80
1 中華民國九十三年九月二十二、二十三日 Recent Research on Dioxin (DXN) Emission from Metal Industrial Facilities Shigenobu OKAJIMA, Dr. Eng. Research & Development Department Plant & Infrastructure Engineering Company KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.

Recent Research on Dioxin (DXN) Emission from Metal …ebooks.lib.ntu.edu.tw/1_file/moeaidb/012799/2004092204.pdf · 1 中華民國九十三年九月二十二、二十三日 Recent

  • Upload
    vanngoc

  • View
    228

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    Recent Researchon Dioxin (DXN) Emission

    from Metal Industrial Facilities

    Shigenobu OKAJIMA, Dr. Eng.

    Research & Development Department Plant & Infrastructure Engineering Company

    KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.

  • 2

    CONTENTS1. Status of Dioxin Emission from Metal

    Industrial Facilities 2. Control Technologies of Dioxin Emission

    in Metal Industrial Facilities 2.1. Electric Steelmaking Furnace2.2. Iron and Steel Sintering Process2.3. Zinc Recovery Facility2.4. Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

  • 3

    1. Status of Dioxin Emissionfrom Metal Industrial Facilities

    3

  • 44

    2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin(2,3,7,8-TeCDD)

    2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran(2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF)

    3,3,4,4-tetrachlorobiphenyl(3,3,4,4-TeCB)

    C

    O

    H

    Cl

    The term dioxins in Japan refers to PCDDs, PCDFs, and co-planar PCBs

    in the Law Concerning Special Measures against Dioxins on July 16, 1999.

  • 55

    Table. Environmental Quality Standarts of Dioxins in Japan(Jan. 15, 2000, Sept. 1, 2002)

    Air

    Water Drinking Water Ground Water

    Soil

    Sediment

    : 0.6 pg-TEQ/m3

    : 1 pg-TEQ/L: 1 pg-TEQ/L: 1 pg-TEQ/L

    : 1,000 pg-TEQ/g: 250 pg-TEQ/g (Target Value)

    : 150 pg-TEQ/g

  • 6

    ExistingNew

    10.1Iron and Steel Sintering Process

    1

    1

    0.5

    5Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    10Zinc Recovery Facility

    5Electric Steelmaking Furnace

    Table. Emission Standards of Dioxinsfor Metal Industrial Facilities in Japan

    6

    (ng-TEQ/m3)

    (Jan. 15, 2000)

  • 7

    ExistingNew

    10

    10

    10Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    10Zinc Recovery Facility

    7

    (pg-TEQ/L)

    (Jan. 15, 2000)

    Table. Effluent Standards of Dioxinsfor Metal Industrial Facilities in Japan

  • 8

    32Iron and Steel Sintering Process

    787

    20

    118

    Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    Zinc Recovery Facility

    Electric Steelmaking Furnace

    Table. Number of Table. Number of Metal Industrial Facilities Reported toLocal Governments under Emission Standards

    of Dioxins in Japan (March 31, 2003)

    Local Governments under Emission Standardsof Dioxins in Japan (March 31, 2003)

    8

  • 9

    87

    14

    Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    Zinc Recovery Facility

    9

    Table. Number of Metal Industrial Facilities Reported toLocal Governments under Effluent Standards

    of Dioxins in Japan (March 31, 2003)

  • 10

    203.8

    14.7

    19.6

    9.2

    65.0

    95.3

    2001

    190.4

    13.6

    16.2

    14.7

    51.1

    94.8

    2002

    178.3

    13.6

    13.2

    8.3

    50.8

    92.4

    2003

    264.1

    15.0

    11.8

    13.8

    93.2

    130.3

    ReductionTarget

    300.9

    13.3

    23.0

    21.8

    101.3

    141.5

    1999

    263.8

    14.2

    22.2

    26.5

    69.8

    131.1

    2000

    328.8

    20.9

    28.8

    25.4

    113.8

    139.9

    1998

    30.7Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    21.8Other Industrial Processes

