RDSO GE_G7

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    1/23

    For official use only

    GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

    GUIDELINES ON

    TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT RESTORATION

    OF EMBANKMENT

    AFTER BREACHES/ WASHOUTS

    Report No. GE: G-7

    JULY-2005

    Geotechnical Engineering Directorate

    RESEARCH DESIGNS & STANDARDS ORGANISATION

    LUCKNOW-226011

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    2/23

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    3/23

    PREFACE

    This report has been prepared on the basis of field experience &

    literature survey. The views expressed are subject to modification from

    time to time in the light of future developments on the subject. The views,

    as such, do not represent the views of Ministry of Railways (Railway

    Board), Government of India.

    This report is the property of RDSO and is meant essentially for

    official use. It may not be loaned, reproduced in part, or in full, or quoted as

    an authority without the permission of Director General, RDSO.

    (Nand Kishore)Executive Director/GE

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    4/23

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    5/23

    CONTENTS

    S.No. Description Page No.

    1. Introduction 1

    2. Scope 1

    3. Reasons for washouts/breaches/slips 1

    4. Type of damages 2

    5. Materials available for restoration work 4

    6. Temporary repair methods 8

    7. Permanent repair methods 11

    8. Conclusion 13

    9. References 15

    10. Annexure 17

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    6/23

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    7/23

    GUIDELINES ON TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT

    RESTORATION OF BANK AFTER BREACHES/WASHOUTS

    1.0 INTRODUCTION

    Washouts/breaches of railway embankment during floods is a

    commonly occurring phenomenon, especially in monsoons. There arevarious direct and indirect losses due to washouts or breaches of the

    embankments. Main reasons behind the washouts/breaches are

    detailed in para 3.0 below.

    2.0 SCOPE

    This report contains a theoretical study on temporary and permanent

    repair methods for washouts/breaches of railway embankments. The

    report is based on field experience, previous studies done by RDSO

    & literature survey. The recommendations of this report will help in

    quick restoration of traffic on a washed out railway formation.

    3.0 REASONS FOR WAHSOUTS/BREACHES/SLIPS

    Main reasons for washouts/breaches are enumerated below-

    i) Continuous Rains- Banks situated in heavy rainfall areas are

    subjected to slips and breaches. When there is a continuous rain or

    continual interceptive rain for prolonged period, there is lot of

    infiltration of rainwater into the bank. This leads to decrease in

    cohesion of soil and drop in the shear strength. Further, it increases

    the gravitational forces acting on the bank & leading to slips in the

    bank.

    In the year 2004, many washouts/breaches of bank took place on

    account of heavy rainfall in Lummding-Badarpur hill section of NFRailway.

    ii) Floods and Receding Water-Floods are natural phenomenon causedby rains. Flash floods in hilly terrain result in washouts. Plain areasare also subjected to rapid flow of water due to heavy floods. During

    major floods, the water carries a lot of debris and it either erodes,

    scours, leads to submergence of bank and/or even overtops it,

    resulting in washouts. Slips occur in banks when flood water recedes.

    Such floods occur mainly in delta region & alluvial plains, where therivers are wide, shallow and meandering type.

    1

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    8/23

    Primary cause ofmeandering is excess discharge during floods, due

    to which high turbulence is developed. Basic factors controlling

    process of meandering are:-

    a) Dischargeb) Stream loadc) Valley sloped) Bed and side resistanceDoab area between river Ganga and Son is heavily flooded in

    monsoon causing formation breaches in Eastern and EC Railway.

    iii) Vertical Sag (Bad Bank)- Many a time during the rains, vertical sagsoccur in railway track. Such sags develop due to inadequate/poor

    bearing capacity of soil. Vertical sags are quite common where a

    good portion of bank is made of ash, cinder or black cotton soils etc.Poor or inadequate compaction of newly made banks may also lead

    to vertical sags.

    iv) Inadequate Openings- Railway banks act as a barrier to the natural

    flow of water in plains especially, where such plains acts as drainagepath for wide spread catchments areas lying many miles away. Whenheavy rain occurs in the catchment areas, water gushes out to the

    plains all of a sudden.

