Upload
brendy
View
42
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Photons and Dileptons. K. Dusling (NC) and I. Zahed. BNL 11. Outline. Set up Rates Evolution Experiments. AA Cartoon. time. Formally . acceptance. evolution. rate. Acceptance: NA60 vs PHENIX. Hadronic Rates. Rate. l +. l +. l -. l -. π. π. π. π. N. N. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Photons and Dileptons
K. Dusling (NC) and I. Zahed
BNL 11
Outline
• Set up• Rates• Evolution• Experiments
AA Cartoon
time
Formally
rateevolution
acceptance
Acceptance: NA60 vs PHENIX
Hadronic Rates
Rate
)0(),()()(
41
21
604
2
2
2
2
23
2
4
JxJxexdqWqm
qm
qqddR xiqll
)0()()( with )(Im1
2),( *4
/
00
JxJTexdiqWqW
eqqW xiqFF
Tq
l+
l-
l+
l-π
π
N
π
π
N
Hadronic Expansion
i d4 x e iqx 0T*J (x)J(0)0 i
a d d4 x e iqx in
a (k)T*J (x)J(0) ina (k)
is,I dN d 4 x e iqx N in
s,I (k)T*J (x)J(0) N ins,I (k)
+2+3, …-Pi, +2+3, …-K
Resonance Gas: 0 ie J=ρ,ρ’,ρ’’,..
+2+3, …-N
Many Feyman Graphs:
l l
l l
,,
i d4 x e iqx 0T*J (x)J(0)0 + + …
l
l
,,,, 11 Ka
ia d d4 x e iqx in
a (k)T*J (x)J(0) ina (k) + …
ll
NN
,
,N ,N
is,I dN d4 x e iqx N in
s,I (k)T*J (x)J(0) N ins,I (k) + …
Chiral Ward Identities: κ
d3k n(k0)(2 3)2k0 f
2 W1F (q,k)
W1F 12q2 ImV (q2)
6(k q)2 ImA[(k q)2]
8((k q)2 m2q2)ImV (q2) Re[R (k q)]
(q q)
ia d d4 x e iqx in
a (k)T*J (x)J (0) ina (k)
Chiral Limit and zero-mtm pion:
)()(Im12)0,( 2221 qqqqW AV
F
κ
VA Mixing=LxR Restoration?
Dey, Eletsky, Ioffe 96
~κ
Expansion Parameter:
n
2m f2
n 3 d3k(2 )3 n(k )
= 0
0
“Dilute”
LXR
Chiral Ward Identities: κ^2
Input:
V (q2) 0 TVV 0
A (q2) 0 T jAjA 0
e+e- Decay
.
VA Mixing in
T=180 MeV
Typical Mixing in
a1a1
T=150 MeV μb=225 MeV
VA Mixing + Bremsstralung
QGP Rates
wQGP:
ImW11R
14
NC eq2
q
q
2 12Tq
ln n
n
l+
l-
l+
l-
wQGP: γ
Collinear Enhancement+ LPM Effect : Arnold, Moore, Yaffe 01
Hydro Evolution
Fireball: NA60
TC 160 MeVs /nB 42Tf ,o. 120 MeV
LH = 6 GeV/fm-3
Thermal Freeze-out
Cooper-Frye
Chemical Freezeout:
Fireball cools faster x Rates higher = w/μπ !
Experiments
NA60:
PHENIX:
Dusling+Z 07 Dusling+Z 09
28
STAR: 11’
PHENIX PRC 81 (2010) 034911
Minbias (value ± stat ± sys) Central (value ± stat ± sys)
STAR 1.53 ± 0.07 ± 0.41 (w/o ρ) 1.40 ± 0.06 ± 0.38 (w/ ρ)
1.72 ± 0.10 ± 0.50 (w/o ρ) 1.54 ± 0.09 ± 0.45 (w/ ρ)
PHENIX 4.7 ± 0.4 ± 1.5 7.6 ± 0.5 ± 1.3Difference 2.0 σ 4.2 σ
Enhancement factor in 0.15<Mee<0.75 Gev/c2
Note: Acceptance difference etc.
WA98: γ
0<qT (GeV) <4 0<qT (GeV)<0.8
N:x2
Rates at RHIC: γ
RHIC1 RHIC2
PHENIX: γ
RHIC1 RHIC2
PHENIX extrapolation: γ
PHENIX: M<<qv
1
Systematics of the Extrapolation
15% Systematics!
LHC: γ
0<qT(GeV)<2 1<qT (GeV)<5
Achievements
1. EM “OK”*2. LxR “restored”3. QGP “visible”
(* PHENIX)