pdfft(3)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    1/10

    FOODHYDROCOLLOIDS

    Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123

    Impact of a thermal treatment on the emulsifying properties of egg yolk.

    Part 2: Effect of the environmental conditions

    Fabien Guilmineau, Ulrich Kulozik

    Technische Universitat Munchen, Chair for Food Process Engineering and Dairy Technology, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, 85354 Freising, Germany

    Received 25 July 2005; accepted 8 December 2005

    Abstract

    The protein solubility and emulsifying properties of native and heat-treated egg yolk (EY) suspensions were investigated in various

    environmental conditions. Four distinct conditions were tested by combining two levels of pH, namely pH 4.0 and 6.5, and two levels of

    ionic strength, namely 0.15 and 0.52 M NaCl, in a model oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion containing 30% oil (v/v). Although the protein

    solubility was greatly reduced by the thermal denaturation in all tested environmental conditions, the average size of oil droplets

    obtained in emulsions made with heated EY was observed to be either similar or slightly smaller than that obtained with native EY,

    depending on the environmental conditions. Using heat-treated EY rather than native EY led to a significant increase of the interfacial

    protein concentration in all environmental conditions. This increased interfacial protein concentration was shown to have a major impact

    on the flocculation behaviour of the emulsions, as well as on their rheological properties and stability to creaming. Hypotheses regarding

    the mechanisms by which insoluble protein aggregates stabilise O/W emulsions at various pH and ionic strengths are discussed.

    r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Egg yolk; Protein denaturation; Emulsifying properties; Environment

    1. Introduction

    Egg yolk (EY) is a reference food emulsifier used in

    many applications ranging from bakery products to salad

    dressings. Commercial EY is routinely pasteurised at

    temperatures between 60 and 68 1C in order to ensure its

    microbiological safety (Cunningham, 1995). Applying

    more severe thermal treatment conditions would allow to

    extend the shelf life of EY and further reduce the risk of

    microbial spoilage. But the impact of an increased degree

    of thermal denaturation of the heat sensitive EY proteins

    on the emulsifying properties of this key functionalingredient is not well understood. In the first part of this

    work we have used dilute EY suspensions to study the

    impact of the heat treatment intensity on the emulsifying

    properties of EY (Guilmineau&Kulozik, submitted). This

    work has notably shown that the interfacial concentration

    of proteins at the O/W interface was significantly increased

    with an increasing degree of protein denaturation. This was

    shown to allow a significant decrease of the flocculation in

    O/W emulsions made with denatured EY, and significantly

    impacted the rheological properties and stability of the

    emulsions obtained. This work was, however, carried out

    on a model emulsion using constant environmental

    conditions, namely a pH of 6.5 and an ionic strength (IS)

    corresponding to 0.52 M NaCl. But the many applications

    of EY in industrial food products cover a much wider

    range of pH and ionic strengths, varying with the

    formulation of the products. The environmental conditionshave been shown to have a significant impact on the

    physico-chemical and emulsifying properties of EY and its

    components (Aluko & Mine, 1998; Anton & Gandemer,

    1999;Le Denmat, Anton, &Beaumal, 2000; Mine, 1998).

    Fresh EY has a pH of about 6.2 and an IS of about 0.17 M

    NaCl (Anton, 1998). In these natural conditions, EY is

    constituted of a continuous aqueous phase containing

    about 80% of the total dry matter and referred to as

    plasma, and insoluble denser structures with a size ranging

    from 0.3 to 2 mm referred to as granules. EY plasma

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhyd

    0268-005X/$ - see front matterr 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.12.006

    Corresponding author. Tel.: +49(0)8161 71 3535;

    fax: +49(0)8161 71 4384.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (U. Kulozik).

    http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhydhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhyd
  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    2/10

    contains globular glycoproteins known as a-, b-, and g-

    livetins, as well as the low-density lipoproteins (LDL),

    which apoproteins are called lipovitellenins. Granules

    contain a phosphoprotein known as phosvitin, as well as

    the high-density lipoproteins (HDL), which apoproteins

    are called lipovitellins (Burley & Vadehra, 1989). Upon

    increase of the IS to values above 0.3 M, granules dissociatebecause of the rupture of the phosphocalcic bridges

    between lipovitellins and phosvitins (Causeret, Matringe,

    & Lorient, 1991). This is a major change of the EY

    microstructure driven by the environmental conditions.

    Partial disruption of EY granules by mechanical shear

    forces has also been observed, leading to the formation of

    granule fragments, notably during high pressure homo-

    genisation (Anton, Beaumal, & Gandemer, 2000). Most

    salad dressings are prepared at a pH around 4.0 by

    addition of acetic and/or citric acid, which contributes to

    the products characteristic taste and inhibits growth of

    most microorganisms (Ford, Borwankar, Pechak, &

    Schwimmer, 2004). This makes this value of low pH a

    particularly relevant one when it gets to studying the

    behaviour of EY in model food emulsions.

    In this work, model oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions

    containing 30% (v/v) sunflower oil were prepared within

    a range of pH and IS most commonly occurring in food

    emulsions. The impact of two levels of pH, namely pH 4.0

    and 6.5, and two levels of IS, namely 0.15 and 0.55 M

    NaCl, on the emulsifying properties of EY was studied.