    At times, openings provided in railway banks may prove inadequate

    to bear this excess amount of water, resulting in washouts. A clear

    difference in height of water level on either side of opening is seen insuch cases. To get over the problem, additional openings across the

    track could provide a solution.

    v) Scouring Damages- Scouring may cause damage to bridgefoundation as well as to other nearby structures such as end

    embankment, retaining walls etc.. If scouring exceeds a certain level,it can result in collapse of bank.

    4.0 TYPES ON DAMAGES

    Washouts/breaches may result in following types of damages:

    i) When the damage is limited to cess of embankment.2

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    9/23

    DAMAGE IS LIMITED TO CESS

    ii) When the damage is extended to center of track.

    DAMAGE IS EXTENDED TO CENTER OF TRACK

    iii) Rupture extends to foundation subsoil and original shapeof embankment is not maintained.

    ORIGINAL SHAPE OF EMBANKMENT DISTURBED

    iv) Embankment is deformed in a way generally similar touniform settlement.

    UNIFORM SETTLEMENT

    3

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    10/23

    v) Embankment behind bridge abutment is settled and cracked.

    EMBANKMENT SETTLED AND CRACKED BEHIND BRIDGE

    5.0 MATERIALS FOR RESTORATION WORK

    i) Cinder

    ii) Boulders

    iii) Sand bags

    iv) Local earthv) Stone dustvi) Fly ash and Bottom ashvii) Sal balli/released rails

    i) Cinder- Cinder used to be easily available in the past when steamlocomotives were in vogue. Therefore, it was used in restoration work

    in an extensive manner on railways. Now, with the progressive

    decline in steam locos over the years and currently no more in use,availability of cinder has become scarce. Hence, the option to use this

    material is no longer available.

    ii) Boulders- Boulders can be procured from nearby stone quarry/river

    bed. Use of boulders in embankment may require heavy compaction

    machinery, which is generally not used in our country. Therefore, inabsence of heavy compaction machinery, use of boulders for

    restoration purpose may not be advisable except for pitching theslopes at later stages of restoration.

    iii) Sand- Sand is easily available in most of the areas and it can serve asa useful restoration material. Ordinary river sand filled in cement

    4

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    11/23

    bags can be stored in advance at convenient points for quick restoration

    of traffic. Embankment restored with sand may require erosion control

    measures later on.

    iv) Local earth- Utilization of local earth offers the simplest and fastest

    method for restoration of embankment. However, the following soils

    must be avoided:

    Peat and Organic soils Chalk etc. which are likely to disintegrate Poorly graded sands with Cu less than 2. Clay and silts of high plasticity (CH & MH) in top 3 m of

    embankment.

    For this purpose, it would be better if borrow pits within railway area are

    identified well in advance.

    v) Stone dust- Stone dust is normally available in ballast quarries as a

    byproduct. It can also serve as a good blanket material, if due attention is

    paid during manufacturing of ballast. Stone dust may be stored in advance

    at convenient locations.

    vi) Fly ash and Bottom ash - About 1000 million tonnes ash is produced in

    India every year by thermal power plants and is available free of cost

    from the plants. In most of the power plants, bottom ash and fly ash are

    mixed in slurry form and is disposed of to ash ponds in slurry form.

    Fly ash is a waste product of thermal power plant where it poses

    problem of disposal. Generally, both ashes are available in huge

    quantities in thermal power stations.

    Fly ash is a finely divided residue resulting from the combustion of

    pulverized coal in the boiler and collected from electrostatic precipitation.

    It is a pozzolanic material which in the presence of water reacts with lime

    and form cementitious materials.

