53
Planning and Zoning Strategies for Protecting Indiana’s Farmland

Planning and Zoning Strategies for Protecting Indiana’s Farmland

  • View
    219

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Planning and Zoning

Strategies for Protecting

Indiana’s Farmland

Brad Buening Planning degree—BSU 15 years—local government Land Use Specialist, IFB Bridge gap between political/ag

Local Planning

Local Planning

Initial charge

Work with ISDA Research existing ag ordinances Compile list Create model zoning ordinances Allow locals to pick and choose

Local Planning

Not self-proclaimed expert

Work experience in planning/local gov’t

Agriculture background

Opportunity to visit and review local ord

Local Planning

Visited ½ counties with P & Z

Reviewed approx. 30 proposed ordinances

Have seen the good, bad, and ugly of zoning

Local Planning

The counties that are proactive are working

70% of job has been reactive, but effective

Local Planning

Quick refresher course on

Indiana Zoning

Local Planning

Types of Plan Commissions

Metro (1) Area (32) Advisory (46) None (13)

Local Planning

Zoning Ordinance Actual law/enforceable Various zoning districts (ag, res, com,ind) Permitted by right—No public hearings Special exception—meet specific criteria Developmental standards (setbacks, coverage,

density, height, or area)

Local Planning

Local Government Process

Zoning districts are created Residential Commercial Agricultural Industrial Open space

Local Planning

Local Government Process

Uses are pigeon-holed in districts K.I.S.S. may not apply

Ethanol plant Bio-diesel plant

Better separation needed Need sub-districts Residential is good example

Local Planning

Local Government Process

Special exceptions are created Unique uses Not needed if sub-districts are created

Local Planning

Local Government Process

Developmental Standards established Setbacks (front, side, rear) Height Area Density

Local Planning

Local Government Process

Public Hearings Petition Advertise Notify Hearing Adopt Record

Local Planning

Planning and Zoning Issues (that I see)

Farm vs. Non-farm conflicts Burden on farmer vs. residents

SE for farmer (backwards) Agricultural clause—for homes in ag area

Livelihood vs. recreational (choice)

Local Planning

I want to keep ag uses from SE (BZA) Emotional Time consuming Expensive Based on subjective criteria

Noise, odor, property values, water usage Hard to measure, expensive, staff, time

Ag zones should allow Ag uses

Local Planning

What is AG land?

Anything Goes

Agriculture

Local Planning

Model Zoning Ordinance

Not one size fits all concept Sliding-scale development (2 versions) Multiple agricultural districts Farm preservation Other methods being used

Local Planning

Researched several zoning concepts

Reviewed pros and cons

Created hybrids by combining concepts

Local Planning

Sliding-scale (version I)

Larger lots are allowed more development Larger remainder for viable farmland

Residential (2ac max) Ag clause Contiguous to one another

Local Planning

Sliding ScaleLot Area Max. # allowed

Up to 20 ac 1

20-40 ac 2

40-80 ac 3

80-160 ac 4

Local Planning

Local Planning

Local Planning

Local Planning

Local Planning

Local Planning

If you add language that say contiguous…

Local Planning

Local Planning

Sliding-scale (version II)

Target smaller tracts Under 20 acres (already ruined)

These tracts can be subdivided aggressively Residential (2ac max) Ag clause Contiguous to one another

Local Planning

These lots were created by earlier methods

Counties thought 15-20 ac would preserve

It only converted faster

Local Planning

20-acre minimum Does not work Drives price/acre up Takes land out of production faster Leaves weeds and mess

Farmer won’t come in for 10-12 acres Max acreage works better

Local Planning

Local Planning

3 highlighted lots could net 9-10 lots

Reduced pressure from viable farmland

Allowed housing in country setting

Made the best of a “bad” situation

Local Planning

Another hybrid would be a flat rate

Allow “X” # of splits for each parent tract

Can incorporate ag clause/contiguous

Can control amount of growth

Local Planning

Multiple agricultural districts

Row crop farming (A-1) CAFO/CFO (A-2) Agri-business (A-3) Residential-ag (A-4) Ag park (A-5)

Local Planning

Reduce land use conflicts;

Maintain property rights;

Efficient use of infrastructure

Local Planning

Another simple variation is an A-2 Housing only on small lot (2ac max)

Need rezone/SE Prove to APC/BZA won’t harm A-1

Personally did this last week Point system

Land use, density, soil types, etc.

Local Planning

Farm preservation

PDR/TDR/LDR Infill incentives Mitigation (developers 2:1) Cluster development Conservation easements (vol) Bargain Sale

Local Planning

PDR/TDR/LDR

Great theory Farmer gets 401K Young farmer able to purchase at farm rate Infrastructure not taxed Control growth areas

Hard to track administratively GIS makes it easier

Local Planning

Infill incentive

Tax abatement on skipped over land Higher densities

Adjacent to infrastructure Lessen pressure on farm land

Local Planning

Developer mitigation

Incentivizing development near city Penalize for hop-scotching around

Trip-generation causing pollution Closer, less pollution

Put a monetary figure to it

Local Planning

Cluster development (Open Space)

Keeping adjacent/contiguous Not hop-scotching Higher density

Preserve farm land Sensitive area

Local Planning

Local Planning

Local Planning

Local Planning

Conservation easements

Voluntary action by land owner Preserves in perpetuity Tax incentive Young farmer encouragement

Long run—create larger tracts

Local Planning

Bargain sales

Selling land below fair market value Difference is charitable contribution Great way to initiate a land trust

Local Planning

Other options Ag clause BMP/additional DS Point system Fences, septics, wells, mailboxes, driveways,

Local Planning

Most of these options are still just band-aids

Multiple zones & TDR/PDR are broader Separate land uses Longevity (create trends) Others will face again with more houses/CAFO

Local Planning

Local flavor and politics will determine:

What to use When to use it Where to use it How to use it

Local Planning

Biggest concern:

Multiple zone adoption No new zones created Have to rezone 1 by 1

Local Planning

Glad to review wording

Assist in ordinance revisions

Compile other county language

Local Planning

Brad Buening Land Use Specialist 317.692.7886 office 317.460.3785 cell [email protected]