Upload
julio-mauricio-vidaurre-ruiz
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
1/10
FOODHYDROCOLLOIDS
Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123
Impact of a thermal treatment on the emulsifying properties of egg yolk.
Part 2: Effect of the environmental conditions
Fabien Guilmineau, Ulrich Kulozik
Technische Universitat Munchen, Chair for Food Process Engineering and Dairy Technology, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, 85354 Freising, Germany
Received 25 July 2005; accepted 8 December 2005
Abstract
The protein solubility and emulsifying properties of native and heat-treated egg yolk (EY) suspensions were investigated in various
environmental conditions. Four distinct conditions were tested by combining two levels of pH, namely pH 4.0 and 6.5, and two levels of
ionic strength, namely 0.15 and 0.52 M NaCl, in a model oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion containing 30% oil (v/v). Although the protein
solubility was greatly reduced by the thermal denaturation in all tested environmental conditions, the average size of oil droplets
obtained in emulsions made with heated EY was observed to be either similar or slightly smaller than that obtained with native EY,
depending on the environmental conditions. Using heat-treated EY rather than native EY led to a significant increase of the interfacial
protein concentration in all environmental conditions. This increased interfacial protein concentration was shown to have a major impact
on the flocculation behaviour of the emulsions, as well as on their rheological properties and stability to creaming. Hypotheses regarding
the mechanisms by which insoluble protein aggregates stabilise O/W emulsions at various pH and ionic strengths are discussed.
r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Egg yolk; Protein denaturation; Emulsifying properties; Environment
1. Introduction
Egg yolk (EY) is a reference food emulsifier used in
many applications ranging from bakery products to salad
dressings. Commercial EY is routinely pasteurised at
temperatures between 60 and 68 1C in order to ensure its
microbiological safety (Cunningham, 1995). Applying
more severe thermal treatment conditions would allow to
extend the shelf life of EY and further reduce the risk of
microbial spoilage. But the impact of an increased degree
of thermal denaturation of the heat sensitive EY proteins
on the emulsifying properties of this key functionalingredient is not well understood. In the first part of this
work we have used dilute EY suspensions to study the
impact of the heat treatment intensity on the emulsifying
properties of EY (Guilmineau&Kulozik, submitted). This
work has notably shown that the interfacial concentration
of proteins at the O/W interface was significantly increased
with an increasing degree of protein denaturation. This was
shown to allow a significant decrease of the flocculation in
O/W emulsions made with denatured EY, and significantly
impacted the rheological properties and stability of the
emulsions obtained. This work was, however, carried out
on a model emulsion using constant environmental
conditions, namely a pH of 6.5 and an ionic strength (IS)
corresponding to 0.52 M NaCl. But the many applications
of EY in industrial food products cover a much wider
range of pH and ionic strengths, varying with the
formulation of the products. The environmental conditionshave been shown to have a significant impact on the
physico-chemical and emulsifying properties of EY and its
components (Aluko & Mine, 1998; Anton & Gandemer,
1999;Le Denmat, Anton, &Beaumal, 2000; Mine, 1998).
Fresh EY has a pH of about 6.2 and an IS of about 0.17 M
NaCl (Anton, 1998). In these natural conditions, EY is
constituted of a continuous aqueous phase containing
about 80% of the total dry matter and referred to as
plasma, and insoluble denser structures with a size ranging
from 0.3 to 2 mm referred to as granules. EY plasma
ARTICLE IN PRESS
www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhyd
0268-005X/$ - see front matterr 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.12.006
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49(0)8161 71 3535;
fax: +49(0)8161 71 4384.
E-mail address: [email protected] (U. Kulozik).
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhydhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhyd8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
2/10
contains globular glycoproteins known as a-, b-, and g-
livetins, as well as the low-density lipoproteins (LDL),
which apoproteins are called lipovitellenins. Granules
contain a phosphoprotein known as phosvitin, as well as
the high-density lipoproteins (HDL), which apoproteins
are called lipovitellins (Burley & Vadehra, 1989). Upon
increase of the IS to values above 0.3 M, granules dissociatebecause of the rupture of the phosphocalcic bridges
between lipovitellins and phosvitins (Causeret, Matringe,
& Lorient, 1991). This is a major change of the EY
microstructure driven by the environmental conditions.
Partial disruption of EY granules by mechanical shear
forces has also been observed, leading to the formation of
granule fragments, notably during high pressure homo-
genisation (Anton, Beaumal, & Gandemer, 2000). Most
salad dressings are prepared at a pH around 4.0 by
addition of acetic and/or citric acid, which contributes to
the products characteristic taste and inhibits growth of
most microorganisms (Ford, Borwankar, Pechak, &
Schwimmer, 2004). This makes this value of low pH a
particularly relevant one when it gets to studying the
behaviour of EY in model food emulsions.
In this work, model oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions
containing 30% (v/v) sunflower oil were prepared within
a range of pH and IS most commonly occurring in food
emulsions. The impact of two levels of pH, namely pH 4.0
and 6.5, and two levels of IS, namely 0.15 and 0.55 M
NaCl, on the emulsifying properties of EY was studied.
