Persons_M95 Dempsey v Rtc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 Persons_M95 Dempsey v Rtc

    1/3

  • 7/24/2019 Persons_M95 Dempsey v Rtc

    2/3

    nd >ne of Three hundred ?P*00(00@ Pesos for each ofhe cases and to pay the costs(

    or the ciil liability, Aud.ent is rendered a.ainstccused oel $epsey con>rin. the payent of US150(00 onthly support to !hristina arie and toontinue payent thru analita Rapada, to be usedolely for the needs of the child until she reaches the.e of aAorityL to reco.niFe the child !hristina aries his natural childL to pay !hristina arie thru analitaapada the su of P10,000(00 as eGeplary daa.eLnd to pay the su of P5,000(00 as attorneyHs fee to

    tty( anuel Rosapapan as !hairan of the !oitteen 3e.al -id of the #6P !hapter of 8abales Olon.apoty and the sae to for part of the le.al aid fund(

    O OR$ERE$( ?Rollo, pp( 2*+24@

    he priate respondent appealed the unicipal trialourtHs decision to the re.ional trial court and prayedhat the a:ard on ciil liability be set aside and theenalty of iprisonent be reduced to a penalty of >nenly(

    a decision rendered on &oeber 2, 1/nd erit in the instant petition(

    he respondent court coitted reersible error :henfailed to taCe into account that the decision of theunicipal trial court :as based on the priate

    espondentHs plea of .uilty( Respondent oel $epseyd not and does not challen.e the alidity ofresidential $ecree &o( ne not eGceedin. t:o hundred pesos or both,unless a hi.her penalty is proided for in the ReisedPenal !ode or special la:s(

    The respondent court erred in its rulin. that the trialcourt deterined a atter not :ithin its copetence

    and authority( There is liCe:ise no basis for its.ratuitous >ndin. that a parent cannot be heldcriinally liable under P($( ed that she is receiin. J150(00onth for the support of the inor !hristina arie$epsey( The aount of P*,000(00 onthly appears ful>ll the reDuireent of =adeDuate support= found inPar( , -rt( 4< of P($( &o(

  • 7/24/2019 Persons_M95 Dempsey v Rtc

    3/3

    he respondent court :ould shift Aurisdiction oer thease fro the unicipal trial court to the $epartentf Social Serices and $eelopent( #t is readilypparent that the $SS$ cannot taCe co.niFance of andnforce the criinal sanctions of P($(