    5

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    12/23

    Typical geo-technical properties of Fly ash

    Parameters Range

    Specific gravity, G 1.90- 2.55

    Plasticity Non-plastic

    M.D.D (gm/cc) 0.9-1.6

    O.M.C (%) 18.0-38.0

    Cohesion (KN/m2) Negligible

    Angle of Internal Friction, 30-40

    Coefficient of Consolidation,

    Cv(cm2/sec) 1.75 10

    5 2.01

    10

    3

    Compression index, Cc 0.05 0.4Permeability, k (cm/sec)

    8 106 7

    10

    4

    Particle Size Distribution (% of

    materials)

    Clay size fraction

    Silt size fraction

    Sand size fraction

    Gravel size fraction

    1 10

    8 85

    7 90

    0 10

    Coefficient of Uniformity, Cu 3.1 10.7

    Bottom ash is collected at the bottom of boiler furnace as a resultant

    of coal burning activity. This is comparatively coarser materialcharacterized by better geo-technical properties and therefore,

    promises to be an excellent material for fill embankment.

    Test results of bottom ash from NTPC Ltd. Ramgundam, Jyothinagar,

    Andhra Pradesh, as obtained in GE lab, RDSO are tabulated below:

    6

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    13/23

    Gravel

    (%)

    Sand

    (%)

    Silt

    (%)

    Clay

    (%)

    %

    Passing

    Classification P.I. Cu Cc

    05 89 06 00 06 SP-SM NP 3.78 1.31

    03 80 17 00 17 SM NP 4.00 0.74

    Physical properties of bottom ash as supplied by NTPC for its various

    units are tabulated below-

    Physical properties of Bottom ash

    S.No Material Sp.Gravity Clay(%) Silt(%) Sand(%) Gravel(%) Cu Cc L.L.

    1 Unchahar 1.66 1.0 12.0 87.0 0 7.8 3.7 92.6

    2 Korba 2.15 0.5 8.0 91.0 0.5 4.7 2.1 77.0

    3 Vijayawa

    da

    1.82 - 22.0 71.0 7.0 9.4 1.1 53.5

    4 Badarpur 1.95 1.0 12.0 87.0 0 9.1 1.0 47.4

    5 Dadri 2.01 1.0 40.0 59.0 0 7.5 1.4 48.0

    6 Ramagun

    dam

    2.08 1.0 12.5 76.5 10 8.0 1.6 65.1

    7 Neyveli 2.08 3.0 5.5 91.5 0 5.2 2.1 104.1

    8 Farakka 2.16 2.5 8.0 78.5 11.1 14 1.5 70.9

    9 Kahalgoa

    n

    2.17 1.0 14.8 65.9 18.3 8.8 1.3 45.0

    10 Rihand 2.19 - 13.6 75.8 10.6 6.5 1.2 57.0

    Bottom ash is non-plastic with silty sand material. Its particles are

    spherical in shape and uniform in size. Due to this property, it is 5 to 10

    times more permeable than soil having the some effective grain size. The

    permeability coefficient, k is in the order of 8.3 x 10-5

    cm/sec. Bottom

    ash is predominantly granular in nature, it behaves much the same as a

    cohesive soil with respect to consolidation. However, a notable

    difference between them is that, the bottom ash consolidates much more

    quickly then a clay soil because it is more permeable.

    7

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    14/23

    Compacted bottom ash achieves its most of shear strength from its

    interlocking of particles, expressed in terms of angle of internal

    friction. It also exhibits some apparent cohesion when moist due to

    surface tension in the pore water.

    Density of bottom ash fill is an important parameter which determines

    the strength, compressibility and permeability characteristics of the

    fill. M.D.D. of bottom ash is on the higher side upto 1.88 gm/cc.

    As compared to fly ash, bottom ash is a coarse grained material (high

    %age of sand), has high value of MDD and specific gravity. Due to

    these properties, bottom ash is superior material to fly ash.

    vii) Sal balli/Released rails - Though these materials are readilyavailable in plenty with the railways, however, they have a limited

    use in restoration work when used alone.