    1997

    135.0Iron and Steel Sintering Process

    463.4

    47.4

    228.5

    Total

    Zinc Recovery Facility

    Electric Steelmaking Furnace

    Table. Trend of the Annual Dioxin Emissionfrom Metal Industrial Facilities in Japan

    10

    (g-TEQ/y)

    Estimated

  • 11

    1.99

    0.0817

    0.0036

    2001

    0.99

    0.0243

    0.0026

    2002

    0.98

    0.0243

    0.0026

    2003

    -

    -

    -

    ReductionTarget

    5.77

    0.0925

    0.0036

    1999

    4.80

    0.0555

    0.0036

    2000

    5.67

    0.0675

    0.0036

    1998

    0.340Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    1997

    6.14

    0.0036

    Total Industrial Facilities

    Zinc Recovery Facility

    Table. Trend of the Annual Dioxin Effluent from Metal Industrial Facilities in Japan

    11

    (g-TEQ/y)

    Estimated

  • 12

    0.111157.40 - 0.1131010Zinc Primary Smelling Facilities

    0.0884,403,000111Copper Recovery Facilities

    0.005

    0.22

    14.7(0.0026)

    51.1

    90.6(4.3)

    Annual Emission (g-TEQ/y)

    0.012 - 0.31

    0.01418 - 0.47018

    0.00053 - 18.4(0.01 - 1.4)

    0.013 - 0.68

    0 - 9.7(0.00015 - 0.67)

    DXN Conc.

    (ng-TEQ/m3[N])

    960.7

    2,436.1

    48,019.2(14.7)

    480.6

    3,062.2

    Emission Factor

    (ng-TEQ/t)

    4

    3

    20(4)

    34

    104(22)

    Number of Data(-)

    3Lead Recovery Facilities

    4Precious Metals Recovery Facilities

    Number of Facilities

    (-)

    26Iron and Steel Sintering Process

    16(3)

    95(30)

    Zinc Recovery Facility(To Water)

    Electric Steelmaking Furnace(From Building Atmosphere)

    Table. Estimated Annual Dioxin Emissionfrom Metal Industrial Facilities in Japan (2002) (#1/3)

    12

    Effluent (pg-TEQ/L)

  • 13

    [Breakdown]

    0.20.023 - 3.82524Aluminum Scrap Melting ProcessOwned by Distributors of Scraps

    of Cars and Metals

    13.8Melting Furnace for Melting Process

    0.07Melting Furnace for Purification Process

    0.014

    1.6

    0.22

    0.39

    14.4

    Annual Emission (g-TEQ/y)

    0.000017 - 0.18

    0 - 0.5

    0 - 6.3

    DXN Conc.

    (ng-TEQ/m3[N])

    716.4

    Emission Factor

    (ng-TEQ/t)

    6

    95

    192

    Number of Data(-)

    145Aluminum Scrap Melting Process

    in Aluminum Rolling

    6Aluminum Scrap Melting Process

    in Aluminum Casting and Die-casting

    Number of Facilities

    (-)

    Drying Furnace

    244

    Roaster

    Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    Table. Estimated Annual Dioxin Emissionfrom Metal Industrial Facilities in Japan (2002) (#2/3)

    13

  • 14

    0.13490.00.000047 - 1.23437Car Component Manufacturing (Aluminum Casting

    and Die-casting)

    (0.024)(13.0)(0.00014 - 5.8)(24)(17)Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing (Aluminum Rolling etc.)

    (To Water)

    (0.0003)

    1.97

    0.2040.049

    0.02

    Annual Emission (g-TEQ/y)

    (0.0014 - 0.2)

    0 - 3.6

    0 - 0.92

    0.0000066 - 0.7

    DXN Conc.