    The objective of this work is to compare the behaviour of

    non-heated (native) EY to that of heat-treated EY in the

    various environmental conditions defined above. The level

    of protein denaturation used for the heat-treated EY washigher than that normally reached with industrial EY

    pasteurisation, and was chosen based on the results

    obtained in the first part of this study (Guilmineau &

    Kulozik, submitted). The solubility of EY proteins as well

    as the key characteristics of the emulsions such as particle

    size distribution, flocculation and interfacial protein con-

    centration were investigated. Hypothesis regarding the

    colloidal interactions taking place between oil droplets in

    the various environmental conditions studied are discussed.

    2. Material and methods

    2.1. Preparation and heating of an EY suspension

    Freshly laid eggs from Lohman Tradition hens were

    collected from the Universitys research farm (Thalhausen)

    and used within 48h after collection. A suspension

    containing 20% (w/w) pure EY in an isotonic NaCl

    solution (i.e. 0.17 M NaCl) is prepared as described by

    Guilmineau and Kulozik (submitted): it is referred to as the

    native EY20.

    2.1.1. Thermal treatment of the EY20 suspension

    Native EY20 was heated as described by Guilmineau

    and Kulozik (submitted) with a holding time of 12 min at

    74 1C: we obtained the heated EY20. Because of the

    dilution of the native EY prior to heating, the heated

    suspension remained fluid despite the intense heat treat-

    ment. Heated EY could therefore be used just as easily as

    native EY to prepare O/W emulsions.

    2.2. Preparation of emulsions

    2.2.1. Preparation of the continuous phase

    The continuous phase was prepared by diluting EY20

    (native or heated) so as to obtain a concentration of 1.12%

    (w/w) EY dry matter. Dilutions were made either in an

    aqueous NaCl solution (not buffered) or in a 0.01M

    acetate buffer (Sodium acetate trihydrate/acetic acid) at

    pH 4.0, containing NaCl so as to obtain a concentration

    of either 0.15 or 0.52 M in the final continuous phase.

    The continuous phases prepared without buffer were

    measured to have an average pH of 6.4970.04 and the

    ones made with the acetate buffer had an average pH of

    4.0370.05.

    All continuous phases were allowed to equilibrate under

    mild agitation (magnetic stirrer) for 30 min before the

    production of the emulsion. Commercial refined sunflower

    oil was used to prepare the emulsions (Cereol Deutschland

    GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). A pre-emulsion with a

    dispersed phase volume fraction j 0:3 was prepared by

    pouring 180 ml of sunflower oil in 420 ml continuous phase

    while mixing with a dispersing system model Ultra Turrax

    T25 (IKA Werke, Staufen, Germany) equipped with an

    18 mm diameter toothed-disc dispersing tool (model

    S25KR-18G) at 8000 rpm. The oil was added over the

    course of 1 min and the agitation was maintained for afurther minute in order to obtain a homogeneous pre-

    emulsion. The median oil droplet diameter in the pre-

    emulsion was measured to be about d50,31316mm

    throughout the trial period. The pre-emulsion was then

    further emulsified by passing it once through the first stage

    of a high-pressure homogeniser model APV 1000 (Invensys

    APV, Albertslund, Denmark) at a pressure of 200 bars and

    a temperature of 25 1C.

    2.3. Characterisation of the EY suspension and emulsions

    2.3.1. Protein solubility

    The solubility of proteins in the EY samples was assessed

    using the method published by Morr et al. (1985)with the

    following modification. Samples of each of the four

    continuous phases prepared as described in Section 2.2

    (two pH and IS levels) were equilibrated under mild

    agitation at 20 1C for 1 h. An aliquote of each suspension

    was kept for total protein content measurement (Pt), and

    the rest was centrifuged twice at 19,000gfor 20 min in order

    to separate the insoluble proteins. An aliquote of the

    supernatant containing the soluble proteins was also

    analysed for protein content (Ps). The protein content

    was determined using the colorimetric method of Mark-

    well, Hass, Bieber, and Tolbert (1978). The percentage of

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1115

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    3/10

    solubility was determined as given in Eq. (1) below.

    Solubility% Ps

    Pt 100. (1)

    2.3.2. Particle size distribution and flocculation

    measurementAll particle size measurements were carried out using a

    laser diffraction spectroscope model LS230 (Beckman-

    Coulter, Germany). Details of the method used are given

    byGuilmineau and Kulozik (submitted).

    2.3.3. Stability to creaming

    The stability to creaming is measured by following the

    formation of a clear droplet-free phase at the bottom of

    a sample of emulsion, using a light scattering optical

    analyser model Turbiscan MA1000 (Formulaction,

    France). All details regarding the determination of the

    initial creaming rate and relative height of the cream layer

    formed during 1 week of storage at 10 1C are given byGuilmineau and Kulozik (submitted).

    2.3.4. Rheological characterisation of the emulsions

    A controlled shear rate rheometer model Rheomat 115

    equipped with a double-gap geometry model MS 0/115

    (Contraves GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was used. The

    details of the method used are given by Guilmineau and

    Kulozik (submitted).

    2.3.5. Interfacial protein concentration

    The method used in this study to separate the oil droplets

    from the continuous phase of the emulsions was adaptedfromPatton and Huston (1986). All details of the method

    used are described by Guilmineau and Kulozik (sub-

    mitted).