    6.0 TEMPORARY REPAIR METHODS

    Various methods for temporary restoration of bank are as follows-

    i)

    Ballah/Rail pilingii) Filling with cinderiii) Filling with sand bagsiv) Filling with Fly ash and Bottom ashv) Filling with local earth

    Temporary repairs methods are described below:

    i) Ballah/Rail Piling - In railway banks, where there is likelihood of

    slip occurring, ballah/rail piling offers the best solution in the short

    term. No other solution will serve the purpose at that moment of time.Ballah/ rail piling proves to be effective solution in following cases-

    (a) Where the movement of trains must not stop or even if it stops,it should be for minimum possible time.

    (b) Where equipments and ballah/rail piling can be mobilized invery short period of time.

    (c) Where the banks are very high and there is slope failure and notthe toe failure.

    (d) where the minor slips have already occurred and immediatelyrestoration of track is required.

    8

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    15/23

    It supports the slipped/ disturbed soil and immediately takes up

    the load and stabilizes the disturbed area. It also removes the chances

    of any further slip in this disturbed region and provides stability to thesoil.

    ii) Filling with cinder - The washed out bank can be rebuilt with puttingthe cinder into the bank. However, these days cinder is not easily

    available in railways which was collected in the past from steam

    locomotives.

    iii) Filling with sand bags - The washed out bank can be rebuilt bydumping sand bags already stored in advance along the bank. Thesand bags should be half filled to minimize void spaces in between

    the sand bags.

    iv) Filling with Fly ash and Bottom ash - The washed out banks can be

    rebuilt with fly ash or bottom ash, the latter being preferable

    material. Fly ash is a cohesionless material and is highly erodible innature. Liquefaction generally occurs when fly ash is deposited under

    loose saturated condition during construction of embankment. Inview of this and properties earlier discussed, special procedure suchas Sandwich Construction or by Earth Cover is required for

    construction of embankment with fly ash.

    Sandwich Construction:

    Intermediate soil layers are often provided in the fly ash

    embankment for ease of construction, to facilitate compaction of

    ash and to provide adequate confinement. Such layers minimize

    9

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    16/23

    liquefaction potential also. Embankment with intermediate soil layers

    can be adopted in case height of the

    Typical cross section of embankment showing sandwich Construction

    embankment is more than 3 m, otherwise Earth Cover method

    can be adopted. The compacted thickness of intermediate soil

    layers shall not be less than 200 mm. One or more layers shall beconstructed depending upon the design requirements. The vertical

    distance between such layers may vary from 1.5 to 3 m. The top 1

    m of embankment should be constructed using selected earth to

    form the subgrade.

    Earth Cover:

    The fly ash embankment should be covered on the sides and top

    by soil to prevent erosion of ash. Good earth suitable for

    embankment construction can be adopted as cover material for flyash embankment.

    For successful compaction of fly ash, self-propelled, pneumatic-tired rollers and self- propelled or towed vibratory rollers can be

    used.

    v) Filling with local earth - The washed out bank can be rebuilt by

    putting the soil from borrow pits which should be at a minimum

    distance of H+3 m from the toe of the bank, where H is the heightof embankment. Proper compaction of the soil should be ensured.

    10

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    17/23

    7.0 PERMANENT REPAIR METHODS

    Permanent repair methods for bank restoration are as follows-

    i) Provision of blanketii) Provision of culvert/bridge etc.iii) Boulder pitchingiv) Toe wallv) Slope flatteningvi) Retaining wallvii) Provision of sand layerviii) TurfingPermanent restoration methods are described below:

    i) Provision of blanket- If it is not possible to provide blanket duringtemporary restoration of embankment, then blanket layer of adequate

    thickness conforming to stipulated specification must be provided a

    the time of permanent restoration. For this purpose, any method asdescribed in RDSO Report no. GE-39 can be used for laying of

    blanket.

