View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1
Page 2
First Page :
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum."
Prepared by:
Hanan Radi Hala El_Shorafa Kholoud Thabet Rania Nassar
Supervised by: Dr. Hatem El_ AidyDiscussed by : Dr. Basel Hamad
Page 3
Page 4
Introduction Objective Heating water types Solar water heating system Motion of the sun Hardware design Software design Simulation and results Conclusion Recommendation and future outcomes
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Statistical
30 houses in Nusseirat area were surveyed on what methods they used for water heating. All of these houses owned a solar water heating system; in addition to an electrical tankless heaters.
Page 9
In the same specified area we found that people suffer four times a week from power outage.
The table shows a model of weekly power outage for the Nusseirat area.
Page 10
Weekly power outage schedule
TimesDays
8 am : 2 pm 2 pm : 10 pm
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Page 11
Fixed Solar system:
The installation of solar waterheating has become the norm in Gaza Strip since 1980’s.
Page 12
Problem:
The mirrors do not move, and the peak energy reach at noon where the sun is perpendicular on the mirrors. But at night time this system is idle.
Page 13
Solution:
For developing the solar system and making it more efficient in heating water.
A new sun tracking system is proposed.
Page 14
Tracking solar system:
The idea is to make this system more efficient by supply peak energy at all the times. This means that the sun is always perpendicular on the mirrors.
Page 15
Tracker types:
1.Single axis trackers
2.Dual axis trackers
a Tip – tilt dual axis tracker (TTDAT)
b Azimuth-Altitude dual axis tracker
(AADAT)
Page 16
Geographical Location
• The climate of a place depends on its geographical location.
• The geographical location depends on:
1. Latitude
2. Longitude
Page 17
Page 18
Astronomical Location of the Sun
The basic position of the sun at any instant can be described by two angles: 1. The azimuth angle
2. The altitude angle
Page 19
1. Azimuth angle
The solar azimuth angle is the angular distance between due South and the projection of the line of sight to the sun on the ground.
Page 20
cos (AZ) = (sin (Al) * sin (L) - sin (D)) / (cos (Al) * cos (L))
Where:
AZ = Solar azimuth angleAl = Solar altitude angleL = Latitude D = Declination
Page 21
2. Altitude angle The altitude angle describes how high the sun appears in the sky.
Page 22
sin (Al) = [cos (L) * cos (D) * cos (H)] + [sin (L) * sin (D)]
Where:
Al = Solar altitude angle.L = Latitude D = Declination H = Hour angle.
Page 23
1. Electrical circuits
2. Mechanical implementation
Page 24
1. Electrical circuits:
Power circuit
Control circuit
Driver circuit
Page 25
Controller Motors
Mirror
Outputref.
Page 26
Power circuit
Page 27
Control circuit:
Keypad Microcontroller LCD
DS1307 74LS244
Page 28
Keypad Microcontroller LCD
DS1307 74LS244
Page 29
1. DS1307
• Real-Time Clock (RTC) Counts Seconds,Minutes, Hours, Date of the Month, Month,Day of the week, and Year with Leap-Year
• 56-Bytes, with NV SRAM.
Page 30
• I2C Serial Interface
• Battery - backed
• Consumes Less than 500nA in Battery-Backup Mode with Oscillator Running
Page 31
Typical operation circuit
Page 32
b 74LS244 ( 3-state buffer)
2. 74LS244 ( 3-state buffer)
• In digital electronics 3-state logic allows an output port to assume a high impedance state in addition to the 0 and 1 logic levels
• Active-low input called OE (Output Enable)
Page 33
L = LOW logic level
H = HIGH logic level
Z = High impedance
Page 34
Three-state buffers can also be used to implement efficient multiplexers especially those with large numbers of inputs.
Page 35
For two stepper motor, using 74LS244 to select the motor which must rotate.
Page 36
Page 37
Driver circuit
• The SLA7024M is designed for high-performance operation of 2-phase, Unipolar stepper motors .
• This driver is most important for limiting and regulating the input current to the stepper motors.
Page 38
Page 39
How the stepper motor can turn left and right??
For half step operation for stepper motor the truth table of SLA7024M is shown in the table
Page 40
0 0 1 0 = 0xF21 0 0 0 = 0xF8
1 0 1 0 = 0xFA
Page 41
2. Mechanical design
• Our system is designed to have dual axis that connected with two stepper motors.
• The size of the load mirror is (35*35cm).
• Using limit switch.
Page 42
Stepper motor
The motor's position can be controlled precisely without any feedback mechanism (Open-loop controller).
Page 43
For solar system using unipolar stepper motor than other types of motors
a.Unipolar stepper motor than bipolar
b. Unipolar stepper motor than servo motor
Page 44
a. Unipolar stepper motor than bipolar
A unipolar stepper motor has two windings per phase, one for each direction of magnetic field. It can be reversed without switching the direction of current.
