Upload
sabrina-marylou-sutton
View
248
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reconciling institutional theory with organizational
theories
How neoinstitutionalism resolves five paradoxes?
Ms.Chanatip Dansirisanti (陳美清 )MA2N0204
Purpose of study:
Review and compare traditional and new institutional in order to address some of the criticism that this theory has received
“Neoinstitutional theory can be linked with streams of research in sociology, economics, and political science”
Introduction*
Neoinstitutional theory possesses strong sociological origin
Organizations are socially rewarded by legitimacy and resources
Survival based on acceptance of coercive, normative, and institutional pressure
Introduction*
Aims of this paper:
Growing body of literature dealing with institutional theory
Addressing criticism that this theory has received; by means of 5 paradoxes and confront with more rational
Defending the utility and power of the theory by showing its ability to inform managerial behavior by combining institutional account with others
Literature Review*Paradoxes in Neoinstitutional theory:
These modifications have resulted in a theory that address change, competitive advantage, and innovation in organization
Paradoxes was motivated in part by several articles that have proposed the integration of this theory
Literature Review*
Conformity versus Differentiation
Conformity Improves the social support of stakeholders and
legitimacy of the firmReduces risks associated with the loss of
legitimacy and helps in resource acquisitionMake all organizations similar, competitive
pressures are stronger
Literature Review*
Conformity versus Differentiation
Differentiation Increase the possibilities of creation a competitive
advantage through resources and capabilityReduce rivalry, increasing the possibility of building
competitive advantageReducing competitiveness and fight for scare
resourcesCreate benefits and dominant positions that will
last until competitor imitate a firm’s key resources
“Both alternatives have an effect on performance, creation and maintenance of dominant market positions”
Literature Review*
Isomorphism versus Heterogeneity
Isomorphism linked with Conformity Resulting from the interrelations between the
institutional context and organizationProvide better access to resources, legitimacy,
and competitive advantage of firmReducing competition and differentiation
Literature Review*
Isomorphism versus Heterogeneity
Heterogeneity linked with DifferentiationSupport better competitiveness Creating competitive positions in business
environment
“Institutional theory can explain not only homogeneity and isomorphism in organization, but also heterogeneity
and variability of generates profits”
Literature Review*
Legitimacy versus Efficiency
LegitimacyProvides firm better access to resources, reputation,
and advantages in situations involving rivalry Consequence of institutional embedded, encourage the
development of research into strategic content
Efficiency pursues legitimacy as result of the relationship with stakeholders
Literature Review*
Legitimacy versus Efficiency
In recent years, more attention has been paid to social dimension of performance. The stakeholders and symbolic management has encouraged firm to try to achieve an economic and social fit. Therefore, firm seek to obtain not only efficiency but also legitimacy
“Legitimacy not only efficiency, it is emphasized as a resource that explains the behavior of organization”
Literature Review*Change versus Inertia
ChangeNew lines of institutional thinking emphasize, strategic
management action and interplayAllow firm to continuously changing their structures and
practices to fit a dynamic environment High risk of being different, High return of being market
leader
Inertia Traditional institution pressure that many firms has been
associated Conformity and acceptance, a fact that make the
organizations turn into “Iron cage”
Literature Review*
Change versus Inertia
The institutional pressure are always changing, the constant interaction among institutions and organizations. This is mean that “there is a process of adaptation to new institutional requirement”
“The institutional changed consequences from organization's action and dynamic”
Literature Review*
Institution versus Organization
Institutional has traditionally been applied to non-profit and social organization such Education and Health sector
Growing interest on the part of organizations in attaining social status emphasize the applicability of institutional analysis
Literature Review*
Institution versus Organization
Social responsibility and symbolic management have increased the degree of accountability that firms must show to their agent, who must be informed about their management in order to provide social support
Development of institutional analysis has transferred organizational principles and management technique from the private to the public sectors
“All organizations are institutions to a larger or smaller degree”
Implication*
Legitimacy and institutional embeddedness with respect to stakeholders and institutions offer ways to reduce transaction costs and create positions of competitive advantage
Competitive advantage can be obtained not only through differentiation, heterogeneity and change, but also through social, stakeholders, and accommodation of institutional pressures that provide legitimacy, resources and competitive position
Conclusion*
This study applying institutional principle to different types of industries and firm
It implies the new streams of institutional with more rational and strategic theories of change
Define definition of Neoinstitutional theory toward more realistic approach with new environment requirements
Classic institutional principles such Inertia, Conformity and Determinism have been disputed
Conclusion*
Considers the institutional explanation of:1) Change
2) Competitive advantage
3) Organizational behavior
“Neoinstitutional theory presents a dynamic perspective by which to explain CHANGE. This apparently breaks away from the previous deterministic view of conformity”
Future research area*
Continue to focus on the integration of strategic and institutional theories in order to explain change in a processual and longitudinal way
longitudinal studies must be undertaken “conformity and acceptance”; studies in combination with strategic action
Technical and institutional changes must be analyze together
Future research area*
Strategic side of institutional responses must be taken into account
Studies should evaluate the impact of the institutional context on performance
How to combining contradictory theories to improve our understanding of how organizations should behave?