Upload
chung-chee-yuen
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
PHYC10001 6 Specialrel Web
Citation preview
© David N. Jamieson 2011
By:
Prof. David N. Jamieson
School of PhysicsUniversity of Melbourne
PHYC10001 Physics 1: Advanced
The Special Theory of RelativityFaradayMaxwell
Lorentz
Einstein
Heaviside
Lecture 2
Lecture 3
Lecture 4
Lecture 5
© David N. Jamieson 2011
At the end of this lecture you will be able to:
Explain how the theory of relativity arose from electromagnetism
Understand the concept of a reference frame
Explain how we know the speed of light is independent of the speed of the source and observer
Know the two postulates of special relativity
(Analyse the “light clock” and show that the postulates lead to time dilation)
Know when I say “c” I mean the speed of light– From celerity = swiftness of action or motion
Everything before this lecture was “Galilean Relativity”
1c + 1c = 2c
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Two ways to make electricity!
NS
NS
Changing magnetic field makes an ELECTRIC field
Moving charge in wires feels MAGNETIC force
Achtung!: There does not need to be two laws of Physics
here!
Induction 1 & 2
BvF
q
. and
dt
ddq BsEEF
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Maxwell Equations (from semester 2)I Gauss’ Law for electrostatics
II Gauss’ Law for magnetism
III Faraday’s Law of induction
IV Ampere-Maxwell Law
Predict the speed of light as an electromagnetic wave
dt
di E
ooo
loop
B.ds
o surfaceclosed
q
E.dA
0 surfaceclosed
B.dA
dt
d B
loop
E.ds
oo
c
1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How fast are we going right now?
What about Galileo and Newton?
Galileo:– The laws of Physics do not depend on absolute
motion (does this include electromagnetism?)
Newton:– An object once set in motion remains in motion until
acted upon by an external force
– The universe is governed by a majestic clockwork where all clocks everywhere at all times tick in perfect synchronisation.
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Do the laws of Physics depend on velocity?
Galileo: No! (but what about light?)
Newton: No! (but what about light?)
Maxwell: Magnetism is a velocity dependent force!
Michelson and Morley: Maybe but can’t find it
Einstein: No!
Very high speed
Galileo: 1634
There is no difference!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Mechanics Idea #1: Galilean Relativity
Galileo (and Newton) knew that an object, once set in motion, continues indefinitely at constant speed unless acted upon by an external force.
And this motion cannot be detected from “inside”
Twice the speed of sound and not a
drop spilled!...or parked at the
gate?
Lifestyle of a Concorde passenger
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Electromagnetism - fast overview
Electromagnetism is DIFFERENT to ordinary mechanics (or is it?)
Electrostatic force:
Magnetic force:
...magnetic force depends on the speed, v !
q Qr
S NB
BvF
q
(into screen)F
rF ˆ2r
kQq
v
q
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How fast are we going anyway?
Earth’s Orbit around Sun:30 km/s
Milky Way Galaxy trajectory towards Great Attractor:7000 km/s
Sun’s Orbit around galaxy:250 km/s
Rotation of Earth:1000 km/hr
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How fast are we going right now?
Possible answers
We are not going right now, so zero
1000 km/hr as the Earth rotates
30 km/s as the Earth orbits
some other speed
??!!?!?!?
Do the laws of relative motion apply to light & electromagnetism?– Is Galilean Relativity correct for light?
Need to study how objects move– From this can develop laws of mechanics
– Need to study how light behaves
Is light consistent with the laws of mechanics?
Can we tell how fast we are going?
(No and No)
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like tennis balls?
100 km/hr
Ball travels at speed hrkmuball /100
right) the to( sourceballball vuv
hrkm /1000100
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like tennis balls?
vsource=100 km/hr
0 km/hr
right) the to( sourceballball vuv
hrkm /0100100
Ball travels at speed hrkmuball /100
),,,( tzyx ),,,( tzyx
tvxx source
tt
x0
y
x
This is Galilean Relativity!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like tennis balls?
double stars
v
v
? vc
? vc
right) the to( sourcelightlight vuv
Light travels at speed culight
Light travels at speed culight
Light signals would get out of sync!!
Galilean Stars
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like tennis balls?
double stars
v
v
c
c
right) the to( sourcelightlight vuv
True situation!
cvlight
No!
Independent of vsource
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like sound waves?
Speed of sound in air always Mach 1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like sound waves?– Speed of sound in air is cs
– Speed relative to observer
Mach 2
Mach 1
right) the to ( observerssound vcv
scobserverv
ssssound cccv 2
observerv
sobserver cv 2
sc
Observer frame
Earth frame
Mach # = v/cs
cs=340 m/s
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like sound waves?
