Upload
sibyl-sanders
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Overview & Outlook for the P/C Insurance Industry:
2012 and Beyond2012 NAMIC Operations Seminar
Charleston, SCAugust 22, 2012
Download at www.iii.org/presentationsRobert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist
Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 [email protected] www.iii.org
3
Economics 2012:
The World Is Changing2012 Is the First Year Since 2005 Where Economic Perceptions and Reality in the US Will Be Positive
Potentially Significant Benefits for P/C Insurers
3
The Strength of the Economy Will Influence P/C Insurer
Growth Opportunities
6
Growth Will Expand Workers Comp Payroll Exposure Base
6
America’s Manufacturing Renaissance?Construction Activity Still Depressed?
7
US Real GDP Growth*
* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 8/12; Insurance Information Institute.
2.7
%0
.5%
3.6
%3
.0%
1.7
%-1
.8%
1.3
%-3
.7%
-5.3
%-0
.3%
1.4
%5
.0%
2.3
%2
.2%
2.6
%2
.4%
0.1
%2
.5%
1.3
%4
.1%
2.0
%1
.5%
1.7
%1
.9%
1.8
%2
.4%
2.7
%2
.9%
-8.9%
4.1
%1
.1%
1.8
%2
.5% 3.6
%3
.1%
-9%
-7%
-5%
-3%
-1%
1%
3%
5%
7%
2
00
0
2
00
1
2
00
2
2
00
3
2
00
4
2
00
5
2
00
6
07
:1Q
07
:2Q
07
:3Q
07
:4Q
08
:1Q
08
:2Q
08
:3Q
08
:4Q
09
:1Q
09
:2Q
09
:3Q
09
:4Q
10
:1Q
10
:2Q
10
:3Q
10
:4Q
11
:1Q
11
:2Q
11
:3Q
11
:4Q
12
:1Q
12
:2Q
12
:3Q
12
:4Q
13
:1Q
13
:2Q
13
:3Q
13
:4Q
Demand for Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will Compound and
Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly
Real GDP Growth (%)
Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit crunch, housing
slump, labor market contraction has been
severe but modest recovery is underway
The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982 drop of 6.8%
2012 is expected to see slow and choppy growth
before accelerating modestly in 2013
Percent Change in Real GDPby State, 2011
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis at http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/gdp_state/gsp_glance.htm ;Insurance Information Institute. 8
Growth varied considerably across states
but in total was weak in 2011
with US overall growth at just
1.7%
TX has been an economic
growth leader
74
.4
73
.6
73
.6
72
.2
73
.6 76
67
.8
68
.9
68
.2
67
.7 71
.6 74
.5
74
.2 77
.5
67
.5 69
.8
74
.3
71
.5
63
.7
55
.7 59
.4
60
.9 64
.1
69
.9
75
.0
75
.3
76
.2
76
.4 79
.3
73
.2
72
.3
73
.6
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1
De
c-1
1
Jan
-12
Fe
b-1
2
Ma
r-1
2
Ap
r-1
2
Ma
y-1
2
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2
Consumer Sentiment Survey (1966 = 100)
January 2010 through August 2012
Consumer confidence has been low for years amid high unemployment, falling home prices and other factors adversely impact
consumers, but improved substantially in late 2011 and early 2012
Source: University of Michigan; Insurance Information Institute
Optimism among consumers Increased in August, and is well above year-ago levels; Suggests concern, but not fear on the part
of consumers.
9
10
16.9
16.5
16.1
13.2
10.4
11.6 12
.7
14.3 14
.7
14.7 15
.1
15.4
15.5
15.4
16.9
16.617
.117.5
17.8
17.4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F 13F 14F 15F 16F 17F 18-22F
(Millions of Units)
Auto/Light Truck Sales, 1999-2022F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/11 and 8/12); Insurance Information Institute.
Car/Light Truck Sales Will Continue to Recover from the 2009 Low Point, Bolstering the Auto Insurer Growth and the Manufacturing Sector.
New auto/light truck sales fell to the lowest level since the late 1960s. Forecast for 2012-13 is
still far below 1999-2007 average of 17 million units, but a recovery is underway.
Job growth and improved credit market conditions will boost auto sales in
2012 and beyond
11
Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2012*
*Percentage change from same month in prior year; through July 2012; seasonally adjustedNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
Cyclical peaks in PP Auto tend to occur
approximately every 10 years (early 1990s, early
2000s and likely the early 2010s)
“Hard” markets tend to occur
during recessionary
periods
Pricing peak occurred in 2010 at
5.1%, falling to 2.8% by Mar. 2012
The July 2012 reading of 3.4%
was similar to the 3.3% recorded in
July 2011
12
(Millions of Units)
New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2022F
1.4
8
1.4
7 1.6
2
1.6
4
1.5
7
1.6
0 1.7
1 1.8
5 1.9
6 2.0
7
1.8
0
1.3
6
0.9
1
0.5
5
0.5
9
0.6
1 0.7
5 0.8
9
1.3
4
1.2
3
1.3
2
1.3
81
.42
1.3
51.4
6
1.2
9
1.2
0
1.0
11.1
9
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F13F14F15F16F17F 18-22F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/11 and 8/12); Insurance Information Institute.
Little Exposure Growth Likely for Homeowners Insurers Until at least 2014. Also Affects Commercial Insurers with Construction Risk Exposure, Surety
New home starts plunged
72% from 2005-2009; A
net annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since
records began in 1959
The plunge and lack of recovery in homebuilding and in construction in general
is holding back payroll exposure growth
Job growth, improved credit
market conditions and demographics
will eventually boost home construction
13
Construction Employment,Jan. 2010—July 2012*
*Seasonally adjustedSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute.
5,59
3
5,52
9 5,55
2
5,55
9
5,51
8
5,50
7
5,49
1 5,51
1
5,49
2
5,49
9
5,48
8
5,47
7
5,45
6
5,48
9
5,49
6
5,49
5
5,49
8
5,49
5
5,50
8
5,49
8
5,52
8
5,51
9
5,52
0 5,54
6 5,56
4
5,56
3
5,54
9
5,54
2
5,51
0
5,51
4
5,51
3
5,400
5,450
5,500
5,550
5,600
5,650
Jan-
10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11
Jul-1
1
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
12
2/30
/210
2
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12
Jul-1
2
Construction employment is still below where it was in
Jan. 2010. In a normal recovery, construction employment would be
growing robustly
(Thousands)
15
Value of Construction Put in Place, June 2012 vs. June 2011*
-3.7%
-27.5%
-2.9%
7.0%
13.1% 12.1% 14.0%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
TotalConstruction
Total PrivateConstruction
Residential--Private
Non-Residential--
Private
Total PublicConstruction
Residential-Public
Non-Residential--
Public
Overall Construction Activity is Up, But Growth Is Entirely in the Private Sector as State/Local Government Budget Woes Continue
Growth (%)
Private sector construction activity is up in both the residential and nonresidential segments
*seasonally adjustedSource: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute.
Private: +13.1% Public: -3.7%
Public sector construction activity remains depressed
16
Value of Private Construction Put in Place, by Segment, June 2012 vs. June 2011*
6.6% 7.0%
18.8%
-10.5%
-5.2%
17.1%
-1.7%
26.5%
19.0%
13.1% 12.1%14.0%
26.3%
6.6%
-15%-10%
-5%0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%
To
tal
Pri
vate
Co
nstr
ucti
on
Resid
en
tial
To
tal
No
nre
sid
en
tial
Lo
dg
ing
Off
ice
Co
mm
erc
ial
Healt
h C
are
Ed
ucati
on
al
Reli
gio
us
Am
usem
en
t &
Rec.
Tra
nsp
ort
ati
on
Co
mm
un
icati
on
Po
wer
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g
Private Construction Activity is Up in Most Segments, Including Residential Construction but Led by Power
Growth (%) Led by the Power industry, Private sector construction activity is up by double digits in many segments after
plunging during the “Great Recession”
*seasonally adjustedSource: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute.
58
.3
57
.1
60
.4
59
.6
57
.8
55
.3
55
.1
55
.2
55
.3 56
.9 58
.2
58
.5 60
.8
61
.4
59
.7
59
.7
54
.2 55
.8
51
.4 52
.5
52
.5
51
.8
52
.2 53
.1 54
.1
52
.4 53
.4 54
.8
53
.5
49
.7
49
.8
40
45
50
55
60
65
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1
De
c-1
1
Jan
-12
Fe
b-1
2
Ma
r-1
2
Ap
r-1
2
Ma
y-1
2
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
ISM Manufacturing Index(Values > 50 Indicate Expansion)
January 2010 through July 2012
The manufacturing sector expanded for 34 consecutive months until June 2012 and added jobs. The question is whether this will continue.
