ENGLISH LANGUAGE PANEL ACTION PLAN

Prepared by: English Panel SRK Pekan Tongod

   

MATA PELAJARAN

 PERATUS LULUS MENGIKUT TAHUN (%)

 

2009 2010 2011

 BAHASA MELAYU

(PEMAHAMAN)  58.0 %  

55.8 % 72.7 %

 BAHASA MELAYU

(PENULISAN)  33.8 %  

57.7 % 50. 9 %

 BAHASA INGGERIS

  19.35 %   

7.7 % 

10. 9 %

 SAINS

  46.7 % 67.3 % 60.0 %

 MATEMATIK

  43.5 %  

38.5 % 

16. 4 %

P a s s Y e a r s U P S R a n a l y s i s

Analysis of UPSR grades 2009

A

B C ABC(Pass)

D E DE (Fail)

GPMP

0. 0 6.45 % 12. 9 %

19. 35 % 38.7 % 41. 9% 80. 65%

2010 A

B C ABC(Pass)

D E DE (Fail)

GMP

0. 0 0.0 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 40.4 % 51.9 % 92. 3 % 4. 4

2011

A

B C ABC(Pass)

D E DE (Fail)

GPMP

0. 0 3.6 % 7.3% 10. 9 % 21.8% 67.3% 89.1% 4.53

UPSR target 2012 Number of registered candidates: 73

• T.O.V: 2012

A

B C ABC(Pass)

D E DE (Fail)

GPMP

2 ( 2. 7%)

5 ( 6. 7%)

15 (20.6%)

30. 0 % 51 (70.0%)

0.0 70.0 %

A students (2 Students) Name Marks

Finals Sem 2 y5

Marks PKSR Sem 1 y6

Marks Mid year y 6

Target Grade

Crisonie Jeniol @ Walter

71 80 A

Claythanie H. Charles

59 66 80 A

B Students (5 students) Name Marks Final

Sem Y5Marks PKSR 1 y 6

Marks Mid Sem Y 6

Target grade UPSR

Jamnie James 49 60 65 B

Masree Masuaning

55 51 60 B

Fedriley Matiwong

53 59 65 B

Mohd Alaf Hafizie

40 41 60 B

Vera Vernalisa 50 45 60 B

C students (15) Name Marks Final

Exam Y5 Marks PKSR 1 y 6

Marks Mid sem y 6

Target UPSR

Crystella Misliyu 30 39 45 C

Erichel Sirab 36 35 45 C

Hebronchin Binchin

34 40 50 C

Amal Wanisa 31 38 45 C

Rozilah Anul 34 38 45 C

Reqland Ruslin 32 41 50 C

Sylvester Perdo 35 39 45 C

Yuni Tujoh 33 40 45 C

Marks Final Exam Y5

Marks PKSR 1 y 6

Marks Mid sem y 6

Target UPSR

Mohd Aidid Sahidin

30 36 40 C

Sheryl Jamani 31 33 40 C

Lycia Anggip 35 40 C

Medalin Rubinsen 36 40 C

Likme 40 C

Marnesna Janes 40 C

Razman Marni 40 C

UPSR Excellence Program 2012

Rationalea) The decrease in the passing rate of the English subject for 2010 and 2011 UPSR examination.b) The low English proficiency level among the students of SRK Pekan Tongod. c) Most of the UPSR students have functional illiteracy, which means their reading and writing (especially in English) skills are inadequate to help them to function beyond the basic use of the language and answer the UPSR English paper. d) The lack of enthusiasm and motivation among the students in learning the language.e) The lack of facilities and opportunities for students and teachers to practice the use of the English language in the school.

SWOT Analysis

• Strength - Hostel facilities that enable extra classes to be held outside of

the school hours.

- Weaknesses- Students lack exposure towards English Language outside of

school hours. - - Lack of funding, have to endure red tapes and bureaucracy to

get resources. - The low level of students literacy. - Lack of qualified teachers in school.

