Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
D A T E :
報告發佈會 Report Launch
2018年12月6日
2
發佈會流程Rundown
1. 致歡迎辭
Opening Remarks
2. 研究報告結果
Research Findings
3. 減廢策略及行動
Strategies and Actions
4. 傳媒問答環節
Media Q&A Session
3
致歡迎辭 Opening Remarks
一次性飲品包裝工作小組主席
Chairman of Single-Use Beverage Packaging Working Group
司馬文先生
Mr. Paul Zimmerman
4
Working together to reduce waste
5
研究報告結果 Research F ind ings
德勤(香港)風險咨詢總監
Director, Risk Advisory, Deloitte Advisory (Hong Kong)
翁介中先生
Mr. Herbert Yung
Drink Without Waste
Research Overview
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 7
Background
The purpose of this research project is to assess different methods to effectively manage beverage packaging waste generated from single-use, sealed containers in Hong Kong with the aim to minimise waste directed to landfills, incinerators, and the environment.
For the purposes of the study, beverages are defined as 'non-alcoholic, non-dairy beverages sold in sealed containers within the Hong Kong market.'
The steps involved in the research were as follows:
• Analysis of the Hong Kong beverage market and packaging management practices
• Review of international best practice
• Stakeholder engagement on sustainable beverage packaging management in Hong Kong
• Economic, social and environmental assessment of two different potential scenarios
Disclaimers
The materials of this presentation are intended to provide general information on the subject concerned. They are only for illustrative purposes and should not be relied upon, and shall not be construed as any advice, opinion or recommendation given by Deloitte Advisory (Hong Kong) Limited and/or its personnel (“DAHK”). DAHK take no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the loss incurred by individuals or entities arising from the use of the materials of this presentation.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 8
What are the characteristics of Hong Kong's beverage market?
Over one billion litres of packaged beverages were consumed in Hong Kong in 2017.
Over a third of this is bottled water, followed by ready-to drink teas, carbonated beverages and juices.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 9
What are the characteristics of Hong Kong's beverage market?
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 10
Is Hong Kong doing enough?
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 11
Is Hong Kong doing enough?
It can be seen from the case studies described above that for a territory to achieve high collection and recycling rates, actions are required throughout the value chain, from design of packaging, through collection, recycling and end use, whilst also creating disincentives for disposing of waste to landfill or incineration.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 12
What could Hong Kong do differently?
The Working Group decided to assess two different scenarios for sustainable management of beverage packaging:
Scenario 2Based on the development of local recycling facilities for PET and liquid cartons and the establishment of an EPR scheme with a DRS.
Scenario 1Based on a ban of plastic bottles and liquid cartons, and the establishment of an EPR scheme, as those materials are of insufficient value to support collection, and there are no local facilities at sufficient scale to process them.
Economic, social and environmental assessments were carried out for each of these scenarios.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 13
Economic assessment
Scenario 2 gives rise to a slight net benefit compared to the BAU 2030, whereas Scenario 1 gives rise to a slight net cost compared to BAU 2030.
Scenario 2 was also found to bring a minimal impact to the majority of stakeholders along the value chain. As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that Scenario 2 performs marginally better than Scenario 1 in the economic assessment.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 14
Social assessment
In Scenario 1, consumer choice, price and convenience were all negatively affected compared to the BAU 2030.
Scenario 2, by contrast, was found to bring benefits or minimal changes in the majority of social assessment categories.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 15
Environmental assessment
Both scenarios yielded benefits compared to BAU 2030, but that in Scenario 1 the benefits were greater.
As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that Scenario 1 performs marginally better than Scenario 2 in terms of environmentalconsiderations.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 16
What do these results mean?
Considering all three assessments together, Scenario 2 performs better than Scenario 1.
If a greater degree of avoidance, eco-design and materials switching were incorporated into Scenario 2, then the environmental performance would be improved. The following section outlines the key steps required to achieve this.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 17
Way forward
Scheme overview and share of responsibilities• Extended producer responsibility scheme
Avoidance• Business commitment to eliminate unnecessary SUBP use• Innovation and support for new businesses relating to re-usable containers• Expanded network of hygienic, accessible water dispensers in public places • Public BYOB campaign
Eco-design• Design for recycling (Eco-design)• Inclusion of recycled materials in beverage packaging• Lightweighting• Compostable and biodegradable plastics?• Life cycle analysis of beverage packaging materials
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 18
Collection• Return Value Scheme (RVS) • Mechanism for collection
Recycling• Build PET recycling capacity within Hong Kong• Build liquid carton recycling capacity within Hong Kong
Way forward
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China. 19
What’s next?
The systemic nature and complex value chain dependencies of beverage packaging management require close co-ordination of all related parties.
Hong Kong has the opportunity to innovate in developing a world-leading collaboration between industry and Government in solving these challenges. Key to the successful delivery of the above points is ongoing management and monitoring of the various required activities in a programmatic and pragmatic manner.