Source: Institute for Supply Management at http://www.ism.ws/ismreport/mfgrob.cfm; Insurance Information Institute.
Manufacturing activity contracted in June for the first time in nearly 3
years, but a resumption of expansion is possible
18
20
Manufacturing Growth for Selected Sectors, 2012 vs. 2011*
11.2%
3.8%
12.1%
3.0% 3.6%5.6%
-0.1%
6.5% 5.3%5.8%9.1%
6.6%
20.9%
6.5%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
All
Ma
nu
fact
uri
ng
Du
rab
le M
fg.
Wo
od
Pro
du
cts
Pri
ma
ryM
eta
ls
Fa
bri
cate
dM
eta
ls
Ma
chin
ery
Ele
ctri
cal
Eq
uip
.
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
nE
qu
ip.
No
n-D
ura
ble
Mfg
.
Fo
od
Pro
du
cts
Pe
tro
leu
m &
Co
al
Ch
em
ica
l
Pla
stic
s &
Ru
bb
er
Te
xtile
Pro
du
cts
Manufacturing Is Expanding Across a Wide Range of Sectors that Will Contribute to Growth in Energy Demand and Insurable Exposures Including: WC, Commercial Property, Commercial Auto and Many Liability Coverages
Growth (%)
Manufacturing of durable goods has been
especially strong in 2012
*Seasonally adjusted; Date are YTD comparing data through June 2012 to the same period in 2011.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/
Durables: +9.1% Non-Durables: +3.0%
66%
68%
70%
72%
74%
76%
78%
80%
82%
Mar
01
Jun 0
1
Sep 0
1
Dec 0
1
Mar
02
Jun 0
2
Sep 0
2
Dec 0
2
Mar
03
Jun 0
3
Sep 0
3
Dec 0
3
Mar
04
Jun 0
4
Sep 0
4
Dec 0
4
Mar
05
Jun 0
5
Sep 0
5
Dec 0
5
Mar
06
Jun 0
6
Sep 0
6
Dec 0
6
Mar
07
Jun 0
7
Sep 0
7
Dec 0
7
Mar
08
Jun 0
8
Sep 0
8
Dec 0
8
Mar
09
Jun 0
9
Sep 0
9
Dec 0
9
Mar
10
Jun 1
0
Sep 1
0
Dec 1
0
Mar
11
Jun 1
1
Sep 1
1
Dec 1
1
Mar
12
Jun 1
2
Recovery in Capacity Utilization is a Positive Sign for Commercial Exposures
Source: Federal Reserve Board statistical releases at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm. 21
Percent of Industrial Capacity
Hurricane Katrina
March 2001-November 2001
recession
“Full Capacity”
The closer the economy is to operating at “full
capacity,” the greater the inflationary pressure
The US operated at 79.3% of industrial capacity in July
2012, above the June 2009 low of 68.3% and tied for the
highest level since April 2008
December 2007-June 2009 Recession
March 2001 through July 2012
21
22
Manufacturing Employment,Jan. 2010—July 2012*
11,4
58
11,4
62
11,4
70
11,5
02
11,5
36
11,5
46
11,5
66
11,5
49
11,5
51
11,5
51
11,5
60
11,5
75
11,6
27
11,6
64
11,6
90
11,7
18
11,7
26
11,7
38
11,7
68
11,7
71
11,7
68
11,7
77
11,7
80
11,8
08
11,8
60
11,8
90
11,9
32
11,9
42
11,9
55
11,9
65
11,9
90
11,000
11,200
11,400
11,600
11,800
12,000
12,200
12,400
Jan-
10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11
Jul-1
1
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
12
2/30
/210
2
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12
Jul-1
2
Manufacturing employment is up by more than 500,000 or 4.6% since Jan. 2010—a
surprising source of strength in the economy
*Seasonally adjustedSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute.
(Thousands)
50
.7 52
.7 54
.1
54
.6
54
.8
53
.5
53
.7
52
.8 53
.9
54
.6 56 5
7.1 5
9.4
59
.7
56
.3
54
.4
53
.3
53
.4
53
.8
52
.6
52
.6
52
.6
52
.6
53
.0
56
.8
57
.3
56
.0
53
.5
53
.7
52
.1
52
.6
40
45
50
55
60
65
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1
De
c-1
1
Jan
-12
Fe
b-1
2
Ma
r-1
2
Ap
r-1
2
Ma
y-1
2
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
ISM Non-Manufacturing Index(Values > 50 Indicate Expansion)
January 2010 through July 2012
Non-manufacturing industries have been expanding and adding jobs. The question is whether this will continue.
Source: Institute for Supply Management at http://www.ism.ws/ismreport/nonmfgrob.cfm; Insurance Information Institute.
Optimism among non-manufacturers was
stable in late 2011 and increased in early 2012
23
24
43,6
9448
,125
69,3
0062
,436
64,0
04 71,2
77 81,2
3582
,446
63,8
5363
,235
64,8
5371
,549
70,6
4362
,304
52,3
7451
,959
53,5
4954
,027
44,3
6737
,884
35,4
7240
,099
38,5
4035
,037
34,3
1739
,201
19,6
95 28,3
2243
,546
60,8
3756
,282
47,8
0610
,998
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 1112
:Q1
Business Bankruptcy Filings,1980-2012: Q1
Sources: American Bankruptcy Institute at http://www.abiworld.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=61633; Insurance Information Institute
Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines as Business Bankruptcies Begin to Decline
2011 bankruptcies totaled 47,806, down 15.1% from 56,282 in 2010—the second consecutive year of decline. Business bankruptcies more
than tripled during the financial crisis. Through Q1:2012, filings are down 11.1% vs. Q1:2011
% Change Surrounding Recessions
1980-82 58.6%1980-87 88.7%1990-91 10.3%2000-01 13.0%2006-09 208.9%*
24
25
Private Sector Business Starts, 1993:Q2 – 2011:Q3*
175
186
174
180
186
192
188
187 18
918
6 190 19
419
119
9 204
202
195
196
196
206
206
201
192
198
206
206
203
211
205
212
200 20
520
420
419
720
320
920
119
219
219
320
1 204
202
210 21
220
921
6 220 22
322
022
021
022
121
220
421
820
920
720
719
919
1 193
172 17
616
918
417
5 179
188
200
183 18
7 191
203
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Business Starts Were Down Nearly 20% in the Recession, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure, But
Are Recovering Slowly* Data through June 30, 2011 are the latest available as of July 26, 2012; Seasonally adjusted. **Annualized based on data through Q3:2011.Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t08.htm.
(Thousands)
Business starts were up 3.5% to 561,000 in the first 9 months of 2011 vs. first 9
months of 2011. 722,000 new business starts were recorded in 2010, up 3.6% from
697,000 in 2009, which was the slowest year for new business starts since 1993
Business Starts2006: 872,0002007: 843,0002008: 790,0002009: 697,000 2010: 722,000 2011: 748,000**
25
27
12 Industries for the Next 10 Years: Insurance Solutions Needed
Export-Oriented Industries
Health Sciences
Health Care
Energy (Traditional)
Alternative Energy
Petrochemical
Agriculture
Natural Resources
Technology (incl. Biotechnology)
Light Manufacturing
Insourced Manufacturing
Many industries are
poised for growth, though
insurers’ ability to
capitalize on these
industries varies widely
Shipping (Rail, Marine, Trucking)
28
Presidential Politics & the P/C Insurance Industry
How Is Profitability Affected by the President’s Political Party?
28
15.10%
9.40%
8.93%
8.65%
8.35%
7.98%
7.68%
6.98%
6.97%
6.65%
5.43%
5.03%
4.83%
4.43%
3.55%
16.43%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%
Carter
Reagan II
G.W. Bush II
Nixon
Clinton I
G.H.W. Bush
Clinton II
Reagan I
Nixon/Ford
Truman
Obama
Eisenhower I
Eisenhower II
G.W. Bush I
Johnson
Kennedy/Johnson
*Truman administration ROE of 6.97% based on 3 years only, 1950-52; ROEs for the years 2008 forward exclude mortgage and financial guaranty segments.Estimated ROE for 2012 = 7.0%. Source: Insurance Information Institute
OVERALL RECORD: 1950-2012*
Democrats 7.67%Republicans 7.97%
Party of President has marginal bearing on profitability of P/C insurance industry
P/C Insurance Industry ROE by Presidential Administration, 1950- 2012*
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
00
02
04
06
08
10
12
E
BLUE = Democratic President RED = Republican President
Tru
man Nixon/Ford
Ken
ned
y/
Joh
nso
n
Eis
enh
ow
er
Car
ter
Reagan/Bush I Clinton Bush II
P/C insurance Industry ROE by Presidential Party Affiliation, 1950- 2012*
*ROEs for the years 2008 forward exclude mortgage and financial guaranty segments; Estimated 2012 ROE = 7.0%Source: Insurance Information Institute
Ob
ama
31
Labor Market Trends
Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal
Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving
31
32
Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Stubbornly High in 2012, But Falling
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan00
Jan01
Jan02
Jan03
Jan04
Jan05
Jan06
Jan07
Jan08
Jan09
Jan10
Jan11
Jan12
Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3
Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6
Unemployment stood at 8.3% in
July 2012
Unemployment peaked at 10.1% in October 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983.
