4
2/11/2014 1 Rehabilitation Strategies Specific to ACL Reconstruction in the Female Athlete Jerry Latimer ATC,PT Associate Director of Sports Medicine The Florida State University Functional Testing Algorithm Davies & Zillmer, 2000¹ Sport Specific Testing Lower Extremity Functional Testing (LEFT) Functional Hop Test Functional Jump Test Open Kinetic Chain Isokinetic Testing Kinesthetic/Proprioceptive/Balance Testing Basic Measurements Basic Measurements Strength & Power Functional Tests Following maturation female athletes landed with significantly more medial knee motion and greater lower extremity valgus compared to males. (Hewett et al, 2009) 2 . “Ligament Dominance”. The supporting musculature supporting the knee struggles to appropriately absorb ground reaction forces thereby placing more force through the static stabilizers of the knee in females. (Hewett et al, 2010) 3 . Females land with more valgus and less LE control. Females struggle with maintaining proper landing LE alignment due to compromised hip abduction strength and trunk control. (Myer et al, 2013) 4 Never lose an opportunity to help correct what science has taught us. Never lose an opportunity to help correct what science has taught us. Females with ACL injuries present with greater trunk displacement in all directions compared to non-ACL injured females. The greatest predictor of ACL injury risk was lateral trunk displacement. (Zazulak, 2007) 5 . “Trunk Dominance” Inability to adequately control the trunk during dynamic activity. Therefore larger moments about the LE exist. (Hewett et al, 2010) 3 Females have demonstrated improper recruitment of the gluteal, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscles during landing leading to greater abduction moments. (Chappell et al, 2007, Hewett et al, 1996, Myer et al 2006) 6-8 Functional Testing Algorithm Davies & Zillmer 2000 1 Sport Specific Testing Lower Extremity Functional Testing (LEFT) Functional Hop Test Functional Jump Test Open Kinetic Chain Isokinetic Testing Kinesthetic/Proprioceptive/Balance Testing Basic Measurements Basic Measurements Strength & Power Functional Tests Functional Testing Algorithm Basic Measurements: quantity vs quality Time since surgery VAS: < 3 on the 0-10 analogue scale AROM (<10%) Gait analysis: Ubersense, Foot posture? Kinesthetic, proprioceptive, and balance training. Star Excursion Balance Test. (Reiman & Manske- Functional Testing in Human Performance, 2009) 9 . Functional Movement Screen- Hurdle Step Assessment. (Cook et al. 1998, Course manual).

Rehabilitation Strategies Specific to ACL Reconstruction in the Female Athlete

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LCA

Citation preview

  • 2/11/2014

    1

    Rehabilitation

    Strategies Specific to

    ACL Reconstruction in

    the Female Athlete Jerry Latimer ATC,PT

    Associate Director of Sports Medicine

    The Florida State University

    Functional Testing Algorithm Davies & Zillmer, 2000

    Sport Specific Testing

    Lower Extremity Functional Testing (LEFT)

    Functional Hop Test

    Functional Jump Test

    Open Kinetic Chain Isokinetic Testing

    Kinesthetic/Proprioceptive/Balance Testing

    Basic Measurements

    Basic

    Measurements

    Strength & Power

    Functional Tests

    Following maturation female athletes landed with significantly more medial knee motion and greater lower extremity valgus compared to males. (Hewett et al, 2009)2.

    Ligament Dominance. The supporting musculature supporting the knee struggles to appropriately absorb ground reaction forces thereby placing more force through the static stabilizers of the knee in females. (Hewett et al, 2010)3.

    Females land with more valgus and less LE control. Females struggle with maintaining proper landing LE alignment due to compromised hip abduction strength and trunk control. (Myer et al, 2013)4

    Never lose an opportunity to

    help correct what science has

    taught us.

    Never lose an opportunity to help

    correct what science has taught

    us.

    Females with ACL injuries present with greater trunk displacement in all directions compared to non-ACL

    injured females. The greatest predictor of ACL injury risk

    was lateral trunk displacement. (Zazulak, 2007)5.

    Trunk Dominance Inability to adequately control the trunk during dynamic activity. Therefore larger moments

    about the LE exist. (Hewett et al, 2010)3

    Females have demonstrated improper recruitment of the gluteal, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscles during

    landing leading to greater abduction moments. (Chappell

    et al, 2007, Hewett et al, 1996, Myer et al 2006)6-8

    Functional Testing Algorithm Davies & Zillmer 20001

    Sport Specific Testing

    Lower Extremity Functional Testing (LEFT)

    Functional Hop Test

    Functional Jump Test

    Open Kinetic Chain Isokinetic Testing

    Kinesthetic/Proprioceptive/Balance Testing

    Basic Measurements

    Basic

    Measurements

    Strength & Power

    Functional Tests

    Functional Testing Algorithm

    Basic Measurements: quantity vs quality

    Time since surgery

    VAS: < 3 on the 0-10 analogue scale

    AROM (

  • 2/11/2014

    2

    Star Excursion FMS Hurdle Step

    Functional Testing Algorithm

    Basic Measurements:

    Core strength (Selective functional movement assessment)

    Lateral flexor (side bridge). Prone bridge, Supine bridge, Endurance of extensors. (Reiman & Manske- Functional Testing in Human Performance, 2009)9.

    Selective Functional Movement Assessment: Overhead Deep Squat. May reveal functional weakness within the core (pelvis, hips and lumbar spine) to adequately stabilize the trunk during dynamic activity. (Rose &Cook, 2009, Course manual).

    Strength and Power:

    Manual muscle testing

    Digital dynamometer testing

    Isokinetic testing: FSU- 12-16 weeks. ( Wilk et al10, JOSPT 1994, Correlation of concentric quadriceps peak

    torque to single leg hop test. r=0.41-0.62.)