Propose a medium for light: Aether
Sound in Air– Air has pressure– Made of O, N, Ar– Has mass– You breath it– ...
Light in Aether?– Aether is insubstantial– Very elastic– Other properties???
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like sound waves?
Aether wind!
skmvobserver /30
skmcvcv observerlight /30
c
Michelson - Morley Experiment in 1887
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Like sound waves?
NO!! Michelson
-Morleyexperimentfound nodifference!
Speed of light istherefore independent ofthe speed of theobserver! 30 km/s skmvobserver /30
c
c
© David N. Jamieson 2011
How does light behave?
Summary– Speed of light
independent of speed of source
– Speed of light independent of speed of observer
Object Us ThemUs 0Them 0Tennis Ball 100 km/hr + v 100 km/hrSound Wave
v
v
v
vcs sc
Light c c
smc /103 8 !
(+ to right)
Us
Them
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Can you catch a beam of light?
Maxwell
Light is an electromagnetic
wave!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity
Laws of Physics the same for everybody
The speed of light the same for everybody
Sun’s light moves at speed c
Sun’s light moves at speed c
Let us look at a startling consequence of these facts
2/c
2/c
2/3)2/( ccc
2/)2/( ccc
c
c
c
c
c
© David N. Jamieson 2011
At the end of this lecture you will be able to:
Know the two postulates of Special Relativity (SR)
Analyse the “light clock” and show that the postulates lead to time dilation
Analyse the “muon experiment” and show that time dilation leads to the Lorentz contraction
Explain why simultaneity is relative
Main conclusion from last lecture:The two postulates of Special Relativity (SR)
Laws of Physics same in all inertial frames
Speed of light same for all observers and independent of source
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Things we have to give up
Universal time
Universal length
Relative velocity formula
Galilean Transform equations
vtxx
yy
zz
tt
Galilean transforms
)( vtxx
yy
zz
)/( 2cvxtt
22 /1/1 cvLorentz transforms
v
y
xt
y
x
t
A new term in the equation for the time transform!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Light Clock
A photon bouncing between mirrors may be used as a clock
© David N. Jamieson 2011
30 km/s
The light clock seen from space
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The light clock seen from space
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Speed c
Speed c
Lecture theatre at rest relative to Sun
Lecture theatre on Earth
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Speed c
Speed c
Long distance
Short distance
Spaceship frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Vector addition of velocities?
skmv /30
skmc /000,300
22 cvV
Wrong!
Speed of light is independent of speed of source!
Spaceship frame
We are going to need a new velocity addition formula!
photon
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Vector addition of velocities?
cV
Speed of light is independent of speed of source!
skmv /30 See later for how to add velocity vectors consistent with relativity.
photon
Earth frame ,
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Speed c
Speed c
Long distance
Short distance
Moving Clock is slow!d
cdt /2
Spaceship frame ,
© David N. Jamieson 2011
22 /1/1)/2( cvcdt
Analysis by spaceship
Speed c
Speed c
d
v
dl l
22 dl 22 dl
cdt /2
The spaceship sees the time intervalon the Earth clock is longer than the timeinterval on the spaceship clock by a factor
22 /1
1
cv
Earth Clock
cdlt /2 22
cdvtt /)2/(2 22
2222 /)2/(4 cdvtt
222222 /4)/( cdtcvt
tt
22 /1 cv
tt
v
2//2 vtlvlt so but
t
Spaceship frame ,
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Summary
The Special Theory of Relativity
First Result: Moving clocks run slow
tcv
tt
.
/1 22
22 /1
1
cv
Moving clock
Our (resting)
clock
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Moving clocks run slow: Experimental Test
Many experimental tests available!
Will look at only one case study
Short lived radioactive particles are created by cosmic ray bombardment of the Earth’s atmosphere
These can be detected (see our third year physics lab)
© David N. Jamieson 2011
View from Earth: Moving clocks run slow!
Cosmic Rays create fast muons in outer atmosphere
Identical muons created in the laboratory live for 2.2 millionths of a second
Even at speed of light, this is not long enough to reach sea level!
Fast muons live longer than slow muons
12 ttt events between interval Time
vLt /
Fast muons created here
Event 1
1t
See plenty here!
Event 22t
L Expect to decay here(660 m)
v
This is the proper height
© David N. Jamieson 2011
View from muons: Moving objects contract!
How do the muons view the situation?
Muons always live for 2.2 millionths of a second by their own clocks
The fast mountain must shrink for it to get past in the short time available
Moving objects contract!