    ii) Provision of culvert/bridge etc- If damage or washout ofembankment occurs due to level difference in water level on both side

    of embankment as already discussed, suitably designed culverts /bridges at appropriate locations should be constructed.

    iii) Boulder Pitching - In situations where railway banks remainsubmerged in water for considerable period during rainy season or

    otherwise, boulder pitching should be carried out upto appropriate

    level.

    iv) Toe Wall - When bank is high, soil is plastic in nature, slope are

    inadequate and water remains in borrow pits by the side of toe of

    banks, such banks are prone to slips. Cross level variations and

    difficulty in maintenance of track are regular feature of such banks

    during the monsoon. Toe wall of boulder crates with re-profiling of

    slopes/sub banks can be probable solution at such places for

    stabilization of banks up to 6 m.

    11

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    18/23

    When bank height is more than 6 m and bank slope profile

    shows signs of bulging, distorting or flattening with passage of

    time, cross level variation, movement of TP post and trees away

    from the centerline of track with every passing year, duringrains, severe slips may occur in such banks. In such type of

    banks, toe wall with Ballah/ Rail piling at toe of sub-bank could

    be good solution.

    v) Slope flattening Slope stability analysis should be carried out

    and if existing slopes are found to be steep, then flatter slope

    should be provided with or without berms/sub-bank in keeping

    with the results of analysis.

    12

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    19/23

    vi) Retaining wall If adequate slopes as determined from slope

    stability analysis can not be provided at site due to various

    constraints, retaining wall may be constructed at toe of the

    embankment.

    vii) Provision of sand layer In case, water table remains high at the

    breach site, 30 cm thick sand layer may be provided at bottom of sub

    bank when slope of embankment has to be stabilized by constructing

    a sub-bank. In such cases, it will be preferable to provide sand layer

    below main bank also at the time of temporary repairs. Sand layer

    will facilitate a lowering of water table and in quick dissipation of

    pore water pressure.

    viii) Turfing - Turfing is suited for soil with some clay friction. Methodconsists of preparing slope area by grading it for sowing seeds or

    planting root strips of locally available creeping grass. Its root goes

    up to 50 to 75 mm deep into the slopes serving as a soil anchor andoffering added resistance to erosion. Some typical species of grass

    which develop good network of roots and considered suitable are

    listed below:

    -

    Doob grass- Chloris gyne- Iponea gorneas (Bacharum Booti)- Casuariva and goat foot creepers etc.- Vetiver grass (vetiveria zizanioides)

    8.0 CONCLUSION

    8.1 Material for repair of embankment should be chosen keeping in viewthe availability of same in the near by area.

    8.2 Depending on past history and experience, vulnerable stretches ofembankment can be identified and approximate quantity of material

    may be worked out.

    8.3 As far as possible, estimated quantity of material may be stored atconvenient locations. If this is not possible, then reliable sources for

    material procurement should be identified well in advance. Possible

    borrow pit area in railway land may be identified and demarcated.

    8.4 If damage is large and permanent repair requires a long time,temporary repairs to a satisfactory level for restoration of traffic

    13

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    20/23

    should be made immediately and permanent repairs made

    subsequently.

    8.5 If damage is small and permanent repair is not difficult, repairsdone initially should be of the permanent repair type. If

    possible all of the permanent repairs should be completed

    during the temporary repair period.

    8.6 The selection of temporary repair method for embankment willdepend on conditions of the damaged embankment. In

    selecting the temporary repair method, it is necessary to

    consider the outline of the permanent repair so as to avoid the

    repetition of the same work during the permanent repair.

    8.7 The repair level at the temporary repair stage will depend on

    the overall level of damage in the area and the time allowed forthe repair work. The general procedure will depend on thedegree of damage.

    Factors to be considered for temporary repair include the extentof damage, the work schedule, the level to which the formation

    will be restored, the scope and process of the work and its

    priority.

    Crack, swelling, movements, and other signs of instability ofslopes or cut slopes should be watched carefully in this periodand until permanent repair is made, because of the danger that

    delayed effects may cause another disaster.