    2.3.6. Zeta-potential measurements

    Zeta potential was measured by a laser light-scattering

    technique using a Zetasizer Nano-Z model ZEN 2600

    (Malvern Instruments, Herrenberg, Germany). The drift

    velocity of oil droplets placed in an electric field is

    accurately determined from the Doppler shift of the light

    scattered by the moving droplets. The emulsions were

    diluted 10,000 fold (v/v) in a buffer solution corresponding

    to their continuous phase (same pH and NaCl concentra-

    tion). All measurements were carried out at a constant

    temperature of 25 1C.

    2.3.7. Statistical analysis

    Three replicates were carried out on three different

    weeks. Oil droplet size distribution, flocculation, rheologi-

    cal properties, stability, interfacial protein concentration

    and zeta-potential were measured each time twice. These

    parameters were subjected to a one-way analysis of

    variance using Statgraphics software (Statistical Graphics

    Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA) with a confidence level

    of 95% (po0:

    05). A multiple range test was used to

    determine which means are significantly different from

    others.

    3. Results

    The solubility of native EY protein is significantlyimpacted by the pH and IS (Fig. 1). The protein solubility

    is lowest at pH 4, independently from the IS. At pH 6.5,

    virtually all proteins are soluble at an IS of 0.52 M NaCl,

    whereas only about two thirds are soluble at low IS (0.15 M

    NaCl). The protein solubility in heated EY is always much

    lower than in native EY. The influence of the environ-

    mental conditions follows the same trend with heated EY

    as with the native one. Thus, protein solubility in heated

    EY is also maximum at pH 6.5 and high IS, and minimal

    at pH 4.

    Le Denmat et al. (2000) have shown that in native EY,

    plasma proteins have a very high solubility over a wide

    range of pH and IS. On the other hand, granules wereshown to be insoluble at a pH of 3, and only partially

    soluble in the physicochemical conditions occuring in

    native EY (i.e. pH of 6.5 and IS of 0.15 M NaCl). Our

    results are consistent with those presented byLe Denmat et

    al. (2000)regarding the solubility of EY proteins. The low

    solubility measured at pH 4 is explained by the insolubility

    of granules at this low pH (Fig. 1). At a pH of 6.5 and

    0.15 M NaCl, granules are mostly insoluble because their

    constituents are aggregated via Ca2+ bridging between

    negatively charged phosphoserine residues of HDL and

    phosvitin (Causeret et al., 1991). Increasing the IS from

    0.15 to 0.55 M NaCl leads to the disruption of phospho-calcic bridges resulting from the displacement of divalent

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Proteinsolu

    bility(%)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 40.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 1. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the solubility of proteins

    in native (non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) EY suspensions.

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231116

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    4/10

    Ca2+ cations by an excess of monovalent Na+. This

    induces the dissociation of granules, and therefore an

    increased level of protein solubility.

    The lower levels of protein solubility measured in heated

    EY suspensions reflect the denaturation of some EY

    proteins which associate to form insoluble protein aggre-

    gates (see Guilmineau & Kulozik, submitted). In heatedsamples at a pH of 6.5, an increase of the IS from 0.15 to

    0.55 M also leads to an increase of the level of solubility

    from 25% to 37%. This indicates that some granule

    proteins are still native after the heat treatment, and can

    therefore still be dissociated by addition of NaCl. This is

    consistent with observations that granule proteins are more

    resistant to heat than plasma proteins (Anton, Le Denmat,

    & Gandemer, 2000; Le Denmat, Anton, & Gandemer,

    1999).

    The median oil droplet diameter obtained in O/W

    emulsions prepared with native and heated EY is

    significantly influenced by the environmental conditions

    (Fig. 2). The smallest droplets are formed at a pH of 6.5

    and an IS of 0.52 M NaCl, whereas the largest are formed

    at a pH of 4 and an IS of 0.15 M NaCl. The heat treatment

    seems to have a rather small impact on the size of oil

    droplets achieved, except at a pH of 4 and a low IS

    where heated EY allows to obtain much smaller droplets as

    native EY.

    The interfacial protein concentration in emulsions

    prepared with native EY is significantly higher at a pH of

    6.5 than at a pH of 4 (Fig. 3). The IS does not seem to

    influence the interfacial protein load at pH 6.5, but at pH 4

    the interfacial load is lower at an IS of 0.52 M NaCl than at

    an IS of 0.15 M NaCl. On the other hand, when heated EY

    is used, the interfacial protein concentration is much higher

    than when native EY is used, under all conditions tested.

    Moreover, there does not seem to be any negative impact

    of the environmental conditions on the interfacial proteinload, since the differences measured between the various

    conditions tested are not significant.

    The zeta-potential of oil droplets in the emulsion is

    significantly impacted by the environmental conditions

    (Fig. 4). Droplets carry a positive charge at a pH of 4 and a

    negative one at a pH of 6.5. Increasing the concentration of

    NaCl at a pH of 4 leads to a decrease of the zeta-potential,

    which is due to the enhanced screening of the adsorbed

    proteins positive charges by negative counter ions.

    However, at a pH of 6.5, increasing the IS leads to an

    increase of the negative zeta-potential, despite the increased

    screening by positive ions from the dissolved NaCl. This

    suggests that the negative charge density of the interface is

    greatly increased by the addition of NaCl, in a way, which

    more than compensates the screening effect. This may be

    due to an increased adsorption of the strongly negative

    phosvitin, following the dissociation of granules taking

    place at high pH and IS.