Stationary muons created
here
Fast mountain
I’m notgoing tolive longenoughto reach
sea level!
1t
Event 1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
View from muons: Moving objects contract!
How do the muons view the situation?
Muons always live for 2.2 millionths of a second by their own clocks
The fast mountain must shrink for it to get past in the short time available
Moving objects contract!
Stationary muons created
here
Fast mountain
1t
Event 1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
View from muons: Moving objects contract!
How do the muons view the situation?
Muons always live for 2.2 millionths of a second by their own clocks
The fast mountain must shrink for it to get past in the short time available!
Moving objects contract!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
View from muons: Moving objects contract!
How do the muons view the situation?
Muons always live for 2.2 millionths of a second by their own clocks
The fast mountain must shrink for it to get past in the short time available
Moving objects contract!
This is the Lorentz contraction
Bottom of mountain reaches muon
2t
vLttt /12
vLttt /12 and
v
L
tLtLv // hence
22 /1 cv
tt
)/( ttLL
22 /1)/ cvLLtt :( eliminate
LL
Event 2
The measured length is always less than or equal to the proper length
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Summary
The Special Theory of Relativity
First Result: Moving clocks run slow
Second Result: Moving objects contract
/LL
22 /1
1
cv
© David N. Jamieson 2011
At the end of this lecture you will be able to: Know the two postulates of Special Relativity (SR)
– Laws of Physics same in all inertial frames– Speed of light same for all observers and independent of source
Lecture 21 Analyse the “muon experiment” and show that time dilation leads to
the Lorentz contraction Explain why simultaneity is relative Know the concept of a “reference frame” Describe the concept of the light cone and relate it to the past, future
and elsewhere Be perplexed at some of the phenomena of SR!
– The long car in the short garage problem– The short ruler in the even shorter inspection hatch– The Magnetic Force– The Twin Phenomenon
Lecture 22 Curved space and the General Theory of Relativity The Global positioning system
38
/LL
tt
22 /1/1 cv
21
mvm )(
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Proton View
Galaxy crossing protons
Galaxy view
proton speed v < c (just) = 1010
Cross galaxy in t=105 years
Proton view
galaxy speed v < c (just)L’ = L/ = 105/1010 = 10-5 l.y.
= 95 million km = 0.7 A.U.Hence t’ = L’/c = 10-5 years
= 315 seconds
Galaxy View
L = 105 light years
v
-v
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Earth View
Alpha Centauri
4.5 ly
Photon View
The universe seen by a photon
Only weightless objects can travel at the speed of light
All clocks freeze
All distances contract to zero
Where would you like to go today?
What if v > c ?
Violate causality
Cannot happen in our universe
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The two postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity
Laws of Physics are the same in all inertial frames
The Speed of light is the same for all observers and independent of the speed source or observer
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Lecture theatre experiment
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Lecture theatre experiment
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Lecture theatre experiment
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Lecture theatre experiment
I see it!I see it!
Event 2Event 1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Lecture theatre experiment
Simultaneous!I see it!I see it!
Event 2Event 1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
I see it!
Event 2
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
I see it!
Event 1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity of Simultaneity
Space view of lecture theatre experiment
30 km/s
I see it!
NOT Simultaneous!
Spacetime simulation
Event 1 later than Event 2
Event 1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Summary
The Special Theory of Relativity
First Result: Moving clocks run slow
Second Result: Moving objects contract
Third Result: Simultaneity is Relative
© David N. Jamieson 2011
At the end of this lecture you will be able to:
Know that simultaneity is relative– Explain the relationship between simultaneity and measurement
Explain the concept of a “reference frame”– Plot maps of space and time and identify the past, the future and
…
– Describe a reference frame and the importance of synchronised clocks and rulers
Understand how to examine some perplexing problems of special relativity– … and how to resolve “paradoxes”
– The long car in the short garage problem
– The short ruler in the even shorter inspection hatch
– The Magnetic Force
(On to advanced topics...)
© David N. Jamieson 2011
A reference frame
To specify an event,
an observer must assign – 3 space coordinates (x, y, z)
– and a time coordinate (t).
We need a calibrated reference frame.
Your clocks and rulers fill all space
You are here at origin
These clocks keep proper time and rulers are proper length
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The problem of measurement Lecture theatre reference frame
Simultaneous!