    8.8 In selecting proper permanent repair methods, the originalstructure of the embankment, the scale and mechanism of the

    damage and the possibility of secondary damage should be

    considered. This selection can be made with use of theinformation on patterns and level of damage, damage

    mechanism and ground conditions that may be obtained in the

    investigation for temporary repair.8.9 At thetime of permanent repair of damaged bank, slope

    stability analysis should be carried out and new slope should be

    provided as per results of slope stability analysis.

    -----------------------

    14

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    21/23

    9.0 REFERENCE :-

    1. Guide lines for Earthwork in Railway Projects, GE:G-1, July2003.

    2. Slope Stability and formation treatment of Malda Division.IPWE Seminar Dec. 2001, Secunderabad,

    3. Comprehensive Report on Natural Disaster Reduction forroads, - Permanent International Association of Road Congress

    1995.

    4. Technical paper title Design and Construction of easternapproach embankment using fly ash for second NizamuddinBridge, New Delhi , CRRI, New Delhi- 110020 in 2nd

    International Conference on Fly ash Disposal and Utilization.

    5. Guidelines for use of fly ash in road embankments- IRCspecification publication, New Delhi 2001, IRC: SP: 58-2001.

    6. A report on Caol Ash- An environment friendly material for filland embankment construction, NTPC, Lodhi road, New Delhi,July,2002, Part I.

    7.

    Guidelines for use of fly ash in Railway embankmentsPublished by NTPC, Lodhi Road, New Delhi March 2003

    15

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    22/23

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The Guidelines has been prepared by

    1. Shri A. K. Singh, Director/GE2. Shri G. Nageswara Rao, Director/GE

    under guidance of Shri Nand Kishore, Executive Director/GE with

    assistance of

    1. Shri S.K Ojha, SRE/GE

    2. Shri R.S Meena, SRE/GE.

    3. Shri Susheel Kumar, JE-II (Design)

    16

  • 7/30/2019 RDSO GE_G7

    23/23

    ANNEXURE

    List of NTPCs Coal Based Thermal Power Stations

    1. Singrauli super Thermal

    Power station

    P.O. Shaktinagar Distt Sonebhadra,

    U.P. 231222

    2. Korba super Thermal Power

    station

    P.O. Pragati Nagar, Korba (West)

    Distt. Korba, CH.-495450

    3. Ramagundam Super Thermal

    Power Station.

    P.O. Jyoti Nagar Distt. Karim Nagar,

    A.P.-5052154. Faraka Super Thermal Power

    station

    P.O. Nabarun, Distt. Murshidabad,

    W.B. 742236

    5. Vindhyachal super Thermal

    Power station

    P.O. Vidhya Nagar Distt. Sindhi, M.P.

    - 486885

    6. Rihand super Thermal Power

    station

    P.O. Rihand Nagar Distt. Sonebhadra

    U.P. - 321223

    7. National Capital Power

    station

    P.O. Vidyut Nagar Dadri Dhaulana

    Road Distt.Gautam Budha Nagar U.P.

    2010088. Feroz Ghandhi Unchahar

    Thermal Power station

    P.O. Unchahar, Distt. Rae Bareilly,

    U.P. 229406

    9. Badarpur Thermal Power

    station

    P.O. Badarpur New Delhi 110044

    10. Kahalgaon super Thermal

    Power station

    P.O. Deeptinagar, Kahalgaon Distt.

    Bhagalpur, Bihar 813203

    11. Talcher-Kaniha superThermal Power station

    P.O. Kaniha, Distt. Angul, Orissa-759147

    12. Talcher- Thermal Powerstation P.O. Talcher Thermal Distt.Angul,Orissa 759101

    13. Tanda Thermal Power station P.O. Tanda Distt. Ambedkarnagar,

    U.P.

    14. Simhadri super Thermal

    Power station

    P.O. Simhadri, Distt. Vishakhapatnam

    A.P. 531020