Page 45
Other hands, bipolar motors have a single winding per phase. The current in a winding needs to be reversed in order to reverse a magnetic pole, so the driving circuit must be more complicate.
Page 46
b. Unipolar stepper motor than servo motor
Servomotors require analog feedback control systems of some type. Typically, this involves a potentiometer to provide feedback about the rotor position.
Stepper motors can be used in simple open-loop control systems.
Page 47
Calibration
For high precision required in the angle were used a half step operation than full step, for normal unipolar full step have 1.8°, so for half step is 1.8°/2 = 0.9°. As is well known that the full period have 360°.
Page 48
To find out the number of turns which must be the motor full cycle of rotation:
1.For full period
360/0.9 = 400 steps
2. The half stepper operation from its truth table must rotate 8 steps for full turn, so, the numbers of turns for motors to have full cycle is
400/8 = 50 turns .
Page 49
• For the altitude angle, the vertical axis from the experiment at this axis was found that for every 1.5 turns have 1°, so, to know angle which the full turns make
Al angle = (50 turn * 1°) / 1.5 turn
Page 50
• For the azimuth angle, from experiment at the horizontal axis, for every 1 turn have 1°.
Az angle = (50 turn * 1°) / 1 turn
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
1. Keypad
In solar system simulation by proteus using 3*4 keys matrix as shown in the figure.
3*4 keypad
Page 54
In hardware implementation using 4*4 keypad because of motors functions.
4*4 keypad
Page 55
2. Microcontroller (PIC18F4620)
The advantages of PIC18F4620:-
• Program memory 64 Kbytes.• Data memory SRAM 3968 bytes.• Data memory EEPROM 1024 bytes.• CPU up to 10 MIPS • 8 x 8 Single-Cycle Hardware Multiplier
Page 56
Page 57
3. LCD
2*20 LCD is used as shown in the figure
Page 58
Page 59
Solar LCD messages
Page 60
After building hardware system, from the response of the system, we observe many errors that are differences between the hardware values and the actual values from data base, and mechanical design error.
Page 61
Software errors
1. Differences in Sunrise and sunsetTable (5-1) Sunrise, sunset values
Page 62
Sun rise(data)
Sun rise (simulation)
difference Error percentage
6:31 6:32 0.01 0.15 %
6:31 6:31 0.00 0.00%
6:30 6:30 0.00 0.00%
6:29 6:29 0.00 0.00%
6:28 6:28 0.00 0.00%
6:27 6:28 0.01 0.15 %
6:27 6:27 0.00 0.00%
To calculate the percentage error for one value at 6/2/2011 let:Error percentage = [(theoretical value – practical value) / theoretical] * 100%(6:31 – 6:32) / 6:31 = 0.15 %
Page 63
Sun set(data)
Sun set (simulation)
difference Error percentage
5:22 5:21 0.01 0.19 %
5:22 5:22 0.00 0.00%
5:23 5:23 0.00 0.00%
5:24 5:24 0.00 0.00%
5:25 5:25 0.00 0.00%
5:26 5:26 0.00 0.00%
5:27 5:26 0.01 0.19 %
Page 64
2. Differences in angles value
Page 65
Altitude
(data base)
Altitude
(simulation)
difference Error percentage
35.27 35.25 0.02 0.05%
41.08 41.06 0.02 0.05%
43.03 43.03 0.00 0.00%
40.67 40.67 0.00 0.00%
34.54 34.54 0.00 0.00%
25.73 25.73 0.00 0.00%
15.20 15.20 0.00 0.00%
Page 66
Azimuth
(data base)
Azimuth
(simulation)
difference Error percentage
144.84 144.76 0.08 0.05%
161.70 161.61 0.09 0.05%
-178.99 -179.06 0.07 0.04%
-159.82 -159.89 0.07 0.04%
-143.27 -143.34 0.07 0.04%
-130.01 -130.08 0.07 0.05%
-119.44 -119.51 0.07 0.05%
Page 67
Hardware errors
As known practical results are not always as accurate as the theoretical results, after we build the mechanical model we noted that the azimuth angle began at approximately 120° and ideally it must begin at 90° so there’s 30° as error.
Page 68
• The problem is the power cut.
• The solution is to convert fixed solar system to movable one.
• Using microcontroller to program all equations to find the two angles.
•Using stepper motor to achieve the exact position.
Page 69
• Using photovoltaic cells ( solar cells ) in our system instead of the mirror because of it's ability to produce direct current electricity from sun light, which is solve the problem of electricity cut off.
Page 70
• For large system, using servo motor instead of stepper.
• In power station generation, using PLC than microcontroller.
Page 71