Left end is at 0
Event 1 Event 2
Right end is at L’
22 /1
1
cv
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The problem of measurement Spaceship reference frame
Left end is at 0
Event 1 Even
Right end is at L’
Not Simultaneous!L
L’=L/
22 /1
1
cv
© David N. Jamieson 2011
time axis
space axis
home
uni
PAST
Future
Elsewhere Elsewhere
The Light Cone: Maps of space-time
Events that happen “elsewhere” can have no effect on
Supernova!
here and nowThis is a
“world line”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Light Cone: History of Universe
Age of quasars
Here and now
The Big Bang
Earth forms
Milky Way forms
time
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The car in the garage
Perplexing Problem #1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the car fit in the garage?22 /1
1
cv
2/L
Garage at rest
Car at rest
L
© David N. Jamieson 2011
v
/L
v
/L
Will the car fit in the garage?
Garage Frame
EVENT “B”
Garage Frame
EVENT “F”
EVENT “B” occurs before EVENT “F”
2/L
2/L
22 /1
1
cv
4
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the car fit in the garage?
Car Frame
EVENT “F”
v
Car Frame
EVENT “B”
v
EVENT “F” occurs before EVENT “B”
L
L
4
© David N. Jamieson 2011
v
/L
v
/L
Will the car fit in the garage?
Garage Frame
EVENT “B”
Garage Frame
EVENT “F”
EVENT “B” occurs before EVENT “F”
2/L
2/L
22 /1
1
cv
4
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the car get wet?
Car Frame
EVENT “F”
v
Car Frame
EVENT “B”
v
EVENT “F” occurs before EVENT “B”
L
L
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The ruler in the drain
Perplexing Problem #2
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Street Frame
Ruler Frame
D r a i n
Drain
v
L
/L v
/L
L
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Street Frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Street Frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Street Frame
YES!!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Ruler Frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Ruler Frame
NO!!
WRONG! Unphysical simulation.
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Ruler Frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Ruler Frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Ruler Frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Will the ruler fall in the drain?
Ruler Frame
TRUE ANSWER: YES!!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The falling ruler
y'
x'
)0,0,( 1xSituation at t’ =0
)0,0,( 2x
Situation at t’ < 0
),,( 11 tyx ),,( 12 tyx
Speed u: y = -ut
Slides with this colour background are in , ,space
!
1y
1x 2x
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The falling rulery'
x'
!
1x 2x
)0,0,( 1xSituation at t’ =0
)0,0,( 2x
Speed u: y = -ut
)( vtxx yy
zz
)/( 2cvxtt 22 /1/1 cv
Lorentz transforms
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The falling ruler
x'
)0,0,( 1xSituation at t’ =0
)0,0,( 2x
!
1x 2x
Speed u: y = -ut
ct'
Event 1:The coordinates
(x’1, 0) transform to:
1111 )( xtvxx 2
12
111 / )/( cxcxvtt
)( tvxx yy
zz
)/( 2cxvtt 22 /1/1 cv
Lorentz transforms
2111 / cxuuty
Event 2:The coordinates
(x’2, 0) transform to:
2222 )( xtvxx 2
22
222 / )/( cxcxvtt 2
222 / cxuuty
Note: Two velocities here
• u is velocity of falling ruler (in –y =y’ direction)
• v is speed of ruler along ground (in +x direction)
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The falling ruler
)0,/ ,( 211 cxux
Situation at t = 0
)0,/ ,( 222 cxux
!
y
x
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The magnetic force
Perplexing Problem #3
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Current in wire: Wire is electrically neutral
+ + + + + + +
– – – – – – –
+ + + + + + +
– – – – – – –
No current
With current dq /
Free electrons(1 per atom)
Metal ionsdq
q d
dq / v
C/m : of unit
! !
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The origin of the magnetic force
Adjacent moving electron
+ + + + + + +
– – – – – – –
– vv
(can choose same speed without loss of generality)
d
d
–
+ + + + + + +
– – – – – –v
+
/d
d
Adjacent moving electron frame dqdq ///
)/( dq BvF
q
! !
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Some numbers For a current of 10 Ampere in a wire of area 1 mm2
– Electron density in Copper Ne = 8.5x1022 atoms/cm3
– The atom density is the same as the electron density because each atom contributes 1 free electron to the metal
From semester 2 theory, the speed of electrons in this wire will be:
– e = electron charge = 1.6x10-19 Coulombs
– A = cross sectional area of wire = 1 mm2
– Gives
What is the gamma factor for this very slow speed?
eeAN
iv
mm/s 7.0105.8).101.(106.1
1022619
v
24
221031
/1
1
cv
This is incredibly small!
