

    [3] A.A. Ivanov, G.G. Krushenka, Preparation of AlSi alloying composition by means ofvibration, Liteinoe Proizvod (3) (1993) 78 (Russian); Met. Abs. 46-0019,(1992).

    [4] X. Jian, T.T. Meek, Q. Han, Refinement of eutectic silicon phase of aluminum A356 alloyusing high-intensity ultrasonic vibration, Scripta Materialia 54, 893896, (2006).

    [5] F.C. Robles Hernandez, J.H. Sokolowski, Comparison among chemical and electromagnetic

    stirring and vibration melt treatments for AlSi hypereutectic alloys, Journal of Alloys andCompounds 426, 205212, (2006).

    [6] M.T.Alonso Rasgado, K. Davey, The effect of vibration on surface finish for semisolid and cast

    components,Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 125-126, 543-548, (2002).[7] M.T. Alonso Rasgado, K. Davey, Vibration and casting surface finish, Journal of MaterialsProcessing Technology 153154, 875880, (2004).

    [8] Chirita, G.; Stefanescu, I; Barbosa, J.; Puga, N.; Soares, D., Silva, F.S., On the Assessment OfPrecessing Variables In a Vertical Centrifugal Casting Technique, submitted to International

    Journal of Cast Metals Research

    [9] Kadir Kocatepe, Effect of low frequency vibration on porosity of LM25 and LM6 alloys,Materials and Design, Vol. 28 Issue 6, 1767-1775, (2006)

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    7/19

    [10] H.S. Kanga, W.Y. Yoon, K.H. Kimb, M.H. Kimc, Y.P. Yoon, Microstructure selections in the

    undercooled hypereutectic AlSi alloys, Materials Science and Engineering A 404, 117123,

    (2005)

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    8/19

    Fig. 1 - Mechanical vibrating device. e - excentricity

    e

    Vibration direction

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    9/19

    Fig. 2 Thermocouples positions on the mould

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    10/19

    Fig. 3 Temperature reading positions in walls of the mould: 1 Down; 2 - Front

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    11/19

    Fig. 4 - Position of the specimen slices in castings. Positions 1, 2, and 3.

    1

    2

    3

    30 mm

    30 mm

    90 mm

    pouring

    direction

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    12/19

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    1 2 3

    Stress

    [MPa]

    Position

    Rupture strength Vibration 8HzVibration 24Hz

    Vibration 0Hz

    Fig. 5 - Rupture strength for 0Hz, 8Hz and 24Hz frequencies for the three sample positions.

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    13/19

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    1 2 3

    Strain[%

    ]

    Position

    Rupture strain Vibration 8HzVibration 24Hz

    Vibration 0Hz

    Fig. 6 - Rupture strain for 0Hz, 8Hz and 24Hz frequencies for the three sample positions.

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    14/19

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

    Temperature

    [C]

    Time [s]

    DOWN

    Gravity

    8Hz

    24 Hz

    Fig. 7 - Solidification curves for the different vibration levels on the down position of the mould

    Temperature

    acquisition point

    on the mould

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    15/19

    200

    220

    240

    260

    280

    300

    320

    340

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

    Temperature

    [C]

    Time [s]

    FRONTGravity

    8Hz

    24 Hz

    Fig. 8 - Solidification curves for the different vibration levels on the front position of the mould

    Temperature

    acquisition point

    on the mould

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    16/19

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0 1 2 3 4

    Volumefraction[%]

    Position

    Al18Si

    (Al) phase-Vibration 24HzEutectic-Vibration 24Hz(Al) phase-Vibration 8HzEutectic-Vibration 8Hz(Al) phase-Vibrat ion 0HzEutectic-Vibration 0Hz

    Fig. 9 Phases volume fraction for the three different vibration levels and tested positions.

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    17/19

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    0 1 2 3 4

    Thicknes

    s

    [mm]

    Position

    Gravity

    Vibrated gravity 8Hz

    Vibrated gravity 24Hz

    Fig. 10 Eutectic silicon lamellas thickness for the three different vibration levels and tested positions.

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    18/19

    0Hz 8Hz

    24Hz

    Fig. 11 Microstructure of castings with vibration at different frequencies (500x)

  • 8/14/2019 .Niatrep Lanruoj Eht Ot Ylppa Taht Sremialcsid

    19/19

    Fig. 12 Heat transfer variation with acceleration and mechanism representation.

    Front position

    Down position

    Liquid movement

    direction - tangential

    Liquid movement

    direction - normal