    A heat treatment of the EY did not have any significant

    impact on the zeta-potential obtained at the oil droplet

    surface, regardless of the environmental conditions.

    The values of zeta-potential obtained with native EY are

    consistent with measurements from Le Denmat et al.

    (2000). The zeta-potential does not exceed 10 mV in all

    environmental conditions tested, which is always well

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    mediandrople

    tdiameterd50.3

    (m)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 40.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 2. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the median oil droplet

    diameter (d50.3) achieved in O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-

    heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    Interfacialproteinload[mg

    .m-2]

    Native

    Heated

    pH 40.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 3. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the interfacial protein

    concentration measured in O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-

    heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1117

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    5/10

    below the 20 mV evaluated by Friberg (1997) to produce

    effective electrostatic stabilisation. The charge of the

    interface changes from a slightly positive charge at pH

    4.0 to a slightly negative one at pH 6.5, which is consistent

    with the expected variation of EY protein charges when

    predicted from their isoelectric points.

    Adsorption of heated EY proteins did not affect thecharge of the interfacial film. Similar observations were

    made with caseins, for which it was reported that a change

    in the geometry of the protein had relatively small effects

    upon the zeta-potential of the emulsion droplets (Dalgleish,

    1999). This suggests that despite the increased proportion

    of denatured proteins present at the interface, the adsorbed

    layer adopts a conformation, which maintains the same

    charge density as the proteins in the native form.

    Both the environmental conditions and a heat treatment

    were measured to have a very significant impact on the

    flocculation of oil droplets (Fig. 5). The flocculation factor

    of emulsions prepared with native EY is always higher than

    that of emulsions prepared with heated EY, at all

    environmental conditions tested. With native EY, the IS

    seems to drive the flocculation, whereby a high IS leads to

    the largest level of flocculation, regardless of the pH. At

    low IS, a pH of 6.5 leads to a significantly higher level of

    flocculation than that obtained at a pH of 4. When heated

    EY is used as opposed to native one, the level of

    flocculation in emulsions containing 0.52 M NaCl is greatly

    reduced, down to a level similar to that obtained at low IS.

    The flocculation factor seems to be less dependant on the

    environmental conditions, although emulsions prepared at

    a pH of 6.5 tend to be slightly more flocculated than those

    prepared at a pH of 4.

    The consistency index (K, according to the Herschell-

    Bulkley model) of the emulsions made with native EY is

    driven by the IS, whereby a high IS promotes a high value

    of K, regardless of the pH (Fig. 6). When heated EY is

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    Zetapotential(mV)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 4

    0.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 4. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the zeta potential of oi

    droplets taken from O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated)

    and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Flocculationfactor(-)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 40.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 5. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the flocculation factor

    measured in O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated

    (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    ConsistencyindexK(mPa.s

    n)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 40.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 6. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the consistency index

    (K) of O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e.

    74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231118

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    6/10

    used, the consistency of the product is less impacted by the

    environmental conditions as when native EY is used.

    All emulsions prepared have a flow index comprised

    between 0.9 and 1.0, which reflects the near-newtonian flow

    behaviour of these fluid emulsions. The flow index of

    emulsions made with native EY is lowest at high IS

    (Fig. 7), which is when the consistency index is the highest(Fig. 6). At low IS, we observe that the flow index is

    significantly higher at a pH of 6.5 than at a pH of 4.0.

    However, when heated EY is used, the flow index of the

    emulsion is much less impacted by the environmental

    conditions than when native EY is used, and averages

    around a value of 0.95 in all tested environments.

    For the emulsion prepared with native EY, we measured

    that the creaming rate of oil droplets is much higher at pH

    4 and 0.15M NaCl than in any other environmental

    conditions (Fig. 8). However, in emulsions prepared with

    heated EY, there is no significant impact of the environ-

    mental conditions on the creaming rate. The creaming rate

    is always slightly lower when heated EY is used as

    emulsifier rather than native EY.

    The relative cream height reported here after 1-week

    storage, when the level of the cream is stabilised, reflects

    the ability of oil droplets to pack in an efficient manner

    under normal gravity (Fig. 9). When native EY is used, the

    tightest packing of droplets is achieved at pH 4 with an IS

    of 0.15 M, and the most lose packing at a pH of 6.5 and an

    IS of 0.52 M. However, when heated EY is used, the final

    level of creaming is not influenced by the environmental

    conditions. The cream obtained is rather more compact

    than that obtained with native EY, except at pH 4 and

    0.15 M NaCl.

    4. Discussion

    The discussion aims at comparing the results of this

    work to those obtained in similar conditions with native

    EY by other authors and focuses on explaining the results

    obtained in the present study regarding the impact of heat

    denaturation of EY.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1.0

    1.1

    Flowindex(-)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 40.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 7. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the flow index of O/W

    emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for

    12 min.) egg yolk.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    Initialcreamingrate(%

    /h)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 40.15 M

    40.52 M

    6.50.15 M

    6.50.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 8. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the initial creaming rate

    (first 611 h after emulsification) measured in O/W emulsions containing

    native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    RCHafter1weekstorag

    e(%)

    Native

    Heated

    pH 4

    0.15 M

    4

    0.52 M

    6.5

    0.15 M

    6.5

    0.52 M[NaCl]

    Fig. 9. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the relative cream height

    (RCH) reached 1 week after emulsification measured in O/W emulsions

    containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg

    yolk.

