OB-UT5-2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    1/24

    Managing conflict: What is conflict?

    different interpretation

    disagreement b/w groups or individuals.

    Pondy describes it as:

    Antecedent conditions of conflictual behavior

    -resource policy

    Individual state of mind Cognitive perception.

    Behavior patterns of self.

    Conflictual behavior range

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    2/24

    Features:

    Incompatibility b/w 2 or more aspects of element-goalsetc.

    Indecisive

    Series of events with interlocking conflict episodes.

    Must be perceived and expressed by parties

    Issues involved in conflict:

    Facts: way of definingGoals: priorities

    Method : procedures

    Values: beliefs.

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    3/24

    Approaches for conflict Traditional view:

    considered dysfunctional, having adverse effects.

    believed to spread disequilibrium .

    orgn interest prevails- Henry Fayol. Human relations view:

    natural phenomenon

    arise due to difference in values and beliefs. Interactionist view:

    positive approach, give way to new ideas, drivestowards innovation and change.

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    4/24

    Aspects of conflict

    Positive aspect:

    --Helps to create dynamic environment.

    --Leads to innovation.--Cohesiveness in group

    --Competition increases

    --Releases frustration

    --Scope of improvement

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    5/24

    CONFLICT FUNCTIONA OR

    DYSFUNCTIONAL

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    6/24

    CONFLICTS ARE DYSFUNCTIONAL

    CONFLICT IS AN INDICATION THAT SITUATION ISTHREATENING, DEVASTATING OR ON A POINT OFBREAKING.

    CONFLICTS ARE UNPRODUCTIVE AND DYSFUNCTIONAL.

    CONFLICTS CAN DELAY OR PREVENT THE ATTAINMENTOF A GOAL OR FRUSTRATE AN INDIVIDUAL. IN HOSPITALSITUATION

    CONFLICT IS INEVITABLE

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    7/24

    CONFLICT ARE FUNCTIONAL

    ALL CONFLICTS ARE NOT UNPRODUCTIVE.

    CONFLICTS CAN BE USEFUL CONSTRUCTIVE,AND POSITIVE

    IN FACT, A RELATIONSHIP WITH FREQUENTCONFLICT MAY BE HEALTHIER THAN ONE

    WITH NO OBSERVABLE CONFLICT

    CONT.

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    8/24

    CONFLICT CAN PROMOTE INNOVATION,

    CREATIVITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW IDEAS,WHICH MAKE ORGANISATIONAL GROWTHPOSSIBLE.

    IF IT IS HANDLED WELL, HOWEVER, CONFLICT

    CAN BE PRODUCTIVE LEADING TO DEEPERUNDERSTANDING, MUTUAL RESPECT ANDCLOSENESS.

    AND THE REALITY IS ALL THE MAJOR REFORMS

    AND CHANGES OCCUR AS A CONSEQUENCE OFCONFLICT

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    9/24

    Negative aspects:

    --Cost addition- deliberate--Source of disequilibrium-inefficiency

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    10/24

    Types of conflict

    Individual level

    Group level

    Organizational level

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    11/24

    Individual levelconflict

    Inter-Individual/Interpersonal

    Verticalconflict

    Horizontalconflict

    Intra-individual

    Roleconflict

    Goal conflict

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    12/24

    Individual level conflictIntra-individual/Interpersonal:

    Goal Conflict

    Role conflict- ambiguity, orgn positionInter-Individual:

    Vertical conflict

    superior-subordinate

    resistance by subordinate

    leads to inefficiency

    resultant- leave orgn.

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    13/24

    Horizontal conflict:

    same level ppl: exchange of information.

    Causes of Interpersonal conflict:

    --nature of people

    1. ego states2. value systems

    3. socio cultural factors

    --situational factors1. Interest conflict

    2. role ambiguity

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    14/24

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    15/24

    Group level conflictInto 2 or more people.

    1. Intra group (within a group)

    when normal tasknew values imported

    when extra group role comes into group-comparisons.

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    16/24

    Inter-group (with different groups)

    Goal compatibility: mktg & production.Resource sharing common pool of resources.

    Task relationship- JIT, dependent on tasks

    Absorption of uncertainty-allocation of money

    Attitudinal sets- closed communication

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    17/24

    Organizationallevel conflict

    Inter-organization

    Intra-organization

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    18/24

    Organizational level conflict:

    Hierarchical conflict

    Line and staff conflict

    Functional conflictFormal and informal conflict

    T f C fli t S f C fli t M t St t

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    19/24

    Type of Conflict Sources of Conflict Management Strategy1. Intra individual Conflicting goals,

    needs, motives

    Role Definition

    2. Interpersonal Disagreementsantagonism

    IPC Skills,TA, Johari-Window, Creative P S,

    Assertive Behaviour

    3. Inter-group Power, Authority

    Status

    Participative Mgt.

    Team Bldg,Training4. Organizational Hierarchical Conflict

    Functional conflict

    Institutional Goal

    setting

    5. Client Hospital Quality of patient careand communication

    Community GoalSetting, Public

    Relations

    Model for diagnosis and management of conflict

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    20/24

    Empowerment and participation:

    Dependency on others leads to frustration, needsempowerment.

    Empowerment is a process that provides greaterautonomy through sharing of relevant information

    and provision of control over factors affecting jobperformance .

    Approaches to empowerment:

    1. Helping to achieve job mastery.

    2. Allowing more control

    3. Providing successful role models

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    21/24

    4. Using social reinforcement

    5. Emotional support

    Characteristics:

    Relies on delegation of authority

    Flat hierarchyFew managers with wider responsibilities

    Employee satisfaction is core value of organization

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    22/24

    ORIGINAL HOFSTEDE FINDINGS

    POWER DISTANCE

    16 46 54 68 81 104

    Austria USA Japan France Mexico Malaysia

    UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE

    8 46 65 82 92 112

    Singapore USA Germany Mexico Japan Greece

    INDIVIDUALISM / COLLECTIVISM

    6 30 46 67 71 91

    Guatemala Mexico Japan Germany France USA

    MASCULINITY / FEMININITY

    5 43 62 66 69 95

    Sweden France USA Germany Mexico Japan

    CONFUCIAN DYNAMISM

    10 29 31 80 96

    Pakistan USA Germany Japan Hong Kong

    THE G L O B E FINDINGS

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    23/24

    THE G.L.O.B.E. FINDINGSJAVIDAN & HOUSE (01)

    DIMENSION LOW MODERATEHIGH

    UNCERTAINTY Russia USA Austria

    AVOIDANCE Bolivia Mexico GermanyHungary Israel Denmark

    POWER Denmark France Russia

    DISTANCE Netherlands England Spain

    South Africa Brazil Thailand

    INDIVIDUALISM Singapore Hong Kong GreeceCOLLECTIVISM Denmark Egypt Hungary

    Japan USA Germany

    ASSERTIVENESS Sweden Ireland Spain

    (Masculinity?) New Zealand Philippines USA

    Switzerland Egypt Greece

    HUMANE Germany Hong Kong Indonesia

    ORIENTATION France Taiwan Malaysia

    (Nurturing?) Spain Sweden Egypt

    FUTURE Russia Slovenia Denmark

    ORIENTATION Argentina Egypt Canada

    (Long-term?) Poland Ireland Netherlands

  • 8/2/2019 OB-UT5-2

    24/24

    Managing change