    < 25% bilateral comparison for sport related activities.

    QPT/BW ratio: Males: 60-65%, Females 50-55%. H/Q ratio: Males: 66-77%, Females: 75%. (Davies et al, 2013)11.

    No mans land. Where do we go from here?

    Functional Testing Algorithm

    Proprioception Upgrade

    Nature vs Nurture: We know what the research says about what females have, how can we influence that?

    How do we re-program? Help facilitate the athlete to develop new engrams for proper movement.

    Sportsmetrics TM (Cincinnati Sports Medicine Research and Education Foundation: Course certification manual).

    6 week program including dynamic warm up, jump training, strength training and agility progression.

    Findings of research: Corrected muscular imbalances, decreased landing forces and increased power, strength, jump and height. (Hewitt et al, 1996)7.

    Proprioception Upgrade

    Jump training: Wall jumps, tuck jumps, squat jumps, barrier jumps (f/b, s/s). 180 degree jumps, broad jumps, bounding in place. SportsmetricsTM (Cincinnati Sports Medicine Research and Education Foundation: Course certification Manual).

    Agility drill progression: Dot Drills progression, T-drill, square drill, serpentine run, shuttle sprints. Continuing to progress speed while maintaining quality of movement pattern. SportsmetricsTM (Cincinnati Sports Medicine Research and Education Foundation: Course certification Manual).

  • 2/11/2014

    3

    Functional Testing Algorithm Davies & Zillmer 20001

    Sport Specific Testing

    Lower Extremity Functional Testing (LEFT)

    Functional Hop Test

    Functional Jump Test

    Open Kinetic Chain Isokinetic Testing

    Kinesthetic/Proprioceptive/Balance Testing

    Basic Measurements

    Basic

    Measurements

    Strength & Power

    Functional Tests

    Functional Testing Algorithm (Davies et al, 2013)

    Functional Testing: (Quantitative & Qualitative LE assessment)

    2-legged jump test: 80-90% distance of height. (Davies et al, 2013)11.

    Return to Sport Functional Testing

    1-legged hop test: 70-80% distance of body height. (Davies et al, 2013)11

    The Lower Extremity

    Functional Test Davies & Zillmer 20001

    Functional Testing Algorithm

    Lower Extremity Functional Test (LEFT): 100 seconds for females. (Davies & Zillmer, 2000)1.

    Return to Sport Functional Testing

    Other tests (Functional Testing in human Performance) Reiman & Manske, 2009.9

    Soligard et al, 200812 concluded that a structured warm up program for young female soccer players can prevent injuries.

    Several warm up programs out there. Warm-up for Injury Prevention and performance (WIPPTM from certification

    manual presented by Sportsmetrics TM) A program designed

    to provide training and conditioning during an athletes

    existing practice time.

    SL march, Hand walk, leg cradle, hip rotation walk, tuck and squat jump

  • 2/11/2014

    4

    References 1) Davies, GJ, Zillmer, DA. Functional Progression of a Patient Through a Rehabilitation Program. Orthopaedic Physical

    Therapy Clinics of North America, 9:103-118, 2000.

    2) Hewett, TE, Torg, JS, Boden, BP. Video analysis of trunk and knee motion during non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: lateral trunk and knee abduction motion are combined componenets of the injury mechanism. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun; 43 (6): 417-22.

    3) Hewett, TE, Ford, KR, Hoogenboom, BJ, Myer, GD. Understanding and preventing ACL injuries: current biomechanical and epidemiologic considerations- update 2010. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Dec; 5 (4): 234-51. Epub 2013.

    4) Myer, GD, Sugimoto, D, Thomas, S, Hewett, TE, The influence of Age on the Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Training to Reduce Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Female Athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013; 41,(1): 203-213.

    5). Zazulak, BT, Hewett, TE, Reeves, NP, Goldber, B, Cholewicki, J. Deficits in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk: a prospective biomechanical epidemiologic study. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jul; 35(7): 1123-30. Epub 2013.

    6) Chappell, JD, Creighton, RA, Giuliani, C, Yu, B, Garrett, WE. Kinematics and electromyography of landing preparation in vertical stop-jump: risks for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Feb;35(2): 235-41. Epub 2013.

    7) Hewett, TE, Stroupe, AL, Nance, TA, Noyes, FR. Plyometric training in femalte athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med. 1996 Nov-Dec; 24(6): 765-73. Epub December 2013.

    8)Myer, GD, Ford, KR, Brent, JL, Hewett, TE. The effects of plyometric vs. dynamic stabilization and balance training on power, balance, and landing force in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2006. May;20(2): 345-53.

    9). Reiman, MP, and Manske, RC. Functional Testing in Human Performance. Human Kinetics. LD Robertson ED. Sheridan Books. 2009.

    10) Wilk, KE, Romaniello, WT, Soscia, SM, Arrigo, CA, Andrews, FR. The Relationship Between Subjective Knee Scores, Isokinetic testing, and Functional Testin in the ACL-Reconstructed Knee. Journal of Orthopedic & Sports Physical Therapy; 20(2) Aug, 1994.

    11). Davies, GJ, Ellenbecker, T, Irrgang, J, Manske, R, Wilk, K. Functional Testing Algorithm and Clinical Decision Making for Return to Play Criteria for the Lower Extremity. APTA-CSM Orthopedic Section course notes. 2013. Epub Dec 2013.

    12).Soligard, T, Nilstad, A, Steffen, K, Myklebust, G, Holme, I, Dvorak, J, Bahr, R, Andersen, TE. Compliance with a comprehensive warm-up program to prevent injuries in youth footbal. Br J Sports Med (2010).

    The TEAM behind the TEAM