Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
イオントラップを用いた量子ゲート実験
The contents of this lecture
1.Introduction2. Ion trap and ion qubit3.Initialization and state detection 4.Coherence time5.Quantum gate6.Spin dependent force and its application
大阪大学大学院基礎工学研究科占部伸二
H22.8.27 量子情報処理サマースクール
Shinji Urabe, Utako.Tanaka, Kenji.Toyoda
Invited researcher Kazuhiro Hayasaka(NICT)
R. Yamazaki (H18.7-H21.3)
Graduate students
Doctor course S.Haze
Master course
K.Uchida, K.Tamura, K.Masuda, N.Wada,
T.Watanabe,
Y.Ibaragi, T.Ohno, T.Kanda, K.Kohda, Y.Tateishi, T.Fujiwara
Urabe Laboratory
1.Introduction
Ion trap: Trapping of charged particles with electromagnetic fieldsMass spectrometry (1950‘s), Spectroscopy ← Laser cooling (1975)
Wineland & Dehmelt, Hänsch & Schawlow
Quantum information processing
qubit: internal states of an ion in an ion string
Cirac & Zoller (1995)
High resolution spectroscopy:
Isolation from the environment
→ Optical frequency standard with single ions(Q~1015 )
Mg+-Al+: 8×10-18: quantum logic spectroscopy(NIST, 2010)
Linear rf traps
Typical trap operating parameters:
ultra high vacuum: less than 10-8 Pa
trap dimension (r0) : 0.6 mm
rf frequency (Ω) : 24 MHz
effective potential depth (Veff) : ~10V
collective motional frequency
z: 0.7MHz, x: 2.1MHz, y: 2.3 MHz
distance between ions in strings: about 7μ
2. Ion traps and ion qubit
z1
~
U1 U2 U3 U4 U5
U1’ U2’ U3’ U4’ U5’ Vrf
r0
z0 z1
Images of 1,2,3 ions
Hyperfine levels, ground state - metastable state
Ions: Be+, Mg+, Zn+, Cd+ (hyperfine qubits)
Ca+, Sr+, Ba+, Yb+, Hg+ (hyperfine or metastabe qubits)
Ion qubit
Doppler cooling : 397nm, 866nm
sideband cooling : 729nm, 854nm
quantum state control : 729nm etc.
40Ca+ ion
Zeeman qubits: 2S1/2 ,m=-1/2 - 2S1/2 ,m=1/2 (~10MHz)
Optical-transition qubits: 2S1/2 - 2D5/2 (729nm)
Terahertz-separated qubits : 2D3/2 - 2D5/2 (1.82THz)
Raman transitions driven by phase locked lasers bridged by a frequency comb
Terahertz-separated qubit:
internal state: optical pumping ~100%
external state: Doppler cooling : from 10000 K to mK
sideband cooling : to the motional ground state
3.Initialization and state detection
Initialization
S- / S+ = <nz > / (<nz >+1)
S-: height of red sideband spectrum
S+: height of blue sideband spectrum
01.0~zn
Red and blue sideband spectra of axial modes in S-D transitions after sideband cooling
0.020 ,017.0~
, stCOM nn
Single ions Two ions
l0>l1>
l2>l3>2S1/2
2D5/2
2P3/2 854nm
729nm (red sideband)
ω 0-ω v
Electron shelving method: nearly 100% efficiencyCycling transitions・・・fluorescence signal ~3x104photons/s/ion
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 120000
200
400
600
800
Coun
ts
Photon counts /sec
Γ~1.4×10-8 s-1
Γ~1 s-1
lΨ> = c1lg> + c2le2>
Quantum jump signal of single ions Histogram of photon counts
State detection
Coherence time: hyperfine ground state・・・several minutes
metastable state・・・ about 1.0 s (40Ca+ )
External disturbance: magnetic field fluctuation, laser linewidth etc.
4.Coherence time
Coherence time of terahertz-separated (D3/2-D5/2) qubits
Fringe visibility of Ramsey signal
K.Toyoda, H.Shiibara, S.Haze, R.Yamazaki,
S.Urabe, Phys. Rev. A 79, 023419, 2009
Entanglement between qubits ・・・ mediated by the collective motional states.
Qubit : internal states, lg>, le>, Bus bit : motional states, l0>, l1>
Carrier
red
sideband
blue
sideband
Optical spectrum of single ions
(Electric quadrupole transitions)
manipulation of qubits・・・ laser pulsescarrier pulse,red sideband pulse, blue sideband pulse
hyperfine qubit: Raman transitions,metastable qubit: E2 transitions
5.Quantum gate
Phase-locked laser system with a frequency comb for D-D qubits
Beat signal of the phase
locked system
854nm 850nm1.8194・・ THz ~ 6.252 GHz × 291 lines + 267.・・ MHz
ΔΦrms=50 mradR.Yamazaki, T.Iwai, K.Toyoda, and S.Urabe, Opt. Lett. Vol.32,No.5,(2007)2085
S.Haze, Y.Senokuchi, R.Yamazaki, K.Toyoda, S.Urabe, Appl. Phys. B to be published
The frequency is locked to a ULE cavity by the Pound-Drever-Hall method.
