17
Probing Particle Acceleration with Probing Particle Acceleration with X-ray/Gamma ray/Gamma-ray ray Polarimetry Polarimetry Mar 22, 2012 X ray/Gamma ray/Gamma ray ray Polarimetry Polarimetry ASTRO-H Session, ASJ meeting T Mi HTkh hiYFk T. Mizuno, H. Takahashi, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima Univ), H. Tajima (Nagoya Univ.), T. Tanaka, Y. Uchiyama (KIPAC/Stanford), S Takeda H Odaka S Watanabe G Sato S. Takeda, H. Odaka, S. Watanabe, G. Sato, M. Kokubun, T. Takahashi (ISAS/JAXA), K. Nakazawa (Tokyo Univ.), P. Coppi (Yale Univ.) and T. Tamagawa (RIKEN) 1 (Yale Univ.) and T. Tamagawa (RIKEN)

Probing Particle Acceleration with X-ray/Gamma-ray Polarimetrymizuno/GLAST/Presentation/...ASTROASTRO--H SGD as a H SGD as a Polarimeter • Si-CdTe Compton Camera + BGO shiled •

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Probing Particle Acceleration with Probing Particle Acceleration with XX--ray/Gammaray/Gamma--rayray PolarimetryPolarimetry

Mar 22, 2012

XX ray/Gammaray/Gamma ray ray PolarimetryPolarimetry

ASTRO-H Session, ASJ meeting

T Mi H T k h hi Y F kT. Mizuno, H. Takahashi, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima Univ), H. Tajima (Nagoya Univ.), T. Tanaka, Y. Uchiyama (KIPAC/Stanford), S Takeda H Odaka S Watanabe G SatoS. Takeda, H. Odaka, S. Watanabe, G. Sato,

M. Kokubun, T. Takahashi (ISAS/JAXA), K. Nakazawa (Tokyo Univ.), P. Coppi

(Yale Univ.) and T. Tamagawa (RIKEN)

1

(Yale Univ.) and T. Tamagawa (RIKEN)

ASTROASTRO--H SGDH SGD

• Si-CdTe Compton Camera + BGO shiled• Constrain incident angle using Compton kinematics• Constrain incident angle using Compton kinematics– efficient background suppression

cosθ = 1+mec

2

−mec

2

Background Level cosθ = 1+E1 + E2

−E2

Tajima+ 10Suzaku HXD-GSO

Background Level

Tajima+ 10

ComptonScat.

0.1 Crab

Photo-abs.

Astro-H SGD

2

BG<=100 mCrab

ASTROASTRO--H SGD as a H SGD as a PolarimeterPolarimeter

• Si-CdTe Compton Camera + BGO shiled• Constrain incident angle using Compton kinematics• Constrain incident angle using Compton kinematics– efficient background suppression– polarization measurement cosθ = 1+

mec2

−mec

2p cosθ = 1+E1 + E2

−E2

Tajima+ 10

Takeda+ 10, NIMAprototype test

Proc. SPIEComptonScat.

Photo-abs.M 0 58 (80 300 k V)

3

M=0.58 (80-300 keV)w/ flight configuration

XX--ray/Gammaray/Gamma--ray ray PolarimetryPolarimetry

• Why polarization? (1) place constraints on source geometries (2) break model degeneracygeometries (2) break model degeneracy– Synchrotron emission (magnetic field)– Compton up-scattering radiation (see photons, disk)

P l d t QED l l ti it ( t i t– Pol. due to QED or general relativity (constraints on fundamental physics and compact object)

PWN PulsarBHB, AGN

4

Magnetic field,Accelerated electrons

Pulsar emission model,QED

Accretion disk,Jet

X/γ-ray pol. not subject to Faraday rotation/depolarization

XX--ray/Gammaray/Gamma--ray ray SpectroPolarimetrySpectroPolarimetry

• Measuring energy dependent polarization is crucial to disentangle emission mechanismsdisentangle emission mechanisms– transition from one pol. generation process to another may

occur over broad energy rangedisk reflection model (Matt+93) Blazar model (Poutanen94)

10%

disk reflection model (Matt+93)pol. vector disk

Blazar model (Poutanen94)

on f

lux

1%degr

ee

h teph

oto

1%

pol. d synchrotron

IC

total

ol. de

gree

5

3 10 keV 500.1%

ICpo

** pol. may be low in EC **

XX--ray/Gammaray/Gamma--ray ray SpectroPolarimetrySpectroPolarimetry

• Measuring energy dependent polarization is crucial to disentangle emission mechanismsdisentangle emission mechanisms– synergy with GEMS and PoGOLite will enhance

science outputs

PoGOLite (2012)30-80 keV

lll l ballloon, Plasctic scint.