The objective of this work is to compare the behaviour of
non-heated (native) EY to that of heat-treated EY in the
various environmental conditions defined above. The level
of protein denaturation used for the heat-treated EY washigher than that normally reached with industrial EY
pasteurisation, and was chosen based on the results
obtained in the first part of this study (Guilmineau &
Kulozik, submitted). The solubility of EY proteins as well
as the key characteristics of the emulsions such as particle
size distribution, flocculation and interfacial protein con-
centration were investigated. Hypothesis regarding the
colloidal interactions taking place between oil droplets in
the various environmental conditions studied are discussed.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Preparation and heating of an EY suspension
Freshly laid eggs from Lohman Tradition hens were
collected from the Universitys research farm (Thalhausen)
and used within 48h after collection. A suspension
containing 20% (w/w) pure EY in an isotonic NaCl
solution (i.e. 0.17 M NaCl) is prepared as described by
Guilmineau and Kulozik (submitted): it is referred to as the
native EY20.
2.1.1. Thermal treatment of the EY20 suspension
Native EY20 was heated as described by Guilmineau
and Kulozik (submitted) with a holding time of 12 min at
74 1C: we obtained the heated EY20. Because of the
dilution of the native EY prior to heating, the heated
suspension remained fluid despite the intense heat treat-
ment. Heated EY could therefore be used just as easily as
native EY to prepare O/W emulsions.
2.2. Preparation of emulsions
2.2.1. Preparation of the continuous phase
The continuous phase was prepared by diluting EY20
(native or heated) so as to obtain a concentration of 1.12%
(w/w) EY dry matter. Dilutions were made either in an
aqueous NaCl solution (not buffered) or in a 0.01M
acetate buffer (Sodium acetate trihydrate/acetic acid) at
pH 4.0, containing NaCl so as to obtain a concentration
of either 0.15 or 0.52 M in the final continuous phase.
The continuous phases prepared without buffer were
measured to have an average pH of 6.4970.04 and the
ones made with the acetate buffer had an average pH of
4.0370.05.
All continuous phases were allowed to equilibrate under
mild agitation (magnetic stirrer) for 30 min before the
production of the emulsion. Commercial refined sunflower
oil was used to prepare the emulsions (Cereol Deutschland
GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). A pre-emulsion with a
dispersed phase volume fraction j 0:3 was prepared by
pouring 180 ml of sunflower oil in 420 ml continuous phase
while mixing with a dispersing system model Ultra Turrax
T25 (IKA Werke, Staufen, Germany) equipped with an
18 mm diameter toothed-disc dispersing tool (model
S25KR-18G) at 8000 rpm. The oil was added over the
course of 1 min and the agitation was maintained for afurther minute in order to obtain a homogeneous pre-
emulsion. The median oil droplet diameter in the pre-
emulsion was measured to be about d50,31316mm
throughout the trial period. The pre-emulsion was then
further emulsified by passing it once through the first stage
of a high-pressure homogeniser model APV 1000 (Invensys
APV, Albertslund, Denmark) at a pressure of 200 bars and
a temperature of 25 1C.
2.3. Characterisation of the EY suspension and emulsions
2.3.1. Protein solubility
The solubility of proteins in the EY samples was assessed
using the method published by Morr et al. (1985)with the
following modification. Samples of each of the four
continuous phases prepared as described in Section 2.2
(two pH and IS levels) were equilibrated under mild
agitation at 20 1C for 1 h. An aliquote of each suspension
was kept for total protein content measurement (Pt), and
the rest was centrifuged twice at 19,000gfor 20 min in order
to separate the insoluble proteins. An aliquote of the
supernatant containing the soluble proteins was also
analysed for protein content (Ps). The protein content
was determined using the colorimetric method of Mark-
well, Hass, Bieber, and Tolbert (1978). The percentage of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1115
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
3/10
solubility was determined as given in Eq. (1) below.
Solubility% Ps
Pt 100. (1)
2.3.2. Particle size distribution and flocculation
measurementAll particle size measurements were carried out using a
laser diffraction spectroscope model LS230 (Beckman-
Coulter, Germany). Details of the method used are given
byGuilmineau and Kulozik (submitted).
2.3.3. Stability to creaming
The stability to creaming is measured by following the
formation of a clear droplet-free phase at the bottom of
a sample of emulsion, using a light scattering optical
analyser model Turbiscan MA1000 (Formulaction,
France). All details regarding the determination of the
initial creaming rate and relative height of the cream layer
formed during 1 week of storage at 10 1C are given byGuilmineau and Kulozik (submitted).
2.3.4. Rheological characterisation of the emulsions
A controlled shear rate rheometer model Rheomat 115
equipped with a double-gap geometry model MS 0/115
(Contraves GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was used. The
details of the method used are given by Guilmineau and
Kulozik (submitted).
2.3.5. Interfacial protein concentration
The method used in this study to separate the oil droplets
from the continuous phase of the emulsions was adaptedfromPatton and Huston (1986). All details of the method
used are described by Guilmineau and Kulozik (sub-
mitted).
