Upload
cg
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
POSTERS
Table (abstract P163): T cell responses to HBV peptides
HBV peptide Proliferation (SI) IFNg SFU/M PBL IL-10 SFU/M PBL
Vacca cHBVb p-value Vacca cHBVb p-value Vacca cHBVb p-value
HBV-S 4.4 1.3 <0.0001 68 12 <0.0001 168 12 0.0001HBV-PreS 1.2 1.3 0.024 15 8 0.024 20 7 0.0065HBV-PreCore 1.5 1.1 0.005 30 12 0.005 102 13 0.0004HBV-Core 1.3 1.1 0.91 43 18 0.007 102 18 0.0001HBV-RT1 1.4 1.4 0.2930 25 15 0.0281 92 18 0.0016HBV-RT2 2.2 1.4 0.0284 28 15 0.0007 287 17 0.0001
*Vacc: 17 vaccinees; cHBV: 168 chronic hepatitis B participants in HBRN.
P163
IMMUNE CORRELATES OF VACCINE-MEDIATED PROTECTIVE
IMMUNITY VERSUS VIRAL PERSISTENCE IN HEPATITIS B VIRUS
INFECTION
J.-J. Park1,2, D.K. Wong3, A.S. Wahed4, W.M. Lee5, J.J. Feld3,
N. Terrault6, M. Khalili7, K.V. Kowdley8, D.T. Lau9, R.K. Sterling10,
W.R. Kim11, C. Smith12,13, R. Carithers14, D.L. Levine1,2, J. Keith1,2,
M.E. Valiga1,2, A.S.F. Lok15, K.-M. Chang1,2. 1University of Pennsylvania,2Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States;3University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 4University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA, 5Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University
of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 6Division of
Gastroenterology, 7University of California San Francisco, San
Francisco, CA, 8Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, 9Division
of Gastroenterology, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 10Virginia
Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 11Mayo Clinic Rochester,
Rochester, 12Mayo Clinic, 13University of Minnesota, Plymouth, MN,14University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, 15Division of
Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor,
MI, United States
E-mail: [email protected]
Background and Aims: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is cleared with
long-lasting antiviral T cell memory whereas HBV persists with
dysfunctional antiviral T cells. Recently, memory T cell responses
to HBV core and reverse transcriptase (RT) in vaccinated anti-HBc-
negative healthcare workers (Werner, Gastro 2013) suggested that
HBV vaccination is protective but not sterilizing. Here, we looked
for immune correlates of vaccine-mediated immunity relative to
immune dysregulation in chronic hepatitis B (cHBV).
Methods: Peripheral lymphocytes from 17 HBV vaccinees and 168
cHBV participants of the NIDDK-sponsored Hepatitis B Research
Network (HBRN) were analyzed for lymphoproliferation and
IFNg/IL10 production following stimulation with HBV peptide pools
(S, preS, preC, Core, RT) and immune phenotype by multi-color
FACS. Statistical analyses included Mann Whitney U and Fisher’s
Exact or Chi-square.
Results: HBV-vaccinees displayed greater proliferative, IFNg+
and IL10+ T cell responses to S (included in HBV vaccine)
and non-S antigens (not included in HBV vaccine) as shown
below. HBV-vaccinees displayed both CD4 and CD8 T cell
responses to HBV-RT suggestive of immune induction during
HBV infection in-vivo. Compared to vaccinees, cHBV participants
displayed increased %Foxp3+/CD4+ Tregs (p = 0.017), reduced
%CD56+CD16− NK-cells (p = 0.0001) and reduced %mDC (p =0.004)
with differential expression in activating, inhibitory and/or
costimulatory molecules.
Conclusions: HBV-specific T cells in HBV-vaccinees show greater
virus-specific proliferation and IFNg as well as IL-10 production
compared to cHBV participants who display differential immune
regulatory phenotype. T cell response to HBV non-S antigens in
HBV vaccinees also suggest protective but non-sterilizing vaccine-
mediated immunity.