Peak rate in the last 30 years:
10.8% in November -
December 1982
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
U-6 went from 8.0% in March
2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 15.0%
in July 2012
January 2000 through July 2012, Seasonally Adjusted (%)
Recession ended in
November 2001
Unemployment kept rising for
19 more months
Recession began in
December 2007
Stubbornly high unemployment and underemployment constrain overall economic growth, but the job market is now clearly improving
32
Jun 12
186
7921
365
127
42 15-1
09-1
465
9723
-12
-85 -58
-161
-253 -230
-257
-347
-456
-547
-734 -6
67-8
06-7
07-7
44-6
49-3
34-4
52-2
97-2
15 -186
-262
75-8
316
62
229
51 6111
714
311
2 193
128 16
711
925
726
126
410
810
2 175
5221
613
9 178 23
4 277
254
147
8511
673
172
144
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
0
200
400
Jan-
07F
eb-0
7M
ar-0
7A
pr-0
7M
ay-0
7Ju
n-07
Jul-0
7A
ug-0
7S
ep-0
7O
ct-0
7N
ov-0
7D
ec-0
7Ja
n-08
Feb
-08
Mar
-08
Apr
-08
May
-08
Jun-
08Ju
l-08
Aug
-08
Sep
-08
Oct
-08
Nov
-08
Dec
-08
Jan-
09F
eb-0
9M
ar-0
9A
pr-0
9M
ay-0
9Ju
n-09
Jul-0
9A
ug-0
9S
ep-0
9O
ct-0
9N
ov-0
9D
ec-0
9Ja
n-10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10Ju
l-10
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11F
eb-1
1M
ar-1
1A
pr-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
n-11
Jul-1
1A
ug-1
1S
ep-1
1O
ct-1
1N
ov-1
1D
ec-1
1Ja
n-12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12Ju
l-12
Monthly Change in Private Employment
January 2008 through July 2012 (Thousands)
Private Employers Added 4.65 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs)
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were
the Largest in the Post-WW II Period
172,000 private sector jobs were created in July
33
0.02
30.
011
-0.0
74-0
.132
-0.2
93-0
.546
-0.7
76-1
.033
-1.3
80-1
.836
-2.3
83-3
.117
-3.7
84-4
.590
-5.2
97-6
.041
-6.6
90-7
.024
-7.4
76-7
.773
-7.9
88-8
.174
-8.4
36-8
.361
-8.4
44-8
.428
-8.3
66-8
.222
-7.9
93-7
.942
-7.8
81-7
.764
-7.6
21-7
.509
-7.3
16-7
.188
-7.0
21-6
.902 -6.3
84-6
.120
-6.0
12-5
.910
-5.7
35-5
.683
-5.4
67-5
.328
-5.1
50-4
.916
-4.6
39-4
.385
-4.2
38-4
.153
-4.0
37-3
.964
-3.7
92
-6.6
45
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
Dec
-07
Jan-
08F
eb-0
8M
ar-0
8A
pr-0
8M
ay-
Jun-
08Ju
l-08
Aug
-08
Sep
-08
Oct
-08
Nov
-08
Dec
-08
Jan-
09F
eb-0
9M
ar-0
9A
pr-0
9M
ay-
Jun-
09Ju
l-09
Aug
-09
Sep
-09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10F
eb-1
0M
ar-1
0A
pr-1
0M
ay-
Jun-
10Ju
l-10
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11F
eb-1
1M
ar-1
1A
pr-1
1M
ay-
Jun-
11Ju
l-11
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
12F
eb-1
2M
ar-1
2A
pr-1
2M
ay-
Jun-
12Ju
l-12
Mill
ion
sCumulative Change in Private Employment: Dec. 2007—July 2012
December 2007 through July 2012 (Millions)
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
Cumulative job losses peaked at 8.444 million
in December 2009
Cumulative job losses as of June 2012 totaled
3.792 million
34
All of the jobs “lost” since
President Obama took office in Jan.
2009 have been recouped
Private Employers Added 4.65 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs)
0
-8
40
86
518
259
109
-70
-212 -188
-201
-221
-230
-267
-282
-295
-349
-367
-446 -4
13
-427
-454
-475
-486
-488
-483
-487
-491
-520
-529
-538
-700
-500
-300
-100
100
300
500
700
Jan-
10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11
Jul-1
1
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12
Jul-1
2
Cumulative Change in Government Employment: Jan. 2010—July 2012
January 2010 through July 2012* (Millions)
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/data/#employment; Insurance Information Institute
Cumulative job losses through June 2012 totaled 538,000
36
Governments at All Levels are Under Severe Fiscal Strain As Tax Receipts Plunged and Pension Obligations Soared During the
Financial Crisis, Causing Them to Reduce Staff
Government at all levels has shed more than a half
million jobs since Jan. 2010 even as private employers created 4.65 million jobs.
Temporary Census hiring distorted 2010
figures
37
Net Change in Government Employment: Jan. 2010—June 2012*
-536
-405
-72 -59
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
Total Local State Federal
(Thousands)
Local government employment shrank by 405,000 from Jan.
2010 through June 2012, accounting for 76% of all government job losses,
negatively impacting WC exposures for those cities and counties that insure privately
*Cumulative change from prior month; Base employment date is Dec. 2009.Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/data/#employment; Insurance Information Institute
State government employment fell by 1.4% since the end of 2009 while
Federal employment is down by 2.1%
38
Unemployment Rates by State, July 2012:Highest 25 States*
12
.0
10
.8
10
.7
9.8
9.6
9.6
9.3
9.1
9.1
9.0
8.9
8.9
8.8
8.7
8.5
8.5
8.4
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.2
7.9
7.7
7.6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
NV RI CA NJ NC SC GA MS NY MI DC IL FL OR CT WA TN AL AZ CO KY US IN PA AK LA
Un
em
plo
ym
en
t R
ate
(%
)
*Provisional figures for July 2012, seasonally adjusted.
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In July, 44 states reported over-the-month unemployment rate increases, 2 states and the District of Columbia had decreases, and 4 states had no change.
39
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.0
6.8
6.6
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.6
5.4
5.3
5.0
4.9
4.4
4.0
3.0
0
2
4
6
8
ME ID WV AR WI MO OH TX MD DE NM HI MT KS MA UT VA MN WY NH IA VT OK SD NE ND
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
Unemployment Rates by State, July 2012: Lowest 25 States*
*Provisional figures for July 2012, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In July, 44 states reported over-the-month unemployment rate increases, 2 states and the District of Columbia had
decreases, and 4 states had no change.
40
US Unemployment Rate Forecast
4.5
%
4.5
%
4.6
%
4.8
%
4.9
% 5.4
% 6.1
%
6.9
%
8.1
%
9.3
%
9.6
% 10
.0%
9.7
%
9.6
%
9.6
%
8.9
%
9.1
%
9.1
%
8.7
%
8.3
%
8.2
%
8.2
%
8.1
%
8.0
%
8.0
%
7.9
%
7.7
%
9.6
%4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
07
:Q1
07
:Q2
07
:Q3
07
:Q4
08
:Q1
08
:Q2
08
:Q3
08
:Q4
09
:Q1
09
:Q2
09
:Q3
09
:Q4
10
:Q1
10
:Q2
10
:Q3
10
:Q4
11
:Q1
11
:Q2
11
:Q3
11
:Q4
12
:Q1
12
:Q2
12
:Q3
12
:Q4
13
:Q1
13
:Q2
13
:Q3
13
:Q4
Rising unemployment eroded payrolls
and workers comp’s
exposure base.
Unemployment peaked at 10% in
late 2009.
* = actual; = forecastsSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (8/12 edition); Insurance Information Institute.
2007:Q1 to 2013:Q4F*
Unemployment forecasts have been revised slightly
upwards for 2012 and 2013. Optimistic scenarios put the
unemployment as low as 8.0% by Q4 of this year.
Jobless figures have been revised
slightly upwards for 2012/13
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12*
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50Wage & Salary DisbursementsWC NPW
43
Payroll Base* WC NWP
Payroll vs. Workers Comp Net Written Premiums, 1990-2012E
*Private employment; Shaded areas indicate recessions. Payroll and WC premiums for 2012 is I.I.I. estimate based YTD 2012 actuals.Sources: NBER (recessions); Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR ; NCCI; I.I.I.