2.3.6. Zeta-potential measurements
Zeta potential was measured by a laser light-scattering
technique using a Zetasizer Nano-Z model ZEN 2600
(Malvern Instruments, Herrenberg, Germany). The drift
velocity of oil droplets placed in an electric field is
accurately determined from the Doppler shift of the light
scattered by the moving droplets. The emulsions were
diluted 10,000 fold (v/v) in a buffer solution corresponding
to their continuous phase (same pH and NaCl concentra-
tion). All measurements were carried out at a constant
temperature of 25 1C.
2.3.7. Statistical analysis
Three replicates were carried out on three different
weeks. Oil droplet size distribution, flocculation, rheologi-
cal properties, stability, interfacial protein concentration
and zeta-potential were measured each time twice. These
parameters were subjected to a one-way analysis of
variance using Statgraphics software (Statistical Graphics
Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA) with a confidence level
of 95% (po0:
05). A multiple range test was used to
determine which means are significantly different from
others.
3. Results
The solubility of native EY protein is significantlyimpacted by the pH and IS (Fig. 1). The protein solubility
is lowest at pH 4, independently from the IS. At pH 6.5,
virtually all proteins are soluble at an IS of 0.52 M NaCl,
whereas only about two thirds are soluble at low IS (0.15 M
NaCl). The protein solubility in heated EY is always much
lower than in native EY. The influence of the environ-
mental conditions follows the same trend with heated EY
as with the native one. Thus, protein solubility in heated
EY is also maximum at pH 6.5 and high IS, and minimal
at pH 4.
Le Denmat et al. (2000) have shown that in native EY,
plasma proteins have a very high solubility over a wide
range of pH and IS. On the other hand, granules wereshown to be insoluble at a pH of 3, and only partially
soluble in the physicochemical conditions occuring in
native EY (i.e. pH of 6.5 and IS of 0.15 M NaCl). Our
results are consistent with those presented byLe Denmat et
al. (2000)regarding the solubility of EY proteins. The low
solubility measured at pH 4 is explained by the insolubility
of granules at this low pH (Fig. 1). At a pH of 6.5 and
0.15 M NaCl, granules are mostly insoluble because their
constituents are aggregated via Ca2+ bridging between
negatively charged phosphoserine residues of HDL and
phosvitin (Causeret et al., 1991). Increasing the IS from
0.15 to 0.55 M NaCl leads to the disruption of phospho-calcic bridges resulting from the displacement of divalent
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Proteinsolu
bility(%)
Native
Heated
pH 40.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 1. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the solubility of proteins
in native (non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) EY suspensions.
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231116
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
4/10
Ca2+ cations by an excess of monovalent Na+. This
induces the dissociation of granules, and therefore an
increased level of protein solubility.
The lower levels of protein solubility measured in heated
EY suspensions reflect the denaturation of some EY
proteins which associate to form insoluble protein aggre-
gates (see Guilmineau & Kulozik, submitted). In heatedsamples at a pH of 6.5, an increase of the IS from 0.15 to
0.55 M also leads to an increase of the level of solubility
from 25% to 37%. This indicates that some granule
proteins are still native after the heat treatment, and can
therefore still be dissociated by addition of NaCl. This is
consistent with observations that granule proteins are more
resistant to heat than plasma proteins (Anton, Le Denmat,
& Gandemer, 2000; Le Denmat, Anton, & Gandemer,
1999).
The median oil droplet diameter obtained in O/W
emulsions prepared with native and heated EY is
significantly influenced by the environmental conditions
(Fig. 2). The smallest droplets are formed at a pH of 6.5
and an IS of 0.52 M NaCl, whereas the largest are formed
at a pH of 4 and an IS of 0.15 M NaCl. The heat treatment
seems to have a rather small impact on the size of oil
droplets achieved, except at a pH of 4 and a low IS
where heated EY allows to obtain much smaller droplets as
native EY.
The interfacial protein concentration in emulsions
prepared with native EY is significantly higher at a pH of
6.5 than at a pH of 4 (Fig. 3). The IS does not seem to
influence the interfacial protein load at pH 6.5, but at pH 4
the interfacial load is lower at an IS of 0.52 M NaCl than at
an IS of 0.15 M NaCl. On the other hand, when heated EY
is used, the interfacial protein concentration is much higher
than when native EY is used, under all conditions tested.
Moreover, there does not seem to be any negative impact
of the environmental conditions on the interfacial proteinload, since the differences measured between the various
conditions tested are not significant.
The zeta-potential of oil droplets in the emulsion is
significantly impacted by the environmental conditions
(Fig. 4). Droplets carry a positive charge at a pH of 4 and a
negative one at a pH of 6.5. Increasing the concentration of
NaCl at a pH of 4 leads to a decrease of the zeta-potential,
which is due to the enhanced screening of the adsorbed
proteins positive charges by negative counter ions.
However, at a pH of 6.5, increasing the IS leads to an
increase of the negative zeta-potential, despite the increased
screening by positive ions from the dissolved NaCl. This
suggests that the negative charge density of the interface is
greatly increased by the addition of NaCl, in a way, which
more than compensates the screening effect. This may be
due to an increased adsorption of the strongly negative
phosvitin, following the dissociation of granules taking
place at high pH and IS.