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1119

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    7/10

    4.1. Thermally aggregated EY proteins can adsorb at the

    O/W interface independently from the environmental

    conditions

    4.1.1. Emulsifying activity (EA) of native and heat-treated

    EY

    Le Denmat et al. (2000) found that the size of oildroplets formed in emulsions containing native EY was

    independent from the environmental conditions. The

    energy used by Le Denmat et al. (2000) to disperse the

    oil by high-pressure homogenisation was much higher than

    the one used in the present work, and the amount of EY

    proteins in the continuous phase was 25 mg/ml, which is

    about 8 times more than the one we used (i.e. 3.2 mg/ml).

    As could be expected,Le Denmat et al. (2000)obtained an

    average oil droplet size about 10 times smaller than the one

    we achieved in the present work. They, however, clearly

    demonstrated a decreased EA of granules at a pH of 3,

    which was attributed to the poor solubility of granule

    proteins at this pH. The authors found that this did not

    affect the EA of complete EY, since the same mean droplet

    diameter d320:42mm was achieved in all environmental

    conditions. It was concluded that the emulsifying proper-

    ties of EY were driven by plasma proteins. However, in our

    study, where we dispersed the oil using a comparatively

    lower energy (i.e. single pass through one stage homo-

    geniser at 200 bar), we observed an increased d50.3 in

    emulsions prepared at a pH of 4 and 0.15M NaCl,

    indicating a decreased EA (Fig. 2). This could be due to the

    fact that the dispersing forces generated during emulsifica-

    tion were insufficient to allow a shear-driven dissociation

    of granule proteins at this low pH and IS.Anton, Beaumal,et al. (2000)showed that insoluble EY granules do adsorb

    at the O/W interface, and suggested that fragments of

    granules obtained during homogenisation can also play the

    same role. As the intensity of disruption forces increases,

    the partial dissociation of granules could lead to a more

    efficient adsorption of granule fragments at the O/W

    interface, and an overall better surface activity of EY. We

    observed that the EA of EY in our study was high at a pH

    of 4 and 0.55M NaCl (Fig. 2), despite the low protein

    solubility (Fig. 1). This seems to indicate that the presence

    of high concentrations of NaCl facilitates the shear-

    induced dissociation of insoluble EY granules at pH 4,

    even when relatively low shear forces are used.

    When an EY suspension is heated, part of the granule

    proteins are denatured and form heterogeneous aggregates

    together with denatured EY plasma proteins. Previous

    work has shown that the heat treatment applied in the

    present study leads to the thermal aggregation of just over

    60% of the total EY proteins (Guilmineau & Kulozik,

    submitted). The forces bonding proteins within heat-

    coagulated EY has been shown to be mostly hydrophobic

    interactions (Kiosseoglou & Paraskevopoulou, 2005).

    These interactions are quite weak and can probably be

    dissociated by the shear forces present in the conditions

    used for emulsification (i.e. 200 bar, one stage homogenisa-

    tion). The interfacial film in emulsions prepared with heat-

    treated EY could therefore be formed by the adsorption of

    a multitude of minute fragments of thermally aggregated

    proteins, obtained by the shear-driven disruption of much

    larger protein aggregates during high pressure homogeni-

    sation. This hypothesis is supported in the present work by

    the fact that denatured EY proteins are adsorbed at the O/W interface, even though they form insoluble protein

    aggregates in the continuous phase. This change in the

    nature of the interfacial film when using heated EY can

    explain the fact that the EA of EY at a pH of 4 and 0.15 M

    NaCl is better when heated EY is used as opposed to native

    EY (Fig. 2). This result suggests that the shear intensity

    obtained during homogenisation in the conditions of this

    study was sufficient to allow a thorough dissociation of

    thermally aggregated EY proteins, although not sufficient

    to dissociate insoluble native granules at low pH and IS.

    4.1.2. Interfacial protein concentration under various

    environmental conditions

    The isoelectric region (pI) of apo-LDL has been

    measured between pH 6.5 and 7.3 (Kojima &Nakamura,

    1985; Nakamura, Hayakawa, & Sato, 1977), and that of

    apo-HDL, although not characterised precisely, is assumed

    to be in the enlarged neutral pH region as well (Le Denmat

    et al., 2000). The increased interfacial protein concentra-

    tion observed with native EY at pH 6.5 (Fig. 3) can be

    explained by the proximity of this pH to the pI of apo-LDL

    and apo-HDL. The decreased charge density of proteins

    around their pI favours their tight re-arrangement leading

    to the formation of dense interfacial films, which was

    notably observed with bovine serum albumin (Das &Chattoraj, 1980).

    This work shows that the interfacial film formed with

    heated EY contains a greater concentration of protein than

    the film formed with native proteins (Fig. 3). This reflects

    the formation of a thick film of aggregated proteins in

    emulsions made with heated EY. During high-pressure

    homogenisation, the protein aggregates formed during

    heating could be broken down by the shear forces into a

    multitude of smaller aggregates, which seem to adsorb

    favourably at the O/W interface. It has indeed been

    reported that the turbulences obtained in high-pressure

    homogenisation favour the adsorption of large protein

    aggregates because the convective mass transport rate

    increases with the size of molecules (Walstra, 1983).