Continued Payroll Growth and Rate Increases Suggest WC NWP Will Grow Again in 2012; +7.9% Growth in 2011 Was the First Gain Since 2005
7/90-3/91 3/01-11/0112/07-6/09
$Billions $Billions
WC premium volume dropped two years before
the recession began
WC net premiums written were down $14B or 29.3% to
$33.8B in 2010 after peaking at $47.8B
in 2005
+9% in 2012E
Insurance Industry Employment Trends: 1990-2012
Insurance Information Institute August 2012
Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038
Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 [email protected] www.iii.org
57
Overview of Insurance Sector Employment Changes*
*Data are through June 2012 and are preliminary (i.e., subject to later revision); not seasonally adjusted.
Insurance Subsector May 2012 Employment
June 2012Employment
Change
P-C Direct 528,000 529,000 +1,000
Reinsurers 27,700 28,100 +400
Claims Adjusters 48,200 48,700 +500
Agents/Brokers 653,000 656,100 +3,100
Life Direct 336,400 337,900 +1,500
Health/Medical Direct 428,500 429,300 +800
Title & other Direct 70,900 70,500 -400
3rd-Party Administration 137,300 137,600 +300
All other insurance-related activities
54,400 54,500 +100
Net Total 2,284,400 2,291,700 +7,300
58
July 2012 Report:1-Month and 12-Month Changes*
P-C Insurers Employment up by 1,000 (+0.2%) vs. May 2012 Employment down by 3,800 (-0.7%) vs. June 2011
Reinsurers Employment up by 400 (+1.4%) vs. May 2012 Employment up by 1,900 (+7.3%) vs. June 2011
Claims Adjusters Employment up by 500 (+1.0%) vs. May 2012 Employment down by 1,500 (-3.0%) vs. June 2011
Insurance Agents & Brokers Employment up by 3,100 (+0.5%) vs. May 2012 Employment up by 7,000 (+1.1%) vs. June 2011
Life Insurers Employment up by 1,500 (+0.4%) vs. May 2012 Employment down by 3,200 (-0.9%) vs. June 2011
Health/Medical Insurers Employment up by 800 (+0.2%) vs. May 2012 Employment up by 800 (+0.2%) vs. June 2011
*Data are through June 2012 and are preliminary (i.e., subject to later revision).
62
Insurance Industry Employment Trends
Soft Market, Difficult Economy, Outsourcing, Productivity
Enhancements and Consolidation Have Contributed
to Industry’s Job Losses
63
U.S. Employment in the DirectP/C Insurance Industry: 1990–2012*
*As of June 2012; Not seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokers.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
Thousands
440
460
480
500
520
540
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
This spurt results from 2010 census data and revised industry counts. BLS adjusted data for
March 2010 through March 2011 but did not revise pre-March 2010 counts. Employment numbers prior
to March 2011 are not comparable to subsequent data.
64
U.S. Employment in the DirectLife Insurance Industry: 1990–2012*
*As of June 2012; Not seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokers.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
Thousands
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
475
500
525
550
575
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
As of June 2012, Life insurance industry employment was down by 16,400 (-
4.6%) to 337,900 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US
employment decline of 3.5%).
Every 4-5 years BLS reconciles its data with census data; sometimes this
reclassifies employment within industries. This drop, spread over
March 2004-March 2005, moved some people to the Health/Medical Expense
sector.
65
U.S. Employment in the Direct Health-Medical Insurance Industry: 1990–2012*
*As of June 2012; Not seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokers.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
Thousands
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
As of June 2012, Health-Medical insurance industry employment was down by 12,600 or 2.9% to 429,300 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US employment
decline of 3.5%).
66
U.S. Employment in the Reinsurance Industry: 1990–2012*
Thousands
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12*As of June 2012; Not seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokers.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
As of June 2012, US employment in the reinsurance industry was up by
1,200 or 4.5% to 28,100 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US employment decline of
3.5%).
67
U.S. Employment in Insurance Agencies & Brokerages: 1990–2012*
Thousands
500
550
600
650
700
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12*As of June 2012; Not seasonally adjusted. Includes all types of insurance.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
As of June 2012, employment at insurance agencies and brokerages
was down by 23,500 or 3.5% to 656,100 since the recession began in
Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US employment decline of 3.5%).
68
U.S. Employment in Insurance Claims Adjusting: 1990–2012*
Thousands
40
45
50
55
60
Jan
-90
Oct
-90
Jul-
91
Ap
r-9
2
Jan
-93
Oct
-93
Jul-
94
Ap
r-9
5
Jan
-96
Oct
-96
Jul-
97
Ap
r-9
8
Jan
-99
Oct
-99
Jul-
00
Ap
r-0
1
Jan
-02
Oct
-02
Jul-
03
Ap
r-0
4
Jan
-05
Oct
-05
Jul-
06
Ap
r-0
7
Jan
-08
Oct
-08
Jul-
09
Ap
r-1
0
Jan
-11
Oct
-11
*As of June 2012; Not seasonally adjusted.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
As of June 2012, claims adjusting employment was down by 3,300 or 6.3% to 48,700 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US employment
decline of 3.5%).
Katrina, Rita, Wilma
69
U.S. Employment in Third-Party Administration of Insurance Funds: 1990–2012*
Thousands
85
95
105
115
125
135
145
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12*As of June 2012; Not seasonally adjusted. Includes all types of insurance.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
70
P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview
Profit Recovery Was Set Back in 2011 by High Catastrophe
Loss & Other Factors
70
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2012:Q1 ($ Millions)
$1
4,1
78
$5
,84
0
$1
9,3
16
$1
0,8
70
$2
0,5
98
$2
4,4
04 $
36
,81
9
$3
0,7
73
$2
1,8
65
$3
,04
6
$3
0,0
29
$6
2,4
96
$3
,04
3
$3
5,2
04
$1
9,1
50
$1
0,1
41
$2
8,6
72
-$6,970
$6
5,7
77
$4
4,1
55
$2
0,5
59
$3
8,5
01
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12:Q1
2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.1% 2009 ROE = 5.0% 2010 ROE = 6.6% 2011 ROAS1 = 3.5% 2012:Q1 ROAS1 = 7.2%
P-C Industry 2012:Q1 profits were up 29% from 2011:Q1, due primarily to lower catastrophe losses
* ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 8.2% ROAS for 2012:Q1, 4.6% ROAS for 2011, 7.6% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What ItOnce Was: Investment Impact on ROEs
Combined Ratio / ROE
* 2008 -2012 figures are return on average surplus and exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2012:Q1 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 99.0, ROAS = 7.2%; 2011 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 108.2, ROAS = 3.5%. Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.
97.5
100.6 100.1 100.8
92.7
101.099.3
100.9
97.6
106.4
95.78.2%
4.6%
7.6%7.4%4.4%
9.6%
15.9%
14.3%
12.7% 10.9%
8.8%
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1978 1979 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012:Q10%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
Combined Ratio ROE*
Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s DepressedInvestment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs
A combined ratio of about 100 generates an ROE of ~6.7% in 2012, ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10,
10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979
Year Ago
2011:Q1 = 102.2, 6.1% ROE
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
*1
2:
Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2012:Q1*
*Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs. 2011 figure is an estimate based on ROAS data. Note: Data for 2008-2012 exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2012:Q1 ROAS = 7.2% including M&FG.Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best.
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3%
1997:11.6%2006:12.7%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2%
10 Years
10 Years9 Years
2011:4.6%*
History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017
ROE
1975: 2.4%
2012:Q8.2%
76
Personal Lines Profitability Analysis
Significant Variability Over Time and Across States
77
18.5
14.5
14.3
14.1
13.5
12.4
12.1
11.8
11.7
11.6
11.3
11.2
11.1
11.0
10.8
10.7
10.7
10.5
10.4
10.2
9.8
9.7
9.6
9.2
9.1
02468
10121416182022
HI VT ME ID DC NH ND MN SD OH KS NM CT IA RI OR WY VA AZ WI CA UT IN AL AK
RN
W P
PA
*Latest available.
Sources: NAIC.
Hawaii was the most profitable state for auto insurers from 2001-2010
Return on Net Worth: Pvt. Passenger Auto, 10-Year Average (2001-2010*)
Top 25 States(Percent)
78
9.0
8.9
8.8
8.8
8.5
8.4
8.0
7.8
7.7
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.0
6.8
5.4
5.3
5.1
4.2
3.4
2.7
-1.2-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
CO NY
SC
WA
NE IL
MD
TN MO US
MT
AR
GA
TX WV
NJ
OK PA
NC
MA
KY
MS
DE
NV FL LA MI
RN
W A
uto
Return on Net Worth: Pvt. Passenger Auto, 10-Year Average (2001-2010*)
*Latest avaiiable.Sources: NAIC
Michigan was the least profitable state, in
large part due to fraud in its no-fault system
(Percent) Bottom 25 States
80
45.5
22.3
20.6
20.3
19.5
18.6
18.4
18.1
17.6
16.5
15.4
15.3
14.6
13.1
12.7
12.7
12.5
12.5
12.2
11.2
10.5
9.4
19.0
18.0
14.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
HI SC RI AK CT DC NV DE NY UT MA OR NC CA WA NM VT ME PA ID NJ VA WY AZ MD
RN
W H
O
*Latest available.