A heat treatment of the EY did not have any significant
impact on the zeta-potential obtained at the oil droplet
surface, regardless of the environmental conditions.
The values of zeta-potential obtained with native EY are
consistent with measurements from Le Denmat et al.
(2000). The zeta-potential does not exceed 10 mV in all
environmental conditions tested, which is always well
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
mediandrople
tdiameterd50.3
(m)
Native
Heated
pH 40.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 2. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the median oil droplet
diameter (d50.3) achieved in O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-
heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Interfacialproteinload[mg
.m-2]
Native
Heated
pH 40.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 3. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the interfacial protein
concentration measured in O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-
heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1117
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
5/10
below the 20 mV evaluated by Friberg (1997) to produce
effective electrostatic stabilisation. The charge of the
interface changes from a slightly positive charge at pH
4.0 to a slightly negative one at pH 6.5, which is consistent
with the expected variation of EY protein charges when
predicted from their isoelectric points.
Adsorption of heated EY proteins did not affect thecharge of the interfacial film. Similar observations were
made with caseins, for which it was reported that a change
in the geometry of the protein had relatively small effects
upon the zeta-potential of the emulsion droplets (Dalgleish,
1999). This suggests that despite the increased proportion
of denatured proteins present at the interface, the adsorbed
layer adopts a conformation, which maintains the same
charge density as the proteins in the native form.
Both the environmental conditions and a heat treatment
were measured to have a very significant impact on the
flocculation of oil droplets (Fig. 5). The flocculation factor
of emulsions prepared with native EY is always higher than
that of emulsions prepared with heated EY, at all
environmental conditions tested. With native EY, the IS
seems to drive the flocculation, whereby a high IS leads to
the largest level of flocculation, regardless of the pH. At
low IS, a pH of 6.5 leads to a significantly higher level of
flocculation than that obtained at a pH of 4. When heated
EY is used as opposed to native one, the level of
flocculation in emulsions containing 0.52 M NaCl is greatly
reduced, down to a level similar to that obtained at low IS.
The flocculation factor seems to be less dependant on the
environmental conditions, although emulsions prepared at
a pH of 6.5 tend to be slightly more flocculated than those
prepared at a pH of 4.
The consistency index (K, according to the Herschell-
Bulkley model) of the emulsions made with native EY is
driven by the IS, whereby a high IS promotes a high value
of K, regardless of the pH (Fig. 6). When heated EY is
ARTICLE IN PRESS
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Zetapotential(mV)
Native
Heated
pH 4
0.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 4. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the zeta potential of oi
droplets taken from O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated)
and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.
0
1
2
3
4
5
Flocculationfactor(-)
Native
Heated
pH 40.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 5. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the flocculation factor
measured in O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated
(i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.
0
5
10
15
20
25
ConsistencyindexK(mPa.s
n)
Native
Heated
pH 40.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 6. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the consistency index
(K) of O/W emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e.
74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231118
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
6/10
used, the consistency of the product is less impacted by the
environmental conditions as when native EY is used.
All emulsions prepared have a flow index comprised
between 0.9 and 1.0, which reflects the near-newtonian flow
behaviour of these fluid emulsions. The flow index of
emulsions made with native EY is lowest at high IS
(Fig. 7), which is when the consistency index is the highest(Fig. 6). At low IS, we observe that the flow index is
significantly higher at a pH of 6.5 than at a pH of 4.0.
However, when heated EY is used, the flow index of the
emulsion is much less impacted by the environmental
conditions than when native EY is used, and averages
around a value of 0.95 in all tested environments.
For the emulsion prepared with native EY, we measured
that the creaming rate of oil droplets is much higher at pH
4 and 0.15M NaCl than in any other environmental
conditions (Fig. 8). However, in emulsions prepared with
heated EY, there is no significant impact of the environ-
mental conditions on the creaming rate. The creaming rate
is always slightly lower when heated EY is used as
emulsifier rather than native EY.
The relative cream height reported here after 1-week
storage, when the level of the cream is stabilised, reflects
the ability of oil droplets to pack in an efficient manner
under normal gravity (Fig. 9). When native EY is used, the
tightest packing of droplets is achieved at pH 4 with an IS
of 0.15 M, and the most lose packing at a pH of 6.5 and an
IS of 0.52 M. However, when heated EY is used, the final
level of creaming is not influenced by the environmental
conditions. The cream obtained is rather more compact
than that obtained with native EY, except at pH 4 and
0.15 M NaCl.
4. Discussion
The discussion aims at comparing the results of this
work to those obtained in similar conditions with native
EY by other authors and focuses on explaining the results
obtained in the present study regarding the impact of heat
denaturation of EY.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
Flowindex(-)
Native
Heated
pH 40.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 7. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the flow index of O/W
emulsions containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for
12 min.) egg yolk.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Initialcreamingrate(%
/h)
Native
Heated
pH 40.15 M
40.52 M
6.50.15 M
6.50.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 8. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the initial creaming rate
(first 611 h after emulsification) measured in O/W emulsions containing
native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg yolk.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
RCHafter1weekstorag
e(%)
Native
Heated
pH 4
0.15 M
4
0.52 M
6.5
0.15 M
6.5
0.52 M[NaCl]
Fig. 9. Impact of pH and NaCl concentration on the relative cream height
(RCH) reached 1 week after emulsification measured in O/W emulsions
containing native (i.e. non-heated) and heated (i.e. 74 1C for 12 min.) egg
yolk.