    (ng-TEQ/m3[N])

    3,533.2

    203.2306.6

    Emission Factor

    (ng-TEQ/t)

    (7)

    48

    16

    13

    Number of Data(-)

    (7)Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing (Car and Car

    Component Manufacturing)(To Water)

    Number of Facilities

    (-)

    16Aluminum Casting and Die-casting Manufacturing

    Reverberating FurnaceMelting Pot or Crucible

    46

    13

    Car Manufacturing (Aluminum Casting and Die-casting)

    Drying Process of Aluminum Cutting Waste inCar and Car Component Manufacturing

    Table. Estimated Annual Dioxin Emission from Metal Industrial Facilities in Japan (2002) (#3/3)

    14

    Effluent (pg-TEQ/L)

  • 15

    2. Control Technologies of Dioxin Emissionin Metal Industrial Facilities

    15

  • 1616

  • 1717

  • 1818

    Fig. Formation Route of PCDDs/PCDFsin Combustion Processes Proposed by Takeuchi

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.89, p.812, 2003)

    (1) CBz, CPh (Precursors) PCDDs/PCDFs(2) PAH PCDDs/PCDFs(3) Soot PCDDs/PCDFs

  • 1919

    Fig. A Scheme for Catalytic Mechanism of CuCl2 in Soot Oxidation Proposed by Mul (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.89, p.817, 2003)

    R1 : 4CuCl + O2 2Cu2OCl2R2 : Reduction of Cu2OCl2 by Carbon

    Formation of Compounds Including Oxgen (C-Os) + CuClR3 : Elimination of C-Os CO/CO2R4 : CuCl-O CuO + 1/2Cl2R5 : CuCl2 2CuCl + Cl2

  • 2020

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    Tem

    p. (

    )

    non-

    mon

    o- di-

    tri-

    tetr

    a-

    pent

    a-

    hexa

    -

    hept

    a-

    octa

    -

    Fig. Melting Point and Boiling Point of PCDDs/PCDFs(Chemosphere, Vol.18, Nos.1-6, pp.783-788, 1989)

    M.P. B.P.PCDDs: PCDFs:

    400

    300

    150Solid Phase

    Gas Phase

  • 2121

    A Summary of Prevention and the Destructionof DXN in Metal Industrial Facilities (#1/2)

    Quality control of scrap or dust inputs depending on the process used. The use of the correct feed material for the particular furnace or process. Selection and sorting to prevent the addition of material that is contaminated with organic matter or precursors can reduce the potential for dioxin formation.The use of optimum combustion conditions. The use of oxygen injection in the upper part of a furnace to ensure complete combustion of furnace gases if necessary to achieve this.The use of correctly designed and operated afterburners and rapid quenching of the hot gases to < 250.

  • 2222

    A Summary of Prevention and the Destructionof DXN in Metal Industrial Facilities (#2/2)

    Very high efficiency dust removal, for example high efficiency fabric filters or ceramic filters.Absorption onto activated carbon in a fixed bed or moving bed reactor or by injection into the gas stream, and removal as filter dust. The use of a catalytic oxidation stage or fabric filters that incorporate a catalytic coating.Treatment of collected dusts in high temperature furnaces to destroy dioxin and to recover metals.

  • 23

    2.1. Electric Steelmaking Furnace

    23

  • 2424

    Present production of iron and steel is approximately 700 - 800 million tons in the world and 100 - 110 million tons in Japan.Production of sintered ore is approximately 100 million tons in Japan.The percentage of electric are furnace (EAF) steel of the overall steel production are approximately 30 % in Japan. Thirty million tons of crude iron and steel, therefore, are produced in EAFs.The direct smelting of iron-containing materials such as scrap is usually performed in EAFs which play an important and increasing role in modern steel works concepts.

    Production and Recycling of Iron and Steel

  • 2525

  • 2626

  • 2727

  • 2828

  • 2929

    Fig. A Chart of Temperature, CO2, O2, and CO of Flue Gas in an EAF Plant

    Time

    CO

    (ppm

    )O

    2 (%

    )C

    O2

    (%)

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    ()

    Time

    Time

    Time

    Termination of PD

    Inlet of Dust CollectorOutlet of EAF

    Inlet of Dust CollectorOutlet of EAF (1/100)

    Completion of MeltingCompletion of 1st PD

    Starting of Power Distribution (PD)