P164
MONOCYTE EXHAUSTION: A MECHANISTIC EXPLANATION FOR
SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INFECTION IN LIVER FAILURE
C. Bernsmeier1, V. Patel1, R. Tidswell1, E. Triantafyllou1,
A. Singanayagam1, W. Khamri2, K. Agarwal1, M. Heneghan1,
C. Willars1, W. Bernal1, G. Auzinger1, Y. Ma1, M. Thursz2,
J. Wendon1, C.G. Antoniades1,2. 1Institute of Liver Studies, King’s
College Hospital, 2Section of Hepatology, St. Mary’s Hospital, Imperial
College London, London, United Kingdom
E-mail: [email protected]
Background and Aims: Monocyte dysfunction is postulated to
account for the marked predisposition to infection and high
mortality in acute (ALF) and acute-on-chronic (ACLF) liver failure.
Defective fractalkine (CX3CR1–CX3CL1) signaling is associated with
impaired monocyte responses to microbial challenge, migration and
survival. We sought to determine monocyte function in relation to
CX3CR1/CX3CL1 expression in patients with liver failure.
Methods: Using flow cytometry, immunophenotyping (CD32,
CD64, CD86, CD163, CD206, HLA-DR, CX3CR1, CCR2/5) and
functional responses (phagocytosis [E. coli/S. aureus]; oxidative
burst [E. coli], LPS-induced TNF-a/IL-6 secretion) of circulating
monocytes (CD14+CD16−; CD14++CD16+; CD14−CD16+) were assessed
in patients with ACLF (n =35), ALF (n =24) cirrhosis (n = 8) and
healthy-controls (n = 23). CX3CL1 serum levels were measured
using ELISA.
Results: Monocytes in ALF and ACLF patients display an anti-
inflammatory phenotype: CD163high/HLA-DRlow/CX3CR1low. CX3CR1
expression is significantly down-regulated (ALF, 1746 vs. 549.5
mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), p = 0.0001 / ACLF, 1746 vs. 243
MFI, p < 0.0001) affecting all monocyte subsets with concomitantly
elevated circulating CX3CL1 levels (p = 0.0004/p =0.0010). In
ALF/ACLF patients, CX3CR1low monocytes exhibited an array of
innate functional defects: (i) significant reductions in phagocytosis
of E. coli and S. aureus (p = 0.0009/ p =0.0083 and p=0.0257/
p =0.0373) and (ii) oxidative burst responses to phagocytosed
E. coli (p = 0.0018/0.0835), (iii) impaired dynamic pathogen uptake
of E. coli (AUC, p = 0.0129/ p =0.0091) and (iv) attenuated TNF-a and
IL-6 secretion in response to LPS (p =0.0041/ p =0.0001; p =0.0053/
p =0.0187) (see figure).
Conclusions: In liver failure, we demonstrate that circulating
monocytes exhibit functional “exhaustion” leading to impaired
pathogen clearance and responses to microbial challenge. Further
studies are required to evaluate the role of defective CX3CR1–
CX3CL1 interaction in monocyte homing to tissue sites of infection.