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1119
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
7/10
4.1. Thermally aggregated EY proteins can adsorb at the
O/W interface independently from the environmental
conditions
4.1.1. Emulsifying activity (EA) of native and heat-treated
EY
Le Denmat et al. (2000) found that the size of oildroplets formed in emulsions containing native EY was
independent from the environmental conditions. The
energy used by Le Denmat et al. (2000) to disperse the
oil by high-pressure homogenisation was much higher than
the one used in the present work, and the amount of EY
proteins in the continuous phase was 25 mg/ml, which is
about 8 times more than the one we used (i.e. 3.2 mg/ml).
As could be expected,Le Denmat et al. (2000)obtained an
average oil droplet size about 10 times smaller than the one
we achieved in the present work. They, however, clearly
demonstrated a decreased EA of granules at a pH of 3,
which was attributed to the poor solubility of granule
proteins at this pH. The authors found that this did not
affect the EA of complete EY, since the same mean droplet
diameter d320:42mm was achieved in all environmental
conditions. It was concluded that the emulsifying proper-
ties of EY were driven by plasma proteins. However, in our
study, where we dispersed the oil using a comparatively
lower energy (i.e. single pass through one stage homo-
geniser at 200 bar), we observed an increased d50.3 in
emulsions prepared at a pH of 4 and 0.15M NaCl,
indicating a decreased EA (Fig. 2). This could be due to the
fact that the dispersing forces generated during emulsifica-
tion were insufficient to allow a shear-driven dissociation
of granule proteins at this low pH and IS.Anton, Beaumal,et al. (2000)showed that insoluble EY granules do adsorb
at the O/W interface, and suggested that fragments of
granules obtained during homogenisation can also play the
same role. As the intensity of disruption forces increases,
the partial dissociation of granules could lead to a more
efficient adsorption of granule fragments at the O/W
interface, and an overall better surface activity of EY. We
observed that the EA of EY in our study was high at a pH
of 4 and 0.55M NaCl (Fig. 2), despite the low protein
solubility (Fig. 1). This seems to indicate that the presence
of high concentrations of NaCl facilitates the shear-
induced dissociation of insoluble EY granules at pH 4,
even when relatively low shear forces are used.
When an EY suspension is heated, part of the granule
proteins are denatured and form heterogeneous aggregates
together with denatured EY plasma proteins. Previous
work has shown that the heat treatment applied in the
present study leads to the thermal aggregation of just over
60% of the total EY proteins (Guilmineau & Kulozik,
submitted). The forces bonding proteins within heat-
coagulated EY has been shown to be mostly hydrophobic
interactions (Kiosseoglou & Paraskevopoulou, 2005).
These interactions are quite weak and can probably be
dissociated by the shear forces present in the conditions
used for emulsification (i.e. 200 bar, one stage homogenisa-
tion). The interfacial film in emulsions prepared with heat-
treated EY could therefore be formed by the adsorption of
a multitude of minute fragments of thermally aggregated
proteins, obtained by the shear-driven disruption of much
larger protein aggregates during high pressure homogeni-
sation. This hypothesis is supported in the present work by
the fact that denatured EY proteins are adsorbed at the O/W interface, even though they form insoluble protein
aggregates in the continuous phase. This change in the
nature of the interfacial film when using heated EY can
explain the fact that the EA of EY at a pH of 4 and 0.15 M
NaCl is better when heated EY is used as opposed to native
EY (Fig. 2). This result suggests that the shear intensity
obtained during homogenisation in the conditions of this
study was sufficient to allow a thorough dissociation of
thermally aggregated EY proteins, although not sufficient
to dissociate insoluble native granules at low pH and IS.
4.1.2. Interfacial protein concentration under various
environmental conditions
The isoelectric region (pI) of apo-LDL has been
measured between pH 6.5 and 7.3 (Kojima &Nakamura,
1985; Nakamura, Hayakawa, & Sato, 1977), and that of
apo-HDL, although not characterised precisely, is assumed
to be in the enlarged neutral pH region as well (Le Denmat
et al., 2000). The increased interfacial protein concentra-
tion observed with native EY at pH 6.5 (Fig. 3) can be
explained by the proximity of this pH to the pI of apo-LDL
and apo-HDL. The decreased charge density of proteins
around their pI favours their tight re-arrangement leading
to the formation of dense interfacial films, which was
notably observed with bovine serum albumin (Das &Chattoraj, 1980).
This work shows that the interfacial film formed with
heated EY contains a greater concentration of protein than
the film formed with native proteins (Fig. 3). This reflects
the formation of a thick film of aggregated proteins in
emulsions made with heated EY. During high-pressure
homogenisation, the protein aggregates formed during
heating could be broken down by the shear forces into a
multitude of smaller aggregates, which seem to adsorb
favourably at the O/W interface. It has indeed been
reported that the turbulences obtained in high-pressure
homogenisation favour the adsorption of large protein
aggregates because the convective mass transport rate
increases with the size of molecules (Walstra, 1983).