Sources: NAIC.
Return on Net Worth: Homeowners Insurance, 10-Year Average (2001-2010*)
(Percent) Top 25 States
Hawaii was the most profitable state for home insurers from 2001-2010
81
9.2
8.0
6.4
5.0
4.8
4.5
3.4
3.4
0.9
-29
.2
8.0
1.0
-4.4
-5.9
-7.1
-7.1
-7.2
-7.3
-8.3
-8.6
-10
.6
-11
.1
-25
.4
-3.8
-2.6-0
.3
0.4
-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-505
1015
NH CO MT MI US WV KS SD WI IL IA TX FL IN OH AR TN GA KY AL ND OK NE MN MO LA MS
RN
W H
O
*Latest available.Sources: NAIC
Bottom 25 States(Percent)
Return on Net Worth: Homeowners Insurance, 10-Year Average (2001-2010*)
Home insurance profitability in
catastrophe prone states suffered
the most over the past decade
96
Top 16 Most Costly World Insurance Losses, 1970-2011**
(Insured Losses, 2011 Dollars, $ Billions)
*Average of range estimates of $35B - $40B as of 1/4/12; Privately insured losses only.**Figures do not include federally insured flood losses.Sources: Swiss Re sigma 1/2011; Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute research.
$11.9$13.0 $13.0$13.1
$19.1$21.3
$24.0$25.0
$37.5
$47.6
$7.7 $8.1 $8.3 $8.5 $9.3 $9.7
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50
Hugo (1989)
WinterStormDaria(1991)
ChileQuake(2010)
Ivan (2004)
TyphoonMirielle(1991)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
ThailandFloods(2011)
NewZealandQuake(2011)
Ike (2008)
Northridge(1994)
SpringTornadoes/
Storms(2011)
WTC TerrorAttack(2001)
Andrew(1992)
JapanQuake,
Tsunami(2011)*
Katrina(2005)
5 of the top 14 most expensive
catastrophes in world history have occurred within the past 2 years
Taken as a single event, the Spring 2011 tornado and
thunderstorm season would likely become the 5th
costliest event in global insurance history
99
U.S. Insured Catastrophe Loss Update
2012 Catastrophe Losses Were Close to “Average” in the First Half of 2012
2011 Was the 5th Most Expensive Year on Record
99
100
US Catastrophe Loss Summary: First Half 2012 $9.3 Billion in Insured Losses in the US Arising from 90 CAT Events
Down 62% from $24.4B in 2011:H1; Loss is close to long-term average
Represents 80%+ of global total
Mild winter helped keep first half losses down
Thunderstorm (includes tornado, hail and wind damage) accounted for $8.8B or 95% of first half insured losses and represent the 3rd most expensive spring t-storm season ever
$14.6 Billion in Economic Losses in the US Down from approximately $75B in 2011:H1
Mild Winter Helped Keep First Half Insured Losses Down Lack of heavy precipitation limited spring flood but exacerbated drought conditions
Severe Droughts Now Impacting Central and Southwest Parts of US Two major wildfires in Colorado in June caused record $500 mill damage in the state
Largest wildfire in New Mexico history occurred in May
Insured crop losses could be high in 2012
Active Early Hurricane Season Tropical Storms Beryl and Debby caused minor wind damage and extensive flooding in FL
Source: Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute.
Natural Disaster Losses in the United States: First Half 2012
101Source: MR NatCatSERVICE
102
Top 14 Most Costly Disastersin U.S. History
(Insured Losses, 2011 Dollars, $ Billions)
*Losses will actually be broken down into several “events” as determined by PCS. Includes losses for the period April 1 – June 30.Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments.
$9.0$11.9 $13.1
$19.1$21.3
$24.0 $25.0
$47.6
$8.5$7.7$6.5$5.5$4.4$4.3
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50
Irene(2011)
Jeanne(2004)
Frances(2004)
Rita (2005)
Hugo (1989)
Ivan (2004)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
Ike (2008)
Northridge(1994)
SpringTornadoes& Storms*
(2011)
9/11Attack(2001)
Andrew(1992)
Katrina(2005)
Taken as a single event, the Spring 2011 tornado and storm season are
is the 4th costliest event in US insurance history
Hurricane Irene became the 11th most expense
hurricane in US history
Nu
mb
er
Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity)
Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire)
Meteorological (storm)
Hydrological (flood, mass movement)
Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – 2012:H1Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – 2011 and First Half 2012)
Source: MR NatCatSERVICE 103
22
6
61
1
50
100
150
200
250
300
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
There were 90 natural disaster events in the first
half of 2012
105
$1
2.3
$1
0.7
$3
.7
$1
4.0
$1
1.3
$6
.0
$3
3.9
$7
.4 $1
5.9
$3
2.9
$7
1.7
$1
0.3
$7
.3
$2
8.5
$1
1.2
$1
4.1
$3
2.3
$9
.3$1
3.7
$4
.7
$7
.8
$3
6.9
$8
.6
$2
5.8
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12*
US Insured Catastrophe Losses
*Munich Re figure for H1 2012.Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01 ($25.9B 2011 dollars). Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B ($15.6B in 2011 dollars.) Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
US CAT Losses in 2011 Were the 5th Highest in US History on An Inflation-Adjusted Basis
H1 2012 CAT losses were down $15.1B or 62% from
$24.4B in H1 2011
Record Tornado Losses Caused
2011 CAT Losses to Surge
($ Billions, 2011 Dollars)
105
$500
$530
$830
$975
$980
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,510
$2,000
$5,000
$6,900
$7,300
$840
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000
Flooding, April*
Wildfire, Sep. 4-19
Thunderstorms, Apr. 19-20
Thunderstorms, Aug. 18-19
Winter Storm, Jan. 31-Feb. 3
Thunderstorms, Jul. 10-14
Texas Drought, 2011*
Thunderstorms, Jun. 16-22
Thunderstorms, Apr. 14-16
Thunderstorms, Apr. 8-11
Thunderstorms, Apr. 3-5
Hurricane Irene, Aug. 26-28**
Thunderstorms, May 20-27
Thunderstorms, Apr. 22-26
**Includes $700 million in flood losses insured through the National Flood Insurance Program.Source: PCS except as noted by “*” which are sourced to Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute.
2011’s Most Expensive Catastrophes, Insured Losses
The Midwest was hard hit by catastrophes in 2011, especially thunderstorms,
including tornadoes, hail and high winds
U.S. Thunderstorm Loss Trends, 1980 – 2012:H1
107Source: Property Claims Service, MR NatCatSERVICE
Average thunderstorm
losses are up more than 5 fold since the early 1980s.
2012 will likely be among the top 5 years on record.
Hurricanes get all the headlines, but thunderstorms are consistent
producers of large scale loss. 2008-2012 are the most expensive
years on record.
Thunderstorm losses in 2012:H1 totaled $8.8 billion, the 3rd highest
first half on record
109
Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2011*
*Insurance Information Institute estimates for 2010 and 2011 based on A.M. Best data.Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers.Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
0.4
1.2
0.4 0.
8 1.3
0.3 0.4 0.
71.
51.
00.
40.
4 0.7
1.8
1.1
0.6
1.4 2.
01.
3 2.0
0.5
0.5 0.7
3.0
1.2
2.1
8.8
2.3
5.9
3.3
2.8
1.0
3.6
2.9
1.6
5.4
1.6
3.3
3.3
8.1
2.7
1.6
5.0
2.6
4.4
8.0
3.6
0.9
0.1
1.1
1.1
0.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades
Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio
by Decade
1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39 2000s: 3.52 2010s: 6.20*
Combined Ratio Points
113
Federal Disaster Declarations Patterns:
1953-2012
113
Records Were Set for Federal Disaster Declarations in 2010 and
2011—Most Declarations Were Unrelated to Tropical Activity
Number of Federal Disaster Declarations, 1953-2012*
13 1
7 18
16
16
7 71
21
22
22
0 25
25
11
11
19
29
17
17
48
46
46
38
30
22 2
54
22
31
52
42
13
42
7 28
23
11
31
38
45
32 3
63
27
54
46
55
04
54
5 49
56
69
48 5
26
37
55
98
19
92
3
43
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
*Through July 31, 2012.Source: Federal Emergency Management Administration; http://www.fema.gov/disasters; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Federal Disaster Declarations Is Rising and Set New Records in 2010 and 2011
The number of federal disaster declarations set a
new record in 2011, with 99, shattering 2010’s record 81
declarations.