But we see these magnetic effects because of the enormous strength of the electric force!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
At the end of this lecture you will be able to:
Explain the magnetic force using the Special Theory of Relativity
Understand how to draw a Minkowski diagram – a map of space time– The time axis– The space axis– … using the magnetic force as an example
Understand (qualitatively) the origin of the Lorentz transformations
Understand Five advanced topics:
Derive the relativistic velocity addition formula
Show that, like time and space, mass depends on reference frame
Understand the subtleties of the twin paradox
Explain why brightness fluctuations constrain the size of an object
Be able to account for things that apparently go faster than the speed of light
(Link time, space and gravity)
(The Global Positioning System)
phenomenon
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The magnetic force – revisited
This time with a spacetime diagram
Perplexing Problem #3 (again)
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The inventor of the “Minkowski Diagram”
Hermann Minkowski
Young Einstein’smathematics lecturerat ETH* Zurich
Followed his youngprotégée's career with interest…
"The views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil of experimental physics, and therein lies their strength. They are radical. Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality."
http
://e
n.w
ikip
ed
ia.o
rg/w
iki/H
erm
an
n_M
inko
wsk
i
*Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich
© David N. Jamieson 2011
1: No current in wire
ct
x
Wor
ld L
ine
of o
rigin
All events at t=0
Positive ion Electron
© David N. Jamieson 2011
2: With current in wire
ct
x
Wor
ld L
ine
of o
rigin
All events at t=0
x’
ct’
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Exercise: Derive the Lorentz Transforms
ct
x
x’
ct’
1x
1ct
1x
1tc
)( vtxx yy
zz
)/( 2cvxtt
22 /1/1 cvLorentz transforms
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Example: Application of the Lorentz Transforms
ct
x
x’
ct’
Earth Frame
)( vtxx yy
zz
)/( 2cvxtt
22 /1/1 cvLorentz transforms
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Example: Application of the Lorentz Transforms
x’
ct’
Spaceship Frame
)( vtxx yy
zz
)/( 2cvxtt
22 /1/1 cvLorentz transforms
© David N. Jamieson 2011
)( vtxx yy
zz
)/( 2cvxtt
22 /1/1 cvLorentz transforms
Example: What are the times on the spaceship clocks?
ct
x
x’
ct’
Event 1:The coordinates
(x1, ct1) of this clock are: (0, 0)
Hence
0)00(1 vx 0)/00( 2
1 cvt
Event 2:The coordinates
(x2, ct2) of this clock are: (L, 0)
HenceLvLx )0(2
222 /)/0( cvLcvLt
v
L0 Earth Frame
© David N. Jamieson 2011
1. Relativistic addition of velocities
Advanced topics
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity
Laws of Physics the same for everybody
The speed of light the same for everybody
Sun’s light moves at speed c
Sun’s light moves at speed c
How do we add velocities?
2/c
2/c
2/3)2/( ccc
2/)2/( ccc
c
c
c
c
c
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Adding velocities in Special Relativity
cu 2/cv
Problem: If u=c in reference frame of sun, what is u’in frame of spaceship?
Note: Two velocity vectors
Light from Sun, u or u’
Relative motion, v
Reference frame S Reference frame S’
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Adding velocities in Special Relativity
v
Problem: If object has velocity u in reference frame S, what is u’ in frame S’?
Note: Two velocity vectors
Object, u or u’
Relative motion, v
Reference frame S Reference frame S’
u=100 km/hr
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations
Consider an object moving at u in frame S, u´ in frame S´
Transform using Lorentz, and time derivatives
But dx/dt = u so:
and inverse (change sign of v):
222 //1
/
//'
''
cdtdxv
vdtdx
cvdxdt
vdtdx
cvxtd
vtxd
dt
dxu
21
'
c
uvvu
u
2
'1
'
c
vuvu
u
2'
'
c
vxtt
vtxx
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations
Example
A nucleus travelling at 0.50c in the laboratory frame decays and spits out an alpha particle at 0.80c with respect to the reference frame of the nucleus. What is the speed of the alpha particle, with respect to the lab?
Let nucleus frame be S´ and lab frame be S so we want:
0.5 + 0.8 = 0.93!
2
'1
'
c
vuvu
u
cccc
c
vuvu
u 93.04.1
3.1
8.05.01
80.050.0'
1
'
2
v = 0.5c u’ = 0.8c
Reference frame S’
Reference frame S
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The spacetime interval
Clearly time dilation and length contraction are related
Consider light clock in two different reference frames, S´ and S´´
h is same in both reference frames
We define an invariant in all reference frames:The spacetime interval s is defined by
The spacetime interval has the same value in all inertial reference frames
2222 xtcs
h
Mirror in S’
''21
21 xtv
'21 tc h
Mirror in S’’
''''21
21 xtv
''21 tc Same in both!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
2. Relativistic mass
Advanced topics
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Length & Time change with speed: How about mass?