Furthermore, the mechanical disruption of protein aggre-
gates held together by hydrophobic interactions probably
leads to the exposure of many hydrophobic sites. The
increased surface hydrophobicity of the protein fragments
could greatly contribute to their rapid adsorption at the
O/W interface. After adsorption, interactions between
neighbouring aggregates could lead to the formation of a
thick and cohesive interfacial film, possibly forming multi-
ple layers. The adsorption of protein aggregates occurs at
all environmental conditions tested, without being nega-
tively impacted by the environment.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231120
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
8/10
4.2. The adsorption of denatured EY protein aggregates
reduces the impact of the environmental conditions on the
emulsifying properties of EY
4.2.1. Decreased level of flocculation in emulsions made with
heated EY
The EY proteins forming the interfacial film are chargedpolymers, and therefore tend to stabilise emulsion droplets
against aggregation through a combination of electrostatic
and steric repulsions (Claesson, Blomberg, Fro berg, Ny-
lander, & Arnebrant, 1995). The principal difference
between these two types of interactions is their sensitivity
to pH and IS (Hunter, 2000). The electrostatic repulsion
between emulsion droplets is dramatically decreased when
the electrical charge on the droplet surface is reduced (e.g.
by altering the pH) or screened (e.g. by increasing the
concentration of electrolyte in the aqueous phase). In
contrast, steric repulsion is fairly insensitive to both
electrolyte concentration and pH (McClements, 1999).
The stability of the emulsion, and particularly the tendency
for oil droplets to flocculate, depends on the intensity of the
steric and electrostatic repulsive forces in relation to the
attractive forces (e.g. van der Waals, hydrophobic interac-
tions). The magnitude and range of electrostatic repulsion
between droplets decrease as the IS of the solution
separating them increases because of electrostatic screen-
ing. This explains the susceptibility of protein-stabilised
emulsions to flocculation when electrolyte concentration is
increased above a critical level (Demetriades, Coupland,&
McClements, 1997). Electrostatic screening can explain the
increased flocculation at a high IS (0.55 M NaCl) when
native EY is used (Fig. 5). At low IS, the lower level offlocculation observed at pH 4.0 compared to pH 6.5 is
probably due to an increased electrostatic repulsion
obtained at pH 4.0 because of the increased interfacial
charge density. As already discussed, it appears that the pI
of the proteins, which are most active at the interface is close
to pH 6, so that their charge density is higher at pH 4 than at
pH 6.5. This difference is clearly shown at low IS by the
measurement of the zeta-potential of oil droplets (Fig. 4).
The decreased level of flocculation obtained at high IS
when heated EY is used as emulsifier indicates a change in
the stabilisation mechanism. Indeed, the absence of
modification of the zeta-potential when a heat-treatment
is applied to the EY, rules out any explanation of the
flocculation behaviour based on electrostatic interactions.
However, a change of the steric interaction is supported by
the increase of interfacial protein concentration measured
when heated EY is used instead of native EY (Fig. 3). Since
the strength of steric repulsions imposed by a polymer
when adsorbed at the interface partially depends on the
amount of polymer adsorbed (Hunter, 2000), it is expected
that the contribution of the steric repulsion to the overall
repulsion forces is increased when heated EY is used. The
impact of the electrostatic screening which appears to drive
the flocculation when native EY is used seems to be
overridden by the increased steric repulsion when heated
EY is used. These results illustrate the fact that an
increased steric contribution over the electrostatic interac-
tions leads to a decreased sensitivity of an emulsions
stability to changes of environmental conditions.
4.2.2. Levelling of the rheological properties of the
emulsionsIt appears that the consistency index of the emulsion
containing native EY is high when the emulsion is
flocculated, which is the case at an IS of 0.55 M NaCl
(Fig. 6). This can be explained by an increase of the
effective volume of the dispersed phase in the flocculated
emulsion which is due to the continuous phase trapped
between oil droplets within the flocs (Dickinson &
Stainsby, 1982). The emulsions having a high degree of
flocculation at high IS also display the lowest values of flow
index, which indicates a higher level of pseudoplasticity
(Fig. 7). This reflects the deflocculation of the droplets
under the effect of increased shear rate (Bower, Washing-
ton,& Peruwal, 1997), and indicates that the flocs formed
at high IS are sensitive to shear forces.
When heated EY is used, the deflocculation of the
emulsion at high IS leads to a decrease of its consistency
index. We also measure a slight pseudoplasticity in
emulsions made with heated EY. This could be due to
the presence of EY protein aggregates in the continuous
phase, which orientation in the shear field (with possible
dissociation) leads to a decreased resistance to flow at
increased shear rate.