    Inlet of Dust Collector

    Outlet of EAF

    Inlet of Dust Collector

    Outlet of EAF

    CO 150,000 ppm= 15 %

  • 3030

    Fig. Typical Dust Collection Systems in EAF Plants (Left: Separated Type; Light: Combined Type)

    EAFCombustion

    Chamber

    GasCooler

    Dust Collector for the Evacuation of the Building Atmosphere

    EAF CombustionChamber

    GasCooler

    Dust Collectorfor the EAF

  • 3131

    Fig. An Example of Scrap Preheating Equipment

    EAF

    CombustionChamber

    Bucket

    Fan

    RotaryLid

    GasCooler

    Body of PreheatingEquipment

    DustCollector

    RegulationValue

  • 3232

    921719233PCDDs/PCDFs at the Stack

    -708-35-2,308-447Filtration and Dilution Effects in theDust Collector

    -15,800-278--Dilution Effect in Combined Flue Gaswith the Building Atmosphere

    14,800---de novo Synthesis in Scrap Preheating-2712,390426de novo Synthesis from 500 to 300

    2,2005911054Formation of PCDDs/PCDFs in the EAF

    D PlantC PlantB PlantA Plant(ng/m3[N])

    Table. Changes of PCDDs/PCDFs in EAF Plants

  • 3333

    Replaced by a Quenching Tower for Rapid Cooling of the Off Gas

  • 3434

  • 3535

    DXN

    (ng-

    TEQ

    /m3 [N

    ])

    Fig. Scatter Plot of Temperature of the Inlet of Dust Collectorsand DXN Conc. in Flue Gases

    Temperature ()

    Separated TypeCombined Type

  • 3636

  • 3737

    Fig. Injection System of Activated Carbon Powderfor Off Gas Treatment

    For the EAF MixingTower

    Dumper

    For the Building Atmosphere

    Blower

    Blower

    CombustionChamber

    GasCooler

    Dumper ActivatedCarbon Powder

    Injection Unit

    Dust Collectorfor the EAF

    Dust Collector forthe Evacuation of theBuilding Atmosphere

  • 3838

    Fig. Dioxin Control in Thermal Processes fromResults of MSW Incineration Studies

  • 3939

    DXN

    (ng/

    g)Solid Phase

    Fig. de novo Synthesis in EAF Dust Heated at the Temperatures of 100, 150, and 200

    Non-treatedEAF Dust

    Gas Phase

    Memory Effect in Dioxin Formation

  • 40

    2.2. Iron and Steel Sintering Process

    40

  • 4141

  • 4242

  • 4343

    Ignition Furnace Air

    Cooling Zone

    Wet Zone

    Incineration or Melting Zone

    Moving Direction of Sintering Bed

    Drying or Calcinations ZoneWindow Boxes

    Fig. Schematic Sintering Process

  • 4444

    CrossSection

  • 4545

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.87, p.230, 2001)

  • 4646

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.87, pp.230-231, 2001)

  • 4747

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.87, p.232, 2001)

  • 4848

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.87, p.230,p.232, 2001)

  • 4949

    SinteringEquipment

    Flue Gas

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.87, p.232, 2001)

    Sintered Ore(Product)

    Dust from Off Gas Dedusting (ex. D-EP Dust)

    Recycled Sinter

    Other RecycledMaterials

    NewMaterials

  • 5050

  • 5151

    Table. Experimental Conditions and Results for Sinter-pot Tests

    1.74000.423.0 + 5.0 + 1.0 +

    3.0

    Anth. + Mill Scalte + EP Dust +BF Dust1.6C 8

    1.62504.25.0 + 1.0Mill Scale + EP Dust1.6C 7

    0.201701.23.0 + 5.0Anth. + Mill Scale1.6C 6

    1.33701.53.0 + 1.0Anth. + EP Dust1.6C 5

    0.090903.73.0BF Dust1.6C 4

    1.6844.51.0EP Dust (Sintering)1.6C 3

    0.10554.25.0Mill Scale1.6C 2

    0.083621.53.0Anthracite1.6C 1

    0.16C BASE

    2.55804.00.08 + 0.05NaCl + Oil1.3B 4

    0.11904.00.05Oil for Rolling1.3B 3

    2.55804.00.08NaCl1.3B 2

    2.45804.00.09PVC1.3B 1

    0.05B BASE

    2.410504.40.17 + 0.10NaCl + OilVariableA 4

    0.04504.50.10Oil for RollingVariableA 3

    0.6510504.50.17NaClVariableA 2

    6.010504.50.18PVCVariableA 1

    0.03A BASE

    Amount of

    DXN(g/kg-mixture)

    T.Cl Contentin Mix.

