O. Dev. ch14

  • Upload
    sani0

  • View
    224

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    1/19

    Organization Development and Change

    Thomas G. Cummings

    Christopher G. Worley

    Chapter Fourteen:

    Restructuring Organizations

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    2/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-2

    Learning Objectives

    for Chapter Fourteen

    To understand the basic principles of

    technostructural design To understand the three basic structural

    choices and two advanced structural choices

    available to organizations

    To understand the process of downsizing

    and reengineering

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    3/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-3

    Contingencies Influencing

    Structural DesignEnvironment

    OrganizationSize

    Technology

    Organization

    Goals

    WorldwideOperationsStructural

    Design

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    4/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-4

    Functional Organization

    VP Research VP Operations VP Human

    Resources

    VP Marketing VP Finance

    President

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    5/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-5

    The Functional Form

    Promotes skill specialization

    Reduces duplication of scarceresources and uses resources

    full time

    Enhances career developmentfor specialists within largedepartments

    Facilitates communication and

    performance because superiorsshare expertise with theirsubordinates

    Exposes specialists to otherswithin same specialty

    Emphasizes routine tasks;encourages short time horizons

    Fosters parochial perspectivesby managers and limitscapacity for top-management

    positions

    Multiplies interdepartmental

    dependencies; increasescoordination and schedulingdifficulties

    Obscures accountability foroverall results

    Advantages Disadvantages

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    6/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-6

    The Divisional Organization

    Ch ef F nanc alff ce

    VP Resea ch

    D v s on Manage

    As a

    VP Hu an

    Resou ces

    VP pe a ons VP Sales and

    Ma ke ng

    D v s on Manage

    No h A e ca

    D v s on Manage

    Eu ope

    Ch ef Execu ve

    ff ce

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    7/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-7

    The Divisional Form

    Recognizes interdepartmentalinterdependencies

    Fosters an orientation towardoverall outcomes and clients

    Allows diversification andexpansion of skills/training

    Ensures accountability bydepartmental managers and

    promotes delegation Heightens departmental

    cohesion and involvement inwork

    Advantages May use skills and resource

    inefficiently

    Limits career advancement byspecialists

    Impedes specialists exposureto others within samespecialties

    Puts multiple-role demands

    upon people and creates stress May promote departmental

    objectives as opposed tooverall organizational goals

    Disadvantages

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    8/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-8

    VP F nance VP Hu an Resou ces

    P og a Manage

    A c af

    P og a ManageNav ga on Sys e s

    P og a Manage

    Space Sys e s

    Sen o VP

    P og a s

    VP Resea ch VP Eng nee ng VP Manufac u ng VP Ma ke ng

    Sen o VP

    pe a ons

    P es den

    CE

    The Matrix Organization

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    9/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-9

    The Matrix Structure

    Makes specialized, functionalknowledge available to all

    projects

    Use people flexibly

    Maintains consistency byforcing communication

    between managers

    Recognizes and providesmechanisms for dealing with

    legitimate, multiple sources ofpower

    Can adapt to environmentalchanges

    Advantages Can be difficult to implement

    Increases role ambiguity,stress, and anxiety

    Performance is lowered

    without power balancingbetween projects andfunctions

    Makes inconsistent demandsand can promote conflict andshort-term crisis orientation

    May reward political skillsover technical skills

    Disadvantages

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    10/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-10

    Characteristics of

    Process-Based Structuresy Processes drive structure

    y Work adds value

    y Teams are fundamental

    y Customers define performance

    y Teams are rewarded for performance

    y Teams are tightly linked to suppliers andcustomers

    y Team members are well informed and trained

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    11/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-11

    The Process-Based Structure

    Devel ew Products ProcessProcess Owner

    Cross Functional Team Members

    Acquiring and Filling ustomer Orders Process

    Process Owner

    Cross Functional Team Members

    Supporting ustomer Usage Process

    Process Owner

    Cross Functional Team Members

    Senior Management Team

    Chair and Key Support Process Owners

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    12/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

    14-12

    The Process-Based Form

    Focuses resources oncustomer satisfaction

    Improves speed and efficiency

    Adapts to environmentalchange rapidly

    Reduces boundaries betweendepartments

    Increases ability to see totalwork flow

    Enhances employeeinvolvement

    Lowers costs dues to overhead

    Can threaten middle managersand staff specialists

    Requires changes incommand-and-controlmindsets

    Duplicates scarce resources

    Requires new skills andknowledge to manage lateralrelationships and teams

    May take longer to makedecisions in teams

    Can be ineffective if wrongprocesses are identified

    Advantages Disadvantages

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    13/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western 14-13

    The Network OrganizationDesigner

    Organizations

    Supplier

    Organizations

    Broker

    Organization

    Producer

    Organizations

    Distributor

    Organizations

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    14/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western 14-14

    Types of Networksy Internal Market Network

    y

    Vertical Market Networky Intermarket Network

    y Opportunity Network

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    15/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western 14-15

    The Network-Based Form

    Enables highly flexible andadaptive responses

    Creates a best of the best

    firm to focus resources oncustomer and market needs

    Each organization canleverage a distinctivecompetency

    Permits rapid globalresponse

    Can produce synergisticresults

    Difficulty managing lateral

    relationships across

    autonomous organizations

    Difficulty motivatingmembers to relinquish

    autonomy to join network

    Sustaining membership and

    benefits can be problematic

    May give partners access to

    proprietary knowledge and

    technology

    Advantages Disadvantages

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    16/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western 14-16

    The Downsizing Process

    Clarify the organizations strategy

    Assess downsizing options and make

    relevant choices

    Implement the changes

    Address the needs of survivors and those

    who leave

    Follow through with growth plans

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    17/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western 14-17

    Downsizing Tactics

    Tactic a act istics E a s

    Wor orcee uction

    yReduces headcountyShort-term focusyFosters transition

    yAttritionyRetirement/buyoutyLayoffs

    OrganizationRedesign

    yChangesorganization

    yMedium-term focusyFosters transition &

    transformation

    yEliminate functions,layers, products

    yMerge unitsyRedesign tasks

    Systemic

    yChanges cultureyLong-term focusyFosters

    transformation

    yChangeresponsibilities

    yFoster continuousimprovement

    yDownsizing is normal

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    18/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western 14-18

    The Reengineering Process

    Prepare the organization

    Specify the organizations strategy and

    objectives

    Fundamentally rethink the way work gets done Identify and analyze core business processes

    Define performance objectives

    Design new processes Restructure the organization around the new

    business processes.

  • 8/6/2019 O. Dev. ch14

    19/19

    Cummings & Worley, 8e(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western 14-19

    Characteristics of

    Reengineered Organizationsy Work units change from functional departments to process

    teams

    y

    Jobs change from simple tasks to multidimensional worky Peoples roles change from controlled to empowered

    y The focus of performance measures and compensationshifts from activities to results.

    y Organization structures change from hierarchical to flat

    y Managers change from supervisors to coaches; executiveschange from scorekeepers to leaders