)(Vm
)(Vm
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Length & Time change with speed: How about mass?
Earth Frame
L
v
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Length & Time change with speed: How about mass?
Earth Frame
L
Earth’s
Throw to Catch analysis:
Time
Vertical momentum
u
L
u
Lt
2/2
v
Event 1: Throw
00 )()( uumuVm 0u
V
Event 2: Catch
v
)( 0um
)(Vm
uv
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Length & Time change with speed: How about mass?
Spaceship Frame
L00
2/2
u
L
u
Lt
Event 1: Throw/ Event 2: Catch = same place
v
1/
u
Lt
tt
/0uu
u
Lt Earth’s
/tt
0u
v
Spaceship’s
Throw to Catch analysis:
Time
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Length & Time change with speed: How about mass?
Earth Frame
u
Earth’s
Throw to Catch analysis:
Time
Vertical momentum
u
Lt
v
v
Event 1: Throw
0u
V
Event 2: Catch
v
)( 0um
)(Vm
00 )()( uumuVm
/0uu
000 )(/)( uumuVm
)()( 0umVm
22
0
/1
)()(
cv
umVm
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Length & Time change with speed: How about mass?
Consider a symmetrical elastic collision between two balls
vv
)(vm
vVu then , Let 0022
0
/1
)()(
cv
umVm
)(vm
22 /1
)0()(
cv
mvm
mass rest mm )0(
Moving objects get heavier!
cvvm as )(
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Constant force, F, implies constant acceleration, a from
Newton’s F = ma formula
Can any speed, v, be reached?
No! Cannot have v > c
Can show that E = mc2 where m is the “relativistic mass”
of an object and E is the total energy of the object
From this:
where m is the “rest mass” of the object.
Moving objects get heavier!
2
21
1)(
c
vmvm
mvm )(
22 /1/1 cv
© David N. Jamieson 2011
3. E=mc2 & relativistic kinetic energy
Advanced topics
© David N. Jamieson 2011
–v
What about E=mc2 ?
v
Mvc
E
c
v
vMc
E
c
v
2
)1(2
)1(
MMcE
2
2cE
MM
2mcE
MMm
M
M
EARTH
FRAM
ESP
ACES
HIP
FRAM
E
–v
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativistic Kinetic Energy: .
Force is the time rate of change of the momentum:
where
where
and 1
What is the relativistically correct relation between force and acceleration?
…
.
We can now integrate . to get the kinetic energy
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativistic Kinetic Energy continued
By definition: .
Using expression on previous page and a change of variable, get:
/ .
hence 1
(Exercise: Show this reduces to when ≪ )
Re-order:
≡ “Total Energy”
Total energy of a particle is Kinetic + Rest Mass energy
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Summary: Total Energy & Momentum
Total energy of a particle is Kinetic + Rest Mass energy:
We already defined the total momentum of a particle:
And finally, it is possible to show:
which is the relativistically correct relation between momentum and total energy (replaces /2m )
© David N. Jamieson 2011
At the end of this lecture you will be able to:
Understand Six advanced topics:
1. Derive the relativistic velocity addition formula
2. Show that, like time and space, mass depends on reference frame
3. E=mc2
4. Understand the subtleties of the twin phenomenon
5. Explain why brightness fluctuations constrain the size of an object
6. Be able to account for things that apparently go faster than the speed of light
Light, time and gravity
Link time, space and gravity
The Global Positioning System
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Example: Relativistic Kinetic Energy
The highest energy cosmic ray protons have 10
What is the kinetic energy of such a proton?
Answer:1
10 110
For a proton, rest mass ≅ 1so 10
Here the kinetic energy is ten orders of magnitude greater than the equivalent rest mass energy!