    (mg/kg)

    Coke Added(mass%)

    Mixing Ratio(mass%)

    AdditivesGas Flow Rate(m3[N]/min)

    No.

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.87, p.234, 2001)

  • 5252

    (Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.88, p.373, p.375, 2002)

  • 5353(Tetsu-to-Hagan, Vol.88, p.384, 2002)

  • 5454

  • 5555

  • 5656

  • 5757

  • 5858

  • 59

    2.3. Zinc Recovery Facility

    59

  • 6060

    Table. Production and Consumption of Zinc in Japan

    300,000 - 350,000Amount of EAF Dust

    700,000 - 750,000

    (250,000 - 350,000)

    Amount of Domestic Consumption

    (Of Which Amount for Zinc Galvanized Sheet Iron)

    60,000Amount of Zinc Recovery from EAF Dust

    20,000 - 50,000Amount of Export

    100,000 - 150,000Amount of Import

    600,000 - 650,000Amount of Domestic Production

    (t/y)

    The amount of zinc reovery from EAF dust is approximately tenth part of that of domestic production.

  • 6161

    Fig. A Summarized Flow Sheet of Five Major ZincRecovery Facilities in Japan

    Volatiling Furnace(Rotary Kiln)

    Sintering Furnace(Dwight Lloyd Type)

    Distilling Furnace(Electrothermic Furnace )

    EAF Dust, etc

    Reducing Furnace(MF Furnace, Rotary Kiln) Drying and Heating

    Furnace

    Refining (Anode)Furnace

    (Rotary Kiln)

    Electric Arc Furnace

  • 6262

  • 6363

    Fig. A Schematic Layout of MF Furnace

    ShutteConveyor

    BypassFlue

    Boiler

    CokingZone

    Settlor

    MeltingZone

    CokeEAF DustLimestone

    Air

    CoolingWater

    Slag, Metal

    Crude ZuOCyclones

    Crude ZuO

    Crude ZuO

    FanStackBF

    Gas CoolerFurnace

    Off Gas

  • 6464

    Fig. A Schematic Layout of Electrothermic Furnace

    Table forDischarge

    LowerElectrode

    UpperElectrode

    Opening forInput

    Materials

    RotaryChute

    CycloneAir Supply for

    Oxidation

    BF

    DischargeOpening

  • 6565

  • 6666

    Table. Examples of Composition of EAF Dust

    0.114.20.803.703.131.12.1021.9

    0.206.81.002.901.420.12.8832.3

    0.254.91.603.703.624.71.9021.5

    0.134.60.503.101.530.92.7029.4

    0.490.30.743.0018.924.70.2019.2

    0.013.28.6013.406.752.72.8020.3

    0.093.32.401.500.516.01.6015.9

    0.304.20.203.903.127.91.8020.7

    0.401.90.803.904.534.90.9021.6

    0.321.20.600.013.325.50.7025.8

    0.154.21.403.505.127.52.6019.6

    0.201.90.506.703.135.00.0216.0

    0.464.81.504.602.034.20.4018.0

    0.334.02.703.508.226.92.6022.7

    0.032.23.203.804.435.91.3017.8

    F %Cl %C %SiO2 %CaO %Fe %Pb %Zn %

    DXN Conc. 0.22 43 ng-TEQ/g (ave. 3 ng-TEQ/g)

  • 67

    2.4. Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing

    67

  • 6868

    Frame of Windows Casting

    Turnings (Swarf)Can

    DXN Conc. in Flue Gas of Aluminum Melting FurnacesUsed Beverage Can (UBC), Frame of WindowsTurnings, Swarf : High