There have been 2,068 federal disaster
declarations since 1953. The average
number of declarations per year is 34 from
1953-2010, though that few haven’t been
recorded since 1995.
23 federal disasters were declared
through July 31, 2012
114
115
Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – 2012: Highest 25 States*
86
78
71
65
64
58
56
56
53
53
51
51
50
49
48
48
48
47
47
46
45
45
42
40
39
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
TX CA OK NY FL LA AL KY AR MO IL TN MS WV IA MN KS NE PA VA OH WA ND NC IN
Dis
as
ter
De
cla
rati
on
s
Over the past nearly 60 years,
Texas has had the highest number of Federal Disaster
Declarations
*Through July 27, 2012. Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.
Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute.
116
Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – 2012: Lowest 25 States*
39
39
37
36
35
34
34
29
28
27
26
26
25
24
24
23
22
21
17
17
17
15
14
12
10
9 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
ME SD AK GA WI VT NJ NH OR MA PR HI MI AZ NM ID MD MT NV CT CO SC DE DC UT RI WY
Dis
as
ter
De
cla
rati
on
s
*Through July 27, 2012. Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.
Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute.
Over the past nearly 60 years, Utah and Rhode Island had the fewest
number of Federal Disaster Declarations
117
SPRING 2012 TORNADO & SEVERE STORM OUTBREAK
2012 Got Off to a Worrisome Start, But Is No Repeat of 2011
117
118
1,1
33
1,1
32 1
,29
7
1,1
73
1,0
82 1,2
34
1,1
73
1,1
48
1,4
24
1,3
45
1,0
71 1,2
16
94
1
1,3
76
1,2
64
1,1
03
1,0
98
1,6
92
1,1
46 1,2
82
89
7
1,819
1,6
91
553
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12*
Nu
mb
er
of
To
rna
do
es
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Nu
mb
er o
f De
ath
s
Number of Tornadoes
Number of Deaths
*Through August 1, 2012.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Storm Prediction Center, National Weather Service at http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/newm.html
Number of Tornadoes and Related Deaths, 1990 – 2012*
Tornadoes claimed 553 lives in 2011, the most since 1925
897 tornadoes have been recorded so far
this year*
2012 Tornado Losses Got Off to an Ominous Beginning, but Slowed. First Half 2011 Insured Losses from Tornadoes and Thunderstorms Topped $21B.
U.S. Tornado Count, 2005-2012*
119
*Through August 21, 2012.Source: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/
2012 count is running well behind 2011
There were 1,897 tornadoes in the US in 2011 far above
average, but well below 2008’s record
June 29, 2012 Derecho: Traveled 600 Miles from Midwest to Mid-Atlantic
120Source: National Weather Service: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/2012/20120629-derecho.png
The June 29 derecho traveled
600 miles in just 10 hours—an average speed of 60 MPH! Peak wind gusts
80-100 MPH.
Millions of people were without power
in sweltering heat for days, particularly in Mid-Atlantic states
10-HOUR RADAR COMPOSITE (2PM – MIDNIGHT)
Location of Tornadoes in the US, 2012*
*Through Aug. 1, 2012.Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2012_annual_summary.html# 121
898 tornadoes killed 68 people through
August 1
Location of Large Hail Reports in the US, 2012*
124*Through Aug. 1, 2012.Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2012_annual_summary.html#
There were 6,149 “Large Hail”
reports through Aug. 1, 2012,
causing extensive damage to homes,
businesses and vehicles
Location of Wind Damage Reports in the US, 2012*
126*Through Aug. 1, 2012.Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2012_annual_summary.html#
Extreme density due to late June derecho
There were 10,542 “Wind Damage” reports through Aug. 1, causing
extensive damage to homes and,
businesses
Severe Weather Reports, 2012*
128*Through Aug. 1, 2012.Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2012_annual_summary.html#
There were already 17,591 severe weather reports through
Aug. 1; including 8984
tornadoes; 6,149 “Large Hail” reports
and 10,542 high wind events
Extreme density due to late June derecho
Severe Weather Reports, 2011
129Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html#
There were 29,996 severe
weather reports in 2011;
including 1,894 tornadoes;
9,417 “Large Hail” reports
and 18,685 high wind events
The BIG Question:When Will the Market Turn?
131
Catastrophes and Other Factors Are Pressuring Insurance Markets
131
New Factor: Record Low Interest Rates Are Contributing to
Underwriting and Pricing Pressures
132
Historical Criteria for a “Market Turn”:Historically All Four Criteria Had to Be Met
Criteria Status Comments
Sustained Period of
Large Underwriting
LossesEarly Stage,
Inevitable
•Apart from 2011 CAT losses, overall p/c underwriting losses remain modest•Combined ratios (ex-CATs) still in low 100s (vs. 110+ at onset of last hard market); CR= 97.6 in Q1:2012 (ex-M&FG)•Prior-year reserve releases continue to reduce u/w losses, boost ROEs, though more modestly
Material Decline in Surplus/ Capacity
Entered 2011 At Record High; Only
Small Decline
•Surplus hit a record $570.7B as of 3/31/12•Fell just 1.6% in 2011 due to CATs•Will likely see new records later in 2012•Little excess capacity remains in reinsurance markets•Modest growth in demand for insurance is insufficient to absorb much excess capacity
Tight Reinsurance
MarketSomewhat in
Place
•Much of the global “excess capacity” was eroded by cats•Higher prices in Asia/Pacific•Modestly higher pricing for US risks
Renewed Underwriting
& Pricing Discipline
Some Firming esp. in
Property, WC
•Commercial lines pricing trends have turned from negative to flat and now positive, esp. Property & WC; •Competition remains intense as many seek to maintain market share
Sources: Barclays Capital; Insurance Information Institute.
INVESTMENTS: THE NEW REALITY
133
Investment Performance is a Key Driver of Profitability
Depressed Yields Will Necessarily Influence
Underwriting & Pricing 133
134
Insurers Have Not Yet Fully Adapted to a Persistently Low Interest Rate Environment
No Expectation that Rates Would Be:Pushed to Such Low Levels
Pushed Down so Rapidly
Held to Such Low Levels for So Long
Suppressed via Unprecedented Aggressiveness of the Federal Reserve– Use of traditional and unconventional tools (QE)– Unconventional ’s policies couldn’t be anticipated, esp. QE1, 2 (3?)
Competitive PressureProtracted Soft MarketAbility to Release Prior Reserves Eases UrgencyRealization of Capital Gains
OFFSETTING FACTORSCapitalization Still SolidEmergence of Sophisticated Price Monitoring and Underwriting Tools
Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Income: 2000–2012F1
$38.9$37.1 $36.7
$38.7
$54.6
$51.2
$47.1 $47.6$49.0
$46.6
$39.6
$49.5
$52.3
$30
$40
$50
$60
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F
Investment Income in 2011 Was Surprisingly Strong, Though Investment Income Is Likely to Weaken in 2012 Due to Persistently Low Interest Rates
1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest and stock dividends.*2012F is based on annualized Q1:2012 actual figure of $11.656B.Sources: ISO; Conning Research & Consulting; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions)
Investment earnings in 2011 were 10.3% below
their 2007 pre-crisis peak
Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2012F1
$35.4
$42.8$47.2
$52.3
$44.4
$36.0
$45.3$48.9
$59.4$55.7
$64.0
$31.7
$39.2
$53.4$56.2
$49.4
$58.0
$51.9$56.9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F
Investment Gains in 2011 Were Surprisingly Robust. Investment Gains Recovered Significantly in 2011 Due to Realized Investment Gains; The
Financial Crisis Caused Investment Gains to Fall by 50% in 20081 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.* 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B; 2012F figure is III estimate based on annualized actual Q1:2012 result of
$12.341B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions)
Investment gains in 2011 were $2.8B above 2010 levels—a surprise given falling rates
and flat stock markets
137
P/C Insurer Net Realized Capital Gains/Losses, 1990-2012:Q1
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
$2.8
8
$4.8
1 $9.8
9
$9.8
2
$10.
81 $18.
02
$13.
02
$16.
21
$6.6
3
-$1.
21
$6.6
1
$9.1
3
$9.7
0
$3.5
2 $8.9
2
-$7.
90
$5.8
5
$7.1
9
$0.6
9
-$19
.81
$9.2
4
$6.0
0
$1.6
6
-$25
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 1112:Q1
Insurers Posted Net Realized Capital Gains in 2010 and 2011 After Following Two Years of Realized Losses During the Financial Crisis. Realized Capital
Losses Were the Primary Cause of 2008/2009’s Large Drop in Profits and ROE
($ Billions) $27.0B positive swing from 2008-2011
138
U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note Yields:A Long Downward Trend, 1990–2012*
*Monthly, through Aug. 2012 (Aug. figure is for week ending 8/17). Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: Federal Reserve Bank at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm. National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
Yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes have been essentially below 5% for a full decade.