• Opportunity The hostel facility enables extra classes to held. Abundance of resources bought by the teachers. The improved resource centre enable more interactive teaching opportunity.

Target- Increase level of students literacy. - Increase in percentage of UPSR pass rate.

Objectives

• To increase students’ literacy and level of proficiency.

• To increase UPSR passing rate by 5-7 % gradually for each year.

• To increase students’ motivation to learn English.

• To increase students’ use of English language and their exposure towards the use of the language.

Programs

• Short term programs (UPSR candidates) a) Intensive UPSR classb) Remedial classc) UPSR paper answering technique workshop d) UPSR clinic

Intensive English UPSR classes

• Intensive classes for UPSR candidates who are targeted to pass the exams.

• Candidates are divided into 3 groups: - Group A – Students who are targeted to get

As and Bs (9 students) - Group B- Students who are targeted to Cs (20

students) - Group C- Remedial students.

Activities

• Weekly extra classes for each group of students. • Group A: Tuesday (2.00- 4.00 p.m) - Watching tutor tv-Intensive UPSR exercises based on work book bought by teachers and parents of students. * extra materials bought by teachers and parents are also extensively used during class times, this is to make easier for teachers to target on students’ weak areas and to give students more exposure towards UPSR format questions.

Group C (Remedial) Intensive Remedial English class• Problem diagnosed: Students are not able to achieve the basic English skills

needed for them to pass the UPSR examination. • Objective: To help students to develop basic English language skill. • Approaches: Each English teacher will adopt 10 students and have two sessions

per week with the students to do remedial English exercises based on the Inspire II/ year 1-3 activity books.

• Target students: 50 weakest students • Duration: 2 one hour sessions per week (depends on teacher’s free time) • Corresponding teachers: All English teachers (10 students per teacher) • Materials needed: English exercises books • Key performance indicator:• By the end of 2012, 20% of the students are able to show development of the

basic skills of English. • By the end of 2015- All of the students are able to show development of the basic

skills of English.

Short Term Programs (UPSR candidates)

UPSR paper answering technique workshop• Problem diagnosed: Students are not equipped with the techniques of

answering the English paper. • Objective: To expose students with the correct technique to answer the

UPSR English paper. • Approaches: Inviting master teachers and UPSR examiner to give input on

how to answer the English paper correctly. • Target students: UPSR candidates• Duration: Once/twice a year• Time: Early May 2011 • Corresponding teachers: All English teachers, counselling teacher. • Key performance indicator: Students will know the technique of answering

UPSR questions

UPSR Clinic

• Involvement with UPSR clinics organised by parties outside of the school e.g: Berita Harian UPSR clinic.

• Students who are attended will act as a Junior teacher who their peers who are not able to attend the clinic.

English Improvement plan

Long term programs (year 1-5) • Foster parents • English is fun! • Phonics reader remedial program• Lit Smart• Self Directed Learning.

Long Term Programs • Phonics Reader

• Problem diagnosed: Students lack literacy skill and can not read fluently in English • Objective: Help develops students’ reading ability.• Approaches: Teachers use the phonics reading program rather than whole language

approach to teach reading by emphasizing on the sounds of the letters rather than the alphabets to teach reading. (For reference please refer to the KSSR year 1 guide)

• Target students: year 1-3 (all classes), year 4-6 (Bestari classes) • Duration: whole year during English lessons. • Corresponding teachers: All English teacher. • Materials needed: Phonics guide (available in the KSSR English standard document) • Key Performance Indicator: • By the end of 2011- 50% of Intelek students and 25% of Bestari students will be able to read

simple sentences in English and understand its meaning. • By the end of 2015- 100% of Intelek students and 60% of Bestari students will be able to

read the simple sentences in English and understand its meaning.

Long Term Programs • b) Lit smart program • Problem diagnosed: Students are not exposed towards the use of English outside of

the textbook and have little interest in learning the language.• Objective: Help increase students’ reading ability and increase students’ motivation

for learning English through the use of real world materials to teach language skills. • Approaches: Teachers use factual and non factual children’s literature materials to

teaching reading and literacy skills with hope to provide students with more language experience, increase motivation for learning and creating students who can think creatively and critically.