    Furthermore, the mechanical disruption of protein aggre-

    gates held together by hydrophobic interactions probably

    leads to the exposure of many hydrophobic sites. The

    increased surface hydrophobicity of the protein fragments

    could greatly contribute to their rapid adsorption at the

    O/W interface. After adsorption, interactions between

    neighbouring aggregates could lead to the formation of a

    thick and cohesive interfacial film, possibly forming multi-

    ple layers. The adsorption of protein aggregates occurs at

    all environmental conditions tested, without being nega-

    tively impacted by the environment.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231120

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    8/10

    4.2. The adsorption of denatured EY protein aggregates

    reduces the impact of the environmental conditions on the

    emulsifying properties of EY

    4.2.1. Decreased level of flocculation in emulsions made with

    heated EY

    The EY proteins forming the interfacial film are chargedpolymers, and therefore tend to stabilise emulsion droplets

    against aggregation through a combination of electrostatic

    and steric repulsions (Claesson, Blomberg, Fro berg, Ny-

    lander, & Arnebrant, 1995). The principal difference

    between these two types of interactions is their sensitivity

    to pH and IS (Hunter, 2000). The electrostatic repulsion

    between emulsion droplets is dramatically decreased when

    the electrical charge on the droplet surface is reduced (e.g.

    by altering the pH) or screened (e.g. by increasing the

    concentration of electrolyte in the aqueous phase). In

    contrast, steric repulsion is fairly insensitive to both

    electrolyte concentration and pH (McClements, 1999).

    The stability of the emulsion, and particularly the tendency

    for oil droplets to flocculate, depends on the intensity of the

    steric and electrostatic repulsive forces in relation to the

    attractive forces (e.g. van der Waals, hydrophobic interac-

    tions). The magnitude and range of electrostatic repulsion

    between droplets decrease as the IS of the solution

    separating them increases because of electrostatic screen-

    ing. This explains the susceptibility of protein-stabilised

    emulsions to flocculation when electrolyte concentration is

    increased above a critical level (Demetriades, Coupland,&

    McClements, 1997). Electrostatic screening can explain the

    increased flocculation at a high IS (0.55 M NaCl) when

    native EY is used (Fig. 5). At low IS, the lower level offlocculation observed at pH 4.0 compared to pH 6.5 is

    probably due to an increased electrostatic repulsion

    obtained at pH 4.0 because of the increased interfacial

    charge density. As already discussed, it appears that the pI

    of the proteins, which are most active at the interface is close

    to pH 6, so that their charge density is higher at pH 4 than at

    pH 6.5. This difference is clearly shown at low IS by the

    measurement of the zeta-potential of oil droplets (Fig. 4).

    The decreased level of flocculation obtained at high IS

    when heated EY is used as emulsifier indicates a change in

    the stabilisation mechanism. Indeed, the absence of

    modification of the zeta-potential when a heat-treatment

    is applied to the EY, rules out any explanation of the

    flocculation behaviour based on electrostatic interactions.

    However, a change of the steric interaction is supported by

    the increase of interfacial protein concentration measured

    when heated EY is used instead of native EY (Fig. 3). Since

    the strength of steric repulsions imposed by a polymer

    when adsorbed at the interface partially depends on the

    amount of polymer adsorbed (Hunter, 2000), it is expected

    that the contribution of the steric repulsion to the overall

    repulsion forces is increased when heated EY is used. The

    impact of the electrostatic screening which appears to drive

    the flocculation when native EY is used seems to be

    overridden by the increased steric repulsion when heated

    EY is used. These results illustrate the fact that an

    increased steric contribution over the electrostatic interac-

    tions leads to a decreased sensitivity of an emulsions

    stability to changes of environmental conditions.

    4.2.2. Levelling of the rheological properties of the

    emulsionsIt appears that the consistency index of the emulsion

    containing native EY is high when the emulsion is

    flocculated, which is the case at an IS of 0.55 M NaCl

    (Fig. 6). This can be explained by an increase of the

    effective volume of the dispersed phase in the flocculated

    emulsion which is due to the continuous phase trapped

    between oil droplets within the flocs (Dickinson &

    Stainsby, 1982). The emulsions having a high degree of

    flocculation at high IS also display the lowest values of flow

    index, which indicates a higher level of pseudoplasticity

    (Fig. 7). This reflects the deflocculation of the droplets

    under the effect of increased shear rate (Bower, Washing-

    ton,& Peruwal, 1997), and indicates that the flocs formed

    at high IS are sensitive to shear forces.

    When heated EY is used, the deflocculation of the

    emulsion at high IS leads to a decrease of its consistency

    index. We also measure a slight pseudoplasticity in

    emulsions made with heated EY. This could be due to

    the presence of EY protein aggregates in the continuous

    phase, which orientation in the shear field (with possible

    dissociation) leads to a decreased resistance to flow at

    increased shear rate.