Since roughly 80% of P/C bond/cash investments are in 10-year or shorter durations, most P/C insurer portfolios will have low-yielding bonds for years to come.
Yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes recently
plunged to all time record lows
138
139
Treasury Yield Curves: Pre-Crisis (July 2007) vs. July 2012*
0.08% 0.10% 0.15% 0.17% 0.23%
0.95%
1.47%
4.82% 4.96% 5.04% 4.96% 4.82% 4.82% 4.88% 5.00% 4.93% 5.00%5.19%
0.59%0.30%
2.51%2.15%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
1M 3M 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 20Y 30Y
July 2012 Yield Curve*Pre-Crisis (July 2007)
Treasury yield curve remains near its most depressed level
in at least 45 years. Investment income is falling as a result. Fed is unlikely to hike rates until well into 2014
at the earliest.
The Fed Is Actively Signaling that it Is Determined to Keep Rates Low Through Late 2014; This Adds to Pricing Pressure for Insurers.
*Week ending July 27.Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors; Insurance Information Institute.
140
-1.8
%
-1.8
%
-2.0
%
-3.6
%
-3.3
%
-3.3
%
-3.7
%
-4.3
%
-5.2
%
-5.7
%
-7.3%
-1.9
%
-2.1
%
-3.1
%
-8%-7%-6%-5%-4%-3%-2%-1%0%
Perso
nal L
ines
Pvt Pass
Aut
o
Pers P
rop
Comm
ercia
l
Comm
l Auto
Credit
Comm
Pro
p
Comm
Cas
Fidelity
/Sure
ty
Warra
nty
Surplu
s Line
s
Med
Mal
WC
Reinsu
rance
**
Lower Investment Earnings Place a Greater Burden on Underwriting and Pricing Discipline
*Based on 2008 Invested Assets and Earned Premiums**US domestic reinsurance onlySource: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.
Reduction in Combined Ratio Necessary to Offset 1% Decline in Investment Yield to Maintain Constant ROE, by Line*
140
1. UNDERWRITING
141
Have Underwriting Losses Been Large Enough for Long Enough to Turn the Market?
141
142
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2012:Q1*
* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers 2008--2012. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010=102.4, 2011=108.2; 2012:Q1=99.0. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.
95.7
99.3100.8
106.4
97.6
101.0
92.6
100.898.4
100.1
107.5
115.8
90
100
110
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* 2012:Q1
Best Combined
Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)
As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out
Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned
Premiums
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net
Losses
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Avg. CAT Losses,
More Reserve Releases
Higher CAT
Losses, Shrinking Reserve
Releases, Toll of Soft
Market
Cyclical Deterioration
Lower CAT
Losses
Underwriting Gain (Loss)1975–2012:Q1*
* Includes mortgage and financial guaranty insurers in all years.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
Large Underwriting Losses Are NOT Sustainable in Current Investment Environment
-$55
-$45
-$35
-$25
-$15
-$5
$5
$15
$25
$35
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 11
Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through
2011 is $479B
($ Billions) Underwriting losses in
2011 totaled $36.5B, the
largest since 2001
145
2
(2)
(8)
(3)
(7)(10) (10)
(4)
(0)
11
24
15
119
(5)
(9)
(14)
(10) (11)(7)
(5)(2)
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$309
2
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
E
12
F
13
F
Pri
or
Yr.
Re
se
rve
Re
lea
se
($
B)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8 Imp
ac
t on
Co
mb
ine
d R
atio
(Po
ints
)
Prior Yr. ReserveDevelopment ($B)
Impact onCombined Ratio(Points)
P/C Reserve Development, 1992–2013F
Reserve Releases Remained Strong in 2010 But Tapered Off in 2011. Releases Are Expected to
Further Diminish in 2012 and 2103Note: 2005 reserve development excludes a $6 billion loss portfolio transfer between American Re and Munich Re. Including this transaction, total prior year adverse development in 2005 was $7 billion. The data from 2000 and subsequent years excludes development from financial guaranty and mortgage insurance. Sources: Barclays Capital; A.M. Best.
Prior year reserve releases totaled $8.8
billion in the first half of 2010, up from
$7.1 billion in the first half of 2009
Financial Strength & Underwriting
148
Cyclical Pattern is P-C Impairment History is Directly Tied to
Underwriting, Reserving & Pricing
148
P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–20118
15
12
71
19
34
91
31
21
99
16
14
13
36
49
31 3
45
04
85
56
05
84
12
91
61
23
11
8 19
49 50
47
35
18
14 15 16 1
9 21
34
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Source: A.M. Best Special Report “1969-2011 Impairment Review,” June 2012; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets
3 small insurers in Missouri did encounter
problems in 2011 following the May
tornado in Joplin. They were absorbed by a
larger insurer and all claims were paid.
149
150
P/C Insurer Impairment Frequency vs. Combined Ratio, 1969-2011
90
95
100
105
110
115
1206
97
07
17
27
37
47
57
67
77
87
98
08
18
28
38
48
58
68
78
88
99
09
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90
00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
91
01
1
Co
mb
ine
d R
ati
o
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Imp
airm
en
t Ra
te
Combined Ratio after Div P/C Impairment Frequency
Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
2011 impairment rate was 0.91%, up from 0.67% in 2010; the rate is slightly higher than the 0.82% average since 1969
Impairment Rates Are Highly Correlated With Underwriting Performance and Reached Record Lows in 2007; Recent Increase Was Associated
Primarily With Mortgage and Financial Guaranty Insurers and Not Representative of the Industry Overall
151
Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2010
3.6%4.0%
8.6%
7.3%
7.8%
7.1%
7.8%13.6%
40.3%
Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2010 Impairment Review, Special Report, April 2011.
Historically, Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing AreBy Far the Leading Cause of P-C Insurer Impairments.
Investment and Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role
Deficient Loss Reserves/Inadequate Pricing
Reinsurance Failure
Rapid GrowthAlleged Fraud
Catastrophe Losses
Affiliate Impairment
Investment Problems (Overstatement of Assets)
Misc.
Sig. Change in Business
153
Number of Recessions Endured by P/C Insurers, by Number of Years in Operation
32
27
20
13
8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1-50 51-75 76-100 101-125 126-150
Sources: Insurance Information Institute research from National Bureau of Economic Research data.
Number of Recessions Since 1860
Many US Insurers Are Close to a Century Old or Older
Number of Years in Operation
Insurers are true survivors—not just of natural catastrophes but also economic ones
153
154
Performance by Segment
154
Private Passenger Auto Combined Ratio: 1993–2012P
10
1.7
10
1.3
10
1.3
10
1.0
10
9.5
10
7.9
10
4.2
98
.4
94
.3
95
.1
95
.5 98
.3 10
0.2
10
1.3
10
1.0
10
0.8
10
0.3
99
.5 10
1.1
10
3.5
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11E 12F
Private Passenger Auto Accounts for 34% of Industry Premiums and Remains the Profit Juggernaut of the P/C Insurance Industry
Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2012F); Insurance Information Institute. 156
Homeowners Insurance Combined Ratio: 1990–2012F
11
3.0
11
7.7
15
8.4
11
3.6
10
1.0 10
9.4
10
8.2
11
1.4 1
21
.7
10
9.3
98
.2
94
.4 10
0.3
88
.9 95
.6
11
6.8
10
5.7
10
6.7
12
3.7
10
5.0
11
8.4
11
2.7 12
1.7
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11E12F
Homeowners Performance Deteriorated in 2011 Due to Large Cat Losses. Extreme Regional Variation Can Be Expected
Due to Local Catastrophe Loss Activity
Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2012E); Insurance Information Institute. 157
158
Homeowners Multi-Peril Loss & LAE Ratio, 2011:Highest 25 States
214.
8
182.
6
138.
8
126.
5
121.
1
118.
4
118.
4
113.
7
109.
6
106.
4
99.8
99.0
93.5
89.3
88.2
86.7
86.1
84.9
82.5
82.4
82.1
80.5
80.0
78.2
75.0
020
4060
80100
120140
160180
200220
TN AL KS MO IA CT NC AR SD WY OH AZ NJ MD PA IL WI GA NE MA IN UT SC OK MN
Loss
& L
AE
Rat
io (
%)
Sources: SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute.
TN and AL had the worst underwriting performance of all states in 2011 due to high
tornado and storm losses
159
Homeowners Multi-Peril Loss & LAE Ratio, 2011:Lowest 25 States
73.7
73.2
72.3
69.0
68.6
67.3
67.1
64.4
64.1
61.7
61.4
59.3
54.8
53.4
52.9
51.7
51.0
48.0
47.9
46.9
45.2
44.2
43.6
42.2
38.9
16.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
CO TX VA NM MS KY MT RI MI VT WV NY AK ND NH DE NV ID ME WA CA DC LA OR FL HI
Loss
& L
AE
Rat
io (%
)
Sources: SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute.