• Target students: year 4-6 ( Intelek classes) • Duration: whole year during English lessons. • Corresponding teachers: All English teachers. • Materials needed: Children’s book (available from the library), children stories and

song DVD, Children’s literature guide

Long Term Programs • Key Performance Indicator: • By the end of 2011- • 30% of Intelek students will be able to read story books equivalent to level

4 in the Ladybird• reading modules in English and understand its meaning. • A minimum 30% pass rate in English in the final examination.• A minimum 15% pass rate in the UPSR examination

• By the end of 2015- 100% of Intelek students will be able to read story books equivalent to level 4 in the Ladybird reading modules in English and understand its meaning

• A minimum of 80% pass rate during the final examination. • A minimum 50% pass rate during the final examination.

Target of Value of Long Term Phonics program (KSSR grade benchmark)

2011 (year 1)

Band 3

Band 2 Band 1

8 15 40

Year 2 Number of students: 63

2012 (year 2)

Band 3

Band 2 Band 1

18 25 20

Long Term Programs • Self Directed Learning

• Problem diagnosed: Students are not able to study and do tasks independently especially when English teachers are not available.

• Objective: Help students develop learning skills that can be utilised for independent study when teachers are not around, during free periods and outside of the classrooms.

• Approaches: Teachers give students with independent tasks and teaches students about learning skills like referencing skills, note writing skills etc.

• Target students: year 4-6 • Duration: whole year during English lessons. • Corresponding teachers: All English teachers, counselling teacher, other subjects’ teachers. • Materials needed: Self directed learning guide, independent learning tasks. • Key Performance Indicator: • By the end of 2011- Students can finish the independent learning tasks given. • By the end of 2015- Students are able to do their own revision and complete tasks independently.

Long Term Programs English is fun! programs• Problem diagnosed: Students have low motivation to learn English and

think of learning English as a burden • Objective: To help develop positive disposition towards learning English by

incorporating English as a fun language to learn. • Approaches: The implementation of English Week, English Day, English In

camp and other related activities• Target students: all students• Duration 2: English week- 5 days/ English Day- 1 day/ English In Camp- 3

days 3 night• Corresponding teachers: All English teachers. • Key performance indicator:• Students are interested in learning English.

Long Term ProgramsTeacher development Program: • Problem diagnosed: The lack of sharing of knowledge and

experience among English teachers. • Objective: To promote the sharing of information and

knowledge among the English teachers in SRK Pekan Tongod. • Approaches: Implementation of in house training and sharing

session with all of the English teachers. • Duration: once a month • Corresponding teachers: All English teachers• Key performance indicator: The professional development of

English teachers in SRK Pekan Tongod.

Work Process

Planning • Evaluation of students’ achievement in examination• Diagnostic of factors leading to students’ failure. • Post-mortem (during panel meeting)• Discussion with administrator, other panel members,

students and parents.

Implementation • Conducting activities based on the yearly plan. • Establishing an English corner.

• Panel meeting every months.

Observation • Monthly and semester examination result. • Discussion with students and parents. • Observation of teaching and learning process.• Students ’assessment.

Report to: • School administrator (principal, assistant

principal) • Head of panel • Parents

Main Obstacles:

• Lack of funding- School is not able to provide enough funding for implementation of programs.

• Facility: The lack of space, facilities, man power and time to implement activities school.

• Students’ and teachers motivation- lack of motivation to teach and learn English.

What we need….

• - More moral, financial and administrative support.

• -More qualified teachers to join our panel. • -More commitment from parents,

administrators and the community to support the development of english language skills.

FUTURE RESULT ANALYSIS

  TOV OTI ETR

2011 7.7%

2012

2013

2014

2015

2010 UPSR Result- 10.9% OTI: 20% per year