About Deloitte Global Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.
Deloitte provides audit & assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax and related services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. Deloitte serves over 80 percent of the Fortune Global 500® companies through a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries and territories bringing world-class capabilities, insights, and high-quality service to address clients’ most complex business challenges. To learn more about how Deloitte’s approximately 286,000 professionals make an impact that matters, please connect with us on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter.
About Deloitte ChinaThe Deloitte brand first came to China in 1917 when a Deloitte office was opened in Shanghai. Now the Deloitte China network of firms, backed by the global Deloitte network, deliver a full range of audit & assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory and tax services to local, multinational and growth enterprise clients in China. We have considerable experience in China and have been a significant contributor to the development of China's accounting standards, taxation system and local professional accountants. To learn more about how Deloitte makes an impact that matters in the China marketplace, please connect with our Deloitte China social media platforms via www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/social-media.
This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively the “Deloitte Network”) is by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication.
© 2018. For information, contact Deloitte China.
2 1
減廢策略及行動Strategies and Act ions
綠惜地球創辦人及總幹事
Founder and Executive Director of The Green Earth (Hong Kong)
劉祉鋒先生
Mr. Edwin Lau
2 2
What do we aim to achieve?
2 3
What is the current situation?
1.7 billion containers (over 80% of beverage packaging) were wasted (2017)
Recycling rates: PET bottle (<9%) Liquid carton (0%)
Where does single-use beverage packaging end up?
2 5
Plastic bottles in landfills: 158 t/d (2016)
2 6
Liquid cartons in landfills: 83 t/d (2016)
Scattered throughout the countryside
Scattered on beaches
Scattered on waters
3 0
Entered the food chain
Marine Organisms
Fish
Humans
Plastic
Plastic
3 1
Why do we generate and
throw away so much
single-use beverage packaging?
3 2
3 3
3 4
3 5
3 6
No awareness of waste reduction!
3 7
No awareness of clean recycling!
3 8
“Pack & Export” has been the norm
3 9
The mainland has restrictedimport of untreated recyclables from 2018
4 0
What voluntary measures have been
taken to address the problem?
100%
recycled PET
Partly
plant-based PET
Collection
SchemesThinner bottles
4 1
Disposal trend of PET Bottles 2006 - 2016
4 2
Disposal of liquid cartons
74 t/d 91 t/d 83 t/d
2014 2015 2016
4 3
We adhere to the waste hierarchy
Avoid
Reduce
Reuse
Recycle
Dispose
High-end
Low-end
4 4
❖ Four strategies and actions have been
developed
❖ Work with government and all relevant
stakeholders to reach our goal by 2025
To reduce waste from
beverage consumption
4 5
Our recommended strategies and actions
4 6
Beverage
dispensers and
promote BYOB
4 7
❖ To prevent migration to other
non-compliant packaging
❖ To set minimum recycled
content for packaging
❖ To prevent contamination of
packaging materials
Regulate
packaging
standards
4 8
Regulate
packaging
standards PET bottles
100% recyclable
No PVC
No multi-layered PET
No compostable or
biodegradable
Liquid cartons
Renewable materials
No straw, glue and bag
Ban non-recyclable
materials
4 9
Cash-on-return
scheme
5 0
Schools
RetailOutlets
MobileUnits
RedemptionCentres
MobileUnits
CommunityRecyclingCentres
CommunityGreen
Stations
RefuseCollection
Points
Cash-on-return
scheme
5 1
From linear to
circular economy
State-of-the-art
recycling facilities
5 2
Beverage producers are
willing to take actions before
legislation comes in
We look forward to having
your support and collaboration
in the coming years
5 3
Minimizing the impacts on consumer choice, convenience and cost.
The challenge
Retail
price
Consumer
$
The challenge – minimizing system costs
Cash-
on-
return
Retail
price
Consumer
$
The challenge – minimizing system costs
Money paid to the person
who returns the packaging
Cash-
on-
return
Retail
price
Consumer
$
The challenge – minimizing system costs
System
cost
Money paid to the person
who returns the packaging
Administration
Logistics
Recycling
Expenses
Levy paid by
producer/importer
Cash-
on-
return
System
cost
Retail
price
Money paid to the person
who returns the packaging
Administration
Logistics
Recycling
Value of recyclable
materials
Income Expenses
Consumer
$
The challenge – minimizing system costs
Levy paid by
producer/importer
Cash-
on-
return
Retail
price
Money paid to the person
who returns the packaging
Administration
Logistics
Recycling
Value of recyclable materials
Consumer
Clean recyclables lowers system costs
Income Expenses$
Cash-
on-
return
System
cost
Retail
price
Value of recyclable
materials
Consumer
Administration
Logistics
Recycling
Money paid to the person
who returns the packaging
Poor system management (everyone their own truck) increases system costs
Income Expenses$
Levy paid by
producer/importer
6 0
傳媒發問環節Media Q&A Session
6 1
The End 完