HI and FL had the best performance in 2011 due to the absence of
hurricanes/tropical storms impacts in either state last year
109.4110.2
118.8
109.5
112.5
110.2
107.6
104.1
109.7 110.2
102.5
105.4
91.2
94.8
101.299.5
101.0
107.5
102.0102.0
111.1112.3
122.3
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
P
12
F
Co
mm
erc
ial L
ine
s C
om
bin
ed
Ra
tio
*2007-2012 figures exclude mortgage and financial guaranty segments.Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
Commercial Lines Combined Ratio, 1990-2012F*
Commercial lines underwriting
performance in 2011 was the worst since 2002
160
Workers Compensation Combined Ratio: 1994–2012F
10
2.0
97
.0 10
0.0
10
1.0
11
0.9
11
0.0
10
7.0
10
2.7
98
.4 10
3.6
10
4.4 1
10
.6 11
6.8
11
5.0
11
6.01
21
.7
10
7.0
11
5.3
11
8.2
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11P 12F
Workers Comp Underwriting Results Are Deteriorating Markedly and the Worst They
Have Been in a DecadeSources: A.M. Best (1994-2010 all carriers); NCCI for 2011 (Private carriers only); 2012 (All Carriers) Insurance Information Institute. 167
2. SURPLUS/CAPITAL/CAPACITY
178
Have Large Global Losses Reduced Capacity in the Industry, Setting
the Stage for a Market Turn?
178
180
Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2012:Q1
Sources: ISO, A.M .Best.
($ Billions)
$487.1$496.6
$512.8$521.8
$478.5
$455.6
$437.1
$463.0
$490.8
$511.5
$540.7$530.5
$544.8
$559.2 $559.1
$538.6
$550.3
$570.7$566.5
$505.0$515.6$517.9
$420
$440
$460
$480
$500
$520
$540
$560
$580
06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4 11:Q1 11:Q2 11:Q3 11:Q4 12:Q1
2011:Q1Previous Surplus Peak
Quarterly Surplus Changes Since 2011:Q1 Peak
11:Q2: -$7.4B (-1.0%)11:Q3: -$27.9B (-4.6%)11:Q4: -$16.2B (-2.5%)12:Q1: +$3.2B (+0.7%)
Surplus as of 3/31/12 hit an all time record high of $570.7B, 0.7% or $3.2B
above the previous record set as of 3/31/11.
*Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business in early 2010.
The Industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.80 of NPW, close to the strongest claims-
paying status in its history.
Drop due to near-record 2011 CAT losses
187
3. REINSURANCE MARKET CONDITIONS
Record Global Catastrophes Activity is
Pressuring Pricing
187
189
Global Property Catastrophe Rate on Line Index, 1990—2012 (as of July 1)
15%
-3%
-13%
-8%
-20% -18% -1
1%
3%
14%
-11%
-6%
-9%
-16%
10%
-12%
-3%
7%
14%
76%
68%
25%
20%
0%
115
141
230
200184
147
121
152
255
233
195
215
184
196
133111
108
237
100
154
173
145
190
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Ye
ar
Ov
er
Ye
ar
% C
ha
ng
e in
RO
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Cu
mu
lativ
e R
ate
on
Lin
e (1
99
0=
10
0)
Year Over Year % Change
Cumulative Rate on Line Index
Sources: Guy Carpenter; Insurance Information Institute.
Property-Cat reinsurance pricing is up about 7% as of
7/1/12 but much more over the past 7-12 years—a cost that
must be reflected in LPI rates
4. RENEWED PRICING DISCIPLINE
191
Is There Evidence of a Broad and Sustained Shift in Pricing?
191
193
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Premium Growth Is Up Modestly: More in 2012?
(Percent)1975-78 1984-87 2000-03
Shaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline
Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33.
2012:Q1 growth
was +3.1%
194
Direct Premiums Written: All P/C Lines Percent Change by State, 2005-2010
44
.8
25
.4
19
.8
17
.3
16
.6
14
.2
13
.9
12
.4
12
.3
11
.9
9.1
8.1
8.1
7.1
6.8
5.4
5.2
4.7
3.8
3.7
3.1
3.0
1.5
1.2
1.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
ND
SD LA
WY
OK
WV
KS IA TX
MT
NE
DE
MS
NM SC
DC
UT
AR
NC ID WA
AL
WI
AK
TN
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute.
Top 25 States
North Dakota is the growth juggernaut of the P/C
insurance industry—too bad nobody lives there…
195
0.7
0.6
0.1
-0.1
-0.3
-0.5
-0.8
-1.4
-1.6
-1.7
-2.5
-2.8
-2.9
-3.4
-3.6
-4.1
-4.5
-4.7
-4.8
-5.7
-5.8
-8
-8.2
-8.3
-13
.5
-14
.2
-15
.5
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5M
D
MO
KY IN NY
GA
MN
VA
US
PA
OR FL IL CT
VT
OH RI
CO
NJ HI
ME
NH
MA
AZ
NV MI
CA
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: SNL Financial LC; Insurance Information Institute.
Bottom 25 States
States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of
the past 5 years
Direct Premiums Written: All P/C Lines Percent Change by State, 2005-2010
US Direct Premiums Written declined by 1.6% between 2005
and 2010
199
Average Commercial Rate Change,All Lines, (1Q:2004–2Q:2012)
-3.2
%-5
.9%
-7.0
%-9
.4%
-9.7
%-8
.2%
-4.6
% -2.7
%-3
.0%
-5.3
%-9
.6%
-11
.3%
-11
.8%
-13
.3%
-12
.0%
-13
.5%
-12
.9%
-11
.0%
-6.4
%-5
.1%
-4.9
%-5
.8%
-5.6
%-5
.3%
-6.4
%-5
.2%
-5.4
% -2.9
%
2.7
% 4.4
%4
.3%
-0.1
% 0.9
%
-0.1
%
-16%
-11%
-6%
-1%
4%
9%
1Q
04
2Q
04
3Q
04
4Q
04
1Q
05
2Q
05
3Q
05
4Q
05
1Q
06
2Q
06
3Q
06
4Q
06
1Q
07
2Q
07
3Q
07
4Q
07
1Q
08
2Q
08
3Q
08
4Q
08
1Q
09
2Q
09
3Q
09
4Q
09
1Q
10
2Q
10
3Q
10
4Q
10
1Q
11
2Q
11
3Q
11
4Q
11
1Q
12
2Q
12
Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute
KRW Effect
Pricing as of Q2:2012 was positive marking the first full
year of gains since 2003. Increases are holding steady in
2012.
(Percent)
Q2 2011 marked the 30th consecutive quarter of price
declines
200
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2012:Q2
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Barclay’s Capital; Insurance Information Institute.
Percentage Change (%)
Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6%
Peak = 2001:Q4 +28.5%
Pricing Turned Negative in Early
2004 and Remained that
way for 7 ½ years
KRW : No Lasting Impact
Pricing turned positive in Q3:2011, the first increase in
nearly 8 years; Q2:2012 renewals were up 4.3%
Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6%
202
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Line: 2012:Q2
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.
Major Commercial Lines Renewed Uniformly Upward in Q2:2012 for Only the Fourth Time Since 2003; Property Lines & Workers
Comp Leading the Way; Cat Losses and Low Interest Rates Provide Momentum Going Forward
Percentage Change (%)
4.7%5.1%
7.2%
8.3%
0.6%
3.0%3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 4.3%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
Su
rety
Co
mm
l Au
to
Um
bre
lla
Bu
sin
ess
Inte
rru
ptio
n
Ge
ne
ral
Lia
bili
ty
EP
L
D&
O
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
mm
erc
ial
Pro
pe
rty
Wo
rke
rsC
om
p
Workers Comp rate increases are large than any other line, followed
by Property lines
Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment
219
Is the Tort PendulumSwinging Against Insurers?
219
220
Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical, 1980-2013E
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12E
To
rt S
ys
tem
Co
sts
1.50%
1.75%
2.00%
2.25%
2.50%
To
rt Co
sts
as
% o
f GD
P
Tort Sytem Costs Tort Costs as % of GDP
($ Billions)
Sources: Towers Watson, 2011 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A
Tort costs in dollar terms have remained high but relatively stable
since the mid-2000s., but are down substantially as a share of GDP
Deepwater Horizon Spike
in 2010
1.68% of GDP in 2013
2.21% of GDP in 2003
= pre-tort reform peak
www.iii.org
Thank you for your timeand your attention!
Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwigDownload at www.iii.org/presentations
Insurance Information Institute Online:
230