4.2.3. Improved creaming stability and formation of a
compact creamIn emulsions made with native EY, the initial creaming
rate seems to be correlated to the median oil droplet
diameter (Figs. 8 and 2, respectively), which is consistent
with the expected impact of the droplet size on the
creaming velocity, as described for example in Stokes
law. Given the intermediate oil droplet concentration in
our model system (j 0:3), droplet flocculation is
expected to increase the creaming velocity because the
flocs have a larger effective size than the individual
droplets. However, we did not observe any correlation
between the degree of flocculation and the creaming rate of
the emulsions. It should be noted that the emulsions were
stirred vigorously prior to the beginning of the creaming
rate measurement, which probably led to some degree of
droplet deflocculation. The initial creaming rate in emul-
sions prepared with heated EY does not seem to be
impacted by the oil droplet size as much as those prepared
with native EY. Despite significant differences in oil
droplet size with a median oil droplet diameter varying
between 3.4 and 4.3mm, the initial creaming rate of oil
droplets in emulsions made with heated EY was constant at
about 1% creaming per hour. This result shows that the
modification of the interfacial film composition and
density-taking place when heated EY is used has a positive
effect on the stability of emulsions to creaming by
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1121
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
9/10
decreasing the creaming rate. This could be due to an
increased density of the oil droplets under the effect of the
increased density of the interfacial film (Fig. 3). The
adsorption of dense material at the O/W interface can
significantly increase the density of oil droplets, and
therefore slow down the creaming (Tan, 1990). This effect
is particularly significant for small oil droplets. In this work,the creaming rate was estimated by observing the kinetic
displacement of a front line separating the floating fat phase
from the sedimenting fat-free phase in a standing sample of
the emulsion. The position of the front moving from the
bottom of the tube upwards reflects the displacement of the
small droplets of the distribution, since they are the slowest
to migrate. It is therefore expected that this method would
allow to detect changes in the density of oil droplets, which
is assumed to be the case in this work.
As highlighted by McClements (1999), the thickness of
the creamed layer formed after complete creaming of the
dispersed phase depends on the effectiveness of droplet
packing and is impacted by the same factors as those
determining the structure of flocs. When native EY is used,
there seems to be a correlation between the median oil
droplet size and the compactness of the cream layer
(Fig. 9). This can be due to the fact that when the droplet
size decreases at constant oil phase volume ratio, the number
of droplets and therefore the interfacial area increases as
well, so that more continuous phase remains trapped
between the oil droplets, giving a less compact cream.
Notice that emulsions made with native EY have a tendency
to flocculate more than the ones made with heated EY,
which reflects the presence of greater attraction forces
between oil droplets. This can lead to oil droplets stickingtogether when coming in contact during creaming, and
therefore forming a cream layer with a relatively open
structure. This could explain why emulsions containing
denatured EY, which tend to be less flocculated, also tend to
form a more compact cream layer than those made with
native EY (Fig. 9). The only environmental condition in
which the cream made with native EY is more compact than
that obtained with heated EY (i.e pH 4 and 0.15 M NaCl) is
also that for which the flocculation factor is minimal, which
is consistent with the hypothesis formulated above. It
appears that when attraction forces between droplets are
weak, the droplets are able to roll around each other more
freely and can therefore pack more closely together. Visual
observations revealed that the cream formed in emulsions
prepared with native EY was cohesive and formed a lump,
which did not re-disperse easily under mild agitation. On the
other hand, the cream formed in emulsions prepared with
heated EY could easily be evenly re-dispersed by simple
manual agitation, which can be an advantage in products,
which have to be shaken just before use.
5. Conclusions
This work has shown that the emulsifying activity of
thermally denatured EY is similar or even better than that
of native EY, depending on the environmental conditions.
Using heated EY rather than native one led to a significant
increase of the interfacial protein concentration under all
environmental conditions. This demonstrates the ability for
thermally denatured insoluble EY protein aggregates to
adsorb efficiently at the O/W interface. EY protein
aggregates formed during heating are thought to bedisrupted by the high shear forces occurring in high-
pressure homogenisation. The resulting micro-particles of
aggregated proteins would constitute the interfacial film
when heat-treated EY is used as emulsifier. The adsorption
of denatured EY proteins was shown to greatly decrease
the flocculation of oil droplets, particularly at high ionic
strength. This is thought to be due to an increased
contribution of the steric repulsions between droplets when
protein aggregates are adsorbed at the interface. The
rheological properties as well as the stability of the
emulsions against creaming were shown to be much less
sensitive to variations of the environmental conditions
when heated EY was used rather than native EY. Further
work is required to study the impact of the environmental
conditions on the composition of the interfacial film
formed with both native and denatured EY.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Jan Peter Luh and Mario Henrique
Martinez Marins for their valued contribution in the
experimental phase of this work.
References
Aluko, R. E., & Mine, Y. (1998). Characterization of oil in water
emulsions stabilized by hens egg yolk granule. Food Hydrocolloid,12,
203210.
Anton, M. (1998). Structure and functional properties of hen egg yolk
constituents. In S. G. Pandalai (Ed.), Recent research developments in
agricultural and food chemistry, Vol. 2 (pp. 839864). Trivandrum,
India: Research Signpost.
Anton, M., Beaumal, V., & Gandemer, G. (2000). Adsorption at the oil-
water interface and emulsifying properties of native granules from egg
yolk: Effect of aggregated state. Food Hydrocolloids, 14, 327335.