    4.2.3. Improved creaming stability and formation of a

    compact creamIn emulsions made with native EY, the initial creaming

    rate seems to be correlated to the median oil droplet

    diameter (Figs. 8 and 2, respectively), which is consistent

    with the expected impact of the droplet size on the

    creaming velocity, as described for example in Stokes

    law. Given the intermediate oil droplet concentration in

    our model system (j 0:3), droplet flocculation is

    expected to increase the creaming velocity because the

    flocs have a larger effective size than the individual

    droplets. However, we did not observe any correlation

    between the degree of flocculation and the creaming rate of

    the emulsions. It should be noted that the emulsions were

    stirred vigorously prior to the beginning of the creaming

    rate measurement, which probably led to some degree of

    droplet deflocculation. The initial creaming rate in emul-

    sions prepared with heated EY does not seem to be

    impacted by the oil droplet size as much as those prepared

    with native EY. Despite significant differences in oil

    droplet size with a median oil droplet diameter varying

    between 3.4 and 4.3mm, the initial creaming rate of oil

    droplets in emulsions made with heated EY was constant at

    about 1% creaming per hour. This result shows that the

    modification of the interfacial film composition and

    density-taking place when heated EY is used has a positive

    effect on the stability of emulsions to creaming by

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1121

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    9/10

    decreasing the creaming rate. This could be due to an

    increased density of the oil droplets under the effect of the

    increased density of the interfacial film (Fig. 3). The

    adsorption of dense material at the O/W interface can

    significantly increase the density of oil droplets, and

    therefore slow down the creaming (Tan, 1990). This effect

    is particularly significant for small oil droplets. In this work,the creaming rate was estimated by observing the kinetic

    displacement of a front line separating the floating fat phase

    from the sedimenting fat-free phase in a standing sample of

    the emulsion. The position of the front moving from the

    bottom of the tube upwards reflects the displacement of the

    small droplets of the distribution, since they are the slowest

    to migrate. It is therefore expected that this method would

    allow to detect changes in the density of oil droplets, which

    is assumed to be the case in this work.

    As highlighted by McClements (1999), the thickness of

    the creamed layer formed after complete creaming of the

    dispersed phase depends on the effectiveness of droplet

    packing and is impacted by the same factors as those

    determining the structure of flocs. When native EY is used,

    there seems to be a correlation between the median oil

    droplet size and the compactness of the cream layer

    (Fig. 9). This can be due to the fact that when the droplet

    size decreases at constant oil phase volume ratio, the number

    of droplets and therefore the interfacial area increases as

    well, so that more continuous phase remains trapped

    between the oil droplets, giving a less compact cream.

    Notice that emulsions made with native EY have a tendency

    to flocculate more than the ones made with heated EY,

    which reflects the presence of greater attraction forces

    between oil droplets. This can lead to oil droplets stickingtogether when coming in contact during creaming, and

    therefore forming a cream layer with a relatively open

    structure. This could explain why emulsions containing

    denatured EY, which tend to be less flocculated, also tend to

    form a more compact cream layer than those made with

    native EY (Fig. 9). The only environmental condition in

    which the cream made with native EY is more compact than

    that obtained with heated EY (i.e pH 4 and 0.15 M NaCl) is

    also that for which the flocculation factor is minimal, which

    is consistent with the hypothesis formulated above. It

    appears that when attraction forces between droplets are

    weak, the droplets are able to roll around each other more

    freely and can therefore pack more closely together. Visual

    observations revealed that the cream formed in emulsions

    prepared with native EY was cohesive and formed a lump,

    which did not re-disperse easily under mild agitation. On the

    other hand, the cream formed in emulsions prepared with

    heated EY could easily be evenly re-dispersed by simple

    manual agitation, which can be an advantage in products,

    which have to be shaken just before use.

    5. Conclusions

    This work has shown that the emulsifying activity of

    thermally denatured EY is similar or even better than that

    of native EY, depending on the environmental conditions.

    Using heated EY rather than native one led to a significant

    increase of the interfacial protein concentration under all

    environmental conditions. This demonstrates the ability for

    thermally denatured insoluble EY protein aggregates to

    adsorb efficiently at the O/W interface. EY protein

    aggregates formed during heating are thought to bedisrupted by the high shear forces occurring in high-

    pressure homogenisation. The resulting micro-particles of

    aggregated proteins would constitute the interfacial film

    when heat-treated EY is used as emulsifier. The adsorption

    of denatured EY proteins was shown to greatly decrease

    the flocculation of oil droplets, particularly at high ionic

    strength. This is thought to be due to an increased

    contribution of the steric repulsions between droplets when

    protein aggregates are adsorbed at the interface. The

    rheological properties as well as the stability of the

    emulsions against creaming were shown to be much less

    sensitive to variations of the environmental conditions

    when heated EY was used rather than native EY. Further

    work is required to study the impact of the environmental

    conditions on the composition of the interfacial film

    formed with both native and denatured EY.

    Acknowledgement

    The authors thank Jan Peter Luh and Mario Henrique

    Martinez Marins for their valued contribution in the

    experimental phase of this work.

    References

    Aluko, R. E., & Mine, Y. (1998). Characterization of oil in water

    emulsions stabilized by hens egg yolk granule. Food Hydrocolloid,12,

    203210.

    Anton, M. (1998). Structure and functional properties of hen egg yolk

    constituents. In S. G. Pandalai (Ed.), Recent research developments in

    agricultural and food chemistry, Vol. 2 (pp. 839864). Trivandrum,

    India: Research Signpost.

    Anton, M., Beaumal, V., & Gandemer, G. (2000). Adsorption at the oil-

    water interface and emulsifying properties of native granules from egg

    yolk: Effect of aggregated state. Food Hydrocolloids, 14, 327335.