line width : less than 1KHz,
frequency drift : less than 3kHz/h
729nm Ti : sapphire laser for S-D qubits
Carrier Rabi oscillation Blue-sideband Rabi oscillation
Rabi oscillations of S1/2-D5/2 transitions in single 40Ca+ ions
Carrier
transition
0,0, ge
Blue-sideband
transition
0,1, ge
2S1/2, nz=0
2D5/2,
nz=1
nz=0
Time [μs]
Popu
lation in D
5/2
0
)2/cos()2/sin(
)2/sin()2/cos(
)]sinˆcosˆ(2
exp[),(ˆ
)0(), (ˆ )(
:phase , :area pulse pulse,carrier 0
i
i
yx
ie
ie
iR
Rt
t
5.1 Single qubit rotation le>
geggegg 100 ,,1,0 ,,0,0
operation swap :pulse sideband red
5.2 Two-qubit gate
Z0̂
0̂1̂
1000
0100
0010
0001
Z-C : -control :pulse(aux) 2 sideband red z
, 11
11
2
1H gate Hadamard:pulse /2carrier
Cirac-Zoller C-Not gate
Cirac-Zoller Gate experiment using terahertz-separated qubits
CZ gate excitation scheme
Single 40Ca+,
Control bit : phonon states
l0>: n=0
l1>: n=1
Target bit: internal states
l↑>:D5/2(m=1/2)
l↓>: D3/2(m=1/2)
Sideband
cooling
Preparation:
(1)D5/2, n=1,
blue sideband π pulse
on S-D transitions
(2)D5/2, n=0,
carrier π pulse on S-D transitions
C-Z gate:
blue-sideband 2π pulse
on S-D transitions
2/)(ψ ,0n )2(
2/) (ψ ,1n )1(
2/)(ψ ψ
ψ )2(
ψ )1(
Control-ZRamsey π/2
pulse
Ramsey π/2
pulse
CZ gate result
K.Toyoda, S.Haze, R.Yamazaki, S.Urabe, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 032322 , 2010
Fidelity~0.74
(a) Carrier Rabi oscillation in S-D transition
(b) BSB Rabi oscillation in S-D transition
(c) Carrier Rabi oscillation in D-D transition
Initial phonon state: |0>
Initial phonon state: |1>Simulation results obtained by
solving the density matrix equation
5.3 Creation of two-particle entanglement
2 two-level ions are irradiated equally with a
laser pulse, whose frequency is tuned near the
first red sideband of the COM mode.
parameter Dicke-Lamb:
,N/ ,0
L
e
gνz
The total number of excitation of quanta is conserved
and the basis of one-quantum Hamiltonian
is composed of :
Interaction Hamiltonian (rotating frame)
}0eg, ,0ge, ,1gg,{:Basis
0
0
1
02/
02/
2/2/
ˆ
IH
}0 ,0 ,1gg,{:Basis
0
0
1
00
02/
02/
ˆ
IH
2/10
2/)eg,ge,(
,2/)eg,ge,(
n=0
n=1
}0eg, ,0ge, ,1gg,{
I.E.Linington & N.V. Vitanov:
Phys. Rev. A77,010302 (2008)
Adiabatic condition
0)ge,eg,(2
1 1gg,
2/322 )(2
1 ≪
(1) Rapid adiabatic passage method
(2)Red sideband π pulse method ( two-state system)
010 0)2/sin(1gg,)2/cos( tit
)/(t ,0)ge,eg,(2
1 0)(t ,1gg, D.B.Hume et al. PRA, 80,
052302,2009
I.E.Linington & N.V. Vitanov: Phys. Rev. A77,010302 (2008)RSB RAP pulse
,0W g,g,g, N
mm
k
kN
m
N
m PC
gg,e,e,e,1
W :state Dicke
N ions
}0 ,1gg,{:subspace state- twosymmetric
Energy of dressed states
Important process:
initialization to 0g,g 21 1g,e 211g,g 21
blue sideband π carrier π
Off resonant 854nm laser
(100GHz)
1g,g 21
differential AC Stark shift methods
kHz90
Carrier spectrum of two ions:
AC Stark shift, on
Individual addressing to
one ion is necessary.