    : Low

  • 6969

    Table. Recycling and Final Disposal ofUsed Aluminum Cans in Japan (2002)

    (9.1 %)

    (20.6 %)

    (70.3 %)

    [Breakdown]

    49,000 t/yFinal Disposal

    50,000 t/yFor Die-casting and Casting

    22,000 t/y

    171,000 t/y

    234,000 t/y

    292,000 t/y

    For Deoxdizing agents and Commodities

    For Aluminum Alloys

    Recycling

    Consumption

    14.72 billion cans

    17.78 billion cans

    Total Aluminum Consumption : 3,900,000 t/yTotal Aluminum Recycling : 1,450,000 t/y

  • 7070

    Fig. Scrap Pre-heating, De-coating, and Melting Processfor UBC (Used Beverage Can)

    Cyclone

    Airlock

    Exhaust

    Dust

    Air

    Fuel

    Molten Aluminum

    Fan for Hot Gas

    AirFuel

    Water

    Fan

    Airlock

    AirlockRotary Kiln(> 500)

    Scrap Discharge Opening

    Water

    Inlet forUBCScrap

    ReverberatoryFurnace

    Combustion Chamber (800)

  • 7171

  • 7272

    BF

    800

    Charge ofTurnings (Swarf)

    Flue Gas

    Burner

    Burner

    300 - 500

    Discharge ofTurnings (Swarf)

    Cyclone

    Coolingby Air

    Fig. Drying Process for Turnings

    Combustion Furnace

    Rotary Kiln

  • 7373

  • 7474

    Fig. Examples of Aluminum Melting Reverberatory Furnace(Upper: Side Well Type; Lower: Standard Type)

    Scrap

    Scrubber

    Flue Gas fromthe Combustion

    (Melting) Furnace

    Refining Agents(Flux, Gases)

    Burner

    GasCooler

    BF

    Flue Gas

    Combustion (Melting)Furnace

    Stacking Machine

    Stacking Machine

    Casting

    Product

    Product

    Flue Gas

    Casting

    HoldingFurnace

    BFGasCooler

    Flue Gas formthe Fore-furnace

    Fore-Furnace

  • 7575

    (Organohalogen Compounds, Vol.56, p.214, 2002)

  • 7676(Organohalogen Compounds, Vol.56, p.215, 2002)

  • 7777

    (Organohalogen Compounds, Vol.56, p.216, 2002)

  • 7878

    Table. Factors of DXN Formation in Secondary Aluminum Production

    Recycle Oil(Chlorine Content0.001 0.22 %)

    Fuels

    9.16

    Melting FurnaceMemory Effect

    in the Off Gas Dust

    Chlorine MixturesChloride (Salt Flux)

    Aluminum Scrap

    700 750 200 500

    (Batch Process)

    Melting Process

    0.147

    De-coating Furnace

    UBC

    300 500

    Off Gas Combustion: 800

    De-coating Process

    16.6

    Drying Furnace

    Turnings, Swarf

    300 500

    Off Gas Combustion: 800

    Drying Process

    Pre-treatment

    Process Chemicalsand Gases

    DXN Formation

    in Processes

    Materials

    0.174Emission Factor

    (g-TEQ/t)

    Temperature

    Refining Process

  • 7979

    Issues in Metal Industrial DXN Sourcesin Comparison with MSW Incineration Facilities

    (1) MSW incineration facilities have coped with adoption of high combustion temperature. The adoption of such a countermeasure, however, is difficult in industrial thermal processes because keeping of the quality and yield of produets is necessary.

    (2) Government budgets have been injected into improvement of equipment in MSW incineration facilities, while enterprises have to pay for improvement of their equipment or facilities for reduction of DXN emission.

    (3) Reduction of the amount of MSW is widely required in MSW management; in contrast it is difficult to reduce production in enterprises.

  • 8080

    Thank you for your kind attention.

    http://www.khi.co.jp/index_e.htmlhttp://www.kawasaki.com.cn/