    Anton, M., & Gandemer, G. (1999). Effect of pH on interface

    composition and on quality of oil-in-water emulsions made with hen

    egg yolk. Colloids and Surfaces B, 12, 351358.

    Anton, M., Le Denmat, M., & Gandemer, G. (2000). Thermostability of

    hen egg yolk granules: Contribution of native structure of granules.Journal of Food Science, 65(4), 581584.

    Bower, C., Washington, C., & Peruwal, T. S. (1997). The use of image

    analysis to characterize aggregates in a shear field. Colloids and

    Surfaces A, 127, 105112.

    Burley, R. W., & Vadehra, D. V. (1989). The Avian egg: Chemistry and

    biology. New York: Wiley.

    Causeret, D., Matringe, E., & Lorient, D. (1991). Ionic strength and pH

    effect on composition and microstructure of granules.Journal of Food

    Science, 56, 15321536.

    Claesson, P. M., Blomberg, E., Fro berg, J. C., Nylander, T., & Arnebrant,

    T. (1995). Protein interactions at solid surfaces. Advances in Colloid

    and Interface Science, 57, 161227.

    Cunningham, F. E. (1995). Chapter 12: Egg-product pasteurization. In

    W. J. Stadelman, & O. J. Cotterill (Eds.), Egg science and technology

    (pp. 289321). New York: Haworth Food Products Press.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231122

  • 8/13/2019 pdfft(3)

    10/10

    Dalgleish, D. G. (1999). Interfacial structures and colloidal interactions in

    protein-stabilised emulsions. In E. Dickinson, & J. M. Rodriguez

    Patino (Eds.), Food emulsions and foamsInterfaces, interactions and

    stability(pp. 116). Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Das, K. P., & Chattoraj, D. K. (1980). Adsorption of proteins at the polar

    oilwater interface.Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,78(2), 422429.

    Demetriades, K., Coupland, J. N., & McClements, D. J. (1997).

    Physicochemical properties of whey protein-stabilized emulsions asaffected by heating and ionic strength. Journal of Food Science, 62(3),

    462467.

    Dickinson, E., & Stainsby, G. (1982). Colloids in food. London: Applied

    Science Publishers.

    Ford, L. D., Borwankar, R. P., Pechak, D., & Schwimmer, B. (2004).

    Chapter 13: Dressings and sauces. In S. E. Friberg, K. Larsson, & J.

    Sjo blom (Eds.), Food emulsions (pp. 525572). New York: Marcel

    Dekker, Inc.

    Friberg, S. E. (1997). Chapter 1: Emulsion stability. In S. E. Friberg, & K.

    Larsson (Eds.),Food emulsions(pp. 155). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Guilmineau, F., Kulozik, U. (submitted). Impact of e thermal treatment

    on the emulsifying properties of egg yolk. Part 1: Effect of the

    treatment intensity. Food Hydrocolloids, submitted for peer-review.

    Hunter, R. J. (2000). Introduction to modern colloid science. Oxford,

    New York: Oxford University Press.Kiosseoglou, V. D., & Paraskevopoulou, A. (2005). Molecular interac-

    tions in gels prepared with egg yolk and its fractions. Food

    Hydrocolloids, 19, 527532.

    Kojima, E., & Nakamura, R. (1985). Heat gelling properties of hens egg

    yolk LDL in the presence of other proteins. Journal of Food Science,

    50, 6366.

    Le Denmat, M., Anton, M., & Beaumal, V. (2000). Characterisation of

    emulsion properties and of interface composition in O/W emulsions

    prepared with hen egg yolk, plasma and granules. Food Hydrocolloids,

    14, 539549.

    Le Denmat, M., Anton, M., & Gandemer, G. (1999). Protein denaturation

    and emulsifying properties of plasma and granules of egg yolk as

    related to heat treatment. Journal of Food Science, 64, 194197.

    Markwell, M. A., Hass, S. M., Bieber, L. L., & Tolbert, N. E. (1978). Amodification of the lowry procedure to simplify protein determination

    in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Analytical Biochemistry, 87,

    206210.

    McClements, D. J. (1999). Food emulsionsPrinciples, practice, and

    techniques. London, New York: CRC Press.

    Mine, Y. (1998). Emulsifying characterization of hens egg yolk proteins in

    oil-in-water emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids, 12, 409415.

    Morr, C. V., German, B., Kinsella, J. E., Regenstein, J. M., Van Buren, J.

    P., Kilara, A., et al. (1985). A collaborative study to develop a

    standardized food protein solubility procedure. Journal of Food

    Science, 50(6), 17151718.

    Nakamura, R., Hayakawa, R., & Sato, Y. (1977). Isolation and

    fractionation of the protein moiety of egg yolk low density lipoprotein.

    Poultry Science, 56, 11481152.

    Patton, S., & Huston, G. E. (1986). A method for isolation of milk fatglobules. Lipids, 21(2), 170174.

    Tan, C. T. (1990). Beverage emulsions. In K. Larsson, & S. E. Friberg

    (Eds.), Food emulsions(pp. 445478). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Walstra, P. (1983). Formation of emulsions. In P. Becher (Ed.),

    Encyclopedia of emulsion technology: Basic theory, Vol. 1 (pp. 57127).

    New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1123