Qubit: S1/2,m=-1/2 and D5/2, m=-5/2
for ,2cos )( 21z zP
Pulse sequence of generation of two-particle entangled states
Fidelity of the
generated states
eggegeegegeggegeF ,,,,2
1||
Diagonal terms Off diagonal terms
Analysis Pulse Ⅰ: Parity )()2cos(2)( geeg,egge,eegg,21 zzP
Analysis Pulse Ⅱ: Parity
Diagonal terms: probability of single-ion fluorescing events after the state creation
Off diagonal terms: parity signal after analysis pulse Ⅰor Ⅱ0 for Dicke states
RAP: rapid adiabatic passage pulse
06.062.0 F
)(03.040.0
Result of the RAP method
)(06.083.0
Histogram of photon counts Parity signal after analysis pulse II
g
e
r
0
Raman beams
1Lk
2Lk
)/2(z
)(
0
21
z
LLz
kn
zkkk
0z
)ˆˆ()2/ˆ)((ˆ )(†)(
,int
titvi
j
zj eaeaH
D.Leibfried et al., Nature,422,412,2003
G.J.Milburn et al, Fortschr. Phys.,48,801,2000
Spin dependent force Hamiltonian,
σz dependent force
Optical dipole force (state dependent)
Laser 1 Laser 2
),ˆˆ(ˆ :mode COM †aazk jz
Interaction picture and rotating wave approximation
tzkH jz
j
z cos ˆˆint
j
6.Spin dependent force and its applications
A.Sorensen & K.Molmer, PRA,62,022311, 2000
P.C.Haljan et al, PRA, 72,062316, 2005
C.F Roos, New J. Phys., 10, 013002, 2008
Two-color beams(Ω1,Ω2), 2 ions
, :detuninng
. : addressing collective
0201
021
jj
σφ dependent force(Molmer & Sorensen gate)
Two pairs of Raman beams
Nkaazkaazk
NMkaazk
zsssszsssz
zccccjz
2/ ),ˆˆ(ˆ ),ˆˆ(ˆ :modestretch
2/ ),ˆˆ(ˆ :mode COM
†
2
†
1
†
..)(ˆ 21
2,1
0int cheeeHziktizikti
i
j
i
Amplitude-modulated beams
0
0
]2/)(cos[]2/)(cos[2
])cos[(])cos[(
21021
2010
zkktzkkt
zktzkt
Dressed states
)(2
1
)(2
1
ge
ge
Modulation signal Resonant carrier wave
0
E2 transition
S
D
and , :sidebands the toclose 0 ≪≪
(1)General field coupling
Interaction picture and rotating wave approximation
j
yjy
j
xjx
titi
yx
JJ
eaeaJJH
ˆ2
1ˆ ,ˆ2
1ˆ
)ˆˆ](sinˆcosˆ[ ˆ )()(†
0int
)0()(ˆ(t) tU
displacement operator
})sin(){((t)
),1()(
2
0
)(
0
tt
et ti
Time evolution:
) ˆexp( }]ˆ)(ˆ)({ˆexp[)(ˆ 2†
xgx JiatatJtU
σΦ dependence
z
p
xx
ie
xx
ie
Φ
20 )(2 :phase gained
integer: ,2)(
y trajectorclosed
n
nnt
g
)0,(:center ,: radius ),0,(:center ,: radius 0000 xxxxxxxx JJJJ
Spin dependent circular motion in the phase space
20 )(2 ),/(2 1 :ex
ggn
xj
ji
xigeff
xj
ji
xiggxg
H
iNiJiU
ˆˆˆ :nHamiltonia effective
),ˆˆexp()4/exp(]exp[ˆ 2
Spin-spin interaction
Disentangling condition
Φg: unconventional geometric phase
Φg=(geometric phase) +(dynamic phase),(dynamic phase)=-2x(geometric phase) S.Zhu, D.Z.Wang, PRL,91,187902,2003
Quantum simulation: Ising model
ix
i
xjziz
ji
x
ji BJH ,,,
,
,Ising2
1ˆ
Phase transition: paramagnetc order
⇔ (anti-) ferromagnetic order
Two ions:A.Friedenauer et.al, Nature phys. 4,757,2008
Generation of entangled states
]2/exp[ˆ )2
1(or ,
2
2
max0
xg JiU
Entanglement of two ions:
(stretch mode)
))(2/1(
))(2/1(
) )(2/1(
) )(2/1(
4
3
2
1
geiegge
geiegeg
ggieegg
ggieeee
High fidelity Bell state generation: F=0.993,
J.Benheim et al, Nature phys. Vol.4,463,2008
P.C.Haljan et al, PRA,
72,062316, 2005
(2)Weak-field coupling
)/()(~
,ˆˆ)4/~
(ˆ~
)ˆ~exp( )(ˆ ) ˆ)exp(ˆ( )(ˆ
1
2
0
2
22
0
xj
ji
xixeff
xxgx
JH
tJitUJiJDtU
≪≪
Quantum simulation : frustrated Ising spins
Three ions, transverse mode
i
i
yy
j
x
ji
i
xijeff BJH ˆˆˆ
matrixation transformmode normal:
,2
,
22
,,2
mi
m m
mjmixjiij
b
bb
M
kJ
23121 JJJ Nearest-neighbor interaction
132 JJ Next-nearest-neighbor interaction
K.Kim et.al., PRL,103, 120502(2009)
K.Kim et .al., nature, 465,3(2010)
A.Sorensen & K.Molmer, PRL,82,1971(1999)
今後の方向
1.大規模・集積化プレーナートラップ
2.他の量子糸との結合
3.量子シミュレーション
4.高速化