At CERN,maximum proton energy in LHC (lab frame) is
7 10
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Some gamma factors
Object speed gamma
J/kg
Car on freeway 100 km/r 1.00 400
Fast proton c/2 1.15 1.4 x 1016
Electron in Melbourne
Synchrotron 3 GeV c 6.00 4.5 x 1016
Cosmic ray proton c 1010 9 x 1026
Australian electric power for 1 year 1.42 x 1018 J
(45 GW continuous)
22 /1/1 cvv
/ 1
63 billion years of Australian electric power
Kinetic Energy per kg
© A/Prof RE Scholten (2008)
Relativistic energy: pmc2
(pmc2) has units of energy
At low velocity, (pmc2) reduces to
Second term is classical kinetic energy, associated with the motion
First term suggests there is an inherent energy associated with mass itself
Define the total energy E of a particle as
Rest energy is E0=mc2 (also called mass energy)
Relativistic kinetic energy
Returning to eqn (*), we can substitute E0=mc2:
and
123
2222
2
22
22
p 2
1
2
11
/1mumcmc
c
u
cu
mcmc
energy kinetic energy rest 02
p KEmcE
0p2
p 11 EmcK
22222p mcpcmc
20
22 EpcE
Epc p
© David N. Jamieson 2011
4. The Twin Phenomenon
Advanced topics
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenonTi
me
axis
Arrive’
Depart’
Arrive/Depart High Earth clocks run FAST!
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenon
Tim
e ax
is
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenonTi
me
axis
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenon
Tim
e ax
is
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
Arrive’
Arrive/Depart
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenonTi
me
axis
Arrive’
Arrive/Depart
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
High Earth clocks run FAST!
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenon
Tim
e ax
is
Arrive’
Arrive/Depart
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
High Earth clocks run FAST!
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenonTi
me
axis
Arrive’
Arrive/Depart
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
Depart’
High Earth clocks run FAST!
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenon
Tim
e ax
is
Arrive’
Arrive/Depart
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
Depart’
High Earth clocks run FAST!
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The twin phenomenonTi
me
axis
Arrive’
Arrive/Depart
Start/Start’
Finish/Finish’
Depart’
High Earth clocks run FAST!
!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
5. Brightness fluctuations and the size of objects
Advanced topics
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativity and brightness fluctuations
Imagine all stars in a globular cluster simultaneously get brighter
A
BC
10 ly
Photons from A reach Earth 10 years before photons from C
Therefore takes 10 years for globular cluster to reach new brightness
Observations of brightness fluctuations provides information about the size of objects
e.g. Quasars fluctuate on timescales of months
© David N. Jamieson 2011
6. Things that go faster than the speed of light (or at least look like it)
Advanced topics
© David N. Jamieson 2011
6.1 Superluminal Interstellar Scissors
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Superluminal scissors #1
© David N. Jamieson 2011
6.2 Superluminal Jets
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Superluminal jets from SS433 So what is going on???
18,000 light years from here
Eclipsing binary x-ray: black hole pulling matter from companion star
Emitting x-rays from accretion disc + jets of hot hydrogen
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Superluminal jets from SS433
See: Mirabel, I.F, Rodriguez, L.F., 1994 Nature 371 page 46 “A superluminal source in the galaxy”
SS433
time
dist
ance
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 1
Earth
SS433
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 365 = 1Year
Earth
SS433
Distance=
2 light years
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day -6yr
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day -5yr
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433 SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day -4yr
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day -3yr
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day -2yr
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 0
SS433
Image of blob leaving SS433
Image of blob far from SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 100
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 200
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 300
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 365
SS433
Image of blob far from SS433Telescope view
from Earth
SS433
Earth
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Day 365
SS433
Telescope viewfrom Earth
SS433
Earth
Distance=
2 light years
Distance=
1 light year
Image of blob far from SS433
“Top view”
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Light, time and gravity
Introducing: The Theory of General Relativity
Advanced topics
Practitioners of General Relativity were once described as "magnificent cultural ornaments“ by Lord Martin Rees, President Royal Society, December 1999.
© David N. Jamieson 2011
A reference frame
To specify an event,
an observer must assign – 3 space coordinates (x, y, z)
– and a time coordinate (t).
We need a calibrated reference frame.
Your clocks and rulers fill all space
You are here at origin
These clocks keep proper time and rulers are proper length
© David N. Jamieson 2011
SR + Acceleration = Warped Space = GR
Mechanism for warping space
Use a rotating reference frame
Apply Special Relativity & Lorentz contraction
Apply Equivalence Principle
Get non-Euclidian geometry
Experiments in geometry:
Does C=2 r ?
© David N. Jamieson 2011
WHY ARE YOU WEIGHTLESS WHEN YOU FALL?
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Aside: Why are astronauts weightless?
Radius of Earth 6,350 km
Height of tower 400 km
Gravity at top of tower:– almost same as
on surface!
– “g”=8.71 m/s2
Why are astronauts weightless?
Answer: Because they are falling!
22
/71.8)400(
"" smkmr
Gmg
Earth
Earth
Data:mEarth = 61024 kgrEarth = 6350 kmG=6.6710–11 N.m2/kg2
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Einstein’s Equivalence Principle of 1912
Inertial mass:
Gravitational mass:
Newton knew mI = mG
Eötvös experiment confirmed this to high accuracy
Why?