Anton, M., & Gandemer, G. (1999). Effect of pH on interface
composition and on quality of oil-in-water emulsions made with hen
egg yolk. Colloids and Surfaces B, 12, 351358.
Anton, M., Le Denmat, M., & Gandemer, G. (2000). Thermostability of
hen egg yolk granules: Contribution of native structure of granules.Journal of Food Science, 65(4), 581584.
Bower, C., Washington, C., & Peruwal, T. S. (1997). The use of image
analysis to characterize aggregates in a shear field. Colloids and
Surfaces A, 127, 105112.
Burley, R. W., & Vadehra, D. V. (1989). The Avian egg: Chemistry and
biology. New York: Wiley.
Causeret, D., Matringe, E., & Lorient, D. (1991). Ionic strength and pH
effect on composition and microstructure of granules.Journal of Food
Science, 56, 15321536.
Claesson, P. M., Blomberg, E., Fro berg, J. C., Nylander, T., & Arnebrant,
T. (1995). Protein interactions at solid surfaces. Advances in Colloid
and Interface Science, 57, 161227.
Cunningham, F. E. (1995). Chapter 12: Egg-product pasteurization. In
W. J. Stadelman, & O. J. Cotterill (Eds.), Egg science and technology
(pp. 289321). New York: Haworth Food Products Press.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 111411231122
8/13/2019 pdfft(3)
10/10
Dalgleish, D. G. (1999). Interfacial structures and colloidal interactions in
protein-stabilised emulsions. In E. Dickinson, & J. M. Rodriguez
Patino (Eds.), Food emulsions and foamsInterfaces, interactions and
stability(pp. 116). Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Das, K. P., & Chattoraj, D. K. (1980). Adsorption of proteins at the polar
oilwater interface.Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,78(2), 422429.
Demetriades, K., Coupland, J. N., & McClements, D. J. (1997).
Physicochemical properties of whey protein-stabilized emulsions asaffected by heating and ionic strength. Journal of Food Science, 62(3),
462467.
Dickinson, E., & Stainsby, G. (1982). Colloids in food. London: Applied
Science Publishers.
Ford, L. D., Borwankar, R. P., Pechak, D., & Schwimmer, B. (2004).
Chapter 13: Dressings and sauces. In S. E. Friberg, K. Larsson, & J.
Sjo blom (Eds.), Food emulsions (pp. 525572). New York: Marcel
Dekker, Inc.
Friberg, S. E. (1997). Chapter 1: Emulsion stability. In S. E. Friberg, & K.
Larsson (Eds.),Food emulsions(pp. 155). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Guilmineau, F., Kulozik, U. (submitted). Impact of e thermal treatment
on the emulsifying properties of egg yolk. Part 1: Effect of the
treatment intensity. Food Hydrocolloids, submitted for peer-review.
Hunter, R. J. (2000). Introduction to modern colloid science. Oxford,
New York: Oxford University Press.Kiosseoglou, V. D., & Paraskevopoulou, A. (2005). Molecular interac-
tions in gels prepared with egg yolk and its fractions. Food
Hydrocolloids, 19, 527532.
Kojima, E., & Nakamura, R. (1985). Heat gelling properties of hens egg
yolk LDL in the presence of other proteins. Journal of Food Science,
50, 6366.
Le Denmat, M., Anton, M., & Beaumal, V. (2000). Characterisation of
emulsion properties and of interface composition in O/W emulsions
prepared with hen egg yolk, plasma and granules. Food Hydrocolloids,
14, 539549.
Le Denmat, M., Anton, M., & Gandemer, G. (1999). Protein denaturation
and emulsifying properties of plasma and granules of egg yolk as
related to heat treatment. Journal of Food Science, 64, 194197.
Markwell, M. A., Hass, S. M., Bieber, L. L., & Tolbert, N. E. (1978). Amodification of the lowry procedure to simplify protein determination
in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Analytical Biochemistry, 87,
206210.
McClements, D. J. (1999). Food emulsionsPrinciples, practice, and
techniques. London, New York: CRC Press.
Mine, Y. (1998). Emulsifying characterization of hens egg yolk proteins in
oil-in-water emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids, 12, 409415.
Morr, C. V., German, B., Kinsella, J. E., Regenstein, J. M., Van Buren, J.
P., Kilara, A., et al. (1985). A collaborative study to develop a
standardized food protein solubility procedure. Journal of Food
Science, 50(6), 17151718.
Nakamura, R., Hayakawa, R., & Sato, Y. (1977). Isolation and
fractionation of the protein moiety of egg yolk low density lipoprotein.
Poultry Science, 56, 11481152.
Patton, S., & Huston, G. E. (1986). A method for isolation of milk fatglobules. Lipids, 21(2), 170174.
Tan, C. T. (1990). Beverage emulsions. In K. Larsson, & S. E. Friberg
(Eds.), Food emulsions(pp. 445478). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Walstra, P. (1983). Formation of emulsions. In P. Becher (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of emulsion technology: Basic theory, Vol. 1 (pp. 57127).
New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F. Guilmineau, U. Kulozik / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 11141123 1123