6

GEMS (2014-)2-10 keVX-ray mirror+MPGD

ASTRO-H SGD (2014-)40-600 keVSi/CdTe Compton Camera

Case Study 1: Case Study 1: CygCyg XX--11

• A toy model of polarized emission– Polarized jet seen by INTEGRAL/IBIS (67% pol., φ=140eg,Polarized jet seen by INTEGRAL/IBIS (67% pol., φ 140eg,

contributing in E>100keV)– Disk reflection (3% pol. in 2-10keV and 10% pol. in 30-60 keV,

φ=162deg (Long+80))φ 162deg (Long 80))• See how SGD (+others) can measure polarization

HE JetDisk reflection( l i d) C t i ti HE Jet

(polarized)(polarized) Comptonization

(non-pol) A-H SGD

pol. deg.=67+/-30%(E>=400 keV)

7

Long+802.6/5.2 keVhint of weak pol.

Laurent+11

(E> 400 keV)

SGD SGD PolarimetryPolarimetry of of CygCyg XX--11

• Energy dependent polarization measurement w/ ASTRO-H SGD– disclose jet component hidden in Comptonization down to j p p

100 keV

INTEGRAL IBIS

SGD Simulation, 300 ks10% polarization @100-180keV

INTEGRAL IBIS Modulation Curve@250-400 keV

(consistent with no pol.)

17% polarization @180-330keV17% polarization @180 330keV

8Tanaka (Stanford)

WideWide--band band PolarimetryPolarimetry of of CygCyg XX--11

• Coordination with soft/hard X-ray polarimetry– disentangle disk reflection and jet emissiondisentangle disk reflection and jet emission– Compare directions of magnetic field (soft γ), disk (X-ray) and

jet (radio)HE Jet

disk reflectiondisk reflectionassumption:100 ks obs.M=0.32 (GEMS, PoGO)SGD scaled from 300ks sim

Disk reflecti ne ee

SGD scaled from 300ks sim.

Disk reflection(perpendicular to

disk) HE jet(synchrotron)ol

. an

gle

ol. de

gre

9

(synchrotron)

po po

Case Study 2: Crab NebulaCase Study 2: Crab Nebula

• A toy model based on the OSO-8/INTEGRAL dataPD 20% PA 156d (2 6/5 2k V) OSO 8 h l N b l• PD=20%, PA=156deg (2.6/5.2keV): OSO-8, whole Nebula

• PD=50%, PA=124deg (>100keV): INTEGRAL, aligned with pulsar rot. axis• Let’s assume PD=30% and PA=138deg (30-80keV)

NPA @2.6/5.2 keVPD=20%

EPA@ 100 k VPA@ >100 keVPD=50%

10

2’

Case Study 2: Crab NebulaCase Study 2: Crab Nebula

• A toy model based on the OSO-8/INTEGRAL dataSGD ill fi ( d ) th li t

ASTRO-H/SGD(100 ks)

• SGD will confirm (or deny) the alignment with pulsar rot. axis• Constraints on PWN model w/ soft-X and hard-X data gl

e

NPA @2.6/5.2 keVPD=20%

INTEGRAL/SPI(1.2 Ms)

har X ata

pol. a

n

EPA@ 100 k V

(1.2 Ms)

eePA@ >100 keVPD=50%

ol. de

gre

11

2’

po

Summary and ProspectSummary and Prospect

• Pol. measurement by A-H SGD can place constraints on source geometry and break model degeneracyon source geometry and break model degeneracy (qualitatively new type of information)

• Synergy with X-ray polarimeters will enhance science t toutputs

• Two case studies are presented (Cyg X-1 and Crab; robust targets for SGD polarimetry)robust targets for SGD polarimetry)

• Pol. measurement of pulsars and AGN flares will also be possible (to understand BG anisotropy is important)

Thank you for your Attention12

Thank you for your Attention

Backup SlidesBackup SlidesBackup SlidesBackup Slides

13

XX--ray/Gammaray/Gamma--ray ray SpectroPolarimetrySpectroPolarimetry

• Measuring energy dependent polarization is crucial to disentangle emission mechanismsdisentangle emission mechanisms

disk reflection model (Matt+93)pol vector disk

Strong polarization (67%) from Cyg X-1 jet in HE (Laurent+11)

10%

pol. vector disk Cyg X-1 jet in HE (Laurent+11)

e

1%

l. d

egre

e 67% pol.

0 1%

po pol. <20%

14

3 10 keV 500.1%

PolarizationPolarization

• 光源が非一様だと偏光が生じる

そろ た磁場 シ ク–そろった磁場下でのシンクロトロン

–特定の面でのコンプトン散乱

Unpolarized

15

Polarized

Crab Nebula Polarization (XCrab Nebula Polarization (X--ray)ray)

• Measured by OSO-8 (Bragg reflection)

P i i lPosition Angle2.6 keV 5.2 keV

Modulation @2.6 keV

16

Weisskopf+78

CygCyg XX--1 Radio Jet1 Radio Jet

• 8 GHz images at three orbital phases (1998 August)

17

Stirling+01