S120 Journal of Hepatology 2014 vol. 60 | S67–S214
POSTERS
0 30 600
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
min.incubation
ΔM
FI
Healthy
ALF*
*
0 30 600
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
min.incubation
ΔM
FI
Healthy
ACLF*
*
Healthy ACLF ALF
0
1000
2000
3000
MF
I
***
n=11 n=19 n=14
***
monocy
tes
CD14
+CD16
-
CD14
+CD16
+
CD14
lowCD16
+0
5000
10000
15000
MF
I
Healthy ALF0
20
40
60
80
100
% o
f c
ells
**
n=21 n=22
Healthy ACLF Cirrhotics0
20
40
60
80
100
% o
f c
ells
p=0.0835 ns
n=21 n=34 n=8
**
ALF ACLF Healthy
0
20
40
60
80
100
% o
f c
ells
p=0.0009
n=20 n=22 n=15
p=0.0083
ALF ACLF healthy
0
20
40
60
80
100
% o
f c
ells
n=14 n=19 n=16
p=0.0257
p=0.0373
E.coli S.aureusA
B
C
D
Healthy cirrhotics ACLF
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
MF
I m
ed
ian
TNF
n=7 n=8n=5
****
Healthy ALF0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
MF
I m
ed
ian
TNF
n=7 n=4
**
Healthy cirrhotics ACLF
0
1000
2000
3000
MF
I m
ed
ian
IL-6
n=8 n=8n=5
ns*
Healthy ALF0
1000
2000
3000
MF
I m
ed
ian
IL-6
n=8 n=4
**
ALF ACLF
ALF ACLF
ALF ACLFE CX3CR1 CX3CR1
Figure (abstract P164): Monocytes from patients with acute (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) exhibit diverse functional defects and lowCX3CR1 expression. (A) Phagocytosis capacity of E. coli and S. aureus; (B) dynamics of phagocytosis (E. coli); (C) oxidative burst; (D) LPS-induced cytokinesecretion (TNF-a/IL-6); (E) CX3CR1 expression.
P165
CD4+ T CELLS INDUCE LIVER DAMAGE AFTER ADENOVIRAL
INFECTION OF HEPATOCYTES
M. Wittlich1, V. Staudt2, T. Bopp2, E. Schmitt2, P.A. Knolle1,3,
D. Wohlleber1. 1Institutes for Molecular Medicine and Experimental
Immunology (IMMEI), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, 2Institute for
Immunology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 3Institute
of Molecular Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Munich,
Germany
E-mail: [email protected]
Background and Aims: CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTL) are capable of
releasing TNF and inducing apoptosis of infected hepatocytes after
cross-presentation of viral antigen by liver sinusoidal endothelial
cells (LSEC). This novel non-canonical CTL effector function
accounts for about 40% of the antiviral effector function. CD4+ T
cells in turn are reported to be necessary for an efficient licensing
of dendritic cells and priming of CD8+ T cells. But since especially
Th1 cells are a source of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, they
could be able to induce liver damage in viral infection. To investigate
if CD4+ Th1 cells possess a non-canonical effector function, we used
a similar model.
Methods: Mice were infected with a recombinant hepatotropic
adenovirus, which primarily infects hepatocytes and expresses
ovalbumin, followed by adoptive transfer of in vitro differentiated
CD4+ T cells. Protein fragments of ovalbumin can be presented to
the OVA-specific H2-Ab1 (I-Ab)-restricted T helper cells.
Results: Our findings support the ability of Th1 differentiated cells
to induce liver damage, whereas Th2 differentiated cells, incapable
of producing TNF, could not induce a comparable ALT elevation.
This effect of Th1 cells is furthermore dependent on the amount of
transferred cells.
Conclusions: Th1 cells have a new non-canonical effector function
that is based on the secretion of TNF, since Th2 cells didn’t induce
comparable effects. Future experiments will elucidate if other T
helper cells with the potential to produce inflammatory cytokines
such as TNF, e.g. Th17 cells, are also capable of inducing liver injury
and possess an antiviral activity.
P166
A COACH, A PLAYMAKER, A DEFENDER AND STRIKERS:
AN EPIGENETIC-TARGET INTERPLAY IN HCV/HCC
M.M. Fouad1, N.M. Elemam1, H.B. Sherif1, S.A. El Sobky1,
R.A. Yacoub1, A.K. Abelhamid1, T. Elbaz2, M.A. Mohey El Din2,
I.O. Fawzy1, H.M. El Tayebi1, N. El-Ekiaby1, R.Y. Mekky1, G. Esmat2,
A.I. Abdelaziz1. 1The Molecular Pathology Research Group, German
University in Cairo, 2Department of Endemic Medicine and Hepatology,
Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
E-mail: [email protected]
Background and Aims: PU.1 is a key regulator modulating the
expression of numerous cell surface receptors in hematopoietic
cells. NKG2A is an inhibitory receptor, while NKG2D is an activating
Journal of Hepatology 2014 vol. 60 | S67–S214 S121