Arghhh!
Einstein: 1912
“The effects of a gravitational field are equivalent to those of an (upward) acceleration”
This is the Equivalence Principle & the birth of General Relativity.
2r
mmGF GEarth
gravity
amF Iinertia
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The geometry of a rotating cylinder
Side view of rotating cylinder
Twelve 1 metre rulers laid down around rim by observer on ground
Circumference:
Velocity of rim
v
L
mLrC 12122
r
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The geometry of a rotating cylinder
Observer on rim sees rulers going past at high speed
They are shrunken to less than 1 m by Lorentz contraction!
I am standing on the bottom of a
stationary cylinder watching lots of rulers go past
Fast moving shrunken rulerv
22 /1
1
cv
/LL
L
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Down
Lorentz contraction makes observer on ground thin, observer on cylinder fat
I am standing on the bottom of a stationary cylinder watching lots
of rulers go past
L
/LL
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Apply Equivalence Principle
A rotating cylinder provides “artificial gravity”
“Artificial gravity” in the control room of the “Discovery” (2001-A Space Odyssey)
Observer held onto wall by centripetal force
2001 centrifuge
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Apply Equivalence Principle
“Gravity” points outwards on rim of rotating disk– C < 2R there
Gravity points inwards on Earth– C > 2R there
Earth’s gravity makes more space!
LLCLL 12/ so
CCL //12
mLrC 12122
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Fast clock = slow by time
dilation
Apply Equivalence Principle
t
tt
v
Gravitational red shift for clocks at different heights
Resting clock
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Apply Equivalence Principle
Centripetal acceleration
t
tt
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Apply Equivalence Principle
Centripetal acceleration
t
tt
Gravitational red shift for clocks at different heights
Low slow clock
High fast clock
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Kepler’s Laws
Data for the Solar System
Planet Eccentricity Orbit Radius R (AU)
Period T (years)
T2/R3
Mercury 0.206 0.387 0.241 1.002
Venus 0.007 0.723 0.615 1.001
Earth 0.017 1.000 1.000 1.000
Mars 0.093 1.524 1.881 1.000
Jupiter 0.048 5.203 11.862 0.999
Saturn 0.056 9.534 29.456 1.001
Largest Biggesterror
Closest
GMr
T
r
T
r
T 2
33
23
32
22
31
21 4
)(
)
)(
)
)(
)
( ( (
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Curved Space: Advance in Perihelion of Mercury
Perihelion (closest approach to Sun) advances owing to gravitational influence from rest of solar system.
The observed advance:– 574” every 100 years.
Calculations using Newton’s universal gravity from the rest of the solar system:
– 531” every 100 years.
Could this be due to unknown planet Vulcan?
No! Residual 574 – 531 = 43” is due to General Relativity
Mercury
© David N. Jamieson 2011
The Global Positioning System
Advanced topics
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Array of 24 satellites that send precision time & position signals
In orbit 20,000 km above surface of Earth (12 hr orbit)
Ground station in US to maintain system
Satellites broadcast accurate time signals
Hand held receiver can locate your position to phenomenal accuracy
Orbits are inside Van Allen radiation belts
Need radiation hard electronics
What is the Global Positioning System?
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativistic Problems for the GPS
1. GPS satellites clocks run slow by 6 millionths of a second per day (SR - time dilation)
2. Cannot synchronise by exchange of signals
3. GPS satellite clocks run fast by 45 millionths of a second per day (GR - gravitational blue shift)
Net effect: Run fast by 39 millionths of a second per day (=error of 12 kilometres)!
SOLUTION: Make the clocks run slow to compensate!
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Relativistic formulae
Kinetic energy 2
2
1mvK 2)1( mcKrel
Momentum
Velocity addition
mvPrel mvP
m mMass
Pythagoras 2222 zyxd 222222 zyxtcs
)/1(
)(2cuv
vuu
vuu
22 /1
1
cv
v
uu ,
mm ,
Total energy UKE relKmcmcE 22
© David N. Jamieson 2011
Conclusion
“Philosophy is written in this great book (by which I mean the universe) which stands always open to our view, but it cannot be understood unless one first learns how to comprehend the language and interpret the symbols in which it is written, and its symbols are triangles, circles and other geometric figures, without which it is not humanly possible to comprehend even one word of it; without these, one wanders in a dark labyrinth”– Galileo Galilei (Il Saggiatore,
1623)
The Hubble deep field south: 12 billion light years of galaxies at the south celestial polehttp://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1998/41/image/b
(October 1998)